↑ Up

iProver---3.9.4.UNS-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : iProver---3.9.4
% Problem  : SWV341-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM

% Computer : n009.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Fri Sep 25 03:17:22 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 14.43s 2.81s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 14.43s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    4
%            Number of leaves      :    4
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   11 (   7 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   15 (   0 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   10 (   6   ~;   4   |;   0   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    5 (   3 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of types       :    1 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :    0 (   0   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of predicates  :    2 (   1 usr;   1 prp; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    9 (   9 usr;   4 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :    8 (   0 sgn   8   !;   0   ?;   4   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f3375,axiom,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( c_in(X0,c_Event_Oused(X1),tc_Message_Omsg)
      | ~ c_in(X0,c_Message_Oparts(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,X1)),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SWV005-2.ax',cls_Event_Oc_A_58_Aparts_A_Iknows_ASpy_Aevs1_J_A_61_61_62_Ac_A_58_Aused_Aevs1_0) ).

fof(f3465,axiom,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( c_in(X0,c_Message_Oparts(X1),tc_Message_Omsg)
      | ~ c_in(X0,c_Message_Oanalz(X1),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SWV005-2.ax',cls_Message_Oanalz__conj__parts_0) ).

fof(f3576,negated_conjecture,
    ~ c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OKey(v_K),c_Event_Oused(v_evs3),tc_Message_Omsg),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_1) ).

fof(f3583,negated_conjecture,
    c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OKey(v_K),c_Message_Oanalz(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evs3)),tc_Message_Omsg),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_8) ).

tcf(c_3004,negated_conjecture,
    ~ c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OKey(v_K),c_Event_Oused(v_evs3),tc_Message_Omsg),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f3576]) ).

tcf(c_3011,negated_conjecture,
    c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OKey(v_K),c_Message_Oanalz(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evs3)),tc_Message_Omsg),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f3583]) ).

tcf(c_3042,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( c_in(X0,c_Event_Oused(X1),tc_Message_Omsg)
      | ~ c_in(X0,c_Message_Oparts(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,X1)),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f3375]) ).

tcf(c_3156,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( c_in(X0,c_Message_Oparts(X1),tc_Message_Omsg)
      | ~ c_in(X0,c_Message_Oanalz(X1),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f3465]) ).

tcf(c_39130,plain,
    c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OKey(v_K),c_Message_Oparts(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evs3)),tc_Message_Omsg),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_3011,c_3156]) ).

tcf(c_41742,plain,
    c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OKey(v_K),c_Event_Oused(v_evs3),tc_Message_Omsg),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_39130,c_3042]) ).

tcf(c_41744,plain,
    $false,
    inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_41742,c_3004]) ).


%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.02  % Problem  : SWV341-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.00/0.03  % Command  : run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM
% 0.10/0.36  % Computer : n009.cluster.edu
% 0.10/0.36  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.10/0.36  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.10/0.36  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.10/0.36  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.10/0.36  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.10/0.36  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.10/0.36  % DateTime : Thu Sep 24 19:17:43 UTC 2026
% 0.10/0.37  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.10/0.37  Running run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM
% 0.10/0.41  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.10/0.41  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/iproveropt-multi-core.sh -d -n -l tptp -s fof_schedule -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.10/0.42  
% 0.10/0.42  % ======== iProver multi-core TPTP/SMT =========
% 0.10/0.42  
% 0.10/0.42  % Detected problem language: tptp
% 0.10/0.43  % Proving...
% 14.43/2.81  % SZS status Started for theBenchmark.p
% 14.43/2.81  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark.p
% 14.43/2.81  
% 14.43/2.81  %---------------- iProver v3.9.4 (pre CASC 2026/SMT-COMP 2026) ----------------%
% 14.43/2.81  
% 14.43/2.81  % ------  iProver source info
% 14.43/2.81  
% 14.43/2.81  % git: date: 2026-07-19 20:42:38 +0200
% 14.43/2.81  % git: sha1: 804e7d636a263075307957e923b7a22a4035de61
% 14.43/2.81  % git: non_committed_changes: false
% 14.43/2.81  
% 14.43/2.81  % ------ Parsing...% successful
% 14.43/2.81  
% 14.43/2.81  
% 14.43/2.81  % ------ Clausification by vclausify_rel  & Parsing by iProver...% 
% 14.43/2.81  
% 14.43/2.81  % ------ Preprocessing... sup_sim: 40  sf_s  rm: 5 0s  sf_e  pe_s  pe:1:0s pe:2:0s pe:4:0s pe:8:0s pe_e  sup_sim: 16  sf_s  rm: 16 0s  sf_e  pe_s  pe_e  sup_sim: 0  sf_s  rm: 16 0s  sf_e  pe_s  pe_e % 
% 14.43/2.81  
% 14.43/2.81  % ------ Preprocessing... gs_s  sp: 0 0s  gs_e  snvd_s sp: 0 0s snvd_e % 
% 14.43/2.81  
% 14.43/2.81  % ------ Preprocessing... sf_s  rm: 1 0s  sf_e  sf_s  rm: 0 0s  sf_e 
% 14.43/2.81  % ------ Proving...
% 14.43/2.81  % ------ Problem Properties 
% 14.43/2.81  
% 14.43/2.81  % 
% 14.43/2.81  % clauses                               676
% 14.43/2.81  % conjectures                           9
% 14.43/2.81  % EPR                                   29
% 14.43/2.81  % Horn                                  604
% 14.43/2.81  % unary                                 286
% 14.43/2.81  % binary                                286
% 14.43/2.81  % lits                                  1178
% 14.43/2.81  % lits eq                               500
% 14.43/2.81  % fd_pure                               0
% 14.43/2.81  % fd_pseudo                             0
% 14.43/2.81  % fd_cond                               37
% 14.43/2.81  % fd_pseudo_cond                        57
% 14.43/2.81  % AC symbols                            0
% 14.43/2.81  
% 14.43/2.81  % ------ Schedule dynamic 5 is on 
% 14.43/2.81  
% 14.43/2.81  % ------ Input Options "--resolution_flag false --inst_lit_sel_side none" Time Limit: 10.
% 14.43/2.81  
% 14.43/2.81  
% 14.43/2.81  % ------ 
% 14.43/2.81  % Current options:
% 14.43/2.81  % ------ 
% 14.43/2.81  
% 14.43/2.81  
% 14.43/2.81  % 
% 14.43/2.81  
% 14.43/2.81  % ------ Proving...
% 14.43/2.81  % 
% 14.43/2.81  
% 14.43/2.81  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark.p
% 14.43/2.81  
% 14.43/2.81  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 14.43/2.81  
% 14.43/2.81  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------