↑ Up

iProver---3.9.4.UNS-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : iProver---3.9.4
% Problem  : SWV328-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM

% Computer : n015.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Fri Sep 25 03:17:18 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 35.85s 7.38s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 35.85s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    9
%            Number of leaves      :    8
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   24 (  13 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   41 (   0 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   32 (  15   ~;  17   |;   0   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    7 (   3 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    5 (   2 avg)
%            Number of types       :    1 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :    0 (   0   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of predicates  :    2 (   1 usr;   1 prp; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of functors    :   15 (  15 usr;   6 con; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   24 (   0 sgn  24   !;   0   ?;  12   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f3190,axiom,
    ! [X2,X3,X0,X1] :
      ( c_in(X0,X1,X3)
      | c_in(X0,X2,X3)
      | ~ c_in(X0,c_union(X1,X2,X3),X3) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/MSC001-1.ax',cls_Set_OUn__iff_0) ).

fof(f3412,axiom,
    ! [X2,X0,X1] :
      ( c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OKey(X0),X2,tc_Message_Omsg)
      | c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(X0,X1),X2,tc_Message_Omsg)
      | ~ c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(X0,X1),c_Message_Osynth(X2),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SWV005-2.ax',cls_Message_OCrypt__synth__eq_0) ).

fof(f3465,axiom,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( c_in(X0,c_Message_Oparts(X1),tc_Message_Omsg)
      | ~ c_in(X0,c_Message_Oanalz(X1),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SWV005-2.ax',cls_Message_Oanalz__conj__parts_0) ).

fof(f3559,axiom,
    ! [X2,X0,X1] :
      ( c_in(X0,c_union(c_Message_Osynth(c_Message_Oanalz(X2)),c_Message_Oparts(X2),tc_Message_Omsg),tc_Message_Omsg)
      | ~ c_in(X1,c_Message_Osynth(c_Message_Oanalz(X2)),tc_Message_Omsg)
      | ~ c_in(X0,c_Message_Oparts(c_insert(X1,X2,tc_Message_Omsg)),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SWV005-4.ax',cls_Message_OFake__parts__insert__in__Un__dest_0) ).

fof(f3592,negated_conjecture,
    c_in(v_X,c_Message_Osynth(c_Message_Oanalz(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evsf))),tc_Message_Omsg),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_1) ).

fof(f3593,negated_conjecture,
    ~ c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OKey(v_K),c_Message_Oanalz(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evsf)),tc_Message_Omsg),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_2) ).

fof(f3594,negated_conjecture,
    c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(v_K,c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NB)),c_Message_Oparts(c_insert(v_X,c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evsf),tc_Message_Omsg)),tc_Message_Omsg),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_3) ).

fof(f3597,negated_conjecture,
    ~ c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(v_K,c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NB)),c_Message_Oparts(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evsf)),tc_Message_Omsg),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_6) ).

tcf(c_3019,negated_conjecture,
    c_in(v_X,c_Message_Osynth(c_Message_Oanalz(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evsf))),tc_Message_Omsg),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f3592]) ).

tcf(c_3020,negated_conjecture,
    ~ c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OKey(v_K),c_Message_Oanalz(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evsf)),tc_Message_Omsg),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f3593]) ).

tcf(c_3021,negated_conjecture,
    c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(v_K,c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NB)),c_Message_Oparts(c_insert(v_X,c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evsf),tc_Message_Omsg)),tc_Message_Omsg),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f3594]) ).

tcf(c_3024,negated_conjecture,
    ~ c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(v_K,c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NB)),c_Message_Oparts(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evsf)),tc_Message_Omsg),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f3597]) ).

tcf(c_3050,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] :
      ( c_in(X0,c_union(c_Message_Osynth(c_Message_Oanalz(X2)),c_Message_Oparts(X2),tc_Message_Omsg),tc_Message_Omsg)
      | ~ c_in(X1,c_Message_Osynth(c_Message_Oanalz(X2)),tc_Message_Omsg)
      | ~ c_in(X0,c_Message_Oparts(c_insert(X1,X2,tc_Message_Omsg)),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f3559]) ).

tcf(c_3070,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] :
      ( c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OKey(X0),X2,tc_Message_Omsg)
      | c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(X0,X1),X2,tc_Message_Omsg)
      | ~ c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(X0,X1),c_Message_Osynth(X2),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f3412]) ).

tcf(c_3079,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( c_in(X0,c_Message_Oparts(X1),tc_Message_Omsg)
      | ~ c_in(X0,c_Message_Oanalz(X1),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f3465]) ).

tcf(c_3272,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i,X3: $i] :
      ( c_in(X0,X2,X3)
      | c_in(X0,X1,X3)
      | ~ c_in(X0,c_union(X1,X2,X3),X3) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f3190]) ).

tcf(c_89026,plain,
    ( c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(v_K,c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NB)),c_union(c_Message_Osynth(c_Message_Oanalz(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evsf))),c_Message_Oparts(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evsf)),tc_Message_Omsg),tc_Message_Omsg)
    | ~ c_in(v_X,c_Message_Osynth(c_Message_Oanalz(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evsf))),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_3021,c_3050]) ).

tcf(c_89085,plain,
    c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(v_K,c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NB)),c_union(c_Message_Osynth(c_Message_Oanalz(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evsf))),c_Message_Oparts(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evsf)),tc_Message_Omsg),tc_Message_Omsg),
    inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_89026,c_3019]) ).

