%------------------------------------------------------------------------------ % File : CSE---1.7 % Problem : SWV341-2 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v3.2.0. % Transfm : none % Format : tptp:raw % Command : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %d %s % Computer : n029.cluster.edu % Model : x86_64 x86_64 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz % Memory : 8042.1875MB % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64 % CPULimit : 300s % WCLimit : 300s % DateTime : Mon Jun 24 16:46:50 EDT 2024 % Result : Unsatisfiable 0.54s 0.59s % Output : CNFRefutation 0.54s % Verified : % SZS Type : - % Comments : %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ %----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ %----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT % 0.00/0.12 % Problem : SWV341-2 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v3.2.0. % 0.00/0.12 % Command : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %d %s % 0.12/0.33 % Computer : n029.cluster.edu % 0.12/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64 % 0.12/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz % 0.12/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB % 0.12/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64 % 0.12/0.33 % CPULimit : 300 % 0.12/0.33 % WCLimit : 300 % 0.12/0.33 % DateTime : Thu Jun 20 21:24:09 EDT 2024 % 0.12/0.33 % CPUTime : % 0.20/0.56 start to proof:theBenchmark % 0.54/0.59 %------------------------------------------- % 0.54/0.59 % File :CSE---1.7 % 0.54/0.59 % Problem :theBenchmark % 0.54/0.59 % Transform :cnf % 0.54/0.59 % Format :tptp:raw % 0.54/0.59 % Command :java -jar mcs_scs.jar %d %s % 0.54/0.59 % 0.54/0.59 % Result :Theorem 0.000000s % 0.54/0.59 % Output :CNFRefutation 0.000000s % 0.54/0.59 %------------------------------------------- % 0.54/0.59 %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ % 0.54/0.59 % File : SWV341-2 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v3.2.0. % 0.54/0.59 % Domain : Software Verification (Security) % 0.54/0.59 % Problem : Cryptographic protocol problem for Yahalom % 0.54/0.59 % Version : [Pau06] axioms : Reduced > Especial. % 0.54/0.59 % English : % 0.54/0.59 % 0.54/0.59 % Refs : [Pau06] Paulson (2006), Email to G. Sutcliffe % 0.54/0.59 % Source : [Pau06] % 0.54/0.59 % Names : % 0.54/0.59 % 0.54/0.59 % Status : Unsatisfiable % 0.54/0.59 % Rating : 0.00 v5.4.0, 0.06 v5.3.0, 0.10 v5.2.0, 0.00 v3.2.0 % 0.54/0.59 % Syntax : Number of clauses : 4 ( 2 unt; 0 nHn; 4 RR) % 0.54/0.59 % Number of literals : 6 ( 0 equ; 3 neg) % 0.54/0.59 % Maximal clause size : 2 ( 1 avg) % 0.54/0.59 % Maximal term depth : 3 ( 1 avg) % 0.54/0.59 % Number of predicates : 1 ( 1 usr; 0 prp; 3-3 aty) % 0.54/0.59 % Number of functors : 9 ( 9 usr; 4 con; 0-2 aty) % 0.54/0.59 % Number of variables : 4 ( 0 sgn) % 0.54/0.59 % SPC : CNF_UNS_RFO_NEQ_HRN % 0.54/0.59 % 0.54/0.59 % Comments : The problems in the [Pau06] collection each have very many axioms, % 0.54/0.59 % of which only a small selection are required for the refutation. % 0.54/0.59 % The mission is to find those few axioms, after which a refutation % 0.54/0.59 % can be quite easily found. This version has only the necessary % 0.54/0.59 % axioms. % 0.54/0.59 %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ % 0.54/0.59 cnf(cls_conjecture_1,negated_conjecture, % 0.54/0.59 ~ c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OKey(v_K),c_Event_Oused(v_evs3),tc_Message_Omsg) ). % 0.54/0.59 % 0.54/0.59 cnf(cls_conjecture_8,negated_conjecture, % 0.54/0.59 c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OKey(v_K),c_Message_Oanalz(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evs3)),tc_Message_Omsg) ). % 0.54/0.59 % 0.54/0.59 cnf(cls_Event_Oc_A_58_Aparts_A_Iknows_ASpy_Aevs1_J_A_61_61_62_Ac_A_58_Aused_Aevs1_0,axiom, % 0.54/0.59 ( ~ c_in(V_c,c_Message_Oparts(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,V_evs)),tc_Message_Omsg) % 0.54/0.59 | c_in(V_c,c_Event_Oused(V_evs),tc_Message_Omsg) ) ). % 0.54/0.59 % 0.54/0.59 cnf(cls_Message_Oanalz__conj__parts_0,axiom, % 0.54/0.59 ( ~ c_in(V_X,c_Message_Oanalz(V_H),tc_Message_Omsg) % 0.54/0.59 | c_in(V_X,c_Message_Oparts(V_H),tc_Message_Omsg) ) ). % 0.54/0.59 % 0.54/0.59 %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ % 0.54/0.59 %------------------------------------------- % 0.54/0.59 % Proof found % 0.54/0.59 % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark % 0.54/0.59 % SZS output start Proof % 0.54/0.60 %ClaNum:4(EqnAxiom:0) % 0.54/0.60 %VarNum:8(SingletonVarNum:4) % 0.54/0.60 %MaxLitNum:2 % 0.54/0.60 %MaxfuncDepth:2 % 0.54/0.60 %SharedTerms:10 % 0.54/0.60 %goalClause: 1 2 % 0.54/0.60 %singleGoalClaCount:2 % 0.54/0.60 [2]~P1(f2(a1),f5(a9),a7) % 0.54/0.60 [1]P1(f2(a1),f6(f4(a3,a9)),a7) % 0.54/0.60 [3]~P1(x31,f6(x32),a7)+P1(x31,f8(x32),a7) % 0.54/0.60 [4]P1(x41,f5(x42),a7)+~P1(x41,f8(f4(a3,x42)),a7) % 0.54/0.60 %EqnAxiom % 0.54/0.60 % 0.54/0.60 %------------------------------------------- % 0.54/0.60 cnf(5,plain, % 0.54/0.60 ($false), % 0.54/0.60 inference(scs_inference,[],[1,2,3,4]), % 0.54/0.60 ['proof']). % 0.54/0.60 % SZS output end Proof % 0.54/0.60 % Total time :0.000000s %------------------------------------------------------------------------------