%------------------------------------------------------------------------------ % File : CSE---1.7 % Problem : SWV334-2 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v3.2.0. % Transfm : none % Format : tptp:raw % Command : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %d %s % Computer : n020.cluster.edu % Model : x86_64 x86_64 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz % Memory : 8042.1875MB % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64 % CPULimit : 300s % WCLimit : 300s % DateTime : Mon Jun 24 16:46:47 EDT 2024 % Result : Unsatisfiable 0.55s 0.61s % Output : CNFRefutation 0.55s % Verified : % SZS Type : - % Comments : %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ %----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ %----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT % 0.11/0.12 % Problem : SWV334-2 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v3.2.0. % 0.11/0.12 % Command : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %d %s % 0.12/0.34 % Computer : n020.cluster.edu % 0.12/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64 % 0.12/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz % 0.12/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB % 0.12/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64 % 0.12/0.34 % CPULimit : 300 % 0.12/0.34 % WCLimit : 300 % 0.12/0.34 % DateTime : Thu Jun 20 20:27:54 EDT 2024 % 0.12/0.34 % CPUTime : % 0.21/0.57 start to proof:theBenchmark % 0.55/0.60 %------------------------------------------- % 0.55/0.60 % File :CSE---1.7 % 0.55/0.60 % Problem :theBenchmark % 0.55/0.60 % Transform :cnf % 0.55/0.60 % Format :tptp:raw % 0.55/0.60 % Command :java -jar mcs_scs.jar %d %s % 0.55/0.60 % 0.55/0.60 % Result :Theorem 0.000000s % 0.55/0.60 % Output :CNFRefutation 0.000000s % 0.55/0.60 %------------------------------------------- % 0.55/0.61 %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ % 0.55/0.61 % File : SWV334-2 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v3.2.0. % 0.55/0.61 % Domain : Software Verification (Security) % 0.55/0.61 % Problem : Cryptographic protocol problem for Yahalom % 0.55/0.61 % Version : [Pau06] axioms : Reduced > Especial. % 0.55/0.61 % English : % 0.55/0.61 % 0.55/0.61 % Refs : [Pau06] Paulson (2006), Email to G. Sutcliffe % 0.55/0.61 % Source : [Pau06] % 0.55/0.61 % Names : % 0.55/0.61 % 0.55/0.61 % Status : Unsatisfiable % 0.55/0.61 % Rating : 0.00 v5.4.0, 0.06 v5.3.0, 0.10 v5.2.0, 0.00 v3.2.0 % 0.55/0.61 % Syntax : Number of clauses : 2 ( 2 unt; 0 nHn; 2 RR) % 0.55/0.61 % Number of literals : 2 ( 0 equ; 1 neg) % 0.55/0.61 % Maximal clause size : 1 ( 1 avg) % 0.55/0.61 % Maximal term depth : 5 ( 2 avg) % 0.55/0.61 % Number of predicates : 1 ( 1 usr; 0 prp; 3-3 aty) % 0.55/0.61 % Number of functors : 12 ( 12 usr; 7 con; 0-3 aty) % 0.55/0.61 % Number of variables : 1 ( 1 sgn) % 0.55/0.61 % SPC : CNF_UNS_RFO_NEQ_HRN % 0.55/0.61 % 0.55/0.61 % Comments : The problems in the [Pau06] collection each have very many axioms, % 0.55/0.61 % of which only a small selection are required for the refutation. % 0.55/0.61 % The mission is to find those few axioms, after which a refutation % 0.55/0.61 % can be quite easily found. This version has only the necessary % 0.55/0.61 % axioms. % 0.55/0.61 %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ % 0.55/0.61 cnf(cls_conjecture_11,negated_conjecture, % 0.55/0.61 ~ c_in(c_Event_Oevent_OSays(v_A,v_B,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(V_U,c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(v_K,c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NB)))),c_List_Oset(v_evs4,tc_Event_Oevent),tc_Event_Oevent) ). % 0.55/0.61 % 0.55/0.61 cnf(cls_conjecture_7,negated_conjecture, % 0.55/0.61 c_in(c_Event_Oevent_OSays(v_A,v_B,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_Xa,c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(v_K,c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NB)))),c_List_Oset(v_evs4,tc_Event_Oevent),tc_Event_Oevent) ). % 0.55/0.61 % 0.55/0.61 %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ % 0.55/0.61 %------------------------------------------- % 0.55/0.61 % Proof found % 0.55/0.61 % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark % 0.55/0.61 % SZS output start Proof % 0.55/0.61 %ClaNum:2(EqnAxiom:0) % 0.55/0.61 %VarNum:1(SingletonVarNum:1) % 0.55/0.61 %MaxLitNum:1 % 0.55/0.61 %MaxfuncDepth:4 % 0.55/0.61 %SharedTerms:13 % 0.55/0.61 %goalClause: 1 2 % 0.55/0.61 %singleGoalClaCount:2 % 0.55/0.61 [1]P1(f4(a1,a8,f6(a9,f3(a10,f2(a11)))),f5(a12,a7),a7) % 0.55/0.61 [2]~P1(f4(a1,a8,f6(x21,f3(a10,f2(a11)))),f5(a12,a7),a7) % 0.55/0.61 %EqnAxiom % 0.55/0.61 % 0.55/0.61 %------------------------------------------- % 0.55/0.61 cnf(3,plain, % 0.55/0.61 ($false), % 0.55/0.61 inference(scs_inference,[],[1,2]), % 0.55/0.61 ['proof']). % 0.55/0.61 % SZS output end Proof % 0.55/0.61 % Total time :0.000000s %------------------------------------------------------------------------------