↑ Up

CSE---1.7.UNS-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : CSE---1.7
% Problem  : SWV315-2 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %d %s

% Computer : n029.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Mon Jun 24 16:46:40 EDT 2024

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 116.74s 116.76s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 116.77s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.12  % Problem    : SWV315-2 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.03/0.12  % Command    : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %d %s
% 0.13/0.33  % Computer : n029.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.33  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.13/0.33  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.13/0.33  % DateTime   : Thu Jun 20 17:20:54 EDT 2024
% 0.13/0.33  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.49/0.59  start to proof:theBenchmark
% 116.74/116.74  %-------------------------------------------
% 116.74/116.74  % File        :CSE---1.7
% 116.74/116.74  % Problem     :theBenchmark
% 116.74/116.74  % Transform   :cnf
% 116.74/116.74  % Format      :tptp:raw
% 116.74/116.74  % Command     :java -jar mcs_scs.jar %d %s
% 116.74/116.74  
% 116.74/116.74  % Result      :Theorem 116.100000s
% 116.74/116.74  % Output      :CNFRefutation 116.100000s
% 116.74/116.74  %-------------------------------------------
% 116.74/116.75  %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 116.74/116.75  % File     : SWV315-2 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v3.2.0.
% 116.74/116.75  % Domain   : Software Verification (Security)
% 116.74/116.75  % Problem  : Cryptographic protocol problem for Otway Rees
% 116.74/116.75  % Version  : [Pau06] axioms : Reduced > Especial.
% 116.74/116.75  % English  :
% 116.74/116.75  
% 116.74/116.75  % Refs     : [Pau06] Paulson (2006), Email to G. Sutcliffe
% 116.74/116.75  % Source   : [Pau06]
% 116.74/116.75  % Names    :
% 116.74/116.75  
% 116.74/116.75  % Status   : Unsatisfiable
% 116.74/116.75  % Rating   : 0.00 v4.0.0, 0.14 v3.4.0, 0.00 v3.2.0
% 116.74/116.75  % Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   11 (   1 unt;   2 nHn;   9 RR)
% 116.74/116.75  %            Number of literals    :   23 (   0 equ;  11 neg)
% 116.74/116.75  %            Maximal clause size   :    3 (   2 avg)
% 116.74/116.75  %            Maximal term depth    :    4 (   1 avg)
% 116.74/116.75  %            Number of predicates  :    1 (   1 usr;   0 prp; 3-3 aty)
% 116.74/116.75  %            Number of functors    :   15 (  15 usr;   7 con; 0-3 aty)
% 116.74/116.75  %            Number of variables   :   19 (   2 sgn)
% 116.74/116.75  % SPC      : CNF_UNS_RFO_NEQ_NHN
% 116.74/116.75  
% 116.74/116.75  % Comments : The problems in the [Pau06] collection each have very many axioms,
% 116.74/116.75  %            of which only a small selection are required for the refutation.
% 116.74/116.76  %            The mission is to find those few axioms, after which a refutation
% 116.74/116.76  %            can be quite easily found. This version has only the necessary
% 116.74/116.76  %            axioms.
% 116.74/116.76  %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 116.74/116.76  cnf(cls_conjecture_1,negated_conjecture,
% 116.74/116.76      c_in(v_X,c_Message_Osynth(c_Message_Oanalz(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evsf))),tc_Message_Omsg) ).
% 116.74/116.76  
% 116.74/116.76  cnf(cls_conjecture_2,negated_conjecture,
% 116.74/116.76      ( c_in(v_A,c_Event_Obad,tc_Message_Oagent)
% 116.74/116.76      | ~ c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OKey(c_Public_OshrK(v_A)),c_Message_Oparts(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evsf)),tc_Message_Omsg) ) ).
