%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E-SAT---3.5.1
% Problem : SWV320-2 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% Computer : n004.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 03:01:14 PM UTC 2026
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.24s 0.55s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.24s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 4
% Number of leaves : 4
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 12 ( 8 unt; 0 nHn; 12 RR)
% Number of literals : 19 ( 0 equ; 10 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 2 ( 1 usr; 1 prp; 0-3 aty)
% Number of functors : 13 ( 13 usr; 8 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 7 ( 0 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(cls_OtwayRees_OSpy__see__shrK_0,axiom,
( ~ c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OKey(c_Public_OshrK(X2)),c_Message_Oparts(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,X1)),tc_Message_Omsg)
| ~ c_in(X1,c_OtwayRees_Ootway,tc_List_Olist(tc_Event_Oevent))
| c_in(X2,c_Event_Obad,tc_Message_Oagent) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_OtwayRees_OSpy__see__shrK_0) ).
cnf(cls_conjecture_1,negated_conjecture,
c_in(v_evs,c_OtwayRees_Ootway,tc_List_Olist(tc_Event_Oevent)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_1) ).
cnf(cls_conjecture_2,negated_conjecture,
~ c_in(v_A,c_Event_Obad,tc_Message_Oagent),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_2) ).
cnf(cls_conjecture_0,negated_conjecture,
c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OKey(c_Public_OshrK(v_A)),c_Message_Oparts(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evs)),tc_Message_Omsg),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_0) ).
cnf(c_0_4,plain,
( ~ c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OKey(c_Public_OshrK(X2)),c_Message_Oparts(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,X1)),tc_Message_Omsg)
| ~ c_in(X1,c_OtwayRees_Ootway,tc_List_Olist(tc_Event_Oevent))
| c_in(X2,c_Event_Obad,tc_Message_Oagent) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[cls_OtwayRees_OSpy__see__shrK_0]) ).
cnf(c_0_5,plain,
( ~ c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OKey(c_Public_OshrK(X2)),c_Message_Oparts(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,X1)),tc_Message_Omsg)
| ~ c_in(X1,c_OtwayRees_Ootway,tc_List_Olist(tc_Event_Oevent))
| c_in(X2,c_Event_Obad,tc_Message_Oagent) ),
c_0_4 ).
cnf(c_0_6,negated_conjecture,
c_in(v_evs,c_OtwayRees_Ootway,tc_List_Olist(tc_Event_Oevent)),
cls_conjecture_1 ).
cnf(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
~ c_in(v_A,c_Event_Obad,tc_Message_Oagent),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[cls_conjecture_2]) ).
cnf(c_0_8,negated_conjecture,
( ~ c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OKey(c_Public_OshrK(X1)),c_Message_Oparts(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evs)),tc_Message_Omsg)
| c_in(X1,c_Event_Obad,tc_Message_Oagent) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_5,c_0_6]) ).
cnf(c_0_9,negated_conjecture,
c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OKey(c_Public_OshrK(v_A)),c_Message_Oparts(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evs)),tc_Message_Omsg),
cls_conjecture_0 ).
cnf(c_0_10,negated_conjecture,
~ c_in(v_A,c_Event_Obad,tc_Message_Oagent),
c_0_7 ).
