↑ Up

E---3.5.1.UNS-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E---3.5.1
% Problem  : SWV340-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM

% Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 02:54:27 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 11.01s 1.99s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 11.01s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    8
%            Number of leaves      :   12
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   41 (  20 unt;   0 nHn;  37 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   65 (   6 equ;  27 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    8 (   2 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    3 (   1 usr;   1 prp; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of functors    :   25 (  25 usr;  12 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   61 (  15 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(cls_Message_OMPair__parts_1,axiom,
    ( ~ c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(X1,X2),c_Message_Oparts(X3),tc_Message_Omsg)
    | c_in(X1,c_Message_Oparts(X3),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SWV005-0.ax',cls_Message_OMPair__parts_1) ).

cnf(cls_Message_Oparts_OInj_0,axiom,
    ( ~ c_in(X1,X2,tc_Message_Omsg)
    | c_in(X1,c_Message_Oparts(X2),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SWV005-0.ax',cls_Message_Oparts_OInj_0) ).

cnf(cls_Yahalom_OGets__imp__analz__Spy__dest_0,axiom,
    ( ~ c_in(c_Event_Oevent_OGets(X2,X3),c_List_Oset(X1,tc_Event_Oevent),tc_Event_Oevent)
    | ~ c_in(X1,c_Yahalom_Oyahalom,tc_List_Olist(tc_Event_Oevent))
    | c_in(X3,c_Message_Oanalz(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,X1)),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SWV005-4.ax',cls_Yahalom_OGets__imp__analz__Spy__dest_0) ).

cnf(cls_conjecture_4,negated_conjecture,
    c_in(c_Event_Oevent_OGets(v_A,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(c_Public_OshrK(v_A),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(v_B),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OKey(v_Ka),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NA),c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NB))))),v_X)),c_List_Oset(v_evs4,tc_Event_Oevent),tc_Event_Oevent),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_4) ).

cnf(cls_conjecture_9,negated_conjecture,
    v_K = v_Ka,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_9) ).

cnf(cls_Message_Oparts_OBody__dest_0,axiom,
    ( ~ c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(X1,X2),c_Message_Oparts(X3),tc_Message_Omsg)
    | c_in(X2,c_Message_Oparts(X3),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SWV005-4.ax',cls_Message_Oparts_OBody__dest_0) ).

cnf(cls_conjecture_1,negated_conjecture,
    c_in(v_evs4,c_Yahalom_Oyahalom,tc_List_Olist(tc_Event_Oevent)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_1) ).

cnf(cls_Message_OMPair__parts_0,axiom,
    ( ~ c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(X1,X2),c_Message_Oparts(X3),tc_Message_Omsg)
    | c_in(X2,c_Message_Oparts(X3),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SWV005-0.ax',cls_Message_OMPair__parts_0) ).

cnf(cls_Message_Oparts__analz_0,axiom,
    c_Message_Oparts(c_Message_Oanalz(X1)) = c_Message_Oparts(X1),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SWV005-2.ax',cls_Message_Oparts__analz_0) ).

cnf(cls_Message_Oparts__idem_0,axiom,
    c_Message_Oparts(c_Message_Oparts(X1)) = c_Message_Oparts(X1),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SWV005-2.ax',cls_Message_Oparts__idem_0) ).

cnf(cls_Event_Oc_A_58_Aparts_A_Iknows_ASpy_Aevs1_J_A_61_61_62_Ac_A_58_Aused_Aevs1_0,axiom,
    ( ~ c_in(X1,c_Message_Oparts(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,X2)),tc_Message_Omsg)
    | c_in(X1,c_Event_Oused(X2),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SWV005-2.ax',cls_Event_Oc_A_58_Aparts_A_Iknows_ASpy_Aevs1_J_A_61_61_62_Ac_A_58_Aused_Aevs1_0) ).

cnf(cls_conjecture_8,negated_conjecture,
    ~ c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OKey(v_K),c_Event_Oused(v_evs4),tc_Message_Omsg),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_8) ).

cnf(c_0_12,plain,
    ( ~ c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(X1,X2),c_Message_Oparts(X3),tc_Message_Omsg)
    | c_in(X1,c_Message_Oparts(X3),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[cls_Message_OMPair__parts_1]) ).

