↑ Up

E-SAT---3.5.1.UNS-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E-SAT---3.5.1
% Problem  : SWV341-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM

% Computer : n003.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 03:01:19 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 4.33s 1.16s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 4.33s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    4
%            Number of leaves      :    4
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   13 (   7 unt;   0 nHn;  13 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   19 (   0 equ;   9 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    2 (   1 usr;   1 prp; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    9 (   9 usr;   4 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   12 (   0 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(cls_Message_Oanalz__conj__parts_0,axiom,
    ( ~ c_in(X1,c_Message_Oanalz(X2),tc_Message_Omsg)
    | c_in(X1,c_Message_Oparts(X2),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SWV005-2.ax',cls_Message_Oanalz__conj__parts_0) ).

cnf(cls_Event_Oc_A_58_Aparts_A_Iknows_ASpy_Aevs1_J_A_61_61_62_Ac_A_58_Aused_Aevs1_0,axiom,
    ( ~ c_in(X1,c_Message_Oparts(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,X2)),tc_Message_Omsg)
    | c_in(X1,c_Event_Oused(X2),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SWV005-2.ax',cls_Event_Oc_A_58_Aparts_A_Iknows_ASpy_Aevs1_J_A_61_61_62_Ac_A_58_Aused_Aevs1_0) ).

cnf(cls_conjecture_8,negated_conjecture,
    c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OKey(v_K),c_Message_Oanalz(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evs3)),tc_Message_Omsg),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_8) ).

cnf(cls_conjecture_1,negated_conjecture,
    ~ c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OKey(v_K),c_Event_Oused(v_evs3),tc_Message_Omsg),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_1) ).

cnf(c_0_4,plain,
    ( ~ c_in(X1,c_Message_Oanalz(X2),tc_Message_Omsg)
    | c_in(X1,c_Message_Oparts(X2),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[cls_Message_Oanalz__conj__parts_0]) ).

cnf(c_0_5,plain,
    ( ~ c_in(X1,c_Message_Oparts(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,X2)),tc_Message_Omsg)
    | c_in(X1,c_Event_Oused(X2),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[cls_Event_Oc_A_58_Aparts_A_Iknows_ASpy_Aevs1_J_A_61_61_62_Ac_A_58_Aused_Aevs1_0]) ).

cnf(c_0_6,plain,
    ( ~ c_in(X1,c_Message_Oanalz(X2),tc_Message_Omsg)
    | c_in(X1,c_Message_Oparts(X2),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
    c_0_4 ).

cnf(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
    c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OKey(v_K),c_Message_Oanalz(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evs3)),tc_Message_Omsg),
    cls_conjecture_8 ).

cnf(c_0_8,negated_conjecture,
    ~ c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OKey(v_K),c_Event_Oused(v_evs3),tc_Message_Omsg),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[cls_conjecture_1]) ).

cnf(c_0_9,plain,
    ( ~ c_in(X1,c_Message_Oparts(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,X2)),tc_Message_Omsg)
    | c_in(X1,c_Event_Oused(X2),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
    c_0_5 ).

cnf(c_0_10,negated_conjecture,
    c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OKey(v_K),c_Message_Oparts(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evs3)),tc_Message_Omsg),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_6,c_0_7]) ).

cnf(c_0_11,negated_conjecture,
    ~ c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OKey(v_K),c_Event_Oused(v_evs3),tc_Message_Omsg),
    c_0_8 ).

