%------------------------------------------------------------------------------ % File : CSE---1.7 % Problem : SWV320-2 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v3.2.0. % Transfm : none % Format : tptp:raw % Command : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %d %s % Computer : n026.cluster.edu % Model : x86_64 x86_64 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz % Memory : 8042.1875MB % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64 % CPULimit : 300s % WCLimit : 300s % DateTime : Mon Jun 24 16:46:42 EDT 2024 % Result : Unsatisfiable 0.57s 0.63s % Output : CNFRefutation 0.59s % Verified : % SZS Type : - % Comments : %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ %----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ %----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT % 0.12/0.12 % Problem : SWV320-2 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v3.2.0. % 0.12/0.12 % Command : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %d %s % 0.13/0.33 % Computer : n026.cluster.edu % 0.13/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64 % 0.13/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz % 0.13/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB % 0.13/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64 % 0.13/0.33 % CPULimit : 300 % 0.13/0.33 % WCLimit : 300 % 0.13/0.33 % DateTime : Thu Jun 20 20:10:09 EDT 2024 % 0.13/0.34 % CPUTime : % 0.57/0.60 start to proof:theBenchmark % 0.57/0.63 %------------------------------------------- % 0.57/0.63 % File :CSE---1.7 % 0.57/0.63 % Problem :theBenchmark % 0.57/0.63 % Transform :cnf % 0.57/0.63 % Format :tptp:raw % 0.57/0.63 % Command :java -jar mcs_scs.jar %d %s % 0.57/0.63 % 0.57/0.63 % Result :Theorem 0.000000s % 0.57/0.63 % Output :CNFRefutation 0.000000s % 0.57/0.63 %------------------------------------------- % 0.57/0.63 %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ % 0.57/0.63 % File : SWV320-2 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v3.2.0. % 0.57/0.63 % Domain : Software Verification (Security) % 0.57/0.63 % Problem : Cryptographic protocol problem for Otway Rees % 0.57/0.63 % Version : [Pau06] axioms : Reduced > Especial. % 0.57/0.63 % English : % 0.57/0.63 % 0.57/0.63 % Refs : [Pau06] Paulson (2006), Email to G. Sutcliffe % 0.57/0.63 % Source : [Pau06] % 0.57/0.63 % Names : % 0.57/0.63 % 0.57/0.63 % Status : Unsatisfiable % 0.57/0.63 % Rating : 0.00 v5.3.0, 0.05 v5.2.0, 0.00 v3.2.0 % 0.57/0.63 % Syntax : Number of clauses : 4 ( 3 unt; 0 nHn; 4 RR) % 0.57/0.63 % Number of literals : 6 ( 0 equ; 3 neg) % 0.57/0.63 % Maximal clause size : 3 ( 1 avg) % 0.57/0.63 % Maximal term depth : 3 ( 1 avg) % 0.57/0.63 % Number of predicates : 1 ( 1 usr; 0 prp; 3-3 aty) % 0.57/0.63 % Number of functors : 13 ( 13 usr; 8 con; 0-2 aty) % 0.57/0.63 % Number of variables : 2 ( 0 sgn) % 0.57/0.63 % SPC : CNF_UNS_RFO_NEQ_HRN % 0.57/0.63 % 0.57/0.63 % Comments : The problems in the [Pau06] collection each have very many axioms, % 0.57/0.63 % of which only a small selection are required for the refutation. % 0.57/0.63 % The mission is to find those few axioms, after which a refutation % 0.57/0.63 % can be quite easily found. This version has only the necessary % 0.57/0.63 % axioms. % 0.57/0.63 %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ % 0.57/0.63 cnf(cls_conjecture_0,negated_conjecture, % 0.57/0.63 c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OKey(c_Public_OshrK(v_A)),c_Message_Oparts(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evs)),tc_Message_Omsg) ). % 0.57/0.63 % 0.57/0.63 cnf(cls_conjecture_1,negated_conjecture, % 0.57/0.63 c_in(v_evs,c_OtwayRees_Ootway,tc_List_Olist(tc_Event_Oevent)) ). % 0.57/0.63 % 0.57/0.63 cnf(cls_conjecture_2,negated_conjecture, % 0.57/0.63 ~ c_in(v_A,c_Event_Obad,tc_Message_Oagent) ). % 0.57/0.63 % 0.57/0.63 cnf(cls_OtwayRees_OSpy__see__shrK_0,axiom, % 0.57/0.63 ( ~ c_in(V_evs,c_OtwayRees_Ootway,tc_List_Olist(tc_Event_Oevent)) % 0.57/0.63 | ~ c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OKey(c_Public_OshrK(V_A)),c_Message_Oparts(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,V_evs)),tc_Message_Omsg) % 0.57/0.63 | c_in(V_A,c_Event_Obad,tc_Message_Oagent) ) ). % 0.57/0.63 % 0.57/0.63 %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ % 0.57/0.63 %------------------------------------------- % 0.57/0.63 % Proof found % 0.57/0.63 % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark % 0.57/0.63 % SZS output start Proof % 0.57/0.63 %ClaNum:4(EqnAxiom:0) % 0.57/0.63 %VarNum:4(SingletonVarNum:2) % 0.57/0.63 %MaxLitNum:3 % 0.57/0.63 %MaxfuncDepth:2 % 0.57/0.63 %SharedTerms:16 % 0.57/0.63 %goalClause: 1 2 3 % 0.57/0.63 %singleGoalClaCount:3 % 0.57/0.63 [3]~P1(a11,a6,a13) % 0.57/0.63 [1]P1(a1,a2,f10(a8)) % 0.57/0.63 [2]P1(f3(f9(a11)),f7(f5(a4,a1)),a12) % 0.57/0.63 [4]P1(x41,a6,a13)+~P1(x42,a2,f10(a8))+~P1(f3(f9(x41)),f7(f5(a4,x42)),a12) % 0.57/0.63 %EqnAxiom % 0.59/0.63 % 0.59/0.63 %------------------------------------------- % 0.59/0.64 cnf(5,plain, % 0.59/0.64 ($false), % 0.59/0.64 inference(scs_inference,[],[3,1,2,4]), % 0.59/0.64 ['proof']). % 0.59/0.64 % SZS output end Proof % 0.59/0.64 % Total time :0.000000s %------------------------------------------------------------------------------