cnf(c_0_13,plain,
    ( ~ c_in(X1,X2,tc_Message_Omsg)
    | c_in(X1,c_Message_Oparts(X2),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[cls_Message_Oparts_OInj_0]) ).

cnf(c_0_14,plain,
    ( ~ c_in(c_Event_Oevent_OGets(X2,X3),c_List_Oset(X1,tc_Event_Oevent),tc_Event_Oevent)
    | ~ c_in(X1,c_Yahalom_Oyahalom,tc_List_Olist(tc_Event_Oevent))
    | c_in(X3,c_Message_Oanalz(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,X1)),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[cls_Yahalom_OGets__imp__analz__Spy__dest_0]) ).

cnf(c_0_15,negated_conjecture,
    c_in(c_Event_Oevent_OGets(v_A,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(c_Public_OshrK(v_A),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(v_B),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OKey(v_Ka),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NA),c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NB))))),v_X)),c_List_Oset(v_evs4,tc_Event_Oevent),tc_Event_Oevent),
    cls_conjecture_4 ).

cnf(c_0_16,negated_conjecture,
    v_K = v_Ka,
    cls_conjecture_9 ).

cnf(c_0_17,plain,
    ( ~ c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(X1,X2),c_Message_Oparts(X3),tc_Message_Omsg)
    | c_in(X2,c_Message_Oparts(X3),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[cls_Message_Oparts_OBody__dest_0]) ).

cnf(c_0_18,plain,
    ( ~ c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(X1,X2),c_Message_Oparts(X3),tc_Message_Omsg)
    | c_in(X1,c_Message_Oparts(X3),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
    c_0_12 ).

cnf(c_0_19,plain,
    ( ~ c_in(X1,X2,tc_Message_Omsg)
    | c_in(X1,c_Message_Oparts(X2),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
    c_0_13 ).

cnf(c_0_20,plain,
    ( ~ c_in(c_Event_Oevent_OGets(X2,X3),c_List_Oset(X1,tc_Event_Oevent),tc_Event_Oevent)
    | ~ c_in(X1,c_Yahalom_Oyahalom,tc_List_Olist(tc_Event_Oevent))
    | c_in(X3,c_Message_Oanalz(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,X1)),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
    c_0_14 ).

cnf(c_0_21,negated_conjecture,
    c_in(c_Event_Oevent_OGets(v_A,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(c_Public_OshrK(v_A),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(v_B),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OKey(v_K),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NA),c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NB))))),v_X)),c_List_Oset(v_evs4,tc_Event_Oevent),tc_Event_Oevent),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_15,c_0_16]) ).

cnf(c_0_22,negated_conjecture,
    c_in(v_evs4,c_Yahalom_Oyahalom,tc_List_Olist(tc_Event_Oevent)),
    cls_conjecture_1 ).

cnf(c_0_23,plain,
    ( ~ c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(X1,X2),c_Message_Oparts(X3),tc_Message_Omsg)
    | c_in(X2,c_Message_Oparts(X3),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[cls_Message_OMPair__parts_0]) ).

cnf(c_0_24,plain,
    ( ~ c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(X1,X2),c_Message_Oparts(X3),tc_Message_Omsg)
    | c_in(X2,c_Message_Oparts(X3),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
    c_0_17 ).

cnf(c_0_25,plain,
    ( ~ c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(X1,X3),X2,tc_Message_Omsg)
    | c_in(X1,c_Message_Oparts(X2),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_18,c_0_19]) ).

cnf(c_0_26,negated_conjecture,
    c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(c_Public_OshrK(v_A),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(v_B),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OKey(v_K),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NA),c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NB))))),v_X),c_Message_Oanalz(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evs4)),tc_Message_Omsg),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_20,c_0_21]),c_0_22])]) ).

cnf(c_0_27,axiom,
    c_Message_Oparts(c_Message_Oanalz(X1)) = c_Message_Oparts(X1),
    cls_Message_Oparts__analz_0 ).

cnf(c_0_28,plain,
    ( ~ c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(X1,X2),c_Message_Oparts(X3),tc_Message_Omsg)
    | c_in(X2,c_Message_Oparts(X3),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
    c_0_23 ).

