%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.5.1
% Problem : SWV339-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% Computer : n015.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 02:54:27 PM UTC 2026
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.14s 0.74s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.14s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 5
% Number of leaves : 3
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 11 ( 8 unt; 3 nHn; 7 RR)
% Number of literals : 14 ( 6 equ; 3 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 3 ( 1 usr; 1 prp; 0-3 aty)
% Number of functors : 8 ( 8 usr; 5 con; 0-1 aty)
% Number of variables : 6 ( 6 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(cls_conjecture_6,negated_conjecture,
~ c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OKey(v_K),c_Event_Oused(v_evs3),tc_Message_Omsg),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_6) ).
cnf(cls_Public_OshrK__in__used_0,axiom,
c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OKey(c_Public_OshrK(X1)),c_Event_Oused(X2),tc_Message_Omsg),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SWV005-3.ax',cls_Public_OshrK__in__used_0) ).
cnf(cls_conjecture_8,negated_conjecture,
( v_K = c_Public_OshrK(v_A)
| v_K = c_Public_OshrK(v_B) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_8) ).
cnf(c_0_3,negated_conjecture,
~ c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OKey(v_K),c_Event_Oused(v_evs3),tc_Message_Omsg),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[cls_conjecture_6]) ).
cnf(c_0_4,axiom,
c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OKey(c_Public_OshrK(X1)),c_Event_Oused(X2),tc_Message_Omsg),
cls_Public_OshrK__in__used_0 ).
cnf(c_0_5,negated_conjecture,
( v_K = c_Public_OshrK(v_A)
| v_K = c_Public_OshrK(v_B) ),
cls_conjecture_8 ).
cnf(c_0_6,negated_conjecture,
~ c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OKey(v_K),c_Event_Oused(v_evs3),tc_Message_Omsg),
c_0_3 ).
cnf(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
( c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OKey(v_K),c_Event_Oused(X1),tc_Message_Omsg)
| c_Public_OshrK(v_B) = v_K ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_4,c_0_5]) ).
cnf(c_0_8,negated_conjecture,
c_Public_OshrK(v_B) = v_K,
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_6,c_0_7]) ).
cnf(c_0_9,negated_conjecture,
c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OKey(v_K),c_Event_Oused(X1),tc_Message_Omsg),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_4,c_0_8]) ).
cnf(c_0_10,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_6,c_0_9])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03 % Problem : SWV339-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.00/0.05 % Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.11/0.57 % Computer : n015.cluster.edu
% 0.11/0.57 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.11/0.57 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.11/0.57 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.11/0.57 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.11/0.57 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.11/0.57 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.11/0.57 % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 08:45:07 UTC 2026
% 0.11/0.57 % CPUTime :
% 0.11/0.57 Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.11/0.62 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.11/0.62 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.14/0.74 % Version: 3.5.1
% 0.14/0.74 % Preprocessing class: FMLMSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.14/0.74 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.14/0.74 % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.14/0.74 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.14/0.74 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.14/0.74 % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.14/0.74 % new_bool_3 with pid 1075041 completed with status 0
% 0.14/0.74 % Result found by new_bool_3
% 0.14/0.74 % Preprocessing class: FMLMSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.14/0.74 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.14/0.74 % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.14/0.74 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.14/0.74 % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0))
% 0.14/0.74 % SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.14/0.74 % Search class: FGHSM-FSLM31-DFFFFFNN
% 0.14/0.74 % Scheduled 7 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.14/0.74 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 28s (1) cores
% 0.14/0.74 % SubtermCWHack with pid 1075044 completed with status 0
% 0.14/0.74 % Result found by SubtermCWHack
% 0.14/0.74 % Preprocessing class: FMLMSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.14/0.74 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.14/0.74 % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.14/0.74 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.14/0.74 % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0))
% 0.14/0.74 % SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.14/0.74 % Search class: FGHSM-FSLM31-DFFFFFNN
% 0.14/0.74 % Scheduled 7 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.14/0.74 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 28s (1) cores
% 0.14/0.74 % Preprocessing time : 0.008 s
% 0.14/0.74
% 0.14/0.74 % Proof found!
% 0.14/0.74 % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.14/0.74 % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.14/0.74 % Parsed axioms : 2950
% 0.14/0.74 % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 2341
% 0.14/0.74 % Initial clauses : 609
% 0.14/0.74 % Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.14/0.74 % Initial clauses in saturation : 609
% 0.14/0.74 % Processed clauses : 345
% 0.14/0.74 % ...of these trivial : 11
% 0.14/0.74 % ...subsumed : 83
% 0.14/0.74 % ...remaining for further processing : 251
% 0.14/0.74 % Other redundant clauses eliminated : 11
% 0.14/0.74 % Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.14/0.74 % Backward-subsumed : 3
% 0.14/0.74 % Backward-rewritten : 11
% 0.14/0.74 % Generated clauses : 308
% 0.14/0.74 % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 136
% 0.14/0.74 % ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.14/0.74 % Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.14/0.74 % Paramodulations : 276
% 0.14/0.74 % Factorizations : 0
% 0.14/0.74 % NegExts : 0
% 0.14/0.74 % Equation resolutions : 32
% 0.14/0.74 % Disequality decompositions : 0
% 0.14/0.74 % Total rewrite steps : 135
% 0.14/0.74 % ...of those cached : 70
% 0.14/0.74 % Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.14/0.74 % Propositional check models : 0
% 0.14/0.74 % Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.14/0.74 % Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.14/0.74 % Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.14/0.74 % Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.14/0.74 % Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.14/0.74 % Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.14/0.74 % Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.14/0.74 % Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.14/0.74 % Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.14/0.74 % Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.14/0.74 % Current number of processed clauses : 237
% 0.14/0.74 % Positive orientable unit clauses : 101
% 0.14/0.74 % Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.14/0.74 % Negative unit clauses : 39
% 0.14/0.74 % Non-unit-clauses : 97
% 0.14/0.74 % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 400
% 0.14/0.74 % ...number of literals in the above : 1030
% 0.14/0.74 % Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.14/0.74 % Current number of archived clauses : 14
% 0.14/0.74 % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 3098
% 0.14/0.74 % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 2685
% 0.14/0.74 % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 29
% 0.14/0.74 % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 601
% 0.14/0.74 % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.14/0.74 % BW rewrite match attempts : 46
% 0.14/0.74 % BW rewrite match successes : 10
% 0.14/0.74 % Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.14/0.74 % Condensation successes : 0
% 0.14/0.74 % Termbank termtop insertions : 38937
% 0.14/0.74 % Search garbage collected termcells : 7631
% 0.14/0.74
% 0.14/0.74 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.14/0.74 % User time : 0.031 s
% 0.14/0.74 % System time : 0.014 s
% 0.14/0.74 % Total time : 0.045 s
% 0.14/0.74 % Maximum resident set size: 6568 pages
% 0.14/0.74
% 0.14/0.74 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.14/0.74 % User time : 0.088 s
% 0.14/0.74 % System time : 0.020 s
% 0.14/0.74 % Total time : 0.107 s
% 0.14/0.74 % Maximum resident set size: 6656 pages
% 0.14/0.74 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------