↑ Up

CARINE---0.734.UNS-Ref.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : CARINE---0.734
% Problem  : SWV329-2 : TPTP v5.0.0. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm  : add_equality
% Format   : carine
% Command  : carine %s t=%d xo=off uct=32000

% Computer : art02.cs.miami.edu
% Model    : i686 i686
% CPU      : Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 2.80GHz @ 2793MHz
% Memory   : 2018MB
% OS       : Linux 2.6.26.8-57.fc8
% CPULimit : 300s
% DateTime : Sun Nov 28 06:59:58 EST 2010

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.49s
% Output   : Refutation 0.49s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : None (Parsing solution fails)
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    : 0

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ERROR: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% Command entered:
% /home/graph/tptp/Systems/CARINE---0.734/carine /tmp/SystemOnTPTP20197/SWV/SWV329-2+noeq.car t=300 xo=off uct=32000
% CARINE version 0.734 (Dec 2003)
% Initializing tables ... done.
% Parsing .......... done.
% Calculating time slices ... done.
% Building Lookup Tables ... done.
% Looking for a proof at depth = 1 ...
% 	t = 0 secs [nr = 11] [nf = 0] [nu = 2] [ut = 6]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 2 ...
% 	t = 0 secs [nr = 468] [nf = 0] [nu = 146] [ut = 117]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 3 ...
% +================================================+
% |                                                |
% | Congratulations!!! ........ A proof was found. |
% |                                                |
% +================================================+
% Base Clauses and Unit Clauses used in proof:
% ============================================
% Base Clauses:
% -------------
% B0: ~c_in_3(v_B_0(),c_Event_Obad_0(),tc_Message_Oagent_0())
% B2: c_in_3(v_X_0(),c_Message_Osynth_1(c_Message_Oanalz_1(c_Event_Oknows_2(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy_0(),v_evsf_0()))),tc_Message_Omsg_0())
% B4: ~c_in_3(c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt_2(c_Public_OshrK_1(v_B_0()),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair_2(c_Message_Omsg_OAgent_1(v_A_0()),c_Message_Omsg_OKey_1(v_K_0()))),c_Message_Oparts_1(c_Event_Oknows_2(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy_0(),v_evsf_0())),tc_Message_Omsg_0())
% B5: ~c_in_3(x0,c_Message_Oanalz_1(x1),tc_Message_Omsg_0()) | c_in_3(x0,c_Message_Oparts_1(x1),tc_Message_Omsg_0())
% B6: ~c_in_3(x0,c_union_3(x1,x2,x3),x3) | c_in_3(x0,x2,x3) | c_in_3(x0,x1,x3)
% B7: ~c_in_3(c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt_2(x0,x1),c_Message_Osynth_1(x2),tc_Message_Omsg_0()) | c_in_3(c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt_2(x0,x1),x2,tc_Message_Omsg_0()) | c_in_3(c_Message_Omsg_OKey_1(x0),x2,tc_Message_Omsg_0())
% B8: ~c_in_3(x1,c_Message_Osynth_1(c_Message_Oanalz_1(x2)),tc_Message_Omsg_0()) | ~c_in_3(x0,c_Message_Oparts_1(c_insert_3(x1,x2,tc_Message_Omsg_0())),tc_Message_Omsg_0()) | c_in_3(x0,c_union_3(c_Message_Osynth_1(c_Message_Oanalz_1(x2)),c_Message_Oparts_1(x2),tc_Message_Omsg_0()),tc_Message_Omsg_0())
% B9: ~c_in_3(c_Message_Omsg_OKey_1(c_Public_OshrK_1(x1)),c_Message_Oanalz_1(c_Event_Oknows_2(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy_0(),x0)),tc_Message_Omsg_0()) | ~c_in_3(x0,c_Yahalom_Oyahalom_0(),tc_List_Olist_1(tc_Event_Oevent_0())) | c_in_3(x1,c_Event_Obad_0(),tc_Message_Oagent_0())
