↑ Up

iProver---3.9.4.UNS-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : iProver---3.9.4
% Problem  : SWV338-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM

% Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Fri Sep 25 03:17:21 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 33.76s 6.35s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 33.76s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    7
%            Number of leaves      :    9
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   26 (  15 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   44 (   5 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    4 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   34 (  16   ~;  18   |;   0   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    8 (   3 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    5 (   2 avg)
%            Number of types       :    1 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :    0 (   0   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of predicates  :    3 (   1 usr;   1 prp; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of functors    :   17 (  17 usr;   7 con; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   20 (   0 sgn  20   !;   0   ?;  11   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f3181,axiom,
    ! [X0,X1] : c_union(X0,X0,X1) = X0,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/MSC001-1.ax',cls_Set_OUn__absorb_0) ).

fof(f3375,axiom,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( c_in(X0,c_Event_Oused(X1),tc_Message_Omsg)
      | ~ c_in(X0,c_Message_Oparts(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,X1)),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SWV005-2.ax',cls_Event_Oc_A_58_Aparts_A_Iknows_ASpy_Aevs1_J_A_61_61_62_Ac_A_58_Aused_Aevs1_0) ).

fof(f3519,axiom,
    ! [X0] :
      ( c_Message_OinvKey(X0) = X0
      | ~ c_in(X0,c_Message_OsymKeys,tc_nat) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SWV005-3.ax',cls_Public_OinvKey__K_0) ).

fof(f3566,axiom,
    ! [X2,X3,X0,X1] :
      ( c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OKey(c_Message_OinvKey(X0)),c_Message_Oparts(X3),tc_Message_Omsg)
      | c_in(X0,c_Message_OkeysFor(c_Message_Oparts(c_union(X2,X3,tc_Message_Omsg))),tc_nat)
      | ~ c_in(X1,c_Message_Osynth(c_Message_Oanalz(X3)),tc_Message_Omsg)
      | ~ c_in(X0,c_Message_OkeysFor(c_Message_Oparts(c_insert(X1,X2,tc_Message_Omsg))),tc_nat) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_Event_OkeysFor__parts__insert__dest_0) ).

fof(f3567,negated_conjecture,
    c_in(v_K,c_Message_OsymKeys,tc_nat),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_0) ).

fof(f3569,negated_conjecture,
    c_in(v_X,c_Message_Osynth(c_Message_Oanalz(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evsf))),tc_Message_Omsg),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_2) ).

fof(f3571,negated_conjecture,
    ~ c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OKey(v_K),c_Event_Oused(v_evsf),tc_Message_Omsg),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_4) ).

fof(f3572,negated_conjecture,
    c_in(v_K,c_Message_OkeysFor(c_Message_Oparts(c_insert(v_X,c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evsf),tc_Message_Omsg))),tc_nat),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_5) ).

fof(f3573,negated_conjecture,
    ( c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OKey(v_K),c_Event_Oused(v_evsf),tc_Message_Omsg)
    | ~ c_in(v_K,c_Message_OkeysFor(c_Message_Oparts(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evsf))),tc_nat) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_6) ).

tcf(c_2997,negated_conjecture,
    c_in(v_K,c_Message_OsymKeys,tc_nat),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f3567]) ).

tcf(c_2999,negated_conjecture,
    c_in(v_X,c_Message_Osynth(c_Message_Oanalz(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evsf))),tc_Message_Omsg),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f3569]) ).

tcf(c_3001,negated_conjecture,
    ~ c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OKey(v_K),c_Event_Oused(v_evsf),tc_Message_Omsg),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f3571]) ).

tcf(c_3002,negated_conjecture,
    c_in(v_K,c_Message_OkeysFor(c_Message_Oparts(c_insert(v_X,c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evsf),tc_Message_Omsg))),tc_nat),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f3572]) ).

tcf(c_3003,negated_conjecture,
    ( c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OKey(v_K),c_Event_Oused(v_evsf),tc_Message_Omsg)
    | ~ c_in(v_K,c_Message_OkeysFor(c_Message_Oparts(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evsf))),tc_nat) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f3573]) ).

tcf(c_3013,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] :
      ( ( c_Message_OinvKey(X0) = X0 )
      | ~ c_in(X0,c_Message_OsymKeys,tc_nat) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f3519]) ).

tcf(c_3117,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( c_in(X0,c_Event_Oused(X1),tc_Message_Omsg)
      | ~ c_in(X0,c_Message_Oparts(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,X1)),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f3375]) ).

tcf(c_3118,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i,X3: $i] :
      ( c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OKey(c_Message_OinvKey(X0)),c_Message_Oparts(X3),tc_Message_Omsg)
      | c_in(X0,c_Message_OkeysFor(c_Message_Oparts(c_union(X2,X3,tc_Message_Omsg))),tc_nat)
      | ~ c_in(X1,c_Message_Osynth(c_Message_Oanalz(X3)),tc_Message_Omsg)
      | ~ c_in(X0,c_Message_OkeysFor(c_Message_Oparts(c_insert(X1,X2,tc_Message_Omsg))),tc_nat) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f3566]) ).

tcf(c_3247,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] : c_union(X0,X0,X1) = X0,
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f3181]) ).

tcf(c_4389,negated_conjecture,
    ~ c_in(v_K,c_Message_OkeysFor(c_Message_Oparts(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evsf))),tc_nat),
    inference(global_subsumption_just,[status(thm)],[c_3003,c_3001,c_3003]) ).

tcf(c_38253,plain,
    c_Message_OinvKey(v_K) = v_K,
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_2997,c_3013]) ).