% 116.74/116.76  
% 116.74/116.76  cnf(cls_conjecture_4,negated_conjecture,
% 116.74/116.76      ( ~ c_in(v_A,c_Event_Obad,tc_Message_Oagent)
% 116.74/116.76      | ~ c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OKey(c_Public_OshrK(v_A)),c_Message_Oparts(c_insert(v_X,c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evsf),tc_Message_Omsg)),tc_Message_Omsg) ) ).
% 116.74/116.76  
% 116.74/116.76  cnf(cls_conjecture_5,negated_conjecture,
% 116.74/116.76      ( c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OKey(c_Public_OshrK(v_A)),c_Message_Oparts(c_insert(v_X,c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evsf),tc_Message_Omsg)),tc_Message_Omsg)
% 116.74/116.76      | c_in(v_A,c_Event_Obad,tc_Message_Oagent) ) ).
% 116.74/116.76  
% 116.74/116.76  cnf(cls_Message_OFake__parts__insert__in__Un__dest_0,axiom,
% 116.74/116.76      ( ~ c_in(V_Z,c_Message_Oparts(c_insert(V_X,V_H,tc_Message_Omsg)),tc_Message_Omsg)
% 116.74/116.76      | ~ c_in(V_X,c_Message_Osynth(c_Message_Oanalz(V_H)),tc_Message_Omsg)
% 116.74/116.76      | c_in(V_Z,c_union(c_Message_Osynth(c_Message_Oanalz(V_H)),c_Message_Oparts(V_H),tc_Message_Omsg),tc_Message_Omsg) ) ).
% 116.74/116.76  
% 116.74/116.76  cnf(cls_Message_OKey__synth__eq_0,axiom,
% 116.74/116.76      ( ~ c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OKey(V_K),c_Message_Osynth(V_H),tc_Message_Omsg)
% 116.74/116.76      | c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OKey(V_K),V_H,tc_Message_Omsg) ) ).
% 116.74/116.76  
% 116.74/116.76  cnf(cls_Message_Oanalz__conj__parts_0,axiom,
% 116.74/116.76      ( ~ c_in(V_X,c_Message_Oanalz(V_H),tc_Message_Omsg)
% 116.74/116.76      | c_in(V_X,c_Message_Oparts(V_H),tc_Message_Omsg) ) ).
% 116.74/116.76  
% 116.74/116.76  cnf(cls_Message_Oparts_OInj_0,axiom,
% 116.74/116.76      ( ~ c_in(V_X,V_H,tc_Message_Omsg)
% 116.74/116.76      | c_in(V_X,c_Message_Oparts(V_H),tc_Message_Omsg) ) ).
% 116.74/116.76  
% 116.74/116.76  cnf(cls_Public_OSpy__spies__bad__shrK_0,axiom,
% 116.74/116.76      ( ~ c_in(V_A,c_Event_Obad,tc_Message_Oagent)
% 116.74/116.76      | c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OKey(c_Public_OshrK(V_A)),c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,V_evs),tc_Message_Omsg) ) ).
% 116.74/116.76  
% 116.74/116.76  cnf(cls_Set_OUn__iff_0,axiom,
% 116.74/116.76      ( ~ c_in(V_c,c_union(V_A,V_B,T_a),T_a)
% 116.74/116.76      | c_in(V_c,V_B,T_a)
% 116.74/116.76      | c_in(V_c,V_A,T_a) ) ).
% 116.74/116.76  
% 116.74/116.76  cnf(cls_Set_Oinsert__iff_2,axiom,
% 116.74/116.76      ( ~ c_in(V_a,V_A,T_a)
% 116.74/116.76      | c_in(V_a,c_insert(V_b,V_A,T_a),T_a) ) ).