% Unit Clauses:
% --------------
% U1: < d0 v0 dv0 f1 c3 t4 td2 b nc > c_in_3(v_evsf_0(),c_Yahalom_Oyahalom_0(),tc_List_Olist_1(tc_Event_Oevent_0()))
% U3: < d0 v0 dv0 f8 c8 t16 td4 b nc > c_in_3(c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt_2(c_Public_OshrK_1(v_B_0()),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair_2(c_Message_Omsg_OAgent_1(v_A_0()),c_Message_Omsg_OKey_1(v_K_0()))),c_Message_Oparts_1(c_insert_3(v_X_0(),c_Event_Oknows_2(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy_0(),v_evsf_0()),tc_Message_Omsg_0())),tc_Message_Omsg_0())
% U4: < d0 v0 dv0 f7 c6 t13 td4 b nc > ~c_in_3(c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt_2(c_Public_OshrK_1(v_B_0()),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair_2(c_Message_Omsg_OAgent_1(v_A_0()),c_Message_Omsg_OKey_1(v_K_0()))),c_Message_Oparts_1(c_Event_Oknows_2(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy_0(),v_evsf_0())),tc_Message_Omsg_0())
% U51: < d2 v0 dv0 f4 c4 t8 td3 > ~c_in_3(c_Message_Omsg_OKey_1(c_Public_OshrK_1(v_B_0())),c_Message_Oanalz_1(c_Event_Oknows_2(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy_0(),v_evsf_0())),tc_Message_Omsg_0())
% U52: < d2 v0 dv0 f11 c9 t20 td5 > c_in_3(c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt_2(c_Public_OshrK_1(v_B_0()),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair_2(c_Message_Omsg_OAgent_1(v_A_0()),c_Message_Omsg_OKey_1(v_K_0()))),c_union_3(c_Message_Osynth_1(c_Message_Oanalz_1(c_Event_Oknows_2(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy_0(),v_evsf_0()))),c_Message_Oparts_1(c_Event_Oknows_2(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy_0(),v_evsf_0())),tc_Message_Omsg_0()),tc_Message_Omsg_0())
% U53: < d2 v0 dv0 f8 c6 t14 td4 > c_in_3(c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt_2(c_Public_OshrK_1(v_B_0()),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair_2(c_Message_Omsg_OAgent_1(v_A_0()),c_Message_Omsg_OKey_1(v_K_0()))),c_Message_Osynth_1(c_Message_Oanalz_1(c_Event_Oknows_2(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy_0(),v_evsf_0()))),tc_Message_Omsg_0())
% U586: < d3 v0 dv0 f4 c4 t8 td3 > c_in_3(c_Message_Omsg_OKey_1(c_Public_OshrK_1(v_B_0())),c_Message_Oanalz_1(c_Event_Oknows_2(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy_0(),v_evsf_0())),tc_Message_Omsg_0())
% --------------- Start of Proof ---------------
% Derivation of unit clause U1:
% c_in_3(v_evsf_0(),c_Yahalom_Oyahalom_0(),tc_List_Olist_1(tc_Event_Oevent_0())) ....... U1
% Derivation of unit clause U3:
% c_in_3(c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt_2(c_Public_OshrK_1(v_B_0()),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair_2(c_Message_Omsg_OAgent_1(v_A_0()),c_Message_Omsg_OKey_1(v_K_0()))),c_Message_Oparts_1(c_insert_3(v_X_0(),c_Event_Oknows_2(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy_0(),v_evsf_0()),tc_Message_Omsg_0())),tc_Message_Omsg_0()) ....... U3
% Derivation of unit clause U4:
% ~c_in_3(c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt_2(c_Public_OshrK_1(v_B_0()),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair_2(c_Message_Omsg_OAgent_1(v_A_0()),c_Message_Omsg_OKey_1(v_K_0()))),c_Message_Oparts_1(c_Event_Oknows_2(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy_0(),v_evsf_0())),tc_Message_Omsg_0()) ....... U4
% Derivation of unit clause U51:
% ~c_in_3(v_B_0(),c_Event_Obad_0(),tc_Message_Oagent_0()) ....... B0
