%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.5.1
% Problem : SWV335-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% Computer : n007.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 02:54:26 PM UTC 2026
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.23s 10.85s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.23s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 6
% Number of leaves : 9
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 30 ( 15 unt; 6 nHn; 30 RR)
% Number of literals : 54 ( 0 equ; 25 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 5 ( 2 avg)
% Number of predicates : 2 ( 1 usr; 1 prp; 0-3 aty)
% Number of functors : 14 ( 14 usr; 6 con; 0-3 aty)
% Number of variables : 42 ( 0 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(cls_Message_OFake__parts__insert__in__Un__dest_0,axiom,
( ~ c_in(X2,c_Message_Osynth(c_Message_Oanalz(X3)),tc_Message_Omsg)
| ~ c_in(X1,c_Message_Oparts(c_insert(X2,X3,tc_Message_Omsg)),tc_Message_Omsg)
| c_in(X1,c_union(c_Message_Osynth(c_Message_Oanalz(X3)),c_Message_Oparts(X3),tc_Message_Omsg),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SWV006-3.ax',cls_Message_OFake__parts__insert__in__Un__dest_0) ).
cnf(cls_Set_OUnE_0,axiom,
( ~ c_in(X1,c_union(X2,X3,X4),X4)
| c_in(X1,X2,X4)
| c_in(X1,X3,X4) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/MSC001-2.ax',cls_Set_OUnE_0) ).
cnf(cls_conjecture_3,negated_conjecture,
c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(v_K,c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NB)),c_Message_Oparts(c_insert(v_X,c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evsf),tc_Message_Omsg)),tc_Message_Omsg),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_3) ).
cnf(cls_conjecture_1,negated_conjecture,
c_in(v_X,c_Message_Osynth(c_Message_Oanalz(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evsf))),tc_Message_Omsg),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_1) ).
cnf(cls_conjecture_4,negated_conjecture,
~ c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(v_K,c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NB)),c_Message_Oparts(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evsf)),tc_Message_Omsg),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_4) ).
cnf(cls_Message_Oanalz__into__parts__dest_0,axiom,
( ~ c_in(X1,c_Message_Oanalz(X2),tc_Message_Omsg)
| c_in(X1,c_Message_Oparts(X2),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SWV006-3.ax',cls_Message_Oanalz__into__parts__dest_0) ).
cnf(cls_Message_OCrypt__synth_1,axiom,
( ~ c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(X1,X2),c_Message_Osynth(X3),tc_Message_Omsg)
| c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(X1,X2),X3,tc_Message_Omsg)
| c_in(X2,c_Message_Osynth(X3),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SWV006-0.ax',cls_Message_OCrypt__synth_1) ).
cnf(cls_Message_ONonce__synth_0,axiom,
( ~ c_in(c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(X1),c_Message_Osynth(X2),tc_Message_Omsg)
| c_in(c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(X1),X2,tc_Message_Omsg) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SWV006-0.ax',cls_Message_ONonce__synth_0) ).
cnf(cls_conjecture_2,negated_conjecture,
~ c_in(c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NB),c_Message_Oanalz(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evsf)),tc_Message_Omsg),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_2) ).
cnf(c_0_9,plain,
( ~ c_in(X2,c_Message_Osynth(c_Message_Oanalz(X3)),tc_Message_Omsg)
| ~ c_in(X1,c_Message_Oparts(c_insert(X2,X3,tc_Message_Omsg)),tc_Message_Omsg)
| c_in(X1,c_union(c_Message_Osynth(c_Message_Oanalz(X3)),c_Message_Oparts(X3),tc_Message_Omsg),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[cls_Message_OFake__parts__insert__in__Un__dest_0]) ).
cnf(c_0_10,plain,
( ~ c_in(X1,c_union(X2,X3,X4),X4)
| c_in(X1,X2,X4)
| c_in(X1,X3,X4) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[cls_Set_OUnE_0]) ).
cnf(c_0_11,plain,
( ~ c_in(X2,c_Message_Osynth(c_Message_Oanalz(X3)),tc_Message_Omsg)
| ~ c_in(X1,c_Message_Oparts(c_insert(X2,X3,tc_Message_Omsg)),tc_Message_Omsg)
| c_in(X1,c_union(c_Message_Osynth(c_Message_Oanalz(X3)),c_Message_Oparts(X3),tc_Message_Omsg),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
c_0_9 ).
cnf(c_0_12,negated_conjecture,
c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(v_K,c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NB)),c_Message_Oparts(c_insert(v_X,c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evsf),tc_Message_Omsg)),tc_Message_Omsg),
cls_conjecture_3 ).
