%------------------------------------------------------------------------------ % File : Etableau---0.67 % Problem : SWV321-2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.2.0. % Transfm : none % Format : tptp:raw % Command : etableau --auto --tsmdo --quicksat=10000 --tableau=1 --tableau-saturation=1 -s -p --tableau-cores=8 --cpu-limit=%d %s % Computer : n024.cluster.edu % Model : x86_64 x86_64 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz % Memory : 8042.1875MB % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64 % CPULimit : 300s % WCLimit : 600s % DateTime : Wed Jul 20 18:20:23 EDT 2022 % Result : Unsatisfiable 0.22s 0.40s % Output : CNFRefutation 0.22s % Verified : % SZS Type : - % Comments : %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ %----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ %----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT % 0.04/0.14 % Problem : SWV321-2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.2.0. % 0.04/0.15 % Command : etableau --auto --tsmdo --quicksat=10000 --tableau=1 --tableau-saturation=1 -s -p --tableau-cores=8 --cpu-limit=%d %s % 0.14/0.36 % Computer : n024.cluster.edu % 0.14/0.36 % Model : x86_64 x86_64 % 0.14/0.36 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz % 0.14/0.36 % Memory : 8042.1875MB % 0.14/0.36 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64 % 0.14/0.36 % CPULimit : 300 % 0.14/0.36 % WCLimit : 600 % 0.14/0.36 % DateTime : Wed Jun 15 00:10:33 EDT 2022 % 0.14/0.37 % CPUTime : % 0.22/0.39 # No SInE strategy applied % 0.22/0.39 # Auto-Mode selected heuristic G_E___208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN % 0.22/0.39 # and selection function SelectComplexExceptUniqMaxHorn. % 0.22/0.39 # % 0.22/0.39 # Presaturation interreduction done % 0.22/0.39 # Number of axioms: 11 Number of unprocessed: 11 % 0.22/0.39 # Tableaux proof search. % 0.22/0.39 # APR header successfully linked. % 0.22/0.39 # Hello from C++ % 0.22/0.39 # The folding up rule is enabled... % 0.22/0.39 # Local unification is enabled... % 0.22/0.39 # Any saturation attempts will use folding labels... % 0.22/0.39 # 11 beginning clauses after preprocessing and clausification % 0.22/0.39 # Creating start rules for all 4 conjectures. % 0.22/0.39 # There are 4 start rule candidates: % 0.22/0.39 # Found 1 unit axioms. % 0.22/0.39 # Unsuccessfully attempted saturation on 1 start tableaux, moving on. % 0.22/0.39 # 4 start rule tableaux created. % 0.22/0.39 # 10 extension rule candidate clauses % 0.22/0.39 # 1 unit axiom clauses % 0.22/0.39 % 0.22/0.39 # Requested 8, 32 cores available to the main process. % 0.22/0.39 # There are not enough tableaux to fork, creating more from the initial 4 % 0.22/0.39 # Returning from population with 12 new_tableaux and 0 remaining starting tableaux. % 0.22/0.39 # We now have 12 tableaux to operate on % 0.22/0.40 # There were 1 total branch saturation attempts. % 0.22/0.40 # There were 0 of these attempts blocked. % 0.22/0.40 # There were 0 deferred branch saturation attempts. % 0.22/0.40 # There were 0 free duplicated saturations. % 0.22/0.40 # There were 1 total successful branch saturations. % 0.22/0.40 # There were 0 successful branch saturations in interreduction. % 0.22/0.40 # There were 0 successful branch saturations on the branch. % 0.22/0.40 # There were 1 successful branch saturations after the branch. % 0.22/0.40 # SZS status Unsatisfiable for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p % 0.22/0.40 # SZS output start for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p % 0.22/0.40 # Begin clausification derivation % 0.22/0.40 % 0.22/0.40 # End clausification derivation % 0.22/0.40 # Begin listing active clauses obtained from FOF to CNF conversion % 0.22/0.40 cnf(i_0_12, negated_conjecture, (c_in(v_X,c_Message_Osynth(c_Message_Oanalz(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evsf))),tc_Message_Omsg))). % 0.22/0.40 