%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.5.1
% Problem : SWV338-2 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% Computer : n012.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 02:54:27 PM UTC 2026
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.07s 0.34s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.07s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 6
% Number of leaves : 9
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 28 ( 15 unt; 4 nHn; 26 RR)
% Number of literals : 48 ( 5 equ; 20 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 4 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 5 ( 2 avg)
% Number of predicates : 3 ( 1 usr; 1 prp; 0-3 aty)
% Number of functors : 17 ( 17 usr; 7 con; 0-3 aty)
% Number of variables : 26 ( 2 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(cls_Event_OkeysFor__parts__insert__dest_0,axiom,
( ~ c_in(X2,c_Message_Osynth(c_Message_Oanalz(X4)),tc_Message_Omsg)
| ~ c_in(X1,c_Message_OkeysFor(c_Message_Oparts(c_insert(X2,X3,tc_Message_Omsg))),tc_nat)
| c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OKey(c_Message_OinvKey(X1)),c_Message_Oparts(X4),tc_Message_Omsg)
| c_in(X1,c_Message_OkeysFor(c_Message_Oparts(c_union(X3,X4,tc_Message_Omsg))),tc_nat) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_Event_OkeysFor__parts__insert__dest_0) ).
cnf(cls_conjecture_6,negated_conjecture,
( ~ c_in(v_K,c_Message_OkeysFor(c_Message_Oparts(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evsf))),tc_nat)
| c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OKey(v_K),c_Event_Oused(v_evsf),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_6) ).
cnf(cls_conjecture_4,negated_conjecture,
~ c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OKey(v_K),c_Event_Oused(v_evsf),tc_Message_Omsg),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_4) ).
cnf(cls_conjecture_5,negated_conjecture,
c_in(v_K,c_Message_OkeysFor(c_Message_Oparts(c_insert(v_X,c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evsf),tc_Message_Omsg))),tc_nat),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_5) ).
cnf(cls_Event_Oc_A_58_Aparts_A_Iknows_ASpy_Aevs1_J_A_61_61_62_Ac_A_58_Aused_Aevs1_0,axiom,
( ~ c_in(X1,c_Message_Oparts(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,X2)),tc_Message_Omsg)
| c_in(X1,c_Event_Oused(X2),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_Event_Oc_A_58_Aparts_A_Iknows_ASpy_Aevs1_J_A_61_61_62_Ac_A_58_Aused_Aevs1_0) ).
cnf(cls_Set_OUn__absorb_0,axiom,
c_union(X1,X1,X2) = X1,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_Set_OUn__absorb_0) ).
cnf(cls_conjecture_2,negated_conjecture,
c_in(v_X,c_Message_Osynth(c_Message_Oanalz(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evsf))),tc_Message_Omsg),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_2) ).
cnf(cls_Public_OinvKey__K_0,axiom,
( ~ c_in(X1,c_Message_OsymKeys,tc_nat)
| c_Message_OinvKey(X1) = X1 ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_Public_OinvKey__K_0) ).
cnf(cls_conjecture_0,negated_conjecture,
c_in(v_K,c_Message_OsymKeys,tc_nat),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_0) ).
cnf(c_0_9,plain,
( ~ c_in(X2,c_Message_Osynth(c_Message_Oanalz(X4)),tc_Message_Omsg)
| ~ c_in(X1,c_Message_OkeysFor(c_Message_Oparts(c_insert(X2,X3,tc_Message_Omsg))),tc_nat)
| c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OKey(c_Message_OinvKey(X1)),c_Message_Oparts(X4),tc_Message_Omsg)
| c_in(X1,c_Message_OkeysFor(c_Message_Oparts(c_union(X3,X4,tc_Message_Omsg))),tc_nat) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[cls_Event_OkeysFor__parts__insert__dest_0]) ).
cnf(c_0_10,negated_conjecture,
( ~ c_in(v_K,c_Message_OkeysFor(c_Message_Oparts(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evsf))),tc_nat)
| c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OKey(v_K),c_Event_Oused(v_evsf),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[cls_conjecture_6]) ).
cnf(c_0_11,negated_conjecture,
~ c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OKey(v_K),c_Event_Oused(v_evsf),tc_Message_Omsg),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[cls_conjecture_4]) ).