cnf(c_0_13,negated_conjecture,
c_in(v_X,c_Message_Osynth(c_Message_Oanalz(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evsf))),tc_Message_Omsg),
cls_conjecture_1 ).
cnf(c_0_14,negated_conjecture,
~ c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(v_K,c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NB)),c_Message_Oparts(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evsf)),tc_Message_Omsg),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[cls_conjecture_4]) ).
cnf(c_0_15,plain,
( ~ c_in(X1,c_Message_Oanalz(X2),tc_Message_Omsg)
| c_in(X1,c_Message_Oparts(X2),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[cls_Message_Oanalz__into__parts__dest_0]) ).
cnf(c_0_16,plain,
( ~ c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(X1,X2),c_Message_Osynth(X3),tc_Message_Omsg)
| c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(X1,X2),X3,tc_Message_Omsg)
| c_in(X2,c_Message_Osynth(X3),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[cls_Message_OCrypt__synth_1]) ).
cnf(c_0_17,plain,
( ~ c_in(X1,c_union(X2,X3,X4),X4)
| c_in(X1,X2,X4)
| c_in(X1,X3,X4) ),
c_0_10 ).
cnf(c_0_18,negated_conjecture,
c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(v_K,c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NB)),c_union(c_Message_Osynth(c_Message_Oanalz(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evsf))),c_Message_Oparts(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evsf)),tc_Message_Omsg),tc_Message_Omsg),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_12]),c_0_13])]) ).
cnf(c_0_19,negated_conjecture,
~ c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(v_K,c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NB)),c_Message_Oparts(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evsf)),tc_Message_Omsg),
c_0_14 ).
cnf(c_0_20,plain,
( ~ c_in(X1,c_Message_Oanalz(X2),tc_Message_Omsg)
| c_in(X1,c_Message_Oparts(X2),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
c_0_15 ).
cnf(c_0_21,plain,
( ~ c_in(c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(X1),c_Message_Osynth(X2),tc_Message_Omsg)
| c_in(c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(X1),X2,tc_Message_Omsg) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[cls_Message_ONonce__synth_0]) ).
cnf(c_0_22,plain,
( ~ c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(X1,X2),c_Message_Osynth(X3),tc_Message_Omsg)
| c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(X1,X2),X3,tc_Message_Omsg)
| c_in(X2,c_Message_Osynth(X3),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
c_0_16 ).
cnf(c_0_23,negated_conjecture,
c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(v_K,c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NB)),c_Message_Osynth(c_Message_Oanalz(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evsf))),tc_Message_Omsg),
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_17,c_0_18]),c_0_19]) ).
cnf(c_0_24,negated_conjecture,
~ c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(v_K,c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NB)),c_Message_Oanalz(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evsf)),tc_Message_Omsg),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_19,c_0_20]) ).
cnf(c_0_25,negated_conjecture,
~ c_in(c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NB),c_Message_Oanalz(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evsf)),tc_Message_Omsg),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[cls_conjecture_2]) ).
cnf(c_0_26,plain,
( ~ c_in(c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(X1),c_Message_Osynth(X2),tc_Message_Omsg)
| c_in(c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(X1),X2,tc_Message_Omsg) ),
c_0_21 ).
cnf(c_0_27,negated_conjecture,
c_in(c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NB),c_Message_Osynth(c_Message_Oanalz(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evsf))),tc_Message_Omsg),
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_22,c_0_23]),c_0_24]) ).
cnf(c_0_28,negated_conjecture,
~ c_in(c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NB),c_Message_Oanalz(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evsf)),tc_Message_Omsg),
c_0_25 ).
