↑ Up

E-SAT---3.5.1.UNS-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E-SAT---3.5.1
% Problem  : SWV326-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM

% Computer : n001.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 03:01:15 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 1.10s 0.63s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 1.10s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    9
%            Number of leaves      :   10
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   37 (  12 unt;   2 nHn;  37 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   62 (  21 equ;  28 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    5 (   2 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    3 (   1 usr;   1 prp; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of functors    :   18 (  18 usr;  10 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   33 (   9 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(cls_conjecture_32,negated_conjecture,
    ( v_Ba != v_C
    | c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(c_Public_OshrK(v_Aa),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NAa),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(v_Aa),c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(v_B)))),c_Message_Oparts(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evs1)),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_32) ).

cnf(cls_Message_Oparts_OBody__dest_0,axiom,
    ( ~ c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(X1,X2),c_Message_Oparts(X3),tc_Message_Omsg)
    | c_in(X2,c_Message_Oparts(X3),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SWV006-2.ax',cls_Message_Oparts_OBody__dest_0) ).

cnf(cls_conjecture_3,negated_conjecture,
    v_A = v_Aa,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_3) ).

cnf(cls_conjecture_5,negated_conjecture,
    v_NA = c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NAa),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_5) ).

cnf(cls_Message_OMPair__parts_1,axiom,
    ( ~ c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(X1,X2),c_Message_Oparts(X3),tc_Message_Omsg)
    | c_in(X1,c_Message_Oparts(X3),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SWV006-0.ax',cls_Message_OMPair__parts_1) ).

cnf(cls_conjecture_2,negated_conjecture,
    ~ c_in(c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NAa),c_Event_Oused(v_evs1),tc_Message_Omsg),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_2) ).

cnf(cls_conjecture_33,negated_conjecture,
    ( v_B != v_Ba
    | c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(c_Public_OshrK(v_A),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_NA,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(v_A),c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(v_C)))),c_Message_Oparts(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evs1)),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_33) ).

cnf(cls_Event_Oc_A_58_Aparts_A_Iknows_ASpy_Aevs1_J_A_61_61_62_Ac_A_58_Aused_Aevs1_0,axiom,
    ( ~ c_in(X1,c_Message_Oparts(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,X2)),tc_Message_Omsg)
    | c_in(X1,c_Event_Oused(X2),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SWV006-0.ax',cls_Event_Oc_A_58_Aparts_A_Iknows_ASpy_Aevs1_J_A_61_61_62_Ac_A_58_Aused_Aevs1_0) ).

cnf(cls_conjecture_25,negated_conjecture,
    ( v_C = v_Ba
    | v_B = v_Ba ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_25) ).

cnf(cls_Public_OMPair__used_1,axiom,
    ( ~ c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(X1,X2),c_Event_Oused(X3),tc_Message_Omsg)
    | c_in(X1,c_Event_Oused(X3),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SWV006-2.ax',cls_Public_OMPair__used_1) ).

cnf(c_0_10,negated_conjecture,
    ( v_Ba != v_C
    | c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(c_Public_OshrK(v_Aa),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NAa),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(v_Aa),c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(v_B)))),c_Message_Oparts(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evs1)),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[cls_conjecture_32]) ).

cnf(c_0_11,plain,
    ( ~ c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(X1,X2),c_Message_Oparts(X3),tc_Message_Omsg)
    | c_in(X2,c_Message_Oparts(X3),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[cls_Message_Oparts_OBody__dest_0]) ).

cnf(c_0_12,negated_conjecture,
    ( v_Ba != v_C
    | c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(c_Public_OshrK(v_Aa),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NAa),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(v_Aa),c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(v_B)))),c_Message_Oparts(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evs1)),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
    c_0_10 ).

cnf(c_0_13,negated_conjecture,
    v_A = v_Aa,
    cls_conjecture_3 ).

cnf(c_0_14,negated_conjecture,
    v_NA = c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NAa),
    cls_conjecture_5 ).

cnf(c_0_15,plain,
    ( ~ c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(X1,X2),c_Message_Oparts(X3),tc_Message_Omsg)
    | c_in(X1,c_Message_Oparts(X3),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[cls_Message_OMPair__parts_1]) ).

cnf(c_0_16,plain,
    ( ~ c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(X1,X2),c_Message_Oparts(X3),tc_Message_Omsg)
    | c_in(X2,c_Message_Oparts(X3),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
    c_0_11 ).

cnf(c_0_17,negated_conjecture,
    ( v_C != v_Ba
    | c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(c_Public_OshrK(v_A),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_NA,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(v_A),c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(v_B)))),c_Message_Oparts(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evs1)),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_12,c_0_13]),c_0_14]),c_0_13]) ).