tcf(c_83444,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] :
      ( c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OKey(c_Message_OinvKey(v_K)),c_Message_Oparts(X0),tc_Message_Omsg)
      | c_in(v_K,c_Message_OkeysFor(c_Message_Oparts(c_union(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evsf),X0,tc_Message_Omsg))),tc_nat)
      | ~ c_in(v_X,c_Message_Osynth(c_Message_Oanalz(X0)),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_3002,c_3118]) ).

tcf(c_83456,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] :
      ( c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OKey(v_K),c_Message_Oparts(X0),tc_Message_Omsg)
      | c_in(v_K,c_Message_OkeysFor(c_Message_Oparts(c_union(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evsf),X0,tc_Message_Omsg))),tc_nat)
      | ~ c_in(v_X,c_Message_Osynth(c_Message_Oanalz(X0)),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
    inference(light_normalisation,[status(thm)],[c_83444,c_38253]) ).

tcf(c_83840,plain,
    ( c_in(v_K,c_Message_OkeysFor(c_Message_Oparts(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evsf))),tc_nat)
    | c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OKey(v_K),c_Message_Oparts(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evsf)),tc_Message_Omsg)
    | ~ c_in(v_X,c_Message_Osynth(c_Message_Oanalz(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evsf))),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_3247,c_83456]) ).

tcf(c_83849,plain,
    c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OKey(v_K),c_Message_Oparts(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evsf)),tc_Message_Omsg),
    inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_83840,c_4389,c_2999]) ).

tcf(c_83913,plain,
    c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OKey(v_K),c_Event_Oused(v_evsf),tc_Message_Omsg),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_83849,c_3117]) ).

tcf(c_83916,plain,
    $false,
    inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_83913,c_3001]) ).


%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : SWV338-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.00/0.04  % Command  : run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM
% 0.13/0.39  % Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.39  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.39  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.39  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.13/0.39  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.13/0.39  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.40  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.13/0.40  % DateTime : Thu Sep 24 19:19:05 UTC 2026
% 0.13/0.40  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.13/0.40  Running run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM
% 0.13/0.44  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.13/0.44  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/iproveropt-multi-core.sh -d -n -l tptp -s fof_schedule -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.13/0.45  
% 0.13/0.45  % ======== iProver multi-core TPTP/SMT =========
% 0.13/0.45  
% 0.13/0.45  % Detected problem language: tptp
% 0.19/0.47  % Proving...
% 33.76/6.35  % SZS status Started for theBenchmark.p
% 33.76/6.35  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark.p
% 33.76/6.35  
% 33.76/6.35  %---------------- iProver v3.9.4 (pre CASC 2026/SMT-COMP 2026) ----------------%
% 33.76/6.35  
% 33.76/6.35  % ------  iProver source info
% 33.76/6.35  
% 33.76/6.35  % git: date: 2026-07-19 20:42:38 +0200
% 33.76/6.35  % git: sha1: 804e7d636a263075307957e923b7a22a4035de61
% 33.76/6.35  % git: non_committed_changes: false
% 33.76/6.35  
% 33.76/6.35  % ------ Parsing...% successful
% 33.76/6.35  
% 33.76/6.35  
% 33.76/6.35  % ------ Clausification by vclausify_rel  & Parsing by iProver...% 
% 33.76/6.35  
% 33.76/6.35  % ------ Preprocessing... sup_sim: 40  sf_s  rm: 5 0s  sf_e  pe_s  pe:1:0s pe:2:0s pe:4:0s pe:8:0s pe_e  sup_sim: 16  sf_s  rm: 16 0s  sf_e  pe_s  pe_e  sup_sim: 0  sf_s  rm: 16 0s  sf_e  pe_s  pe_e % 
% 33.76/6.35  
% 33.76/6.35  % ------ Preprocessing... gs_s  sp: 0 0s  gs_e  snvd_s sp: 0 0s snvd_e % 
% 33.76/6.35  
% 33.76/6.35  % ------ Preprocessing... sf_s  rm: 1 0s  sf_e  sf_s  rm: 0 0s  sf_e 
% 33.76/6.35  % ------ Proving...
% 33.76/6.35  % ------ Problem Properties 
% 33.76/6.35  
% 33.76/6.35  % 
% 33.76/6.35  % clauses                               660
% 33.76/6.35  % conjectures                           7
% 33.76/6.35  % EPR                                   25
% 33.76/6.35  % Horn                                  587
% 33.76/6.35  % unary                                 275
% 33.76/6.35  % binary                                285
% 33.76/6.35  % lits                                  1149
% 33.76/6.35  % lits eq                               487
% 33.76/6.35  % fd_pure                               0
% 33.76/6.35  % fd_pseudo                             0
% 33.76/6.35  % fd_cond                               37
% 33.76/6.35  % fd_pseudo_cond                        52
% 33.76/6.35  % AC symbols                            0
% 33.76/6.35  
% 33.76/6.35  % ------ Schedule dynamic 5 is on 
% 33.76/6.35  
% 33.76/6.35  % ------ Input Options "--resolution_flag false --inst_lit_sel_side none" Time Limit: 10.
% 33.76/6.35  
% 33.76/6.35  
% 33.76/6.35  % ------ 
% 33.76/6.35  % Current options:
% 33.76/6.35  % ------ 
% 33.76/6.35  
% 33.76/6.35  
% 33.76/6.35  % 
% 33.76/6.35  
% 33.76/6.35  % ------ Proving...
% 33.76/6.35  % 
% 33.76/6.35  
% 33.76/6.35  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark.p
% 33.76/6.35  
% 33.76/6.35  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 33.76/6.35  
% 33.76/6.35  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------