↑ Up

CSE---1.7.UNS-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : CSE---1.7
% Problem  : SWV336-2 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %d %s

% Computer : n028.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Mon Jun 24 16:46:48 EDT 2024

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.54s 0.61s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.54s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.13  % Problem    : SWV336-2 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.07/0.13  % Command    : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %d %s
% 0.13/0.34  % Computer : n028.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.13/0.34  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.13/0.34  % DateTime   : Thu Jun 20 16:00:09 EDT 2024
% 0.13/0.34  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.20/0.57  start to proof:theBenchmark
% 0.54/0.60  %-------------------------------------------
% 0.54/0.60  % File        :CSE---1.7
% 0.54/0.60  % Problem     :theBenchmark
% 0.54/0.60  % Transform   :cnf
% 0.54/0.60  % Format      :tptp:raw
% 0.54/0.60  % Command     :java -jar mcs_scs.jar %d %s
% 0.54/0.60  
% 0.54/0.60  % Result      :Theorem 0.000000s
% 0.54/0.60  % Output      :CNFRefutation 0.000000s
% 0.54/0.60  %-------------------------------------------
% 0.54/0.60  %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.54/0.60  % File     : SWV336-2 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.54/0.60  % Domain   : Software Verification (Security)
% 0.54/0.60  % Problem  : Cryptographic protocol problem for Yahalom
% 0.54/0.60  % Version  : [Pau06] axioms : Reduced > Especial.
% 0.54/0.60  % English  :
% 0.54/0.60  
% 0.54/0.60  % Refs     : [Pau06] Paulson (2006), Email to G. Sutcliffe
% 0.54/0.60  % Source   : [Pau06]
% 0.54/0.60  % Names    :
% 0.54/0.60  
% 0.54/0.61  % Status   : Unsatisfiable
% 0.54/0.61  % Rating   : 0.00 v5.4.0, 0.06 v5.3.0, 0.10 v5.2.0, 0.00 v3.2.0
% 0.54/0.61  % Syntax   : Number of clauses     :    2 (   2 unt;   0 nHn;   2 RR)
% 0.54/0.61  %            Number of literals    :    2 (   0 equ;   1 neg)
% 0.54/0.61  %            Maximal clause size   :    1 (   1 avg)
% 0.54/0.61  %            Maximal term depth    :    8 (   2 avg)
% 0.54/0.61  %            Number of predicates  :    1 (   1 usr;   0 prp; 3-3 aty)
% 0.54/0.61  %            Number of functors    :   16 (  16 usr;   8 con; 0-3 aty)
% 0.54/0.61  %            Number of variables   :    3 (   1 sgn)
% 0.54/0.61  % SPC      : CNF_UNS_RFO_NEQ_HRN
% 0.54/0.61  
% 0.54/0.61  % Comments : The problems in the [Pau06] collection each have very many axioms,
% 0.54/0.61  %            of which only a small selection are required for the refutation.
% 0.54/0.61  %            The mission is to find those few axioms, after which a refutation
% 0.54/0.61  %            can be quite easily found. This version has only the necessary
% 0.54/0.61  %            axioms.
% 0.54/0.61  %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.54/0.61  cnf(cls_conjecture_6,negated_conjecture,
% 0.54/0.61      c_in(c_Event_Oevent_OSays(c_Message_Oagent_OServer,v_Aa,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(c_Public_OshrK(v_Aa),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(v_Ba),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OKey(v_K),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NAa),c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NB))))),c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(c_Public_OshrK(v_Ba),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(v_Aa),c_Message_Omsg_OKey(v_K))))),c_List_Oset(v_evs3,tc_Event_Oevent),tc_Event_Oevent) ).
% 0.54/0.61  
% 0.54/0.61  cnf(cls_conjecture_7,negated_conjecture,
% 0.54/0.61      ~ c_in(c_Event_Oevent_OSays(c_Message_Oagent_OServer,V_U,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(c_Public_OshrK(V_U),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(V_V),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OKey(v_K),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(V_W),c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NB))))),c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(c_Public_OshrK(V_V),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(V_U),c_Message_Omsg_OKey(v_K))))),c_List_Oset(v_evs3,tc_Event_Oevent),tc_Event_Oevent) ).
% 0.54/0.61  
% 0.54/0.61  %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.54/0.61  %-------------------------------------------
% 0.54/0.61  % Proof found
% 0.54/0.61  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.54/0.61  % SZS output start Proof
% 0.54/0.61  %ClaNum:2(EqnAxiom:0)
% 0.54/0.61  %VarNum:6(SingletonVarNum:3)
% 0.54/0.61  %MaxLitNum:1
% 0.54/0.61  %MaxfuncDepth:5
% 0.54/0.61  %SharedTerms:25
% 0.54/0.61  %goalClause: 1 2
% 0.54/0.61  %singleGoalClaCount:2
% 0.54/0.61  [1]P1(f2(a1,a4,f10(f8(f5(a4),f10(f6(a12),f10(f7(a13),f10(f9(a14),f9(a15))))),f8(f5(a12),f10(f6(a4),f7(a13))))),f3(a16,a11),a11)
% 0.54/0.61  [2]~P1(f2(a1,x21,f10(f8(f5(x21),f10(f6(x22),f10(f7(a13),f10(f9(x23),f9(a15))))),f8(f5(x22),f10(f6(x21),f7(a13))))),f3(a16,a11),a11)
% 0.54/0.61  %EqnAxiom
% 0.54/0.61  
% 0.54/0.61  %-------------------------------------------
% 0.54/0.61  cnf(3,plain,
% 0.54/0.61     ($false),
% 0.54/0.61     inference(scs_inference,[],[1,2]),
% 0.54/0.61     ['proof']).
% 0.54/0.61  % SZS output end Proof
% 0.54/0.61  % Total time :0.000000s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------