↑ Up

E---3.5.1.UNS-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E---3.5.1
% Problem  : SWV338-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM

% Computer : n019.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 02:54:27 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 25.53s 4.00s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 25.53s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    5
%            Number of leaves      :   11
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   33 (  19 unt;   5 nHn;  27 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   56 (  10 equ;  23 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    4 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    5 (   2 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    3 (   1 usr;   1 prp; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of functors    :   17 (  17 usr;   7 con; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   38 (   2 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(cls_Event_OkeysFor__parts__insert__dest_0,axiom,
    ( ~ c_in(X2,c_Message_Osynth(c_Message_Oanalz(X4)),tc_Message_Omsg)
    | ~ c_in(X1,c_Message_OkeysFor(c_Message_Oparts(c_insert(X2,X3,tc_Message_Omsg))),tc_nat)
    | c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OKey(c_Message_OinvKey(X1)),c_Message_Oparts(X4),tc_Message_Omsg)
    | c_in(X1,c_Message_OkeysFor(c_Message_Oparts(c_union(X3,X4,tc_Message_Omsg))),tc_nat) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_Event_OkeysFor__parts__insert__dest_0) ).

cnf(cls_Public_OinvKey__K_0,axiom,
    ( ~ c_in(X1,c_Message_OsymKeys,tc_nat)
    | c_Message_OinvKey(X1) = X1 ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SWV005-3.ax',cls_Public_OinvKey__K_0) ).

cnf(cls_Message_Oparts__Un_0,axiom,
    c_Message_Oparts(c_union(X1,X2,tc_Message_Omsg)) = c_union(c_Message_Oparts(X1),c_Message_Oparts(X2),tc_Message_Omsg),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SWV005-0.ax',cls_Message_Oparts__Un_0) ).

cnf(cls_Message_OkeysFor__Un_0,axiom,
    c_Message_OkeysFor(c_union(X1,X2,tc_Message_Omsg)) = c_union(c_Message_OkeysFor(X1),c_Message_OkeysFor(X2),tc_nat),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SWV005-0.ax',cls_Message_OkeysFor__Un_0) ).

cnf(cls_conjecture_0,negated_conjecture,
    c_in(v_K,c_Message_OsymKeys,tc_nat),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_0) ).

cnf(cls_conjecture_6,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ c_in(v_K,c_Message_OkeysFor(c_Message_Oparts(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evsf))),tc_nat)
    | c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OKey(v_K),c_Event_Oused(v_evsf),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_6) ).

cnf(cls_conjecture_4,negated_conjecture,
    ~ c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OKey(v_K),c_Event_Oused(v_evsf),tc_Message_Omsg),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_4) ).

cnf(cls_Event_Oc_A_58_Aparts_A_Iknows_ASpy_Aevs1_J_A_61_61_62_Ac_A_58_Aused_Aevs1_0,axiom,
    ( ~ c_in(X1,c_Message_Oparts(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,X2)),tc_Message_Omsg)
    | c_in(X1,c_Event_Oused(X2),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SWV005-2.ax',cls_Event_Oc_A_58_Aparts_A_Iknows_ASpy_Aevs1_J_A_61_61_62_Ac_A_58_Aused_Aevs1_0) ).

cnf(cls_conjecture_5,negated_conjecture,
    c_in(v_K,c_Message_OkeysFor(c_Message_Oparts(c_insert(v_X,c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evsf),tc_Message_Omsg))),tc_nat),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_5) ).

cnf(cls_conjecture_2,negated_conjecture,
    c_in(v_X,c_Message_Osynth(c_Message_Oanalz(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evsf))),tc_Message_Omsg),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_2) ).

cnf(cls_Set_OUn__absorb_0,axiom,
    c_union(X1,X1,X2) = X1,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/MSC001-1.ax',cls_Set_OUn__absorb_0) ).