cnf(c_0_18,negated_conjecture,
    ~ c_in(c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NAa),c_Event_Oused(v_evs1),tc_Message_Omsg),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[cls_conjecture_2]) ).

cnf(c_0_19,negated_conjecture,
    ( v_B != v_Ba
    | c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(c_Public_OshrK(v_A),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_NA,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(v_A),c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(v_C)))),c_Message_Oparts(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evs1)),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[cls_conjecture_33]) ).

cnf(c_0_20,plain,
    ( ~ c_in(X1,c_Message_Oparts(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,X2)),tc_Message_Omsg)
    | c_in(X1,c_Event_Oused(X2),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[cls_Event_Oc_A_58_Aparts_A_Iknows_ASpy_Aevs1_J_A_61_61_62_Ac_A_58_Aused_Aevs1_0]) ).

cnf(c_0_21,plain,
    ( ~ c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(X1,X2),c_Message_Oparts(X3),tc_Message_Omsg)
    | c_in(X1,c_Message_Oparts(X3),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
    c_0_15 ).

cnf(c_0_22,negated_conjecture,
    ( v_C != v_Ba
    | c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_NA,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(v_A),c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(v_B))),c_Message_Oparts(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evs1)),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_16,c_0_17]) ).

cnf(c_0_23,negated_conjecture,
    ~ c_in(c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NAa),c_Event_Oused(v_evs1),tc_Message_Omsg),
    c_0_18 ).

cnf(c_0_24,negated_conjecture,
    ( v_B != v_Ba
    | c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(c_Public_OshrK(v_A),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_NA,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(v_A),c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(v_C)))),c_Message_Oparts(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evs1)),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
    c_0_19 ).

cnf(c_0_25,plain,
    ( ~ c_in(X1,c_Message_Oparts(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,X2)),tc_Message_Omsg)
    | c_in(X1,c_Event_Oused(X2),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
    c_0_20 ).

cnf(c_0_26,negated_conjecture,
    ( v_C != v_Ba
    | c_in(v_NA,c_Message_Oparts(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evs1)),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_21,c_0_22]) ).

cnf(c_0_27,negated_conjecture,
    ~ c_in(v_NA,c_Event_Oused(v_evs1),tc_Message_Omsg),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_23,c_0_14]) ).

cnf(c_0_28,negated_conjecture,
    ( v_B != v_Ba
    | c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_NA,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(v_A),c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(v_C))),c_Message_Oparts(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evs1)),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_16,c_0_24]) ).

cnf(c_0_29,negated_conjecture,
    ( v_C = v_Ba
    | v_B = v_Ba ),
    cls_conjecture_25 ).

cnf(c_0_30,negated_conjecture,
    v_C != v_Ba,
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_25,c_0_26]),c_0_27]) ).

cnf(c_0_31,plain,
    ( ~ c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(X1,X2),c_Event_Oused(X3),tc_Message_Omsg)
    | c_in(X1,c_Event_Oused(X3),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[cls_Public_OMPair__used_1]) ).

cnf(c_0_32,negated_conjecture,
    ( v_B != v_Ba
    | c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_NA,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(v_A),c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(v_C))),c_Event_Oused(v_evs1),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_25,c_0_28]) ).

cnf(c_0_33,negated_conjecture,
    v_B = v_Ba,
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_29,c_0_30]) ).

cnf(c_0_34,plain,
    ( ~ c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(X1,X2),c_Event_Oused(X3),tc_Message_Omsg)
    | c_in(X1,c_Event_Oused(X3),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
    c_0_31 ).

cnf(c_0_35,negated_conjecture,
    c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_NA,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(v_A),c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(v_C))),c_Event_Oused(v_evs1),tc_Message_Omsg),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_32,c_0_33])]) ).