cnf(c_0_11,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_8,c_0_9]),c_0_10]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.04 % Problem : SWV320-2 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.00/0.07 % Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.21/0.48 % Computer : n004.cluster.edu
% 0.21/0.48 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.21/0.48 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.21/0.48 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.21/0.48 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.21/0.48 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.21/0.48 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.21/0.48 % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 08:40:21 UTC 2026
% 0.21/0.49 % CPUTime :
% 0.21/0.49 Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.24/0.54 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.24/0.54 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.24/0.55 % Version: 3.5.1
% 0.24/0.55 % Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.24/0.55 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.24/0.55 % Starting G----_0031_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_S0Y with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.24/0.55 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.24/0.55 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.24/0.55 % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.24/0.55 % G----_0031_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_S0Y with pid 2741913 completed with status 0
% 0.24/0.55 % Result found by G----_0031_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_S0Y
% 0.24/0.55 % Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.24/0.55 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.24/0.55 % Starting G----_0031_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_S0Y with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.24/0.55 % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 0.24/0.55 % No SInE strategy applied
% 0.24/0.55 % Search class: FHUNF-FFSF21-SFFFFFNN
% 0.24/0.55 % Scheduled 7 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.24/0.55 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 0.24/0.55 % Starting G----_0031_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_S0Y with 151s (1) cores
% 0.24/0.55 % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S0Y with 136s (1) cores
% 0.24/0.55 % Starting new_bool_3 with 136s (1) cores
% 0.24/0.55 % Starting new_bool_1 with 136s (1) cores
% 0.24/0.55 % new_bool_1 with pid 2741921 completed with status 0
% 0.24/0.55 % Result found by new_bool_1
% 0.24/0.55 % Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.24/0.55 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.24/0.55 % Starting G----_0031_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_S0Y with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.24/0.55 % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 0.24/0.55 % No SInE strategy applied
% 0.24/0.55 % Search class: FHUNF-FFSF21-SFFFFFNN
% 0.24/0.55 % Scheduled 7 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.24/0.55 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 0.24/0.55 % Starting G----_0031_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_S0Y with 151s (1) cores
% 0.24/0.55 % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S0Y with 136s (1) cores
% 0.24/0.55 % Starting new_bool_3 with 136s (1) cores
% 0.24/0.55 % Starting new_bool_1 with 136s (1) cores
% 0.24/0.55 % Preprocessing time : 0.001 s
% 0.24/0.55 % Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.24/0.55
% 0.24/0.55 % Proof found!
% 0.24/0.55 % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.24/0.55 % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.24/0.55 % Parsed axioms : 4
% 0.24/0.55 % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 0.24/0.55 % Initial clauses : 4
% 0.24/0.55 % Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.24/0.55 % Initial clauses in saturation : 4
% 0.24/0.55 % Processed clauses : 9
% 0.24/0.55 % ...of these trivial : 0
% 0.24/0.55 % ...subsumed : 0
% 0.24/0.55 % ...remaining for further processing : 9
% 0.24/0.55 % Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.24/0.55 % Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.24/0.55 % Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.24/0.55 % Backward-rewritten : 0
% 0.24/0.55 % Generated clauses : 2
% 0.24/0.55 % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 1
% 0.24/0.55 % ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.24/0.55 % Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.24/0.55 % Paramodulations : 2
% 0.24/0.55 % Factorizations : 0
% 0.24/0.55 % NegExts : 0
% 0.24/0.55 % Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.24/0.55 % Disequality decompositions : 0
% 0.24/0.55 % Total rewrite steps : 0
% 0.24/0.55 % ...of those cached : 0
% 0.24/0.55 % Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.24/0.55 % Propositional check models : 0
% 0.24/0.55 % Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.24/0.55 % Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.24/0.55 % Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.24/0.55 % Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.24/0.55 % Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.24/0.55 % Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.24/0.55 % Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.24/0.55 % Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.24/0.55 % Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.24/0.55 % Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.24/0.55 % Current number of processed clauses : 5
% 0.24/0.55 % Positive orientable unit clauses : 2
% 0.24/0.55 % Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.24/0.55 % Negative unit clauses : 1
% 0.24/0.55 % Non-unit-clauses : 2
% 0.24/0.55 % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 0
% 0.24/0.55 % ...number of literals in the above : 0
% 0.24/0.55 % Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.24/0.55 % Current number of archived clauses : 4
% 0.24/0.55 % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 1
% 0.24/0.55 % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 1
% 0.24/0.55 % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 0
% 0.24/0.55 % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.24/0.55 % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.24/0.55 % BW rewrite match attempts : 0
% 0.24/0.55 % BW rewrite match successes : 0
% 0.24/0.55 % Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.24/0.55 % Condensation successes : 0
% 0.24/0.55 % Termbank termtop insertions : 190
% 0.24/0.55 % Search garbage collected termcells : 8
% 0.24/0.55
% 0.24/0.55 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.24/0.55 % User time : 0.000 s
% 0.24/0.55 % System time : 0.003 s
% 0.24/0.55 % Total time : 0.003 s
% 0.24/0.55 % Maximum resident set size: 3632 pages
% 0.24/0.55
% 0.24/0.55 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.24/0.55 % User time : 0.004 s
% 0.24/0.55 % System time : 0.013 s
% 0.24/0.55 % Total time : 0.017 s
% 0.24/0.55 % Maximum resident set size: 4608 pages
% 0.24/0.55 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------