% ~c_in_3(c_Message_Omsg_OKey_1(c_Public_OshrK_1(x1)),c_Message_Oanalz_1(c_Event_Oknows_2(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy_0(),x0)),tc_Message_Omsg_0()) | ~c_in_3(x0,c_Yahalom_Oyahalom_0(),tc_List_Olist_1(tc_Event_Oevent_0())) | c_in_3(x1,c_Event_Obad_0(),tc_Message_Oagent_0()) ....... B9
%  ~c_in_3(c_Message_Omsg_OKey_1(c_Public_OshrK_1(v_B_0())), c_Message_Oanalz_1(c_Event_Oknows_2(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy_0(), x0)), tc_Message_Omsg_0()) | ~c_in_3(x0, c_Yahalom_Oyahalom_0(), tc_List_Olist_1(tc_Event_Oevent_0())) ....... R1 [B0:L0, B9:L2]
%  c_in_3(v_evsf_0(),c_Yahalom_Oyahalom_0(),tc_List_Olist_1(tc_Event_Oevent_0())) ....... U1
%   ~c_in_3(c_Message_Omsg_OKey_1(c_Public_OshrK_1(v_B_0())), c_Message_Oanalz_1(c_Event_Oknows_2(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy_0(), v_evsf_0())), tc_Message_Omsg_0()) ....... R2 [R1:L1, U1:L0]
% Derivation of unit clause U52:
% c_in_3(v_X_0(),c_Message_Osynth_1(c_Message_Oanalz_1(c_Event_Oknows_2(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy_0(),v_evsf_0()))),tc_Message_Omsg_0()) ....... B2
% ~c_in_3(x1,c_Message_Osynth_1(c_Message_Oanalz_1(x2)),tc_Message_Omsg_0()) | ~c_in_3(x0,c_Message_Oparts_1(c_insert_3(x1,x2,tc_Message_Omsg_0())),tc_Message_Omsg_0()) | c_in_3(x0,c_union_3(c_Message_Osynth_1(c_Message_Oanalz_1(x2)),c_Message_Oparts_1(x2),tc_Message_Omsg_0()),tc_Message_Omsg_0()) ....... B8
%  ~c_in_3(x0, c_Message_Oparts_1(c_insert_3(v_X_0(), c_Event_Oknows_2(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy_0(), v_evsf_0()), tc_Message_Omsg_0())), tc_Message_Omsg_0()) | c_in_3(x0, c_union_3(c_Message_Osynth_1(c_Message_Oanalz_1(c_Event_Oknows_2(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy_0(), v_evsf_0()))), c_Message_Oparts_1(c_Event_Oknows_2(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy_0(), v_evsf_0())), tc_Message_Omsg_0()), tc_Message_Omsg_0()) ....... R1 [B2:L0, B8:L0]
%  c_in_3(c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt_2(c_Public_OshrK_1(v_B_0()),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair_2(c_Message_Omsg_OAgent_1(v_A_0()),c_Message_Omsg_OKey_1(v_K_0()))),c_Message_Oparts_1(c_insert_3(v_X_0(),c_Event_Oknows_2(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy_0(),v_evsf_0()),tc_Message_Omsg_0())),tc_Message_Omsg_0()) ....... U3
%   c_in_3(c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt_2(c_Public_OshrK_1(v_B_0()), c_Message_Omsg_OMPair_2(c_Message_Omsg_OAgent_1(v_A_0()), c_Message_Omsg_OKey_1(v_K_0()))), c_union_3(c_Message_Osynth_1(c_Message_Oanalz_1(c_Event_Oknows_2(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy_0(), v_evsf_0()))), c_Message_Oparts_1(c_Event_Oknows_2(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy_0(), v_evsf_0())), tc_Message_Omsg_0()), tc_Message_Omsg_0()) ....... R2 [R1:L0, U3:L0]
% Derivation of unit clause U53:
% ~c_in_3(c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt_2(c_Public_OshrK_1(v_B_0()),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair_2(c_Message_Omsg_OAgent_1(v_A_0()),c_Message_Omsg_OKey_1(v_K_0()))),c_Message_Oparts_1(c_Event_Oknows_2(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy_0(),v_evsf_0())),tc_Message_Omsg_0()) ....... B4
% ~c_in_3(x0,c_union_3(x1,x2,x3),x3) | c_in_3(x0,x2,x3) | c_in_3(x0,x1,x3) ....... B6