cnf(c_0_11,plain,
    ( ~ c_in(X2,c_Message_Osynth(c_Message_Oanalz(X4)),tc_Message_Omsg)
    | ~ c_in(X1,c_Message_OkeysFor(c_Message_Oparts(c_insert(X2,X3,tc_Message_Omsg))),tc_nat)
    | c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OKey(c_Message_OinvKey(X1)),c_Message_Oparts(X4),tc_Message_Omsg)
    | c_in(X1,c_Message_OkeysFor(c_Message_Oparts(c_union(X3,X4,tc_Message_Omsg))),tc_nat) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[cls_Event_OkeysFor__parts__insert__dest_0]) ).

cnf(c_0_12,plain,
    ( ~ c_in(X1,c_Message_OsymKeys,tc_nat)
    | c_Message_OinvKey(X1) = X1 ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[cls_Public_OinvKey__K_0]) ).

cnf(c_0_13,plain,
    ( ~ c_in(X2,c_Message_Osynth(c_Message_Oanalz(X4)),tc_Message_Omsg)
    | ~ c_in(X1,c_Message_OkeysFor(c_Message_Oparts(c_insert(X2,X3,tc_Message_Omsg))),tc_nat)
    | c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OKey(c_Message_OinvKey(X1)),c_Message_Oparts(X4),tc_Message_Omsg)
    | c_in(X1,c_Message_OkeysFor(c_Message_Oparts(c_union(X3,X4,tc_Message_Omsg))),tc_nat) ),
    c_0_11 ).

cnf(c_0_14,axiom,
    c_Message_Oparts(c_union(X1,X2,tc_Message_Omsg)) = c_union(c_Message_Oparts(X1),c_Message_Oparts(X2),tc_Message_Omsg),
    cls_Message_Oparts__Un_0 ).

cnf(c_0_15,axiom,
    c_Message_OkeysFor(c_union(X1,X2,tc_Message_Omsg)) = c_union(c_Message_OkeysFor(X1),c_Message_OkeysFor(X2),tc_nat),
    cls_Message_OkeysFor__Un_0 ).

cnf(c_0_16,plain,
    ( ~ c_in(X1,c_Message_OsymKeys,tc_nat)
    | c_Message_OinvKey(X1) = X1 ),
    c_0_12 ).

cnf(c_0_17,negated_conjecture,
    c_in(v_K,c_Message_OsymKeys,tc_nat),
    cls_conjecture_0 ).

cnf(c_0_18,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ c_in(v_K,c_Message_OkeysFor(c_Message_Oparts(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evsf))),tc_nat)
    | c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OKey(v_K),c_Event_Oused(v_evsf),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[cls_conjecture_6]) ).

cnf(c_0_19,negated_conjecture,
    ~ c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OKey(v_K),c_Event_Oused(v_evsf),tc_Message_Omsg),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[cls_conjecture_4]) ).

cnf(c_0_20,plain,
    ( ~ c_in(X1,c_Message_Oparts(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,X2)),tc_Message_Omsg)
    | c_in(X1,c_Event_Oused(X2),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[cls_Event_Oc_A_58_Aparts_A_Iknows_ASpy_Aevs1_J_A_61_61_62_Ac_A_58_Aused_Aevs1_0]) ).

cnf(c_0_21,plain,
    ( ~ c_in(X4,c_Message_Osynth(c_Message_Oanalz(X3)),tc_Message_Omsg)
    | ~ c_in(X1,c_Message_OkeysFor(c_Message_Oparts(c_insert(X4,X2,tc_Message_Omsg))),tc_nat)
    | c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OKey(c_Message_OinvKey(X1)),c_Message_Oparts(X3),tc_Message_Omsg)
    | c_in(X1,c_union(c_Message_OkeysFor(c_Message_Oparts(X2)),c_Message_OkeysFor(c_Message_Oparts(X3)),tc_nat),tc_nat) ),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_14]),c_0_15]) ).

cnf(c_0_22,negated_conjecture,
    c_in(v_K,c_Message_OkeysFor(c_Message_Oparts(c_insert(v_X,c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evsf),tc_Message_Omsg))),tc_nat),
    cls_conjecture_5 ).

cnf(c_0_23,negated_conjecture,
    c_Message_OinvKey(v_K) = v_K,
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_16,c_0_17]) ).

