%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.5.1
% Problem : SWV329-2 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% Computer : n006.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 02:54:25 PM UTC 2026
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.15s 0.43s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.15s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 6
% Number of leaves : 10
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 32 ( 17 unt; 6 nHn; 32 RR)
% Number of literals : 59 ( 0 equ; 28 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 5 ( 2 avg)
% Number of predicates : 2 ( 1 usr; 1 prp; 0-3 aty)
% Number of functors : 23 ( 23 usr; 11 con; 0-3 aty)
% Number of variables : 42 ( 0 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(cls_Message_OFake__parts__insert__in__Un__dest_0,axiom,
( ~ c_in(X2,c_Message_Osynth(c_Message_Oanalz(X3)),tc_Message_Omsg)
| ~ c_in(X1,c_Message_Oparts(c_insert(X2,X3,tc_Message_Omsg)),tc_Message_Omsg)
| c_in(X1,c_union(c_Message_Osynth(c_Message_Oanalz(X3)),c_Message_Oparts(X3),tc_Message_Omsg),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_Message_OFake__parts__insert__in__Un__dest_0) ).
cnf(cls_Set_OUn__iff_0,axiom,
( ~ c_in(X1,c_union(X2,X3,X4),X4)
| c_in(X1,X2,X4)
| c_in(X1,X3,X4) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_Set_OUn__iff_0) ).
cnf(cls_conjecture_4,negated_conjecture,
c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(c_Public_OshrK(v_B),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(v_A),c_Message_Omsg_OKey(v_K))),c_Message_Oparts(c_insert(v_X,c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evsf),tc_Message_Omsg)),tc_Message_Omsg),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_4) ).
cnf(cls_conjecture_1,negated_conjecture,
c_in(v_X,c_Message_Osynth(c_Message_Oanalz(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evsf))),tc_Message_Omsg),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_1) ).
cnf(cls_conjecture_6,negated_conjecture,
~ c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(c_Public_OshrK(v_B),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(v_A),c_Message_Omsg_OKey(v_K))),c_Message_Oparts(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evsf)),tc_Message_Omsg),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_6) ).
cnf(cls_Message_Oanalz__conj__parts_0,axiom,
( ~ c_in(X1,c_Message_Oanalz(X2),tc_Message_Omsg)
| c_in(X1,c_Message_Oparts(X2),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_Message_Oanalz__conj__parts_0) ).
cnf(cls_Message_OCrypt__synth__eq_0,axiom,
( ~ c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(X1,X2),c_Message_Osynth(X3),tc_Message_Omsg)
| c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OKey(X1),X3,tc_Message_Omsg)
| c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(X1,X2),X3,tc_Message_Omsg) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_Message_OCrypt__synth__eq_0) ).
cnf(cls_Yahalom_OSpy__analz__shrK_0,axiom,
( ~ c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OKey(c_Public_OshrK(X2)),c_Message_Oanalz(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,X1)),tc_Message_Omsg)
| ~ c_in(X1,c_Yahalom_Oyahalom,tc_List_Olist(tc_Event_Oevent))
| c_in(X2,c_Event_Obad,tc_Message_Oagent) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_Yahalom_OSpy__analz__shrK_0) ).
cnf(cls_conjecture_5,negated_conjecture,
~ c_in(v_B,c_Event_Obad,tc_Message_Oagent),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_5) ).
cnf(cls_conjecture_0,negated_conjecture,
c_in(v_evsf,c_Yahalom_Oyahalom,tc_List_Olist(tc_Event_Oevent)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_0) ).
cnf(c_0_10,plain,
( ~ c_in(X2,c_Message_Osynth(c_Message_Oanalz(X3)),tc_Message_Omsg)
| ~ c_in(X1,c_Message_Oparts(c_insert(X2,X3,tc_Message_Omsg)),tc_Message_Omsg)
| c_in(X1,c_union(c_Message_Osynth(c_Message_Oanalz(X3)),c_Message_Oparts(X3),tc_Message_Omsg),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[cls_Message_OFake__parts__insert__in__Un__dest_0]) ).
cnf(c_0_11,plain,
( ~ c_in(X1,c_union(X2,X3,X4),X4)
| c_in(X1,X2,X4)
| c_in(X1,X3,X4) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[cls_Set_OUn__iff_0]) ).
cnf(c_0_12,plain,
( ~ c_in(X2,c_Message_Osynth(c_Message_Oanalz(X3)),tc_Message_Omsg)
| ~ c_in(X1,c_Message_Oparts(c_insert(X2,X3,tc_Message_Omsg)),tc_Message_Omsg)
| c_in(X1,c_union(c_Message_Osynth(c_Message_Oanalz(X3)),c_Message_Oparts(X3),tc_Message_Omsg),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
c_0_10 ).
