%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : iProver---3.9.4
% Problem : SWV339-2 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM
% Computer : n015.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Fri Sep 25 03:17:21 PM UTC 2026
% Result : Unsatisfiable 1.89s 1.30s
% Output : CNFRefutation 1.89s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 8
% Number of leaves : 7
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 22 ( 17 unt; 4 def)
% Number of atoms : 52 ( 15 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 2 ( 2 avg)
% Number of connectives : 8 ( 3 ~; 5 |; 0 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 0 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 3 ( 2 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Number of types : 1 ( 0 usr)
% Number of type conns : 0 ( 0 >; 0 *; 0 +; 0 <<)
% Number of predicates : 7 ( 5 usr; 5 prp; 0-3 aty)
% Number of functors : 8 ( 8 usr; 5 con; 0-1 aty)
% Number of variables : 6 ( 0 sgn 6 !; 0 ?; 4 :)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f1,negated_conjecture,
~ c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OKey(v_K),c_Event_Oused(v_evs3),tc_Message_Omsg),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_6) ).
fof(f2,negated_conjecture,
( v_K = c_Public_OshrK(v_A)
| v_K = c_Public_OshrK(v_B) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_8) ).
fof(f3,axiom,
! [X0,X1] : c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OKey(c_Public_OshrK(X0)),c_Event_Oused(X1),tc_Message_Omsg),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_Public_OshrK__in__used_0) ).
tcf(c_52,negated_conjecture,
~ c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OKey(v_K),c_Event_Oused(v_evs3),tc_Message_Omsg),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f1]) ).
tcf(c_53,negated_conjecture,
( ( c_Public_OshrK(v_A) = v_K )
| ( c_Public_OshrK(v_B) = v_K ) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f2]) ).
tcf(c_54,plain,
! [X0: $i,X1: $i] : c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OKey(c_Public_OshrK(X0)),c_Event_Oused(X1),tc_Message_Omsg),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f3]) ).
tcf(c_87,definition,
iPr_def_10 = c_Public_OshrK(v_B),
introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[iPr_def_10])],[]) ).
tcf(c_88,definition,
iPr_def_11 = c_Public_OshrK(v_A),
introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[iPr_def_11])],[]) ).
tcf(c_89,definition,
iPr_def_12 = c_Message_Omsg_OKey(v_K),
introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[iPr_def_12])],[]) ).
tcf(c_90,definition,
iPr_def_13 = c_Event_Oused(v_evs3),
introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[iPr_def_13])],[]) ).
tcf(c_91,negated_conjecture,
( ( iPr_def_11 = v_K )
| ( iPr_def_10 = v_K ) ),
inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_53,c_88,c_87]) ).
tcf(c_92,negated_conjecture,
~ c_in(iPr_def_12,iPr_def_13,tc_Message_Omsg),
inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_52,c_90,c_89]) ).
tcf(c_201,plain,
( ( v_K = iPr_def_10 )
| ( c_Message_Omsg_OKey(iPr_def_11) = iPr_def_12 ) ),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_91,c_89]) ).
tcf(c_208,plain,
! [X0: $i] : c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OKey(iPr_def_10),c_Event_Oused(X0),tc_Message_Omsg),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_87,c_54]) ).
tcf(c_209,plain,
! [X0: $i] : c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OKey(iPr_def_11),c_Event_Oused(X0),tc_Message_Omsg),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_88,c_54]) ).
tcf(c_214,plain,
c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OKey(iPr_def_10),iPr_def_13,tc_Message_Omsg),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_90,c_208]) ).
tcf(c_216,plain,
c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OKey(iPr_def_11),iPr_def_13,tc_Message_Omsg),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_90,c_209]) ).
tcf(c_220,plain,
( c_in(iPr_def_12,iPr_def_13,tc_Message_Omsg)
| ( v_K = iPr_def_10 ) ),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_201,c_216]) ).
tcf(c_221,plain,
v_K = iPr_def_10,
inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_220,c_92]) ).