cnf(c_0_29,plain,
    ( ~ c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(X3,X1),X2,tc_Message_Omsg)
    | c_in(X1,c_Message_Oparts(X2),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_24,c_0_19]) ).

cnf(c_0_30,negated_conjecture,
    c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(c_Public_OshrK(v_A),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(v_B),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OKey(v_K),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NA),c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NB))))),c_Message_Oparts(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evs4)),tc_Message_Omsg),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_25,c_0_26]),c_0_27]) ).

cnf(c_0_31,axiom,
    c_Message_Oparts(c_Message_Oparts(X1)) = c_Message_Oparts(X1),
    cls_Message_Oparts__idem_0 ).

cnf(c_0_32,plain,
    ( ~ c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(X3,X1),X2,tc_Message_Omsg)
    | c_in(X1,c_Message_Oparts(X2),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_28,c_0_19]) ).

cnf(c_0_33,negated_conjecture,
    c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(v_B),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OKey(v_K),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NA),c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NB)))),c_Message_Oparts(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evs4)),tc_Message_Omsg),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_29,c_0_30]),c_0_31]) ).

cnf(c_0_34,plain,
    ( ~ c_in(X1,c_Message_Oparts(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,X2)),tc_Message_Omsg)
    | c_in(X1,c_Event_Oused(X2),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[cls_Event_Oc_A_58_Aparts_A_Iknows_ASpy_Aevs1_J_A_61_61_62_Ac_A_58_Aused_Aevs1_0]) ).

cnf(c_0_35,negated_conjecture,
    c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OKey(v_K),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NA),c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NB))),c_Message_Oparts(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evs4)),tc_Message_Omsg),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_32,c_0_33]),c_0_31]) ).

cnf(c_0_36,negated_conjecture,
    ~ c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OKey(v_K),c_Event_Oused(v_evs4),tc_Message_Omsg),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[cls_conjecture_8]) ).

cnf(c_0_37,plain,
    ( ~ c_in(X1,c_Message_Oparts(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,X2)),tc_Message_Omsg)
    | c_in(X1,c_Event_Oused(X2),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
    c_0_34 ).

cnf(c_0_38,negated_conjecture,
    c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OKey(v_K),c_Message_Oparts(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evs4)),tc_Message_Omsg),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_25,c_0_35]),c_0_31]) ).

cnf(c_0_39,negated_conjecture,
    ~ c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OKey(v_K),c_Event_Oused(v_evs4),tc_Message_Omsg),
    c_0_36 ).