cnf(c_0_12,plain,
( ~ c_in(X2,c_Message_Osynth(c_Message_Oanalz(X4)),tc_Message_Omsg)
| ~ c_in(X1,c_Message_OkeysFor(c_Message_Oparts(c_insert(X2,X3,tc_Message_Omsg))),tc_nat)
| c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OKey(c_Message_OinvKey(X1)),c_Message_Oparts(X4),tc_Message_Omsg)
| c_in(X1,c_Message_OkeysFor(c_Message_Oparts(c_union(X3,X4,tc_Message_Omsg))),tc_nat) ),
c_0_9 ).
cnf(c_0_13,negated_conjecture,
c_in(v_K,c_Message_OkeysFor(c_Message_Oparts(c_insert(v_X,c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evsf),tc_Message_Omsg))),tc_nat),
cls_conjecture_5 ).
cnf(c_0_14,negated_conjecture,
( ~ c_in(v_K,c_Message_OkeysFor(c_Message_Oparts(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evsf))),tc_nat)
| c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OKey(v_K),c_Event_Oused(v_evsf),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
c_0_10 ).
cnf(c_0_15,negated_conjecture,
~ c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OKey(v_K),c_Event_Oused(v_evsf),tc_Message_Omsg),
c_0_11 ).
cnf(c_0_16,plain,
( ~ c_in(X1,c_Message_Oparts(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,X2)),tc_Message_Omsg)
| c_in(X1,c_Event_Oused(X2),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[cls_Event_Oc_A_58_Aparts_A_Iknows_ASpy_Aevs1_J_A_61_61_62_Ac_A_58_Aused_Aevs1_0]) ).
cnf(c_0_17,negated_conjecture,
( ~ c_in(v_X,c_Message_Osynth(c_Message_Oanalz(X1)),tc_Message_Omsg)
| c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OKey(c_Message_OinvKey(v_K)),c_Message_Oparts(X1),tc_Message_Omsg)
| c_in(v_K,c_Message_OkeysFor(c_Message_Oparts(c_union(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evsf),X1,tc_Message_Omsg))),tc_nat) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_12,c_0_13]) ).
cnf(c_0_18,axiom,
c_union(X1,X1,X2) = X1,
cls_Set_OUn__absorb_0 ).
cnf(c_0_19,negated_conjecture,
c_in(v_X,c_Message_Osynth(c_Message_Oanalz(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evsf))),tc_Message_Omsg),
cls_conjecture_2 ).
cnf(c_0_20,negated_conjecture,
~ c_in(v_K,c_Message_OkeysFor(c_Message_Oparts(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evsf))),tc_nat),
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_14,c_0_15]) ).
cnf(c_0_21,plain,
( ~ c_in(X1,c_Message_Oparts(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,X2)),tc_Message_Omsg)
| c_in(X1,c_Event_Oused(X2),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
c_0_16 ).
cnf(c_0_22,negated_conjecture,
c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OKey(c_Message_OinvKey(v_K)),c_Message_Oparts(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evsf)),tc_Message_Omsg),
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_17,c_0_18]),c_0_19])]),c_0_20]) ).
cnf(c_0_23,plain,
( ~ c_in(X1,c_Message_OsymKeys,tc_nat)
| c_Message_OinvKey(X1) = X1 ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[cls_Public_OinvKey__K_0]) ).
cnf(c_0_24,negated_conjecture,
c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OKey(c_Message_OinvKey(v_K)),c_Event_Oused(v_evsf),tc_Message_Omsg),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_21,c_0_22]) ).
cnf(c_0_25,plain,
( ~ c_in(X1,c_Message_OsymKeys,tc_nat)
| c_Message_OinvKey(X1) = X1 ),
c_0_23 ).
cnf(c_0_26,negated_conjecture,
c_in(v_K,c_Message_OsymKeys,tc_nat),
cls_conjecture_0 ).