cnf(c_0_13,negated_conjecture,
c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(c_Public_OshrK(v_B),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(v_A),c_Message_Omsg_OKey(v_K))),c_Message_Oparts(c_insert(v_X,c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evsf),tc_Message_Omsg)),tc_Message_Omsg),
cls_conjecture_4 ).
cnf(c_0_14,negated_conjecture,
c_in(v_X,c_Message_Osynth(c_Message_Oanalz(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evsf))),tc_Message_Omsg),
cls_conjecture_1 ).
cnf(c_0_15,negated_conjecture,
~ c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(c_Public_OshrK(v_B),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(v_A),c_Message_Omsg_OKey(v_K))),c_Message_Oparts(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evsf)),tc_Message_Omsg),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[cls_conjecture_6]) ).
cnf(c_0_16,plain,
( ~ c_in(X1,c_Message_Oanalz(X2),tc_Message_Omsg)
| c_in(X1,c_Message_Oparts(X2),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[cls_Message_Oanalz__conj__parts_0]) ).
cnf(c_0_17,plain,
( ~ c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(X1,X2),c_Message_Osynth(X3),tc_Message_Omsg)
| c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OKey(X1),X3,tc_Message_Omsg)
| c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(X1,X2),X3,tc_Message_Omsg) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[cls_Message_OCrypt__synth__eq_0]) ).
cnf(c_0_18,plain,
( ~ c_in(X1,c_union(X2,X3,X4),X4)
| c_in(X1,X2,X4)
| c_in(X1,X3,X4) ),
c_0_11 ).
cnf(c_0_19,negated_conjecture,
c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(c_Public_OshrK(v_B),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(v_A),c_Message_Omsg_OKey(v_K))),c_union(c_Message_Osynth(c_Message_Oanalz(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evsf))),c_Message_Oparts(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evsf)),tc_Message_Omsg),tc_Message_Omsg),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_12,c_0_13]),c_0_14])]) ).
cnf(c_0_20,negated_conjecture,
~ c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(c_Public_OshrK(v_B),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(v_A),c_Message_Omsg_OKey(v_K))),c_Message_Oparts(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evsf)),tc_Message_Omsg),
c_0_15 ).
cnf(c_0_21,plain,
( ~ c_in(X1,c_Message_Oanalz(X2),tc_Message_Omsg)
| c_in(X1,c_Message_Oparts(X2),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
c_0_16 ).
cnf(c_0_22,plain,
( ~ c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OKey(c_Public_OshrK(X2)),c_Message_Oanalz(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,X1)),tc_Message_Omsg)
| ~ c_in(X1,c_Yahalom_Oyahalom,tc_List_Olist(tc_Event_Oevent))
| c_in(X2,c_Event_Obad,tc_Message_Oagent) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[cls_Yahalom_OSpy__analz__shrK_0]) ).
cnf(c_0_23,plain,
( ~ c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(X1,X2),c_Message_Osynth(X3),tc_Message_Omsg)
| c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OKey(X1),X3,tc_Message_Omsg)
| c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(X1,X2),X3,tc_Message_Omsg) ),
c_0_17 ).
cnf(c_0_24,negated_conjecture,
c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(c_Public_OshrK(v_B),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(v_A),c_Message_Omsg_OKey(v_K))),c_Message_Osynth(c_Message_Oanalz(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evsf))),tc_Message_Omsg),
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_18,c_0_19]),c_0_20]) ).
cnf(c_0_25,negated_conjecture,
~ c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(c_Public_OshrK(v_B),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(v_A),c_Message_Omsg_OKey(v_K))),c_Message_Oanalz(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evsf)),tc_Message_Omsg),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_20,c_0_21]) ).
cnf(c_0_26,negated_conjecture,
~ c_in(v_B,c_Event_Obad,tc_Message_Oagent),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[cls_conjecture_5]) ).
cnf(c_0_27,plain,
( ~ c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OKey(c_Public_OshrK(X2)),c_Message_Oanalz(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,X1)),tc_Message_Omsg)
| ~ c_in(X1,c_Yahalom_Oyahalom,tc_List_Olist(tc_Event_Oevent))
| c_in(X2,c_Event_Obad,tc_Message_Oagent) ),
c_0_22 ).
cnf(c_0_28,negated_conjecture,
c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OKey(c_Public_OshrK(v_B)),c_Message_Oanalz(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evsf)),tc_Message_Omsg),
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_23,c_0_24]),c_0_25]) ).
cnf(c_0_29,negated_conjecture,
c_in(v_evsf,c_Yahalom_Oyahalom,tc_List_Olist(tc_Event_Oevent)),
cls_conjecture_0 ).
cnf(c_0_30,negated_conjecture,
~ c_in(v_B,c_Event_Obad,tc_Message_Oagent),
c_0_26 ).