%  ~c_in_3(c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt_2(c_Public_OshrK_1(v_B_0()), c_Message_Omsg_OMPair_2(c_Message_Omsg_OAgent_1(v_A_0()), c_Message_Omsg_OKey_1(v_K_0()))), c_union_3(x0, c_Message_Oparts_1(c_Event_Oknows_2(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy_0(), v_evsf_0())), tc_Message_Omsg_0()), tc_Message_Omsg_0()) | c_in_3(c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt_2(c_Public_OshrK_1(v_B_0()), c_Message_Omsg_OMPair_2(c_Message_Omsg_OAgent_1(v_A_0()), c_Message_Omsg_OKey_1(v_K_0()))), x0, tc_Message_Omsg_0()) ....... R1 [B4:L0, B6:L1]
%  c_in_3(c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt_2(c_Public_OshrK_1(v_B_0()),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair_2(c_Message_Omsg_OAgent_1(v_A_0()),c_Message_Omsg_OKey_1(v_K_0()))),c_union_3(c_Message_Osynth_1(c_Message_Oanalz_1(c_Event_Oknows_2(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy_0(),v_evsf_0()))),c_Message_Oparts_1(c_Event_Oknows_2(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy_0(),v_evsf_0())),tc_Message_Omsg_0()),tc_Message_Omsg_0()) ....... U52
%   c_in_3(c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt_2(c_Public_OshrK_1(v_B_0()), c_Message_Omsg_OMPair_2(c_Message_Omsg_OAgent_1(v_A_0()), c_Message_Omsg_OKey_1(v_K_0()))), c_Message_Osynth_1(c_Message_Oanalz_1(c_Event_Oknows_2(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy_0(), v_evsf_0()))), tc_Message_Omsg_0()) ....... R2 [R1:L0, U52:L0]
% Derivation of unit clause U586:
% ~c_in_3(x0,c_Message_Oanalz_1(x1),tc_Message_Omsg_0()) | c_in_3(x0,c_Message_Oparts_1(x1),tc_Message_Omsg_0()) ....... B5
% ~c_in_3(c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt_2(x0,x1),c_Message_Osynth_1(x2),tc_Message_Omsg_0()) | c_in_3(c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt_2(x0,x1),x2,tc_Message_Omsg_0()) | c_in_3(c_Message_Omsg_OKey_1(x0),x2,tc_Message_Omsg_0()) ....... B7
%  c_in_3(c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt_2(x0, x1), c_Message_Oparts_1(x2), tc_Message_Omsg_0()) | ~c_in_3(c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt_2(x0, x1), c_Message_Osynth_1(c_Message_Oanalz_1(x2)), tc_Message_Omsg_0()) | c_in_3(c_Message_Omsg_OKey_1(x0), c_Message_Oanalz_1(x2), tc_Message_Omsg_0()) ....... R1 [B5:L0, B7:L1]
%  ~c_in_3(c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt_2(c_Public_OshrK_1(v_B_0()),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair_2(c_Message_Omsg_OAgent_1(v_A_0()),c_Message_Omsg_OKey_1(v_K_0()))),c_Message_Oparts_1(c_Event_Oknows_2(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy_0(),v_evsf_0())),tc_Message_Omsg_0()) ....... U4
%   ~c_in_3(c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt_2(c_Public_OshrK_1(v_B_0()), c_Message_Omsg_OMPair_2(c_Message_Omsg_OAgent_1(v_A_0()), c_Message_Omsg_OKey_1(v_K_0()))), c_Message_Osynth_1(c_Message_Oanalz_1(c_Event_Oknows_2(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy_0(), v_evsf_0()))), tc_Message_Omsg_0()) | c_in_3(c_Message_Omsg_OKey_1(c_Public_OshrK_1(v_B_0())), c_Message_Oanalz_1(c_Event_Oknows_2(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy_0(), v_evsf_0())), tc_Message_Omsg_0()) ....... R2 [R1:L0, U4:L0]
%   c_in_3(c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt_2(c_Public_OshrK_1(v_B_0()),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair_2(c_Message_Omsg_OAgent_1(v_A_0()),c_Message_Omsg_OKey_1(v_K_0()))),c_Message_Osynth_1(c_Message_Oanalz_1(c_Event_Oknows_2(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy_0(),v_evsf_0()))),tc_Message_Omsg_0()) ....... U53