% 116.74/116.76  
% 116.74/116.76  %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 116.74/116.76  %-------------------------------------------
% 116.74/116.76  % Proof found
% 116.74/116.76  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 116.74/116.76  % SZS output start Proof
% 116.74/116.76  %ClaNum:11(EqnAxiom:0)
% 116.74/116.76  %VarNum:42(SingletonVarNum:19)
% 116.74/116.76  %MaxLitNum:3
% 116.74/116.76  %MaxfuncDepth:3
% 116.74/116.76  %SharedTerms:21
% 116.74/116.76  %goalClause: 1 6 9 10
% 116.74/116.76  %singleGoalClaCount:1
% 116.74/116.76  [1]P1(a1,f6(f5(f3(a2,a15))),a9)
% 116.74/116.76  [6]P1(a14,a4,a11)+~P1(f8(f10(a14)),f7(f3(a2,a15)),a9)
% 116.74/116.76  [9]P1(a14,a4,a11)+P1(f8(f10(a14)),f7(f12(a1,f3(a2,a15),a9)),a9)
% 116.74/116.76  [10]~P1(a14,a4,a11)+~P1(f8(f10(a14)),f7(f12(a1,f3(a2,a15),a9)),a9)
% 116.74/116.76  [2]~P1(x21,x22,a9)+P1(x21,f7(x22),a9)
% 116.74/116.76  [3]~P1(x31,f5(x32),a9)+P1(x31,f7(x32),a9)
% 116.74/116.76  [4]~P1(f8(x41),f6(x42),a9)+P1(f8(x41),x42,a9)
% 116.74/116.76  [5]~P1(x51,a4,a11)+P1(f8(f10(x51)),f3(a2,x52),a9)
% 116.74/116.76  [7]~P1(x71,x73,x74)+P1(x71,f12(x72,x73,x74),x74)
% 116.74/116.76  [11]~P1(x113,f6(f5(x112)),a9)+~P1(x111,f7(f12(x113,x112,a9)),a9)+P1(x111,f13(f6(f5(x112)),f7(x112),a9),a9)
% 116.74/116.76  [8]P1(x81,x82,x83)+P1(x81,x84,x83)+~P1(x81,f13(x84,x82,x83),x83)
% 116.74/116.76  %EqnAxiom
% 116.74/116.76  
% 116.74/116.76  %-------------------------------------------
% 116.77/116.77  cnf(13,plain,
% 116.77/116.77     (P1(a14,a4,a11)+~P1(f8(f10(a14)),f5(f3(a2,a15)),a9)),
% 116.77/116.77     inference(scs_inference,[],[3,6])).
% 116.77/116.77  cnf(15,plain,
% 116.77/116.77     (P1(f8(f10(a14)),f3(a2,x151),a9)+P1(f8(f10(a14)),f7(f12(a1,f3(a2,a15),a9)),a9)),
% 116.77/116.77     inference(scs_inference,[],[5,9])).
% 116.77/116.77  cnf(16,plain,
% 116.77/116.77     (~P1(f8(f10(a14)),f5(f3(a2,a15)),a9)+P1(f8(f10(a14)),f3(a2,x161),a9)),
% 116.77/116.77     inference(scs_inference,[],[13,5])).
% 116.77/116.77  cnf(17,plain,
% 116.77/116.77     (P1(f8(f10(a14)),f3(a2,x171),a9)+~P1(f8(f10(a14)),f6(f5(f3(a2,a15))),a9)),
% 116.77/116.77     inference(scs_inference,[],[16,4])).
% 116.77/116.77  cnf(37,plain,
% 116.77/116.78     (~P1(f8(f10(a14)),f6(f5(f3(a2,a15))),a9)+P1(f8(f10(a14)),f7(f3(a2,x371)),a9)),
% 116.77/116.78     inference(scs_inference,[],[2,17])).
% 116.77/116.78  cnf(62,plain,
% 116.77/116.78     (P1(x621,x622,a9)+~P1(x621,f13(f5(x623),x622,a9),a9)+P1(x621,f7(x623),a9)),
% 116.77/116.78     inference(scs_inference,[],[3,8])).
