%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SPASS-SCL---0.1
% Problem : SWV337-2 : TPTP v9.2.1. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp
% Command : /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/execute.py 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% Computer : n026.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu May 7 07:37:07 PM UTC 2026
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.41s 0.59s
% Output : Assurance 0s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----No solution output by system
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.12 % Problem : SWV337-2 : TPTP v9.2.1. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.13/0.13 % Command : /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/execute.py 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.17/0.34 % Computer : n026.cluster.edu
% 0.17/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.17/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.17/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.17/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.17/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.17/0.34 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.17/0.34 % DateTime : Thu May 7 13:28:24 EDT 2026
% 0.17/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.17/0.34 SPASS-SCL-FOL version:
% 0.19/0.43 SPASS-SCL-FOL 0.1 (595c0c7b1) [parallel mode]
% 0.41/0.59 Starting: ./SPASS-SCL-FOL --heuristics_normal -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.41/0.59 Starting: ./SPASS-SCL-FOL --heuristics_resolution_1 -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.41/0.59 Starting: ./SPASS-SCL-FOL --heuristics_resolution_2 -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.41/0.59 Starting: ./SPASS-SCL-FOL --heuristics_resolution_3 -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.41/0.59 Starting: ./SPASS-SCL-FOL --heuristics_lmodel_grow -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.41/0.59 Execution resolution_1 ended with status: unsatisfiable
% 0.41/0.59 Used heuristic: resolution_1
% 0.41/0.59
% 0.41/0.59 Input Clauses:
% 0.41/0.59
% 0.41/0.59 Predicates: c_in
% 0.41/0.59 Fol Constants: v_evs4 c_Yahalom_Oyahalom tc_Event_Oevent v_A v_B v_K v_NA v_NB v_X c_Message_Oagent_OSpy tc_Message_Omsg c_Message_Oagent_OServer c_Event_Obad tc_Message_Oagent
% 0.41/0.59 Fol Functions: tc_List_Olist c_Public_OshrK c_Message_Omsg_OAgent c_Message_Omsg_OKey c_Message_Omsg_ONonce c_Message_Omsg_OMPair c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt c_Event_Oevent_OGets c_List_Oset c_Event_Oknows c_Message_Oanalz c_Event_Oevent_OSays c_Message_Oparts
% 0.41/0.59 Problem Properties:
% 0.41/0.59 This is a full first-order problem without equality.
% 0.41/0.59
% 0.41/0.59 After reduction: Problem Properties:
% 0.41/0.59 This is a full first-order problem without equality.
% 0.41/0.59
% 0.41/0.59
% 0.41/0.59 Reduced Input Clauses:
% 0.41/0.59
% 0.41/0.59 Most General Atoms: c_in(x0,c_Message_Oanalz(x1),tc_Message_Omsg) c_in(x0,c_Message_Oparts(x1),tc_Message_Omsg) c_in(x0,c_Yahalom_Oyahalom,tc_List_Olist(tc_Event_Oevent)) c_in(x1,c_Event_Obad,tc_Message_Oagent) c_in(c_Event_Oevent_OSays(c_Message_Oagent_OServer,x1,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(c_Public_OshrK(x1),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(x2),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OKey(x3),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(x4,x5)))),c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(c_Public_OshrK(x2),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(x1),c_Message_Omsg_OKey(x3))))),c_List_Oset(x0,tc_Event_Oevent),tc_Event_Oevent) c_in(c_Event_Oevent_OGets(x1,x2),c_List_Oset(x0,tc_Event_Oevent),tc_Event_Oevent)
% 0.41/0.59
% 0.41/0.59 === Starting SPASS-SCL-FOL A Little Less Naive, considering 6 atoms initially, heuristics mode: resolution_1 ===
% 0.41/0.59
% 0.41/0.59 === Backtracking. Learning clause 12:1:0:[1.0,11.0,10.2,2.1]:: -> c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(c_Public_OshrK(v_A),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(v_B),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OKey(v_K),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NA),c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NB))))),v_X),c_Message_Oanalz(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evs4)),tc_Message_Omsg)
% 0.41/0.59 === Backtracking. Learning clause 14:2:3:[1.0,13.0,9.4,4.1]:TopTopTop: c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(c_Public_OshrK(x0),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(x1),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OKey(v_K),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(x2),c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NB))))),c_Message_Oparts(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evs4)),tc_Message_Omsg) -> c_in(x0,c_Event_Obad,tc_Message_Oagent)
% 0.41/0.59 === Clause set with instances from active satisfied. Growing active. New size: 9
% 0.41/0.59 === Restarting.
% 0.41/0.59 === Backtracking. Learning clause 15:2:3:[7.2,14.1]:TopTopTop: c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(c_Public_OshrK(x0),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(x1),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OKey(v_K),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(x2),c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NB))))),c_Message_Oanalz(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evs4)),tc_Message_Omsg) -> c_in(x0,c_Event_Obad,tc_Message_Oagent)
% 0.41/0.59 === Backtracking. Learning clause 16:1:0:[5.1,12.1]:: -> c_in(v_X,c_Message_Oanalz(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evs4)),tc_Message_Omsg)
% 0.41/0.59 === Backtracking. Learning clause 17:1:0:[6.1,12.1]:: -> c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(c_Public_OshrK(v_A),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(v_B),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OKey(v_K),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NA),c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NB))))),c_Message_Oanalz(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evs4)),tc_Message_Omsg)
% 0.41/0.59 === Clause set with instances from active satisfied. Growing active. New size: 11
% 0.41/0.59 === Restarting.
% 0.41/0.59 === Conflict found: 15:2:3:[7.2,14.1]:TopTopTop: c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(c_Public_OshrK(x0),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(x1),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OKey(v_K),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(x2),c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NB))))),c_Message_Oanalz(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evs4)),tc_Message_Omsg) -> c_in(x0,c_Event_Obad,tc_Message_Oagent) {x0 -> v_A, x1 -> v_B, x2 -> v_NA}
% 0.41/0.59 === Backtracking. Learning clause 18:1:0:[15.1,17.1]:: -> c_in(v_A,c_Event_Obad,tc_Message_Oagent)
% 0.41/0.59 === Clause set with instances from active satisfied. Growing active. New size: 75
% 0.41/0.59 === Clause set with instances from active satisfied. Growing active. New size: 139
% 0.41/0.59 === Backtracking. Learning clause 19:1:3:[5.1,5.2,3.1,5.2]:TopTopTop: c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(x0,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(x1,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(x2,c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NB)))),c_Message_Oanalz(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evs4)),tc_Message_Omsg) ->
% 0.41/0.59
% 0.41/0.59 SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.41/0.59
% 0.41/0.59 Problem: /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.41/0.59
% 0.41/0.59 SPASS-SCL-FOL Statistics:
% 0.41/0.59 Number of learned clauses: 7
% 0.41/0.59 Number of propagations: 99
% 0.41/0.59 Number of decisions: 40
% 0.41/0.59 Number of resolutions: 12
% 0.41/0.59 Number of condensations: 0
% 0.41/0.59 Number of sub resolutions: 2
% 0.41/0.59 Number of input literals (deduplicated): 14
% 0.41/0.59 Number of grows: 4
% 0.41/0.59 Number of considered ground atoms: 139
% 0.41/0.59
% 0.41/0.59 Needed: 0:00:00.01
% 0.41/0.59
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------