cnf(c_0_29,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_26,c_0_27]),c_0_28]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.05 % Problem : SWV335-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.00/0.08 % Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.19/10.47 % Computer : n007.cluster.edu
% 0.19/10.47 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.19/10.47 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.19/10.47 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.19/10.47 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.19/10.47 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.19/10.47 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.19/10.47 % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 08:39:46 UTC 2026
% 0.19/10.47 % CPUTime :
% 0.19/10.47 Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.23/10.51 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.23/10.51 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.23/10.85 % Version: 3.5.1
% 0.23/10.85 % Preprocessing class: FMLMSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.23/10.85 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.23/10.85 % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.23/10.85 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.23/10.85 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.23/10.85 % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.23/10.85 % G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with pid 683689 completed with status 0
% 0.23/10.85 % Result found by G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN
% 0.23/10.85 % Preprocessing class: FMLMSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.23/10.85 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.23/10.85 % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.23/10.85 % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 0.23/10.85 % No SInE strategy applied
% 0.23/10.85 % Search class: FGHSM-SSLM32-DFFFFFNN
% 0.23/10.85 % Scheduled 13 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.23/10.85 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 0.23/10.85 % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 151s (1) cores
% 0.23/10.85 % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S2mI with 113s (1) cores
% 0.23/10.85 % Starting G-E--_208_B07_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S4d with 113s (1) cores
% 0.23/10.85 % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AI with 113s (1) cores
% 0.23/10.85 % G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AI with pid 683700 completed with status 0
% 0.23/10.85 % Result found by G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AI
% 0.23/10.85 % Preprocessing class: FMLMSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.23/10.85 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.23/10.85 % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.23/10.85 % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 0.23/10.85 % No SInE strategy applied
% 0.23/10.85 % Search class: FGHSM-SSLM32-DFFFFFNN
% 0.23/10.85 % Scheduled 13 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.23/10.85 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 0.23/10.85 % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 151s (1) cores
% 0.23/10.85 % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S2mI with 113s (1) cores
% 0.23/10.85 % Starting G-E--_208_B07_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S4d with 113s (1) cores
% 0.23/10.85 % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AI with 113s (1) cores
% 0.23/10.85 % Preprocessing time : 0.013 s
% 0.23/10.85 % Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.23/10.85
% 0.23/10.85 % Proof found!
% 0.23/10.85 % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.23/10.85 % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.23/10.85 % Parsed axioms : 1485
% 0.23/10.85 % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 0.23/10.85 % Initial clauses : 1485
% 0.23/10.85 % Removed in clause preprocessing : 3
% 0.23/10.85 % Initial clauses in saturation : 1482
% 0.23/10.85 % Processed clauses : 3314
% 0.23/10.85 % ...of these trivial : 8
% 0.23/10.85 % ...subsumed : 488
% 0.23/10.85 % ...remaining for further processing : 2818
% 0.23/10.85 % Other redundant clauses eliminated : 4
% 0.23/10.85 % Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.23/10.85 % Backward-subsumed : 1
% 0.23/10.85 % Backward-rewritten : 6
% 0.23/10.85 % Generated clauses : 3882
% 0.23/10.85 % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 3040
% 0.23/10.85 % ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.23/10.85 % Contextual simplify-reflections : 2
% 0.23/10.85 % Paramodulations : 3834
% 0.23/10.85 % Factorizations : 0
% 0.23/10.85 % NegExts : 0
% 0.23/10.85 % Equation resolutions : 48
% 0.23/10.85 % Disequality decompositions : 0
% 0.23/10.85 % Total rewrite steps : 812
% 0.23/10.85 % ...of those cached : 713
% 0.23/10.85 % Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.23/10.85 % Propositional check models : 0
% 0.23/10.85 % Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.23/10.85 % Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.23/10.85 % Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.23/10.85 % Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.23/10.85 % Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.23/10.85 % Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.23/10.85 % Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.23/10.85 % Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.23/10.85 % Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.23/10.85 % Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.23/10.85 % Current number of processed clauses : 1385
% 0.23/10.85 % Positive orientable unit clauses : 194
% 0.23/10.85 % Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.23/10.85 % Negative unit clauses : 77
% 0.23/10.85 % Non-unit-clauses : 1114
% 0.23/10.85 % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 2634
% 0.23/10.85 % ...number of literals in the above : 5383
% 0.23/10.85 % Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.23/10.85 % Current number of archived clauses : 1434
% 0.23/10.85 % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 1071632
% 0.23/10.85 % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 1026023
% 0.23/10.85 % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 433
% 0.23/10.85 % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 15377
% 0.23/10.85 % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.23/10.85 % BW rewrite match attempts : 45
% 0.23/10.85 % BW rewrite match successes : 6
% 0.23/10.85 % Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.23/10.85 % Condensation successes : 0
% 0.23/10.85 % Termbank termtop insertions : 68372
% 0.23/10.85 % Search garbage collected termcells : 1853
% 0.23/10.85
% 0.23/10.85 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.23/10.85 % User time : 0.272 s
% 0.23/10.85 % System time : 0.013 s
% 0.23/10.85 % Total time : 0.284 s
% 0.23/10.85 % Maximum resident set size: 5932 pages
% 0.23/10.85
% 0.23/10.85 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.23/10.85 % User time : 1.305 s
% 0.23/10.85 % System time : 0.062 s
% 0.23/10.85 % Total time : 1.367 s
% 0.23/10.85 % Maximum resident set size: 5376 pages
% 0.23/10.85 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------