% 116.77/116.78  cnf(83,plain,
% 116.77/116.78     (P1(a14,a4,a11)+~P1(f8(f10(a14)),f6(f7(f3(a2,a15))),a9)),
% 116.77/116.78     inference(scs_inference,[],[4,6])).
% 116.77/116.78  cnf(86,plain,
% 116.77/116.78     (P1(f8(x861),f7(x862),a9)+~P1(f8(x861),f13(f5(x862),f6(x863),a9),a9)+P1(f8(x861),x863,a9)),
% 116.77/116.78     inference(scs_inference,[],[4,62])).
% 116.77/116.78  cnf(114,plain,
% 116.77/116.78     (P1(f8(x1141),f7(x1142),a9)+P1(f8(x1141),x1143,a9)+~P1(f8(x1141),f6(f13(f5(x1142),x1143,a9)),a9)),
% 116.77/116.78     inference(scs_inference,[],[4,62])).
% 116.77/116.78  cnf(124,plain,
% 116.77/116.78     (P1(f8(f10(x1241)),f12(x1242,f3(a2,x1243),a9),a9)+~P1(x1241,a4,a11)),
% 116.77/116.78     inference(scs_inference,[],[7,5])).
% 116.77/116.78  cnf(125,plain,
% 116.77/116.78     (~P1(x1251,a4,a11)+P1(f8(f10(x1251)),f7(f12(x1252,f3(a2,x1253),a9)),a9)),
% 116.77/116.78     inference(scs_inference,[],[124,2])).
% 116.77/116.78  cnf(126,plain,
% 116.77/116.78     (~P1(a14,a4,a11)),
% 116.77/116.78     inference(scs_inference,[],[125,10])).
% 116.77/116.78  cnf(127,plain,
% 116.77/116.78     (~P1(f8(f10(a14)),f7(f3(a2,a15)),a9)),
% 116.77/116.78     inference(scs_inference,[],[126,6])).
% 116.77/116.78  cnf(133,plain,
% 116.77/116.78     (~P1(f8(f10(a14)),f6(f7(f3(a2,a15))),a9)),
% 116.77/116.78     inference(scs_inference,[],[126,83])).
% 116.77/116.78  cnf(139,plain,
% 116.77/116.78     (~P1(f8(f10(a14)),f6(f5(f3(a2,a15))),a9)),
% 116.77/116.78     inference(scs_inference,[],[127,37])).
% 116.77/116.78  cnf(143,plain,
% 116.77/116.78     (~P1(f8(f10(a14)),f3(a2,a15),a9)),
% 116.77/116.78     inference(scs_inference,[],[127,2])).
% 116.77/116.78  cnf(147,plain,
% 116.77/116.78     (P1(f8(f10(a14)),f7(f12(a1,f3(a2,a15),a9)),a9)),
% 116.77/116.78     inference(scs_inference,[],[143,15])).
% 116.77/116.78  cnf(288,plain,
% 116.77/116.78     (~P1(a14,f13(a4,a4,a11),a11)),
% 116.77/116.78     inference(scs_inference,[],[143,5,8])).
% 116.77/116.78  cnf(2160,plain,
% 116.77/116.78     (~P1(f8(f10(a14)),f13(f6(f7(f3(a2,a15))),f3(a2,a15),a9),a9)),
% 116.77/116.78     inference(scs_inference,[],[133,127,8,2])).
% 116.77/116.78  cnf(2415,plain,
% 116.77/116.78     (P1(f8(f10(a14)),f13(f6(f5(f3(a2,a15))),f7(f3(a2,a15)),a9),a9)),
% 116.77/116.78     inference(scs_inference,[],[1,2160,288,147,127,7,2,4,8,86,114,11])).
% 116.77/116.78  cnf(2774,plain,
% 116.77/116.78     ($false),
% 116.77/116.78     inference(scs_inference,[],[127,139,2415,8]),
% 116.77/116.78     ['proof']).
% 116.77/116.78  % SZS output end Proof
% 116.77/116.78  % Total time :116.100000s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------