cnf(c_0_24,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ c_in(v_K,c_Message_OkeysFor(c_Message_Oparts(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evsf))),tc_nat)
    | c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OKey(v_K),c_Event_Oused(v_evsf),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
    c_0_18 ).

cnf(c_0_25,negated_conjecture,
    ~ c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OKey(v_K),c_Event_Oused(v_evsf),tc_Message_Omsg),
    c_0_19 ).

cnf(c_0_26,plain,
    ( ~ c_in(X1,c_Message_Oparts(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,X2)),tc_Message_Omsg)
    | c_in(X1,c_Event_Oused(X2),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
    c_0_20 ).

cnf(c_0_27,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ c_in(v_X,c_Message_Osynth(c_Message_Oanalz(X1)),tc_Message_Omsg)
    | c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OKey(v_K),c_Message_Oparts(X1),tc_Message_Omsg)
    | c_in(v_K,c_union(c_Message_OkeysFor(c_Message_Oparts(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evsf))),c_Message_OkeysFor(c_Message_Oparts(X1)),tc_nat),tc_nat) ),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_21,c_0_22]),c_0_23]) ).

cnf(c_0_28,negated_conjecture,
    c_in(v_X,c_Message_Osynth(c_Message_Oanalz(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evsf))),tc_Message_Omsg),
    cls_conjecture_2 ).

cnf(c_0_29,axiom,
    c_union(X1,X1,X2) = X1,
    cls_Set_OUn__absorb_0 ).

cnf(c_0_30,negated_conjecture,
    ~ c_in(v_K,c_Message_OkeysFor(c_Message_Oparts(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evsf))),tc_nat),
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_24,c_0_25]) ).

cnf(c_0_31,negated_conjecture,
    ~ c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OKey(v_K),c_Message_Oparts(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evsf)),tc_Message_Omsg),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_25,c_0_26]) ).