cnf(c_0_31,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_27,c_0_28]),c_0_29])]),c_0_30]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03 % Problem : SWV329-2 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.00/0.05 % Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.10/0.37 % Computer : n006.cluster.edu
% 0.10/0.37 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.10/0.37 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.10/0.37 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.10/0.37 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.10/0.37 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.10/0.37 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.10/0.37 % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 08:41:15 UTC 2026
% 0.10/0.37 % CPUTime :
% 0.10/0.37 Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.15/0.41 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.15/0.41 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.15/0.43 % Version: 3.5.1
% 0.15/0.43 % Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.15/0.43 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.15/0.43 % Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2SI with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.15/0.43 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.43 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.43 % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.43 % new_bool_3 with pid 2458358 completed with status 0
% 0.15/0.43 % Result found by new_bool_3
% 0.15/0.43 % Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.15/0.43 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.15/0.43 % Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2SI with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.15/0.43 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.43 % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0))
% 0.15/0.43 % SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.15/0.43 % Search class: FGUNF-FFSS31-MFFFFFNN
% 0.15/0.43 % partial match(1): FGUNF-FFSF31-MFFFFFNN
% 0.15/0.43 % Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.15/0.43 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 31s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.43 % SubtermCWHack with pid 2458364 completed with status 0
% 0.15/0.43 % Result found by SubtermCWHack
% 0.15/0.43 % Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.15/0.43 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.15/0.43 % Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2SI with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.15/0.43 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.43 % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0))
% 0.15/0.43 % SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.15/0.43 % Search class: FGUNF-FFSS31-MFFFFFNN
% 0.15/0.43 % partial match(1): FGUNF-FFSF31-MFFFFFNN
% 0.15/0.43 % Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.15/0.43 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 31s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.43 % Preprocessing time : 0.001 s
% 0.15/0.43
% 0.15/0.43 % Proof found!
% 0.15/0.43 % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.15/0.43 % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.15/0.43 % Parsed axioms : 10
% 0.15/0.43 % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 0.15/0.43 % Initial clauses : 10
% 0.15/0.43 % Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.15/0.43 % Initial clauses in saturation : 10
% 0.15/0.43 % Processed clauses : 14
% 0.15/0.43 % ...of these trivial : 0
% 0.15/0.43 % ...subsumed : 0
% 0.15/0.43 % ...remaining for further processing : 14
% 0.15/0.43 % Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.15/0.43 % Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.15/0.43 % Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.15/0.43 % Backward-rewritten : 0
% 0.15/0.43 % Generated clauses : 6
% 0.15/0.43 % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 5
% 0.15/0.43 % ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.15/0.43 % Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.15/0.43 % Paramodulations : 6
% 0.15/0.43 % Factorizations : 0
% 0.15/0.43 % NegExts : 0
% 0.15/0.43 % Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.15/0.43 % Disequality decompositions : 0
% 0.15/0.43 % Total rewrite steps : 2
% 0.15/0.43 % ...of those cached : 0
% 0.15/0.43 % Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.15/0.43 % Propositional check models : 0
% 0.15/0.43 % Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.15/0.43 % Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.15/0.43 % Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.15/0.43 % Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.15/0.43 % Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.15/0.43 % Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.15/0.43 % Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.15/0.43 % Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.15/0.43 % Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.15/0.43 % Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.15/0.43 % Current number of processed clauses : 14
% 0.15/0.43 % Positive orientable unit clauses : 6
% 0.15/0.43 % Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.15/0.43 % Negative unit clauses : 3
% 0.15/0.43 % Non-unit-clauses : 5
% 0.15/0.43 % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 1
% 0.15/0.43 % ...number of literals in the above : 3
% 0.15/0.43 % Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.15/0.43 % Current number of archived clauses : 0
% 0.15/0.43 % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 4
% 0.15/0.43 % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 4
% 0.15/0.43 % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 0
% 0.15/0.43 % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 1
% 0.15/0.43 % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.15/0.43 % BW rewrite match attempts : 1
% 0.15/0.43 % BW rewrite match successes : 0
% 0.15/0.43 % Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.15/0.43 % Condensation successes : 0
% 0.15/0.43 % Termbank termtop insertions : 548
% 0.15/0.43 % Search garbage collected termcells : 25
% 0.15/0.43
% 0.15/0.43 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.15/0.43 % User time : 0.004 s
% 0.15/0.43 % System time : 0.002 s
% 0.15/0.43 % Total time : 0.006 s
% 0.15/0.43 % Maximum resident set size: 3592 pages
% 0.15/0.43
% 0.15/0.43 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.15/0.43 % User time : 0.006 s
% 0.15/0.43 % System time : 0.006 s
% 0.15/0.43 % Total time : 0.012 s
% 0.15/0.43 % Maximum resident set size: 4608 pages
% 0.15/0.43 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------