↑ Up

CSE---1.7.UNS-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : CSE---1.7
% Problem  : SWV328-2 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %d %s

% Computer : n023.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Mon Jun 24 16:46:45 EDT 2024

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.55s 0.65s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.55s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.09/0.13  % Problem    : SWV328-2 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.09/0.13  % Command    : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %d %s
% 0.13/0.35  % Computer : n023.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.35  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.35  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.35  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.35  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.35  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.13/0.35  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.13/0.35  % DateTime   : Thu Jun 20 18:17:09 EDT 2024
% 0.13/0.35  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.44/0.59  start to proof:theBenchmark
% 0.55/0.64  %-------------------------------------------
% 0.55/0.64  % File        :CSE---1.7
% 0.55/0.64  % Problem     :theBenchmark
% 0.55/0.64  % Transform   :cnf
% 0.55/0.64  % Format      :tptp:raw
% 0.55/0.64  % Command     :java -jar mcs_scs.jar %d %s
% 0.55/0.64  
% 0.55/0.64  % Result      :Theorem 0.020000s
% 0.55/0.64  % Output      :CNFRefutation 0.020000s
% 0.55/0.64  %-------------------------------------------
% 0.55/0.65  %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.55/0.65  % File     : SWV328-2 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.55/0.65  % Domain   : Software Verification (Security)
% 0.55/0.65  % Problem  : Cryptographic protocol problem for Yahalom
% 0.55/0.65  % Version  : [Pau06] axioms : Reduced > Especial.
% 0.55/0.65  % English  :
% 0.55/0.65  
% 0.55/0.65  % Refs     : [Pau06] Paulson (2006), Email to G. Sutcliffe
% 0.55/0.65  % Source   : [Pau06]
% 0.55/0.65  % Names    :
% 0.55/0.65  
% 0.55/0.65  % Status   : Unsatisfiable
% 0.55/0.65  % Rating   : 0.00 v6.3.0, 0.14 v6.2.0, 0.00 v4.0.0, 0.14 v3.4.0, 0.00 v3.2.0
% 0.55/0.65  % Syntax   : Number of clauses     :    8 (   4 unt;   2 nHn;   8 RR)
% 0.55/0.65  %            Number of literals    :   15 (   0 equ;   7 neg)
% 0.55/0.65  %            Maximal clause size   :    3 (   1 avg)
% 0.55/0.65  %            Maximal term depth    :    4 (   1 avg)
% 0.55/0.65  %            Number of predicates  :    1 (   1 usr;   0 prp; 3-3 aty)
% 0.55/0.65  %            Number of functors    :   15 (  15 usr;   6 con; 0-3 aty)
% 0.55/0.65  %            Number of variables   :   12 (   0 sgn)
% 0.55/0.65  % SPC      : CNF_UNS_RFO_NEQ_NHN
% 0.55/0.65  
% 0.55/0.65  % Comments : The problems in the [Pau06] collection each have very many axioms,
% 0.55/0.65  %            of which only a small selection are required for the refutation.
% 0.55/0.65  %            The mission is to find those few axioms, after which a refutation
% 0.55/0.65  %            can be quite easily found. This version has only the necessary
% 0.55/0.65  %            axioms.
% 0.55/0.65  %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.55/0.65  cnf(cls_conjecture_1,negated_conjecture,
% 0.55/0.65      c_in(v_X,c_Message_Osynth(c_Message_Oanalz(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evsf))),tc_Message_Omsg) ).
% 0.55/0.65  
% 0.55/0.65  cnf(cls_conjecture_2,negated_conjecture,