cnf(c_0_32,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_27,c_0_28]),c_0_29]),c_0_30]),c_0_31]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : SWV338-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.00/0.05  % Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.11/0.37  % Computer : n019.cluster.edu
% 0.11/0.37  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.11/0.37  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.11/0.37  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.11/0.37  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.11/0.37  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.11/0.37  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.11/0.37  % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 08:42:05 UTC 2026
% 0.11/0.38  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.11/0.38  Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.15/0.45  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.15/0.45  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 25.53/4.00  % Version: 3.5.1
% 25.53/4.00  % Preprocessing class: FMLMSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 25.53/4.00  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 25.53/4.00  % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 25.53/4.00  % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 25.53/4.00  % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 25.53/4.00  % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 25.53/4.00  % G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with pid 2176650 completed with status 0
% 25.53/4.00  % Result found by G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN
% 25.53/4.00  % Preprocessing class: FMLMSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 25.53/4.00  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 25.53/4.00  % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 25.53/4.00  % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 25.53/4.00  % No SInE strategy applied
% 25.53/4.00  % Search class: FGHSM-SMLM32-DFFFFFNN
% 25.53/4.00  % Scheduled 13 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 25.53/4.00  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 25.53/4.00  % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 151s (1) cores
% 25.53/4.00  % Starting G-E--_008_C45_F1_PI_SE_Q4_CS_SP_S4SI with 113s (1) cores
% 25.53/4.00  % Starting G-E--_207_C01_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_S5PRR_S0Y with 113s (1) cores
% 25.53/4.00  % Starting G-E--_208_B07CMA_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 113s (1) cores
% 25.53/4.00  % G-E--_208_B07CMA_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with pid 2176661 completed with status 0
% 25.53/4.00  % Result found by G-E--_208_B07CMA_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN
% 25.53/4.00  % Preprocessing class: FMLMSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 25.53/4.00  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 25.53/4.00  % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 25.53/4.00  % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 25.53/4.00  % No SInE strategy applied
% 25.53/4.00  % Search class: FGHSM-SMLM32-DFFFFFNN
% 25.53/4.00  % Scheduled 13 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 25.53/4.00  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 25.53/4.00  % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 151s (1) cores
% 25.53/4.00  % Starting G-E--_008_C45_F1_PI_SE_Q4_CS_SP_S4SI with 113s (1) cores
% 25.53/4.00  % Starting G-E--_207_C01_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_S5PRR_S0Y with 113s (1) cores
% 25.53/4.00  % Starting G-E--_208_B07CMA_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 113s (1) cores
% 25.53/4.00  % Preprocessing time       : 0.052 s
% 25.53/4.00  % Presaturation interreduction done
% 25.53/4.00  
% 25.53/4.00  % Proof found!
% 25.53/4.00  % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 25.53/4.00  % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 25.53/4.00  % Parsed axioms                        : 2948
% 25.53/4.00  % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 0
% 25.53/4.00  % Initial clauses                      : 2948
% 25.53/4.00  % Removed in clause preprocessing      : 12
% 25.53/4.00  % Initial clauses in saturation        : 2936
% 25.53/4.00  % Processed clauses                    : 13411
% 25.53/4.00  % ...of these trivial                  : 80
% 25.53/4.00  % ...subsumed                          : 6588
% 25.53/4.00  % ...remaining for further processing  : 6743
% 25.53/4.00  % Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 218
% 25.53/4.00  % Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 25.53/4.00  % Backward-subsumed                    : 77
% 25.53/4.00  % Backward-rewritten                   : 308
% 25.53/4.00  % Generated clauses                    : 33503
% 25.53/4.00  % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 29862
% 25.53/4.00  % ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 25.53/4.00  % Contextual simplify-reflections      : 25
% 25.53/4.00  % Paramodulations                      : 33217
% 25.53/4.00  % Factorizations                       : 6
% 25.53/4.00  % NegExts                              : 0
% 25.53/4.00  % Equation resolutions                 : 280
% 25.53/4.00  % Disequality decompositions           : 0
% 25.53/4.00  % Total rewrite steps                  : 11501
% 25.53/4.00  % ...of those cached                   : 9613
% 25.53/4.00  % Propositional unsat checks           : 1
% 25.53/4.00  %    Propositional check models        : 1
% 25.53/4.00  %    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 25.53/4.00  %    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 25.53/4.00  %    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 25.53/4.00  %    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 25.53/4.00  %    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 25.53/4.00  %    Propositional encoding time       : 0.014
% 25.53/4.00  %    Propositional solver time         : 0.016
% 25.53/4.00  %    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 25.53/4.00  %    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 25.53/4.00  %    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 25.53/4.00  % Current number of processed clauses  : 3587
% 25.53/4.00  %    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 697
% 25.53/4.00  %    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 31
% 25.53/4.00  %    Negative unit clauses             : 418
% 25.53/4.00  %    Non-unit-clauses                  : 2441
% 25.53/4.00  % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 19487
% 25.53/4.00  % ...number of literals in the above   : 50893
% 25.53/4.00  % Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 25.53/4.00  % Current number of archived clauses   : 3166
% 25.53/4.00  % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 4746839
% 25.53/4.00  % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 3360415
% 25.53/4.00  % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 4190
% 25.53/4.00  % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 139403
% 25.53/4.00  % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 25.53/4.00  % BW rewrite match attempts            : 1329
% 25.53/4.00  % BW rewrite match successes           : 147
% 25.53/4.00  % Condensation attempts                : 0
% 25.53/4.00  % Condensation successes               : 0
% 25.53/4.00  % Termbank termtop insertions          : 532143
% 25.53/4.00  % Search garbage collected termcells   : 4268
% 25.53/4.00  
% 25.53/4.00  % -------------------------------------------------
% 25.53/4.00  % User time                : 3.231 s
% 25.53/4.00  % System time              : 0.096 s
% 25.53/4.00  % Total time               : 3.327 s
% 25.53/4.00  % Maximum resident set size: 8872 pages
% 25.53/4.00  
% 25.53/4.00  % -------------------------------------------------
% 25.53/4.00  % User time                : 15.761 s
% 25.53/4.00  % System time              : 0.469 s
% 25.53/4.00  % Total time               : 16.230 s
% 25.53/4.00  % Maximum resident set size: 6400 pages
% 25.53/4.00  % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------