cnf(c_0_27,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_24,c_0_25]),c_0_26])]),c_0_15]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.01 % Problem : SWV338-2 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.00/0.02 % Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.04/0.30 % Computer : n012.cluster.edu
% 0.04/0.30 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.04/0.30 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.04/0.30 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.04/0.30 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.04/0.30 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.04/0.30 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.04/0.30 % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 08:41:37 UTC 2026
% 0.04/0.30 % CPUTime :
% 0.04/0.30 Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.07/0.33 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.07/0.33 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.07/0.34 % Version: 3.5.1
% 0.07/0.34 % Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.07/0.34 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.07/0.34 % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.07/0.34 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.07/0.34 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.07/0.34 % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.07/0.34 % new_bool_3 with pid 2016585 completed with status 0
% 0.07/0.34 % Result found by new_bool_3
% 0.07/0.34 % Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.07/0.34 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.07/0.34 % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.07/0.34 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.07/0.34 % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0))
% 0.07/0.34 % SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.07/0.34 % Search class: FGUSF-FFSS31-MFFFFFNN
% 0.07/0.34 % Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.07/0.34 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 31s (1) cores
% 0.07/0.34 % SubtermCWHack with pid 2016590 completed with status 0
% 0.07/0.34 % Result found by SubtermCWHack
% 0.07/0.34 % Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.07/0.34 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.07/0.34 % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.07/0.34 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.07/0.34 % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0))
% 0.07/0.34 % SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.07/0.34 % Search class: FGUSF-FFSS31-MFFFFFNN
% 0.07/0.34 % Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.07/0.34 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 31s (1) cores
% 0.07/0.34 % Preprocessing time : 0.001 s
% 0.07/0.34
% 0.07/0.34 % Proof found!
% 0.07/0.34 % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.07/0.34 % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.07/0.34 % Parsed axioms : 9
% 0.07/0.34 % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 0.07/0.34 % Initial clauses : 9
% 0.07/0.34 % Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.07/0.34 % Initial clauses in saturation : 9
% 0.07/0.34 % Processed clauses : 12
% 0.07/0.34 % ...of these trivial : 0
% 0.07/0.34 % ...subsumed : 0
% 0.07/0.34 % ...remaining for further processing : 12
% 0.07/0.34 % Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.07/0.34 % Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.07/0.34 % Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.07/0.34 % Backward-rewritten : 0
% 0.07/0.34 % Generated clauses : 5
% 0.07/0.34 % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 4
% 0.07/0.34 % ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.07/0.34 % Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.07/0.34 % Paramodulations : 5
% 0.07/0.34 % Factorizations : 0
% 0.07/0.34 % NegExts : 0
% 0.07/0.34 % Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.07/0.34 % Disequality decompositions : 0
% 0.07/0.34 % Total rewrite steps : 3
% 0.07/0.34 % ...of those cached : 1
% 0.07/0.34 % Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.07/0.34 % Propositional check models : 0
% 0.07/0.34 % Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.07/0.34 % Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.07/0.34 % Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.07/0.34 % Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.07/0.34 % Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.07/0.34 % Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.07/0.34 % Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.07/0.34 % Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.07/0.34 % Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.07/0.34 % Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.07/0.34 % Current number of processed clauses : 12
% 0.07/0.34 % Positive orientable unit clauses : 6
% 0.07/0.34 % Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.07/0.34 % Negative unit clauses : 2
% 0.07/0.34 % Non-unit-clauses : 4
% 0.07/0.34 % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 1
% 0.07/0.34 % ...number of literals in the above : 1
% 0.07/0.34 % Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.07/0.34 % Current number of archived clauses : 0
% 0.07/0.34 % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 6
% 0.07/0.34 % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 3
% 0.07/0.34 % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 0
% 0.07/0.34 % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 2
% 0.07/0.34 % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.07/0.34 % BW rewrite match attempts : 0
% 0.07/0.34 % BW rewrite match successes : 0
% 0.07/0.34 % Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.07/0.34 % Condensation successes : 0
% 0.07/0.34 % Termbank termtop insertions : 428
% 0.07/0.34 % Search garbage collected termcells : 16
% 0.07/0.34
% 0.07/0.34 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.07/0.34 % User time : 0.002 s
% 0.07/0.34 % System time : 0.001 s
% 0.07/0.34 % Total time : 0.003 s
% 0.07/0.34 % Maximum resident set size: 3644 pages
% 0.07/0.34
% 0.07/0.34 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.07/0.34 % User time : 0.002 s
% 0.07/0.34 % System time : 0.005 s
% 0.07/0.34 % Total time : 0.007 s
% 0.07/0.34 % Maximum resident set size: 4608 pages
% 0.07/0.34 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------