%------------------------------------------------------------------------------ % File : CARINE---0.734 % Problem : SWV337-2 : TPTP v5.0.0. Released v3.2.0. % Transfm : add_equality % Format : carine % Command : carine %s t=%d xo=off uct=32000 % Computer : art09.cs.miami.edu % Model : i686 i686 % CPU : Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 2.80GHz @ 2793MHz % Memory : 2018MB % OS : Linux 2.6.26.8-57.fc8 % CPULimit : 300s % DateTime : Sun Nov 28 07:02:53 EST 2010 % Result : Timeout 300.04s % Output : None % Verified : % SZS Type : None (Parsing solution fails) % Syntax : Number of formulae : 0 % Comments : %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ %----NO SOLUTION OUTPUT BY SYSTEM %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ %----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT % Command entered: % /home/graph/tptp/Systems/CARINE---0.734/carine /tmp/SystemOnTPTP17997/SWV/SWV337-2+noeq.car t=300 xo=off uct=32000 % CARINE version 0.734 (Dec 2003) % Initializing tables ... done. % Parsing .......... done. % Calculating time slices ... done. % Building Lookup Tables ... done. % Looking for a proof at depth = 1 ... % t = 0 secs [nr = 196] [nf = 0] [nu = 184] [ut = 160] % Looking for a proof at depth = 2 ... % t = 0 secs [nr = 14081] [nf = 0] [nu = 9407] [ut = 2438] % Looking for a proof at depth = 3 ... % t = 1 secs [nr = 304043] [nf = 1] [nu = 223472] [ut = 11608] % Looking for a proof at depth = 4 ... % t = 8 secs [nr = 2114725] [nf = 8192] [nu = 1542692] [ut = 12296] % Looking for a proof at depth = 5 ... % t = 41 secs [nr = 10163284] [nf = 53216] [nu = 7038954] [ut = 12296] % Looking for a proof at depth = 6 ... % Entering time slice 2 % Updating parameters ... done. % Looking for a proof at depth = 1 ... % t = 122 secs [nr = 30063312] [nf = 102300] [nu = 21373238] [ut = 12296] % Looking for a proof at depth = 2 ... % t = 122 secs [nr = 30153490] [nf = 102300] [nu = 21446969] [ut = 12296] % Looking for a proof at depth = 3 ... % t = 124 secs [nr = 30555169] [nf = 102303] [nu = 21766446] [ut = 12296] % Looking for a proof at depth = 4 ... % t = 131 secs [nr = 32456784] [nf = 110505] [nu = 23101636] [ut = 12296] % Looking for a proof at depth = 5 ... % t = 167 secs [nr = 41152799] [nf = 167903] [nu = 28597910] [ut = 12296] % Looking for a proof at depth = 6 ... % TIME IS UP! % --------------------------------------------- % | Statistics | % --------------------------------------------- % Profile 3: Performance Statistics: % ================================== % Total number of generated clauses: 73669908 % resolvents: 73374859 factors: 295049 % Number of unit clauses generated: 49428689 % % unit clauses generated to total clauses generated: 67.09 % Number of unit clauses constructed and retained at depth [x]: % ============================================================= % [0] = 4 [1] = 156 [2] = 2278 [3] = 9170 % [4] = 688 % Total = 12296 % Number of generated clauses having [x] literals: % ------------------------------------------------ % [1] = 49428689 [2] = 22460491 [3] = 1758965 [4] = 21741 [5] = 22 % Average size of a generated clause: 2.0 % Number of unit clauses per predicate list: % ========================================== % [0] c_in_3 (+)8 (-)12288 % ------------------ % Total: (+)8 (-)12288 % Total number of unit clauses retained: 12296 % Number of clauses skipped because of their length: 36758601 % N base clauses skippped in resolve-with-all-base-clauses % because of the shortest resolvents table: 0 % Number of successful unifications: 73669908 % Number of unification failures: 89685518 % Number of unit to unit unification failures: 98304 % N literal unification failure due to lookup root_id table: 645823437 % N base clause resolution failure due to lookup table: 1044501 % N UC-BCL resolution dropped due to lookup table: 0 % Max entries in substitution set: 17 % N unit clauses dropped because they exceeded max values: 37491531 % N unit clauses dropped because too much nesting: 36417999 % N unit clauses not constrcuted because table was full: 0 % N unit clauses dropped because UCFA table was full: 0 % Max number of terms in a unit clause: 31 % Max term depth in a unit clause: 14 % Number of states in UCFA table: 147560 % Total number of terms of all unit clauses in table: 352400 % Max allowed number of states in UCFA: 528000 % Ratio n states used/total allowed states: 0.28 % Ratio n states used/total unit clauses terms: 0.42 % Number of symbols (columns) in UCFA: 62 % Profile 2: Number of calls to: % ============================== % PTUnify() = 163355426 % ConstructUnitClause() = 37503823 % Profile 1: Time spent in: % ========================= % ConstructUnitClause() : 74.61 secs % -------------------------------------------------------- % | | % Inferences per sec: 245566 % | | % -------------------------------------------------------- % Elapsed time: 303 secs % CPU time: 300.00 secs % %------------------------------------------------------------------------------