tcf(c_89289,plain,
    ( c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(v_K,c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NB)),c_Message_Oparts(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evsf)),tc_Message_Omsg)
    | c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(v_K,c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NB)),c_Message_Osynth(c_Message_Oanalz(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evsf))),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_89085,c_3272]) ).

tcf(c_89292,plain,
    c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(v_K,c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NB)),c_Message_Osynth(c_Message_Oanalz(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evsf))),tc_Message_Omsg),
    inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_89289,c_3024]) ).

tcf(c_89296,plain,
    ( c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OKey(v_K),c_Message_Oanalz(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evsf)),tc_Message_Omsg)
    | c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(v_K,c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NB)),c_Message_Oanalz(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evsf)),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_89292,c_3070]) ).

tcf(c_89302,plain,
    c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(v_K,c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NB)),c_Message_Oanalz(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evsf)),tc_Message_Omsg),
    inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_89296,c_3020]) ).

tcf(c_89308,plain,
    c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(v_K,c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NB)),c_Message_Oparts(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evsf)),tc_Message_Omsg),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_89302,c_3079]) ).

tcf(c_89310,plain,
    $false,
    inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_89308,c_3024]) ).


%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : SWV328-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.00/0.04  % Command  : run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM
% 0.09/0.35  % Computer : n015.cluster.edu
% 0.09/0.35  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.09/0.35  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.09/0.35  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.09/0.35  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.09/0.35  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.09/0.35  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.09/0.35  % DateTime : Thu Sep 24 19:18:11 UTC 2026
% 0.09/0.36  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.09/0.36  Running run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM
% 0.14/0.39  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.14/0.39  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/iproveropt-multi-core.sh -d -n -l tptp -s fof_schedule -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.14/0.40  
% 0.14/0.40  % ======== iProver multi-core TPTP/SMT =========
% 0.14/0.40  
% 0.14/0.40  % Detected problem language: tptp
% 0.14/0.41  % Proving...
% 35.85/7.38  % SZS status Started for theBenchmark.p
% 35.85/7.38  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark.p
% 35.85/7.38  
% 35.85/7.38  %---------------- iProver v3.9.4 (pre CASC 2026/SMT-COMP 2026) ----------------%
% 35.85/7.38  
% 35.85/7.38  % ------  iProver source info
% 35.85/7.38  
% 35.85/7.38  % git: date: 2026-07-19 20:42:38 +0200
% 35.85/7.38  % git: sha1: 804e7d636a263075307957e923b7a22a4035de61
% 35.85/7.38  % git: non_committed_changes: false
% 35.85/7.38  
% 35.85/7.38  % ------ Parsing...% successful
% 35.85/7.38  
% 35.85/7.38  
% 35.85/7.38  % ------ Clausification by vclausify_rel  & Parsing by iProver...% 
% 35.85/7.38  
% 35.85/7.38  % ------ Preprocessing... sup_sim: 40  sf_s  rm: 13 0s  sf_e  pe_s  pe:1:0s pe:2:0s pe:4:0s pe:8:0s pe_e  sup_sim: 16  sf_s  rm: 17 0s  sf_e  pe_s  pe_e  sup_sim: 0  sf_s  rm: 17 0s  sf_e  pe_s  pe_e % 
% 35.85/7.38  
% 35.85/7.38  % ------ Preprocessing... gs_s  sp: 1 0s  gs_e  snvd_s sp: 0 0s snvd_e % 
% 35.85/7.38  
% 35.85/7.38  % ------ Preprocessing... sf_s  rm: 1 0s  sf_e  sf_s  rm: 0 0s  sf_e 
% 35.85/7.38  % ------ Proving...
% 35.85/7.38  % ------ Problem Properties 
% 35.85/7.38  
% 35.85/7.38  % 
% 35.85/7.38  % clauses                               682
% 35.85/7.38  % conjectures                           10
% 35.85/7.38  % EPR                                   28
% 35.85/7.38  % Horn                                  609
% 35.85/7.38  % unary                                 285
% 35.85/7.38  % binary                                289
% 35.85/7.38  % lits                                  1196
% 35.85/7.38  % lits eq                               503
% 35.85/7.38  % fd_pure                               0
% 35.85/7.38  % fd_pseudo                             0
% 35.85/7.38  % fd_cond                               37
% 35.85/7.38  % fd_pseudo_cond                        57
% 35.85/7.38  % AC symbols                            0
% 35.85/7.38  
% 35.85/7.38  % ------ Schedule dynamic 5 is on 
% 35.85/7.38  
% 35.85/7.38  % ------ Input Options "--resolution_flag false --inst_lit_sel_side none" Time Limit: 10.
% 35.85/7.38  
% 35.85/7.38  
% 35.85/7.38  % ------ 
% 35.85/7.38  % Current options:
% 35.85/7.38  % ------ 
% 35.85/7.38  
% 35.85/7.38  
% 35.85/7.38  % 
% 35.85/7.38  
% 35.85/7.38  % ------ Proving...
% 35.85/7.38  % 
% 35.85/7.38  
% 35.85/7.38  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark.p
% 35.85/7.38  
% 35.85/7.38  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 35.85/7.38  
% 35.85/7.38  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------