cnf(c_0_12,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_9,c_0_10]),c_0_11]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : SWV341-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.00/0.05  % Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.11/0.38  % Computer : n003.cluster.edu
% 0.11/0.38  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.11/0.38  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.11/0.38  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.11/0.38  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.11/0.38  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.11/0.38  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.11/0.38  % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 08:44:01 UTC 2026
% 0.11/0.38  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.11/0.38  Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.15/0.42  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.15/0.42  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 4.33/1.16  % Version: 3.5.1
% 4.33/1.16  % Preprocessing class: FMLMSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 4.33/1.16  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 4.33/1.16  % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 4.33/1.16  % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 4.33/1.16  % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 4.33/1.16  % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 4.33/1.16  % G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with pid 3895394 completed with status 0
% 4.33/1.16  % Result found by G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN
% 4.33/1.16  % Preprocessing class: FMLMSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 4.33/1.16  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 4.33/1.16  % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 4.33/1.16  % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 4.33/1.16  % No SInE strategy applied
% 4.33/1.16  % Search class: FGHSM-SMLM32-DFFFFFNN
% 4.33/1.16  % Scheduled 13 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 4.33/1.16  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 4.33/1.16  % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 151s (1) cores
% 4.33/1.16  % Starting G-E--_008_C45_F1_PI_SE_Q4_CS_SP_S4SI with 113s (1) cores
% 4.33/1.16  % Starting G-E--_207_C01_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_S5PRR_S0Y with 113s (1) cores
% 4.33/1.16  % Starting G-E--_208_B07CMA_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 113s (1) cores
% 4.33/1.16  % G-E--_207_C01_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_S5PRR_S0Y with pid 3895431 completed with status 0
% 4.33/1.16  % Result found by G-E--_207_C01_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_S5PRR_S0Y
% 4.33/1.16  % Preprocessing class: FMLMSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 4.33/1.16  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 4.33/1.16  % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 4.33/1.16  % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 4.33/1.16  % No SInE strategy applied
% 4.33/1.16  % Search class: FGHSM-SMLM32-DFFFFFNN
% 4.33/1.16  % Scheduled 13 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 4.33/1.16  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 4.33/1.16  % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 151s (1) cores
% 4.33/1.16  % Starting G-E--_008_C45_F1_PI_SE_Q4_CS_SP_S4SI with 113s (1) cores
% 4.33/1.16  % Starting G-E--_207_C01_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_S5PRR_S0Y with 113s (1) cores
% 4.33/1.16  % Preprocessing time       : 0.019 s
% 4.33/1.16  
% 4.33/1.16  % Proof found!
% 4.33/1.16  % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 4.33/1.16  % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 4.33/1.16  % Parsed axioms                        : 2954
% 4.33/1.16  % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 0
% 4.33/1.16  % Initial clauses                      : 2954
% 4.33/1.16  % Removed in clause preprocessing      : 12
% 4.33/1.16  % Initial clauses in saturation        : 2942
% 4.33/1.16  % Processed clauses                    : 2975
% 4.33/1.16  % ...of these trivial                  : 26
% 4.33/1.16  % ...subsumed                          : 135
% 4.33/1.16  % ...remaining for further processing  : 2814
% 4.33/1.16  % Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 211
% 4.33/1.16  % Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 4.33/1.16  % Backward-subsumed                    : 4
% 4.33/1.16  % Backward-rewritten                   : 12
% 4.33/1.16  % Generated clauses                    : 26484
% 4.33/1.16  % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 21877
% 4.33/1.16  % ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 4.33/1.16  % Contextual simplify-reflections      : 1
% 4.33/1.16  % Paramodulations                      : 26201
% 4.33/1.16  % Factorizations                       : 1
% 4.33/1.16  % NegExts                              : 0
% 4.33/1.16  % Equation resolutions                 : 282
% 4.33/1.16  % Disequality decompositions           : 0
% 4.33/1.16  % Total rewrite steps                  : 11856
% 4.33/1.16  % ...of those cached                   : 10210
% 4.33/1.16  % Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 4.33/1.16  %    Propositional check models        : 0
% 4.33/1.16  %    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 4.33/1.16  %    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 4.33/1.16  %    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 4.33/1.16  %    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 4.33/1.16  %    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 4.33/1.16  %    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
% 4.33/1.16  %    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
% 4.33/1.16  %    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 4.33/1.16  %    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 4.33/1.16  %    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 4.33/1.16  % Current number of processed clauses  : 2798
% 4.33/1.16  %    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 620
% 4.33/1.16  %    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 18
% 4.33/1.16  %    Negative unit clauses             : 64
% 4.33/1.16  %    Non-unit-clauses                  : 2096
% 4.33/1.16  % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 21843
% 4.33/1.16  % ...number of literals in the above   : 79389
% 4.33/1.16  % Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 4.33/1.16  % Current number of archived clauses   : 26
% 4.33/1.16  % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 2043809
% 4.33/1.16  % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 1100727
% 4.33/1.16  % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 81
% 4.33/1.16  % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 90116
% 4.33/1.16  % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 3
% 4.33/1.16  % BW rewrite match attempts            : 391
% 4.33/1.16  % BW rewrite match successes           : 34
% 4.33/1.16  % Condensation attempts                : 0
% 4.33/1.16  % Condensation successes               : 0
% 4.33/1.16  % Termbank termtop insertions          : 521130
% 4.33/1.16  % Search garbage collected termcells   : 4287
% 4.33/1.16  
% 4.33/1.16  % -------------------------------------------------
% 4.33/1.16  % User time                : 0.608 s
% 4.33/1.16  % System time              : 0.037 s
% 4.33/1.16  % Total time               : 0.645 s
% 4.33/1.16  % Maximum resident set size: 8624 pages
% 4.33/1.16  
% 4.33/1.16  % -------------------------------------------------
% 4.33/1.16  % User time                : 2.919 s
% 4.33/1.16  % System time              : 0.117 s
% 4.33/1.16  % Total time               : 3.035 s
% 4.33/1.16  % Maximum resident set size: 6400 pages
% 4.33/1.16  % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------