↑ Up

E-SAT---3.5.1.UNS-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E-SAT---3.5.1
% Problem  : SWV324-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM

% Computer : n026.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 03:01:15 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 4.54s 1.41s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 4.54s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    7
%            Number of leaves      :    9
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   33 (  12 unt;   2 nHn;  33 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   54 (   3 equ;  23 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    7 (   2 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    3 (   1 usr;   1 prp; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of functors    :   23 (  23 usr;  13 con; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   48 (  16 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(cls_Event_OSays__imp__analz__Spy__dest_0,axiom,
    ( ~ c_in(c_Event_Oevent_OSays(X1,X2,X3),c_List_Oset(X4,tc_Event_Oevent),tc_Event_Oevent)
    | c_in(X3,c_Message_Oanalz(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,X4)),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SWV006-2.ax',cls_Event_OSays__imp__analz__Spy__dest_0) ).

cnf(cls_Message_OMPair__analz_0,axiom,
    ( ~ c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(X1,X2),c_Message_Oanalz(X3),tc_Message_Omsg)
    | c_in(X2,c_Message_Oanalz(X3),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SWV006-0.ax',cls_Message_OMPair__analz_0) ).

cnf(cls_conjecture_1,negated_conjecture,
    c_in(c_Event_Oevent_OSays(c_Message_Oagent_OServer,v_B,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NA),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_X,c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(c_Public_OshrK(v_B),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NB),c_Message_Omsg_OKey(v_K)))))),c_List_Oset(v_evso,tc_Event_Oevent),tc_Event_Oevent),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_1) ).

cnf(cls_Message_Oparts_OBody__dest_0,axiom,
    ( ~ c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(X1,X2),c_Message_Oparts(X3),tc_Message_Omsg)
    | c_in(X2,c_Message_Oparts(X3),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SWV006-2.ax',cls_Message_Oparts_OBody__dest_0) ).

cnf(cls_Message_Oanalz__into__parts__dest_0,axiom,
    ( ~ c_in(X1,c_Message_Oanalz(X2),tc_Message_Omsg)
    | c_in(X1,c_Message_Oparts(X2),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SWV006-2.ax',cls_Message_Oanalz__into__parts__dest_0) ).

cnf(cls_conjecture_2,negated_conjecture,
    ~ c_in(v_A,c_Event_Obad,tc_Message_Oagent),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_2) ).

cnf(cls_conjecture_3,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OKey(c_Public_OshrK(v_A)),c_Message_Oparts(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evso)),tc_Message_Omsg)
    | c_in(v_A,c_Event_Obad,tc_Message_Oagent) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_3) ).

cnf(cls_conjecture_6,negated_conjecture,
    ( c_in(v_A,c_Event_Obad,tc_Message_Oagent)
    | c_Public_OshrK(v_A) = v_K ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_6) ).

cnf(cls_Message_OMPair__parts_0,axiom,
    ( ~ c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(X1,X2),c_Message_Oparts(X3),tc_Message_Omsg)
    | c_in(X2,c_Message_Oparts(X3),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SWV006-0.ax',cls_Message_OMPair__parts_0) ).

cnf(c_0_9,plain,
    ( ~ c_in(c_Event_Oevent_OSays(X1,X2,X3),c_List_Oset(X4,tc_Event_Oevent),tc_Event_Oevent)
    | c_in(X3,c_Message_Oanalz(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,X4)),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[cls_Event_OSays__imp__analz__Spy__dest_0]) ).

cnf(c_0_10,plain,
    ( ~ c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(X1,X2),c_Message_Oanalz(X3),tc_Message_Omsg)
    | c_in(X2,c_Message_Oanalz(X3),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[cls_Message_OMPair__analz_0]) ).

cnf(c_0_11,plain,
    ( ~ c_in(c_Event_Oevent_OSays(X1,X2,X3),c_List_Oset(X4,tc_Event_Oevent),tc_Event_Oevent)
    | c_in(X3,c_Message_Oanalz(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,X4)),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
    c_0_9 ).

cnf(c_0_12,negated_conjecture,
    c_in(c_Event_Oevent_OSays(c_Message_Oagent_OServer,v_B,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NA),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_X,c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(c_Public_OshrK(v_B),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NB),c_Message_Omsg_OKey(v_K)))))),c_List_Oset(v_evso,tc_Event_Oevent),tc_Event_Oevent),
    cls_conjecture_1 ).

cnf(c_0_13,plain,
    ( ~ c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(X1,X2),c_Message_Oparts(X3),tc_Message_Omsg)
    | c_in(X2,c_Message_Oparts(X3),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[cls_Message_Oparts_OBody__dest_0]) ).

