%------------------------------------------------------------------------------ % File : CSE---1.7 % Problem : SWV339-2 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v3.2.0. % Transfm : none % Format : tptp:raw % Command : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %d %s % Computer : n022.cluster.edu % Model : x86_64 x86_64 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz % Memory : 8042.1875MB % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64 % CPULimit : 300s % WCLimit : 300s % DateTime : Mon Jun 24 16:46:49 EDT 2024 % Result : Unsatisfiable 0.51s 0.60s % Output : CNFRefutation 0.51s % Verified : % SZS Type : - % Comments : %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ %----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ %----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT % 0.07/0.12 % Problem : SWV339-2 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v3.2.0. % 0.07/0.12 % Command : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %d %s % 0.12/0.33 % Computer : n022.cluster.edu % 0.12/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64 % 0.12/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz % 0.12/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB % 0.12/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64 % 0.12/0.33 % CPULimit : 300 % 0.12/0.33 % WCLimit : 300 % 0.12/0.33 % DateTime : Thu Jun 20 17:30:23 EDT 2024 % 0.12/0.33 % CPUTime : % 0.51/0.56 start to proof:theBenchmark % 0.51/0.59 %------------------------------------------- % 0.51/0.59 % File :CSE---1.7 % 0.51/0.59 % Problem :theBenchmark % 0.51/0.59 % Transform :cnf % 0.51/0.59 % Format :tptp:raw % 0.51/0.59 % Command :java -jar mcs_scs.jar %d %s % 0.51/0.59 % 0.51/0.59 % Result :Theorem 0.000000s % 0.51/0.59 % Output :CNFRefutation 0.000000s % 0.51/0.59 %------------------------------------------- % 0.51/0.59 %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ % 0.51/0.59 % File : SWV339-2 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v3.2.0. % 0.51/0.59 % Domain : Software Verification (Security) % 0.51/0.59 % Problem : Cryptographic protocol problem for Yahalom % 0.51/0.59 % Version : [Pau06] axioms : Reduced > Especial. % 0.51/0.59 % English : % 0.51/0.59 % 0.51/0.59 % Refs : [Pau06] Paulson (2006), Email to G. Sutcliffe % 0.51/0.59 % Source : [Pau06] % 0.51/0.59 % Names : % 0.51/0.59 % 0.51/0.59 % Status : Unsatisfiable % 0.51/0.59 % Rating : 0.10 v8.1.0, 0.00 v7.5.0, 0.05 v7.4.0, 0.06 v7.3.0, 0.08 v7.1.0, 0.00 v7.0.0, 0.07 v6.4.0, 0.00 v6.1.0, 0.07 v6.0.0, 0.00 v5.5.0, 0.05 v5.4.0, 0.10 v5.3.0, 0.06 v5.2.0, 0.00 v3.4.0, 0.08 v3.3.0, 0.14 v3.2.0 % 0.51/0.59 % Syntax : Number of clauses : 3 ( 2 unt; 1 nHn; 2 RR) % 0.51/0.59 % Number of literals : 4 ( 2 equ; 1 neg) % 0.51/0.60 % Maximal clause size : 2 ( 1 avg) % 0.51/0.60 % Maximal term depth : 3 ( 1 avg) % 0.51/0.60 % Number of predicates : 2 ( 1 usr; 0 prp; 2-3 aty) % 0.51/0.60 % Number of functors : 8 ( 8 usr; 5 con; 0-1 aty) % 0.51/0.60 % Number of variables : 2 ( 2 sgn) % 0.51/0.60 % SPC : CNF_UNS_RFO_SEQ_NHN % 0.51/0.60 % 0.51/0.60 % Comments : The problems in the [Pau06] collection each have very many axioms, % 0.51/0.60 % of which only a small selection are required for the refutation. % 0.51/0.60 % The mission is to find those few axioms, after which a refutation % 0.51/0.60 % can be quite easily found. This version has only the necessary % 0.51/0.60 % axioms. % 0.51/0.60 %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ % 0.51/0.60 cnf(cls_conjecture_6,negated_conjecture, % 0.51/0.60 ~ c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OKey(v_K),c_Event_Oused(v_evs3),tc_Message_Omsg) ). % 0.51/0.60 % 0.51/0.60 cnf(cls_conjecture_8,negated_conjecture, % 0.51/0.60 ( v_K = c_Public_OshrK(v_B) % 0.51/0.60 | v_K = c_Public_OshrK(v_A) ) ). % 0.51/0.60 % 0.51/0.60 cnf(cls_Public_OshrK__in__used_0,axiom, % 0.51/0.60 c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OKey(c_Public_OshrK(V_A)),c_Event_Oused(V_evs),tc_Message_Omsg) ). % 0.51/0.60 % 0.51/0.60 %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ % 0.51/0.60 %------------------------------------------- % 0.51/0.60 % Proof found % 0.51/0.60 % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark % 0.51/0.60 % SZS output start Proof % 0.51/0.60 %ClaNum:12(EqnAxiom:9) % 0.51/0.60 %VarNum:2(SingletonVarNum:2) % 0.51/0.60 %MaxLitNum:2 % 0.51/0.60 %MaxfuncDepth:2 % 0.51/0.60 %SharedTerms:12 % 0.51/0.60 %goalClause: 11 12 % 0.51/0.60 %singleGoalClaCount:1 % 0.51/0.60 [11]~P1(f2(a5),f3(a8),a4) % 0.51/0.60 [10]P1(f2(f1(x101)),f3(x102),a4) % 0.51/0.60 [12]E(f1(a6),a5)+E(f1(a7),a5) % 0.51/0.60 %EqnAxiom % 0.51/0.60 [1]E(x11,x11) % 0.51/0.60 [2]E(x22,x21)+~E(x21,x22) % 0.51/0.60 [3]E(x31,x33)+~E(x31,x32)+~E(x32,x33) % 0.51/0.60 [4]~E(x41,x42)+E(f1(x41),f1(x42)) % 0.51/0.60 [5]~E(x51,x52)+E(f2(x51),f2(x52)) % 0.51/0.60 [6]~E(x61,x62)+E(f3(x61),f3(x62)) % 0.51/0.60 [7]P1(x72,x73,x74)+~E(x71,x72)+~P1(x71,x73,x74) % 0.51/0.60 [8]P1(x83,x82,x84)+~E(x81,x82)+~P1(x83,x81,x84) % 0.51/0.60 [9]P1(x93,x94,x92)+~E(x91,x92)+~P1(x93,x94,x91) % 0.51/0.60 % 0.51/0.60 %------------------------------------------- % 0.51/0.60 cnf(14,plain, % 0.51/0.60 (P1(f2(f1(x141)),f3(x142),a4)), % 0.51/0.60 inference(rename_variables,[],[10])). % 0.51/0.60 cnf(15,plain, % 0.51/0.60 (~E(f1(x151),a5)), % 0.51/0.60 inference(scs_inference,[],[11,10,7,5])). % 0.51/0.60 cnf(17,plain, % 0.51/0.60 (E(f1(a7),a5)), % 0.51/0.60 inference(scs_inference,[],[11,10,14,7,5,8,12])). % 0.51/0.60 cnf(23,plain, % 0.51/0.60 ($false), % 0.51/0.60 inference(scs_inference,[],[17,15]), % 0.51/0.60 ['proof']). % 0.51/0.60 % SZS output end Proof % 0.51/0.60 % Total time :0.000000s %------------------------------------------------------------------------------