%    c_in_3(c_Message_Omsg_OKey_1(c_Public_OshrK_1(v_B_0())), c_Message_Oanalz_1(c_Event_Oknows_2(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy_0(), v_evsf_0())), tc_Message_Omsg_0()) ....... R3 [R2:L0, U53:L0]
% Derivation of the empty clause:
% c_in_3(c_Message_Omsg_OKey_1(c_Public_OshrK_1(v_B_0())),c_Message_Oanalz_1(c_Event_Oknows_2(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy_0(),v_evsf_0())),tc_Message_Omsg_0()) ....... U586
% ~c_in_3(c_Message_Omsg_OKey_1(c_Public_OshrK_1(v_B_0())),c_Message_Oanalz_1(c_Event_Oknows_2(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy_0(),v_evsf_0())),tc_Message_Omsg_0()) ....... U51
%  [] ....... R1 [U586:L0, U51:L0]
% --------------- End of Proof ---------------
% PROOF FOUND!
% ---------------------------------------------
% |                Statistics                 |
% ---------------------------------------------
% Profile 3: Performance Statistics:
% ==================================
% Total number of generated clauses: 2981
% 	resolvents: 2981	factors: 0
% Number of unit clauses generated: 1856
% % unit clauses generated to total clauses generated: 62.26
% Number of unit clauses constructed and retained at depth [x]:
% =============================================================
% [0] = 5		[1] = 1		[2] = 111	[3] = 470	
% Total = 587
% Number of generated clauses having [x] literals:
% ------------------------------------------------
% [1] = 1856	[2] = 1075	[3] = 50	
% Average size of a generated clause: 2.0
% Number of unit clauses per predicate list:
% ==========================================
% [0] c_in_3		(+)6	(-)581
% 			------------------
% 		Total:	(+)6	(-)581
% Total number of unit clauses retained: 587
% Number of clauses skipped because of their length: 3071
% N base clauses skippped in resolve-with-all-base-clauses
% 	because of the shortest resolvents table: 0
% Number of successful unifications: 2990
% Number of unification failures: 2878
% Number of unit to unit unification failures: 2953
% N literal unification failure due to lookup root_id table: 367648
% N base clause resolution failure due to lookup table: 813
% N UC-BCL resolution dropped due to lookup table: 84
% Max entries in substitution set: 7
% N unit clauses dropped because they exceeded max values: 1043
% N unit clauses dropped because too much nesting: 561
% N unit clauses not constrcuted because table was full: 0
% N unit clauses dropped because UCFA table was full: 0
% Max number of terms in a unit clause: 55
% Max term depth in a unit clause: 10
% Number of states in UCFA table: 10669
% Total number of terms of all unit clauses in table: 26240
% Max allowed number of states in UCFA: 528000
% Ratio n states used/total allowed states: 0.02
% Ratio n states used/total unit clauses terms: 0.41
% Number of symbols (columns) in UCFA: 58
% Profile 2: Number of calls to:
% ==============================
% PTUnify() = 5868
% ConstructUnitClause() = 1625
% Profile 1: Time spent in:
% =========================
% ConstructUnitClause() : 0.02 secs
% --------------------------------------------------------
% |                                                      |
%   Inferences per sec: inf
% |                                                      |
% --------------------------------------------------------
% Elapsed time: 0 secs
% CPU time: 0.48 secs
% 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------