cnf(c_0_14,plain,
    ( ~ c_in(X1,c_Message_Oanalz(X2),tc_Message_Omsg)
    | c_in(X1,c_Message_Oparts(X2),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[cls_Message_Oanalz__into__parts__dest_0]) ).

cnf(c_0_15,plain,
    ( ~ c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(X1,X2),c_Message_Oanalz(X3),tc_Message_Omsg)
    | c_in(X2,c_Message_Oanalz(X3),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
    c_0_10 ).

cnf(c_0_16,negated_conjecture,
    c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NA),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_X,c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(c_Public_OshrK(v_B),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NB),c_Message_Omsg_OKey(v_K))))),c_Message_Oanalz(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evso)),tc_Message_Omsg),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_12]) ).

cnf(c_0_17,negated_conjecture,
    ~ c_in(v_A,c_Event_Obad,tc_Message_Oagent),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[cls_conjecture_2]) ).

cnf(c_0_18,plain,
    ( ~ c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(X1,X2),c_Message_Oparts(X3),tc_Message_Omsg)
    | c_in(X2,c_Message_Oparts(X3),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
    c_0_13 ).

cnf(c_0_19,plain,
    ( ~ c_in(X1,c_Message_Oanalz(X2),tc_Message_Omsg)
    | c_in(X1,c_Message_Oparts(X2),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
    c_0_14 ).

cnf(c_0_20,negated_conjecture,
    c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_X,c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(c_Public_OshrK(v_B),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NB),c_Message_Omsg_OKey(v_K)))),c_Message_Oanalz(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evso)),tc_Message_Omsg),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_15,c_0_16]) ).

cnf(c_0_21,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OKey(c_Public_OshrK(v_A)),c_Message_Oparts(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evso)),tc_Message_Omsg)
    | c_in(v_A,c_Event_Obad,tc_Message_Oagent) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[cls_conjecture_3]) ).

cnf(c_0_22,negated_conjecture,
    ( c_in(v_A,c_Event_Obad,tc_Message_Oagent)
    | c_Public_OshrK(v_A) = v_K ),
    cls_conjecture_6 ).

cnf(c_0_23,negated_conjecture,
    ~ c_in(v_A,c_Event_Obad,tc_Message_Oagent),
    c_0_17 ).

cnf(c_0_24,plain,
    ( ~ c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(X1,X2),c_Message_Oparts(X3),tc_Message_Omsg)
    | c_in(X2,c_Message_Oparts(X3),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[cls_Message_OMPair__parts_0]) ).

cnf(c_0_25,plain,
    ( ~ c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(X3,X1),c_Message_Oanalz(X2),tc_Message_Omsg)
    | c_in(X1,c_Message_Oparts(X2),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_18,c_0_19]) ).

cnf(c_0_26,negated_conjecture,
    c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(c_Public_OshrK(v_B),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NB),c_Message_Omsg_OKey(v_K))),c_Message_Oanalz(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evso)),tc_Message_Omsg),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_15,c_0_20]) ).

cnf(c_0_27,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OKey(c_Public_OshrK(v_A)),c_Message_Oparts(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evso)),tc_Message_Omsg)
    | c_in(v_A,c_Event_Obad,tc_Message_Oagent) ),
    c_0_21 ).

cnf(c_0_28,negated_conjecture,
    c_Public_OshrK(v_A) = v_K,
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_22,c_0_23]) ).

cnf(c_0_29,plain,
    ( ~ c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(X1,X2),c_Message_Oparts(X3),tc_Message_Omsg)
    | c_in(X2,c_Message_Oparts(X3),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
    c_0_24 ).

cnf(c_0_30,negated_conjecture,
    c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NB),c_Message_Omsg_OKey(v_K)),c_Message_Oparts(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evso)),tc_Message_Omsg),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_25,c_0_26]) ).

cnf(c_0_31,negated_conjecture,
    ~ c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OKey(v_K),c_Message_Oparts(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evso)),tc_Message_Omsg),
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_27,c_0_28]),c_0_23]) ).