cnf(i_0_13, negated_conjecture, (c_in(v_A,c_Event_Obad,tc_Message_Oagent)|~c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OKey(c_Public_OshrK(v_A)),c_Message_Oparts(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evsf)),tc_Message_Omsg))). % 0.22/0.40 cnf(i_0_14, negated_conjecture, (~c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OKey(c_Public_OshrK(v_A)),c_Message_Oparts(c_insert(v_X,c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evsf),tc_Message_Omsg)),tc_Message_Omsg)|~c_in(v_A,c_Event_Obad,tc_Message_Oagent))). % 0.22/0.40 cnf(i_0_15, negated_conjecture, (c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OKey(c_Public_OshrK(v_A)),c_Message_Oparts(c_insert(v_X,c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evsf),tc_Message_Omsg)),tc_Message_Omsg)|c_in(v_A,c_Event_Obad,tc_Message_Oagent))). % 0.22/0.40 cnf(i_0_18, plain, (c_in(X1,c_Message_Oparts(X2),tc_Message_Omsg)|~c_in(X1,c_Message_Oanalz(X2),tc_Message_Omsg))). % 0.22/0.40 cnf(i_0_19, plain, (c_in(X1,c_Message_Oparts(X2),tc_Message_Omsg)|~c_in(X1,X2,tc_Message_Omsg))). % 0.22/0.40 cnf(i_0_17, plain, (c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OKey(X1),X2,tc_Message_Omsg)|~c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OKey(X1),c_Message_Osynth(X2),tc_Message_Omsg))). % 0.22/0.40 cnf(i_0_22, plain, (c_in(X1,c_insert(X2,X3,X4),X4)|~c_in(X1,X3,X4))). % 0.22/0.40 cnf(i_0_21, plain, (c_in(X1,X2,X3)|c_in(X1,X4,X3)|~c_in(X1,c_union(X2,X4,X3),X3))). % 0.22/0.40 cnf(i_0_20, plain, (c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OKey(c_Public_OshrK(X1)),c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,X2),tc_Message_Omsg)|~c_in(X1,c_Event_Obad,tc_Message_Oagent))). % 0.22/0.40 cnf(i_0_16, plain, (c_in(X1,c_union(c_Message_Osynth(c_Message_Oanalz(X2)),c_Message_Oparts(X2),tc_Message_Omsg),tc_Message_Omsg)|~c_in(X1,c_Message_Oparts(c_insert(X3,X2,tc_Message_Omsg)),tc_Message_Omsg)|~c_in(X3,c_Message_Osynth(c_Message_Oanalz(X2)),tc_Message_Omsg))). % 0.22/0.40 # End listing active clauses. There is an equivalent clause to each of these in the clausification! % 0.22/0.40 # Begin printing tableau % 0.22/0.40 # Found 4 steps % 0.22/0.40 cnf(i_0_12, negated_conjecture, (c_in(v_X,c_Message_Osynth(c_Message_Oanalz(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evsf))),tc_Message_Omsg)), inference(start_rule)). % 0.22/0.40 cnf(i_0_29, plain, (c_in(v_X,c_Message_Osynth(c_Message_Oanalz(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evsf))),tc_Message_Omsg)), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_19])). % 0.22/0.40 cnf(i_0_98, plain, (c_in(v_X,c_Message_Oparts(c_Message_Osynth(c_Message_Oanalz(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evsf)))),tc_Message_Omsg)), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_22])). % 0.22/0.40 cnf(i_0_104, plain, (c_in(v_X,c_insert(X6,c_Message_Oparts(c_Message_Osynth(c_Message_Oanalz(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evsf)))),tc_Message_Omsg),tc_Message_Omsg)), inference(etableau_closure_rule, [i_0_104, ...])). % 0.22/0.40 # End printing tableau % 0.22/0.40 # SZS output end % 0.22/0.40 # Branches closed with saturation will be marked with an "s" % 0.22/0.40 # Child (2442) has found a proof. % 0.22/0.40 # There were 2 total branch saturation attempts. % 0.22/0.40 # There were 0 of these attempts blocked. % 0.22/0.40 # There were 0 deferred branch saturation attempts. % 0.22/0.40 # There were 0 free duplicated saturations. % 0.22/0.40 # There were 2 total successful branch saturations. % 0.22/0.40 # There were 0 successful branch saturations in interreduction. % 0.22/0.40 # There were 0 successful branch saturations on the branch. % 0.22/0.40 # There were 2 successful branch saturations after the branch. % 0.22/0.40 % 0.22/0.40 # Proof search is over... % 0.22/0.40 # Freeing feature tree %------------------------------------------------------------------------------