tcf(c_222,plain,
c_Message_Omsg_OKey(iPr_def_10) = iPr_def_12,
inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_89,c_221]) ).
tcf(c_224,plain,
c_in(iPr_def_12,iPr_def_13,tc_Message_Omsg),
inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_214,c_222]) ).
tcf(c_226,plain,
$false,
inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_224,c_92]) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03 % Problem : SWV339-2 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.00/0.04 % Command : run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM
% 0.12/0.38 % Computer : n015.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.38 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.38 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.38 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.12/0.38 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.12/0.38 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.38 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.12/0.38 % DateTime : Thu Sep 24 19:20:26 UTC 2026
% 0.12/0.38 % CPUTime :
% 0.12/0.38 Running run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM
% 0.12/0.42 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.12/0.42 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/iproveropt-multi-core.sh -d -n -l tptp -s fof_schedule -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.12/0.43
% 0.12/0.43 % ======== iProver multi-core TPTP/SMT =========
% 0.12/0.43
% 0.12/0.43 % Detected problem language: tptp
% 0.12/0.45 % Proving...
% 1.89/1.30 % SZS status Started for theBenchmark.p
% 1.89/1.30 % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark.p
% 1.89/1.30
% 1.89/1.30 %---------------- iProver v3.9.4 (pre CASC 2026/SMT-COMP 2026) ----------------%
% 1.89/1.30
% 1.89/1.30 % ------ iProver source info
% 1.89/1.30
% 1.89/1.30 % git: date: 2026-07-19 20:42:38 +0200
% 1.89/1.30 % git: sha1: 804e7d636a263075307957e923b7a22a4035de61
% 1.89/1.30 % git: non_committed_changes: false
% 1.89/1.30
% 1.89/1.30 % ------ Parsing...% successful
% 1.89/1.30
% 1.89/1.30
% 1.89/1.30 % ------ Clausification by vclausify_rel & Parsing by iProver...%
% 1.89/1.30
% 1.89/1.30 % ------ Preprocessing... sup_sim: 0 sf_s rm: 1 0s sf_e pe_s pe_e %
% 1.89/1.30
% 1.89/1.30 % ------ Preprocessing... gs_s sp: 0 0s gs_e snvd_s sp: 0 0s snvd_e %
% 1.89/1.30
% 1.89/1.30 % ------ Preprocessing... sf_s rm: 1 0s sf_e sf_s rm: 0 0s sf_e
% 1.89/1.30 % ------ Proving...
% 1.89/1.30 % ------ Problem Properties
% 1.89/1.30
% 1.89/1.30 %
% 1.89/1.30 % clauses 7
% 1.89/1.30 % conjectures 2
% 1.89/1.30 % EPR 2
% 1.89/1.30 % Horn 6
% 1.89/1.30 % unary 6
% 1.89/1.30 % binary 1
% 1.89/1.30 % lits 8
% 1.89/1.30 % lits eq 6
% 1.89/1.30 % fd_pure 0
% 1.89/1.30 % fd_pseudo 0
% 1.89/1.30 % fd_cond 0
% 1.89/1.30 % fd_pseudo_cond 0
% 1.89/1.30 % AC symbols 0
% 1.89/1.30
% 1.89/1.30 % ------ Schedule dynamic 5 is on
% 1.89/1.30
% 1.89/1.30 % ------ Input Options "--resolution_flag false --inst_lit_sel_side none" Time Limit: 10.
% 1.89/1.30
% 1.89/1.30
% 1.89/1.30 % ------
% 1.89/1.30 % Current options:
% 1.89/1.30 % ------
% 1.89/1.30
% 1.89/1.30
% 1.89/1.30 %
% 1.89/1.30
% 1.89/1.30 % ------ Proving...
% 1.89/1.30 %
% 1.89/1.30
% 1.89/1.30 % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark.p
% 1.89/1.30
% 1.89/1.30 % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 1.89/1.30
% 1.89/1.30
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------