%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : iProver---3.9.4
% Problem : SWV341-2 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM
% Computer : n014.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Fri Sep 25 03:17:22 PM UTC 2026
% Result : Unsatisfiable 1.54s 1.29s
% Output : CNFRefutation 1.54s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 6
% Number of leaves : 8
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 20 ( 12 unt; 4 def)
% Number of atoms : 46 ( 4 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 2 ( 2 avg)
% Number of connectives : 19 ( 11 ~; 8 |; 0 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 0 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 5 ( 3 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Number of types : 1 ( 0 usr)
% Number of type conns : 0 ( 0 >; 0 *; 0 +; 0 <<)
% Number of predicates : 7 ( 5 usr; 5 prp; 0-3 aty)
% Number of functors : 9 ( 9 usr; 4 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 12 ( 0 sgn 12 !; 0 ?; 8 :)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f1,negated_conjecture,
~ c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OKey(v_K),c_Event_Oused(v_evs3),tc_Message_Omsg),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_1) ).
fof(f2,negated_conjecture,
c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OKey(v_K),c_Message_Oanalz(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evs3)),tc_Message_Omsg),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_8) ).
fof(f3,axiom,
! [X0,X1] :
( c_in(X0,c_Event_Oused(X1),tc_Message_Omsg)
| ~ c_in(X0,c_Message_Oparts(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,X1)),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_Event_Oc_A_58_Aparts_A_Iknows_ASpy_Aevs1_J_A_61_61_62_Ac_A_58_Aused_Aevs1_0) ).
fof(f4,axiom,
! [X0,X1] :
( c_in(X0,c_Message_Oparts(X1),tc_Message_Omsg)
| ~ c_in(X0,c_Message_Oanalz(X1),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_Message_Oanalz__conj__parts_0) ).
tcf(c_53,negated_conjecture,
~ c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OKey(v_K),c_Event_Oused(v_evs3),tc_Message_Omsg),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f1]) ).
tcf(c_54,negated_conjecture,
c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OKey(v_K),c_Message_Oanalz(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evs3)),tc_Message_Omsg),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f2]) ).
tcf(c_55,plain,
! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
( c_in(X0,c_Event_Oused(X1),tc_Message_Omsg)
| ~ c_in(X0,c_Message_Oparts(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,X1)),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f3]) ).
tcf(c_56,plain,
! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
( c_in(X0,c_Message_Oparts(X1),tc_Message_Omsg)
| ~ c_in(X0,c_Message_Oanalz(X1),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f4]) ).
tcf(c_71,definition,
iPr_def_10 = c_Message_Omsg_OKey(v_K),
introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[iPr_def_10])],[]) ).
tcf(c_72,definition,
iPr_def_11 = c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evs3),
introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[iPr_def_11])],[]) ).
tcf(c_73,definition,
iPr_def_12 = c_Message_Oanalz(iPr_def_11),
introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[iPr_def_12])],[]) ).
tcf(c_74,definition,
iPr_def_13 = c_Event_Oused(v_evs3),
introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[iPr_def_13])],[]) ).
tcf(c_75,negated_conjecture,
c_in(iPr_def_10,iPr_def_12,tc_Message_Omsg),
inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_54,c_72,c_73,c_71]) ).
tcf(c_76,negated_conjecture,
~ c_in(iPr_def_10,iPr_def_13,tc_Message_Omsg),
inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_53,c_74]) ).
tcf(c_217,plain,
! [X0: $i] :
( c_in(X0,c_Message_Oparts(iPr_def_11),tc_Message_Omsg)
| ~ c_in(X0,iPr_def_12,tc_Message_Omsg) ),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_73,c_56]) ).
tcf(c_229,plain,
! [X0: $i] :
( c_in(X0,c_Event_Oused(v_evs3),tc_Message_Omsg)
| ~ c_in(X0,c_Message_Oparts(iPr_def_11),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_72,c_55]) ).
tcf(c_230,plain,
! [X0: $i] :
( c_in(X0,iPr_def_13,tc_Message_Omsg)
| ~ c_in(X0,c_Message_Oparts(iPr_def_11),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
inference(light_normalisation,[status(thm)],[c_229,c_74]) ).
