%------------------------------------------------------------------------------ % File : CSE---1.7 % Problem : SWV349-2 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v3.2.0. % Transfm : none % Format : tptp:raw % Command : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %d %s % Computer : n017.cluster.edu % Model : x86_64 x86_64 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz % Memory : 8042.1875MB % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64 % CPULimit : 300s % WCLimit : 300s % DateTime : Mon Jun 24 16:46:53 EDT 2024 % Result : Unsatisfiable 0.57s 0.63s % Output : CNFRefutation 0.57s % Verified : % SZS Type : - % Comments : %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ %----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ %----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT % 0.07/0.12 % Problem : SWV349-2 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v3.2.0. % 0.07/0.12 % Command : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %d %s % 0.13/0.33 % Computer : n017.cluster.edu % 0.13/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64 % 0.13/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz % 0.13/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB % 0.13/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64 % 0.13/0.33 % CPULimit : 300 % 0.13/0.33 % WCLimit : 300 % 0.13/0.33 % DateTime : Thu Jun 20 15:12:54 EDT 2024 % 0.13/0.33 % CPUTime : % 0.42/0.59 start to proof:theBenchmark % 0.42/0.62 %------------------------------------------- % 0.42/0.62 % File :CSE---1.7 % 0.42/0.62 % Problem :theBenchmark % 0.42/0.62 % Transform :cnf % 0.42/0.62 % Format :tptp:raw % 0.42/0.62 % Command :java -jar mcs_scs.jar %d %s % 0.42/0.62 % 0.42/0.62 % Result :Theorem 0.000000s % 0.42/0.62 % Output :CNFRefutation 0.000000s % 0.42/0.62 %------------------------------------------- % 0.42/0.62 %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ % 0.42/0.62 % File : SWV349-2 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v3.2.0. % 0.57/0.63 % Domain : Software Verification (Security) % 0.57/0.63 % Problem : Cryptographic protocol problem for Yahalom % 0.57/0.63 % Version : [Pau06] axioms : Reduced > Especial. % 0.57/0.63 % English : % 0.57/0.63 % 0.57/0.63 % Refs : [Pau06] Paulson (2006), Email to G. Sutcliffe % 0.57/0.63 % Source : [Pau06] % 0.57/0.63 % Names : % 0.57/0.63 % 0.57/0.63 % Status : Unsatisfiable % 0.57/0.63 % Rating : 0.00 v5.4.0, 0.06 v5.3.0, 0.05 v5.2.0, 0.00 v3.2.0 % 0.57/0.63 % Syntax : Number of clauses : 2 ( 2 unt; 0 nHn; 2 RR) % 0.57/0.63 % Number of literals : 2 ( 0 equ; 1 neg) % 0.57/0.63 % Maximal clause size : 1 ( 1 avg) % 0.57/0.63 % Maximal term depth : 5 ( 2 avg) % 0.57/0.63 % Number of predicates : 1 ( 1 usr; 0 prp; 3-3 aty) % 0.57/0.63 % Number of functors : 10 ( 10 usr; 6 con; 0-2 aty) % 0.57/0.63 % Number of variables : 1 ( 1 sgn) % 0.57/0.63 % SPC : CNF_UNS_RFO_NEQ_HRN % 0.57/0.63 % 0.57/0.63 % Comments : The problems in the [Pau06] collection each have very many axioms, % 0.57/0.63 % of which only a small selection are required for the refutation. % 0.57/0.63 % The mission is to find those few axioms, after which a refutation % 0.57/0.63 % can be quite easily found. This version has only the necessary % 0.57/0.63 % axioms. % 0.57/0.63 %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ % 0.57/0.63 cnf(cls_conjecture_4,negated_conjecture, % 0.57/0.63 ~ c_in(c_Event_Oevent_ONotes(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NA),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NB),V_U))),c_List_Oset(v_evso,tc_Event_Oevent),tc_Event_Oevent) ). % 0.57/0.63 % 0.57/0.63 cnf(cls_conjecture_6,negated_conjecture, % 0.57/0.63 c_in(c_Event_Oevent_ONotes(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NA),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NB),v_k))),c_List_Oset(v_evso,tc_Event_Oevent),tc_Event_Oevent) ). % 0.57/0.63 % 0.57/0.63 %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ % 0.57/0.63 %------------------------------------------- % 0.57/0.63 % Proof found % 0.57/0.63 % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark % 0.57/0.63 % SZS output start Proof % 0.57/0.63 %ClaNum:2(EqnAxiom:0) % 0.57/0.63 %VarNum:1(SingletonVarNum:1) % 0.57/0.63 %MaxLitNum:1 % 0.57/0.63 %MaxfuncDepth:4 % 0.57/0.63 %SharedTerms:13 % 0.57/0.63 %goalClause: 1 2 % 0.57/0.63 %singleGoalClaCount:2 % 0.57/0.63 [1]P1(f2(a1,f6(f5(a4),f6(f5(a8),a9))),f3(a10,a7),a7) % 0.57/0.63 [2]~P1(f2(a1,f6(f5(a4),f6(f5(a8),x21))),f3(a10,a7),a7) % 0.57/0.63 %EqnAxiom % 0.57/0.63 % 0.57/0.63 %------------------------------------------- % 0.57/0.63 cnf(3,plain, % 0.57/0.63 ($false), % 0.57/0.63 inference(scs_inference,[],[1,2]), % 0.57/0.63 ['proof']). % 0.57/0.63 % SZS output end Proof % 0.57/0.63 % Total time :0.000000s %------------------------------------------------------------------------------