cnf(c_0_32,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_29,c_0_30]),c_0_31]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.05  % Problem  : SWV324-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.00/0.08  % Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.19/0.49  % Computer : n026.cluster.edu
% 0.19/0.49  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.19/0.49  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.19/0.49  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.19/0.49  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.19/0.49  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.19/0.49  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.19/0.49  % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 08:43:37 UTC 2026
% 0.19/0.50  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.19/0.50  Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.25/0.59  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.25/0.59  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 4.54/1.41  % Version: 3.5.1
% 4.54/1.41  % Preprocessing class: FMLMSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 4.54/1.41  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 4.54/1.41  % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 4.54/1.41  % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 4.54/1.41  % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 4.54/1.41  % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 4.54/1.41  % G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with pid 1870536 completed with status 0
% 4.54/1.41  % Result found by G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN
% 4.54/1.41  % Preprocessing class: FMLMSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 4.54/1.41  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 4.54/1.41  % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 4.54/1.41  % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 4.54/1.41  % No SInE strategy applied
% 4.54/1.41  % Search class: FGHSM-SSLM32-DFFFFFNN
% 4.54/1.41  % Scheduled 13 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 4.54/1.41  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 4.54/1.41  % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 151s (1) cores
% 4.54/1.41  % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S2mI with 113s (1) cores
% 4.54/1.41  % Starting G-E--_208_B07_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S4d with 113s (1) cores
% 4.54/1.41  % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AI with 113s (1) cores
% 4.54/1.41  % G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with pid 1870544 completed with status 0
% 4.54/1.41  % Result found by G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN
% 4.54/1.41  % Preprocessing class: FMLMSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 4.54/1.41  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 4.54/1.41  % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 4.54/1.41  % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 4.54/1.41  % No SInE strategy applied
% 4.54/1.41  % Search class: FGHSM-SSLM32-DFFFFFNN
% 4.54/1.41  % Scheduled 13 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 4.54/1.41  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 4.54/1.41  % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 151s (1) cores
% 4.54/1.41  % Preprocessing time       : 0.022 s
% 4.54/1.41  % Presaturation interreduction done
% 4.54/1.41  
% 4.54/1.41  % Proof found!
% 4.54/1.41  % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 4.54/1.41  % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 4.54/1.41  % Parsed axioms                        : 1477
% 4.54/1.41  % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 0
% 4.54/1.41  % Initial clauses                      : 1477
% 4.54/1.41  % Removed in clause preprocessing      : 3
% 4.54/1.41  % Initial clauses in saturation        : 1474
% 4.54/1.41  % Processed clauses                    : 5601
% 4.54/1.41  % ...of these trivial                  : 6
% 4.54/1.41  % ...subsumed                          : 2704
% 4.54/1.41  % ...remaining for further processing  : 2891
% 4.54/1.41  % Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 31
% 4.54/1.41  % Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 4.54/1.41  % Backward-subsumed                    : 0
% 4.54/1.41  % Backward-rewritten                   : 6
% 4.54/1.41  % Generated clauses                    : 4764
% 4.54/1.41  % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 3814
% 4.54/1.41  % ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 4.54/1.41  % Contextual simplify-reflections      : 0
% 4.54/1.41  % Paramodulations                      : 4682
% 4.54/1.41  % Factorizations                       : 0
% 4.54/1.41  % NegExts                              : 0
% 4.54/1.41  % Equation resolutions                 : 82
% 4.54/1.41  % Disequality decompositions           : 0
% 4.54/1.41  % Total rewrite steps                  : 844
% 4.54/1.41  % ...of those cached                   : 727
% 4.54/1.41  % Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 4.54/1.41  %    Propositional check models        : 0
% 4.54/1.41  %    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 4.54/1.41  %    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 4.54/1.41  %    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 4.54/1.41  %    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 4.54/1.41  %    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 4.54/1.41  %    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
% 4.54/1.41  %    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
% 4.54/1.41  %    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 4.54/1.41  %    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 4.54/1.41  %    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 4.54/1.41  % Current number of processed clauses  : 1469
% 4.54/1.41  %    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 211
% 4.54/1.41  %    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 4.54/1.41  %    Negative unit clauses             : 53
% 4.54/1.41  %    Non-unit-clauses                  : 1205
% 4.54/1.41  % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 1100
% 4.54/1.41  % ...number of literals in the above   : 2776
% 4.54/1.41  % Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 4.54/1.41  % Current number of archived clauses   : 1423
% 4.54/1.41  % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 1695821
% 4.54/1.41  % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 1627402
% 4.54/1.41  % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 2661
% 4.54/1.41  % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 14915
% 4.54/1.41  % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 4.54/1.41  % BW rewrite match attempts            : 112
% 4.54/1.41  % BW rewrite match successes           : 6
% 4.54/1.41  % Condensation attempts                : 0
% 4.54/1.41  % Condensation successes               : 0
% 4.54/1.41  % Termbank termtop insertions          : 86840
% 4.54/1.41  % Search garbage collected termcells   : 1822
% 4.54/1.41  
% 4.54/1.41  % -------------------------------------------------
% 4.54/1.41  % User time                : 0.689 s
% 4.54/1.41  % System time              : 0.027 s
% 4.54/1.41  % Total time               : 0.716 s
% 4.54/1.41  % Maximum resident set size: 5940 pages
% 4.54/1.41  
% 4.54/1.41  % -------------------------------------------------
% 4.54/1.41  % User time                : 2.992 s
% 4.54/1.41  % System time              : 0.115 s
% 4.54/1.41  % Total time               : 3.107 s
% 4.54/1.41  % Maximum resident set size: 5376 pages
% 4.54/1.41  % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------