cnf(c_0_36,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_34,c_0_35]),c_0_27]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : SWV326-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.00/0.04  % Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.11/0.37  % Computer : n001.cluster.edu
% 0.11/0.37  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.11/0.37  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.11/0.37  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.11/0.37  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.11/0.37  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.11/0.37  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.11/0.37  % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 08:46:32 UTC 2026
% 0.11/0.37  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.11/0.37  Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.11/0.42  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.11/0.42  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 1.10/0.63  % Version: 3.5.1
% 1.10/0.63  % Preprocessing class: FMLMSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 1.10/0.63  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 1.10/0.63  % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 1.10/0.63  % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 1.10/0.63  % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 1.10/0.63  % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 1.10/0.63  % G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with pid 2717483 completed with status 0
% 1.10/0.63  % Result found by G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN
% 1.10/0.63  % Preprocessing class: FMLMSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 1.10/0.63  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 1.10/0.63  % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 1.10/0.63  % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 1.10/0.63  % No SInE strategy applied
% 1.10/0.63  % Search class: FGHSM-SSLM32-MFFFFFNN
% 1.10/0.63  % Scheduled 7 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 1.10/0.63  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 1.10/0.63  % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 151s (1) cores
% 1.10/0.63  % Starting G-E--_208_C12_11_nc_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 136s (1) cores
% 1.10/0.63  % Starting G-E--_208_C12_02_nc_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S070I with 136s (1) cores
% 1.10/0.63  % Starting G-E--_208_C47_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S0Y with 136s (1) cores
% 1.10/0.63  % G-E--_208_C12_11_nc_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with pid 2717492 completed with status 0
% 1.10/0.63  % Result found by G-E--_208_C12_11_nc_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN
% 1.10/0.63  % Preprocessing class: FMLMSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 1.10/0.63  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 1.10/0.63  % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 1.10/0.63  % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 1.10/0.63  % No SInE strategy applied
% 1.10/0.63  % Search class: FGHSM-SSLM32-MFFFFFNN
% 1.10/0.63  % Scheduled 7 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 1.10/0.63  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 1.10/0.63  % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 151s (1) cores
% 1.10/0.63  % Starting G-E--_208_C12_11_nc_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 136s (1) cores
% 1.10/0.63  % Preprocessing time       : 0.008 s
% 1.10/0.63  % Presaturation interreduction done
% 1.10/0.63  
% 1.10/0.63  % Proof found!
% 1.10/0.63  % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 1.10/0.63  % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 1.10/0.63  % Parsed axioms                        : 1511
% 1.10/0.63  % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 0
% 1.10/0.63  % Initial clauses                      : 1511
% 1.10/0.63  % Removed in clause preprocessing      : 5
% 1.10/0.63  % Initial clauses in saturation        : 1506
% 1.10/0.63  % Processed clauses                    : 2985
% 1.10/0.63  % ...of these trivial                  : 32
% 1.10/0.63  % ...subsumed                          : 267
% 1.10/0.63  % ...remaining for further processing  : 2686
% 1.10/0.63  % Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 2
% 1.10/0.63  % Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 1.10/0.63  % Backward-subsumed                    : 12
% 1.10/0.63  % Backward-rewritten                   : 24
% 1.10/0.63  % Generated clauses                    : 3508
% 1.10/0.63  % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 2735
% 1.10/0.63  % ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 1.10/0.63  % Contextual simplify-reflections      : 1
% 1.10/0.63  % Paramodulations                      : 3476
% 1.10/0.63  % Factorizations                       : 0
% 1.10/0.63  % NegExts                              : 0
% 1.10/0.63  % Equation resolutions                 : 29
% 1.10/0.63  % Disequality decompositions           : 0
% 1.10/0.63  % Total rewrite steps                  : 829
% 1.10/0.63  % ...of those cached                   : 741
% 1.10/0.63  % Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 1.10/0.63  %    Propositional check models        : 0
% 1.10/0.63  %    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 1.10/0.63  %    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 1.10/0.63  %    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 1.10/0.63  %    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 1.10/0.63  %    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 1.10/0.63  %    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
% 1.10/0.63  %    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
% 1.10/0.63  %    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 1.10/0.63  %    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 1.10/0.63  %    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 1.10/0.63  % Current number of processed clauses  : 1222
% 1.10/0.63  %    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 192
% 1.10/0.63  %    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 1.10/0.63  %    Negative unit clauses             : 50
% 1.10/0.63  %    Non-unit-clauses                  : 980
% 1.10/0.63  % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 2679
% 1.10/0.63  % ...number of literals in the above   : 5414
% 1.10/0.63  % Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 1.10/0.63  % Current number of archived clauses   : 1465
% 1.10/0.63  % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 804028
% 1.10/0.63  % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 781005
% 1.10/0.63  % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 235
% 1.10/0.63  % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 13070
% 1.10/0.63  % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 1.10/0.63  % BW rewrite match attempts            : 47
% 1.10/0.63  % BW rewrite match successes           : 7
% 1.10/0.63  % Condensation attempts                : 0
% 1.10/0.63  % Condensation successes               : 0
% 1.10/0.63  % Termbank termtop insertions          : 63174
% 1.10/0.63  % Search garbage collected termcells   : 1841
% 1.10/0.63  
% 1.10/0.63  % -------------------------------------------------
% 1.10/0.63  % User time                : 0.149 s
% 1.10/0.63  % System time              : 0.015 s
% 1.10/0.63  % Total time               : 0.164 s
% 1.10/0.63  % Maximum resident set size: 5672 pages
% 1.10/0.63  
% 1.10/0.63  % -------------------------------------------------
% 1.10/0.63  % User time                : 0.707 s
% 1.10/0.63  % System time              : 0.051 s
% 1.10/0.63  % Total time               : 0.758 s
% 1.10/0.63  % Maximum resident set size: 5376 pages
% 1.10/0.63  % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------