tcf(c_238,plain,
! [X0: $i] :
( c_in(X0,iPr_def_13,tc_Message_Omsg)
| ~ c_in(X0,iPr_def_12,tc_Message_Omsg) ),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_217,c_230]) ).
tcf(c_246,plain,
c_in(iPr_def_10,iPr_def_13,tc_Message_Omsg),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_75,c_238]) ).
tcf(c_247,plain,
$false,
inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_246,c_76]) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03 % Problem : SWV341-2 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.00/0.04 % Command : run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM
% 0.10/0.37 % Computer : n014.cluster.edu
% 0.10/0.37 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.10/0.37 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.10/0.37 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.10/0.37 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.10/0.37 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.10/0.37 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.10/0.37 % DateTime : Thu Sep 24 19:17:32 UTC 2026
% 0.10/0.37 % CPUTime :
% 0.10/0.37 Running run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM
% 0.10/0.41 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.10/0.41 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/iproveropt-multi-core.sh -d -n -l tptp -s fof_schedule -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.10/0.42
% 0.10/0.42 % ======== iProver multi-core TPTP/SMT =========
% 0.10/0.42
% 0.10/0.43 % Detected problem language: tptp
% 0.10/0.44 % Proving...
% 1.54/1.29 % SZS status Started for theBenchmark.p
% 1.54/1.29 % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark.p
% 1.54/1.29
% 1.54/1.29 %---------------- iProver v3.9.4 (pre CASC 2026/SMT-COMP 2026) ----------------%
% 1.54/1.29
% 1.54/1.29 % ------ iProver source info
% 1.54/1.29
% 1.54/1.29 % git: date: 2026-07-19 20:42:38 +0200
% 1.54/1.29 % git: sha1: 804e7d636a263075307957e923b7a22a4035de61
% 1.54/1.29 % git: non_committed_changes: false
% 1.54/1.29
% 1.54/1.29 % ------ Parsing...% successful
% 1.54/1.29
% 1.54/1.29
% 1.54/1.29 % ------ Clausification by vclausify_rel & Parsing by iProver...%
% 1.54/1.29
% 1.54/1.29 % ------ Preprocessing... sf_s rm: 0 0s sf_e pe_s pe_e %
% 1.54/1.29
% 1.54/1.29 % ------ Preprocessing... gs_s sp: 0 0s gs_e snvd_s sp: 0 0s snvd_e %
% 1.54/1.29
% 1.54/1.29 % ------ Preprocessing... sf_s rm: 1 0s sf_e sf_s rm: 0 0s sf_e
% 1.54/1.29 % ------ Proving...
% 1.54/1.29 % ------ Problem Properties
% 1.54/1.29
% 1.54/1.29 %
% 1.54/1.29 % clauses 8
% 1.54/1.29 % conjectures 2
% 1.54/1.29 % EPR 2
% 1.54/1.29 % Horn 8
% 1.54/1.29 % unary 6
% 1.54/1.29 % binary 2
% 1.54/1.29 % lits 10
% 1.54/1.29 % lits eq 4
% 1.54/1.29 % fd_pure 0
% 1.54/1.29 % fd_pseudo 0
% 1.54/1.29 % fd_cond 0
% 1.54/1.29 % fd_pseudo_cond 0
% 1.54/1.29 % AC symbols 0
% 1.54/1.29
% 1.54/1.29 % ------ Schedule dynamic 5 is on
% 1.54/1.29
% 1.54/1.29 % ------ Input Options "--resolution_flag false --inst_lit_sel_side none" Time Limit: 10.
% 1.54/1.29
% 1.54/1.29
% 1.54/1.29 % ------
% 1.54/1.29 % Current options:
% 1.54/1.29 % ------
% 1.54/1.29
% 1.54/1.29
% 1.54/1.29 %
% 1.54/1.29
% 1.54/1.29 % ------ Proving...
% 1.54/1.29 %
% 1.54/1.29
% 1.54/1.29 % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark.p
% 1.54/1.29
% 1.54/1.29 % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 1.54/1.29
% 1.54/1.29
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------