cnf(c_0_40,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_37,c_0_38]),c_0_39]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : SWV340-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.00/0.05  % Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.10/0.37  % Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% 0.10/0.37  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.10/0.37  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.10/0.37  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.10/0.37  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.10/0.37  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.10/0.37  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.10/0.37  % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 08:43:17 UTC 2026
% 0.10/0.37  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.10/0.37  Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.10/0.42  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.10/0.42  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 11.01/1.99  % Version: 3.5.1
% 11.01/1.99  % Preprocessing class: FMLMSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 11.01/1.99  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 11.01/1.99  % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 11.01/1.99  % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 11.01/1.99  % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 11.01/1.99  % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 11.01/1.99  % G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with pid 2526861 completed with status 0
% 11.01/1.99  % Result found by G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN
% 11.01/1.99  % Preprocessing class: FMLMSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 11.01/1.99  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 11.01/1.99  % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 11.01/1.99  % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 11.01/1.99  % No SInE strategy applied
% 11.01/1.99  % Search class: FGHSM-SMLM32-DFFFFFNN
% 11.01/1.99  % Scheduled 13 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 11.01/1.99  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 11.01/1.99  % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 151s (1) cores
% 11.01/1.99  % Starting G-E--_008_C45_F1_PI_SE_Q4_CS_SP_S4SI with 113s (1) cores
% 11.01/1.99  % Starting G-E--_207_C01_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_S5PRR_S0Y with 113s (1) cores
% 11.01/1.99  % Starting G-E--_208_B07CMA_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 113s (1) cores
% 11.01/1.99  % G-E--_207_C01_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_S5PRR_S0Y with pid 2526871 completed with status 0
% 11.01/1.99  % Result found by G-E--_207_C01_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_S5PRR_S0Y
% 11.01/1.99  % Preprocessing class: FMLMSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 11.01/1.99  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 11.01/1.99  % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 11.01/1.99  % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 11.01/1.99  % No SInE strategy applied
% 11.01/1.99  % Search class: FGHSM-SMLM32-DFFFFFNN
% 11.01/1.99  % Scheduled 13 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 11.01/1.99  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 11.01/1.99  % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 151s (1) cores
% 11.01/1.99  % Starting G-E--_008_C45_F1_PI_SE_Q4_CS_SP_S4SI with 113s (1) cores
% 11.01/1.99  % Starting G-E--_207_C01_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_S5PRR_S0Y with 113s (1) cores
% 11.01/1.99  % Preprocessing time       : 0.031 s
% 11.01/1.99  
% 11.01/1.99  % Proof found!
% 11.01/1.99  % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 11.01/1.99  % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 11.01/1.99  % Parsed axioms                        : 2952
% 11.01/1.99  % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 0
% 11.01/1.99  % Initial clauses                      : 2952
% 11.01/1.99  % Removed in clause preprocessing      : 12
% 11.01/1.99  % Initial clauses in saturation        : 2940
% 11.01/1.99  % Processed clauses                    : 4259
% 11.01/1.99  % ...of these trivial                  : 78
% 11.01/1.99  % ...subsumed                          : 991
% 11.01/1.99  % ...remaining for further processing  : 3190
% 11.01/1.99  % Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 223
% 11.01/1.99  % Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 11.01/1.99  % Backward-subsumed                    : 61
% 11.01/1.99  % Backward-rewritten                   : 21
% 11.01/1.99  % Generated clauses                    : 30410
% 11.01/1.99  % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 25050
% 11.01/1.99  % ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 11.01/1.99  % Contextual simplify-reflections      : 6
% 11.01/1.99  % Paramodulations                      : 30115
% 11.01/1.99  % Factorizations                       : 1
% 11.01/1.99  % NegExts                              : 0
% 11.01/1.99  % Equation resolutions                 : 294
% 11.01/1.99  % Disequality decompositions           : 0
% 11.01/1.99  % Total rewrite steps                  : 15233
% 11.01/1.99  % ...of those cached                   : 13389
% 11.01/1.99  % Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 11.01/1.99  %    Propositional check models        : 0
% 11.01/1.99  %    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 11.01/1.99  %    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 11.01/1.99  %    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 11.01/1.99  %    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 11.01/1.99  %    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 11.01/1.99  %    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
% 11.01/1.99  %    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
% 11.01/1.99  %    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 11.01/1.99  %    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 11.01/1.99  %    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 11.01/1.99  % Current number of processed clauses  : 3108
% 11.01/1.99  %    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 697
% 11.01/1.99  %    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 18
% 11.01/1.99  %    Negative unit clauses             : 156
% 11.01/1.99  %    Non-unit-clauses                  : 2237
% 11.01/1.99  % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 23531
% 11.01/1.99  % ...number of literals in the above   : 85123
% 11.01/1.99  % Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 11.01/1.99  % Current number of archived clauses   : 92
% 11.01/1.99  % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 2316002
% 11.01/1.99  % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 1295744
% 11.01/1.99  % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 461
% 11.01/1.99  % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 111048
% 11.01/1.99  % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 5
% 11.01/1.99  % BW rewrite match attempts            : 981
% 11.01/1.99  % BW rewrite match successes           : 42
% 11.01/1.99  % Condensation attempts                : 0
% 11.01/1.99  % Condensation successes               : 0
% 11.01/1.99  % Termbank termtop insertions          : 578455
% 11.01/1.99  % Search garbage collected termcells   : 4270
% 11.01/1.99  
% 11.01/1.99  % -------------------------------------------------
% 11.01/1.99  % User time                : 1.313 s
% 11.01/1.99  % System time              : 0.054 s
% 11.01/1.99  % Total time               : 1.367 s
% 11.01/1.99  % Maximum resident set size: 8620 pages
% 11.01/1.99  
% 11.01/1.99  % -------------------------------------------------
% 11.01/1.99  % User time                : 6.771 s
% 11.01/1.99  % System time              : 0.226 s
% 11.01/1.99  % Total time               : 6.997 s
% 11.01/1.99  % Maximum resident set size: 6400 pages
% 11.01/1.99  % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------