% 0.55/0.65      ~ c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OKey(v_K),c_Message_Oanalz(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evsf)),tc_Message_Omsg) ).
% 0.55/0.65  
% 0.55/0.65  cnf(cls_conjecture_3,negated_conjecture,
% 0.55/0.65      c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(v_K,c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NB)),c_Message_Oparts(c_insert(v_X,c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evsf),tc_Message_Omsg)),tc_Message_Omsg) ).
% 0.55/0.65  
% 0.55/0.65  cnf(cls_conjecture_6,negated_conjecture,
% 0.55/0.65      ~ c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(v_K,c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NB)),c_Message_Oparts(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evsf)),tc_Message_Omsg) ).
% 0.55/0.65  
% 0.55/0.65  cnf(cls_Message_OCrypt__synth__eq_0,axiom,
% 0.55/0.65      ( ~ c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(V_K,V_X),c_Message_Osynth(V_H),tc_Message_Omsg)
% 0.55/0.65      | c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(V_K,V_X),V_H,tc_Message_Omsg)
% 0.55/0.65      | c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OKey(V_K),V_H,tc_Message_Omsg) ) ).
% 0.55/0.65  
% 0.55/0.65  cnf(cls_Message_OFake__parts__insert__in__Un__dest_0,axiom,
% 0.55/0.65      ( ~ c_in(V_Z,c_Message_Oparts(c_insert(V_X,V_H,tc_Message_Omsg)),tc_Message_Omsg)
% 0.55/0.65      | ~ c_in(V_X,c_Message_Osynth(c_Message_Oanalz(V_H)),tc_Message_Omsg)
% 0.55/0.65      | c_in(V_Z,c_union(c_Message_Osynth(c_Message_Oanalz(V_H)),c_Message_Oparts(V_H),tc_Message_Omsg),tc_Message_Omsg) ) ).
% 0.55/0.65  
% 0.55/0.65  cnf(cls_Message_Oanalz__conj__parts_0,axiom,
% 0.55/0.65      ( ~ c_in(V_X,c_Message_Oanalz(V_H),tc_Message_Omsg)
% 0.55/0.65      | c_in(V_X,c_Message_Oparts(V_H),tc_Message_Omsg) ) ).
% 0.55/0.65  
% 0.55/0.65  cnf(cls_Set_OUn__iff_0,axiom,
% 0.55/0.65      ( ~ c_in(V_c,c_union(V_A,V_B,T_a),T_a)
% 0.55/0.65      | c_in(V_c,V_B,T_a)
% 0.55/0.65      | c_in(V_c,V_A,T_a) ) ).
% 0.55/0.65  
% 0.55/0.65  %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.55/0.65  %-------------------------------------------
% 0.55/0.65  % Proof found
% 0.55/0.65  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.55/0.65  % SZS output start Proof
% 0.55/0.65  %ClaNum:8(EqnAxiom:0)
% 0.55/0.65  %VarNum:31(SingletonVarNum:12)
% 0.55/0.65  %MaxLitNum:3
% 0.55/0.65  %MaxfuncDepth:3
% 0.55/0.65  %SharedTerms:19
% 0.55/0.65  %goalClause: 1 2 3 4
% 0.55/0.65  %singleGoalClaCount:4
% 0.55/0.65  [3]~P1(f8(a13),f4(f3(a2,a15)),a10)
% 0.55/0.65  [4]~P1(f7(a13,f6(a14)),f9(f3(a2,a15)),a10)
% 0.55/0.65  [1]P1(a1,f5(f4(f3(a2,a15))),a10)
% 0.55/0.65  [2]P1(f7(a13,f6(a14)),f9(f11(a1,f3(a2,a15),a10)),a10)
% 0.55/0.65  [5]~P1(x51,f4(x52),a10)+P1(x51,f9(x52),a10)
% 0.55/0.65  [6]P1(f8(x61),x62,a10)+P1(f7(x61,x63),x62,a10)+~P1(f7(x61,x63),f5(x62),a10)
% 0.55/0.65  [8]~P1(x83,f5(f4(x82)),a10)+~P1(x81,f9(f11(x83,x82,a10)),a10)+P1(x81,f12(f5(f4(x82)),f9(x82),a10),a10)
% 0.55/0.65  [7]P1(x71,x72,x73)+P1(x71,x74,x73)+~P1(x71,f12(x74,x72,x73),x73)
% 0.55/0.65  %EqnAxiom
% 0.55/0.65  
% 0.55/0.65  %-------------------------------------------
% 0.55/0.65  cnf(11,plain,
% 0.55/0.65     (~P1(f7(a13,f6(a14)),f5(f4(f3(a2,a15))),a10)),
% 0.55/0.65     inference(scs_inference,[],[4,3,5,6])).
% 0.55/0.65  cnf(24,plain,
% 0.55/0.65     ($false),
% 0.55/0.65     inference(scs_inference,[],[4,11,2,1,7,8]),
% 0.55/0.65     ['proof']).
% 0.55/0.65  % SZS output end Proof
% 0.55/0.65  % Total time :0.020000s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------