%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.5.1
% Problem : SWV350-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% Computer : n017.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 02:54:30 PM UTC 2026
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.19s 0.55s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.19s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 3
% Number of leaves : 2
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 6 ( 6 unt; 0 nHn; 6 RR)
% Number of literals : 6 ( 0 equ; 3 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 5 ( 2 avg)
% Number of predicates : 2 ( 1 usr; 1 prp; 0-3 aty)
% Number of functors : 10 ( 10 usr; 6 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 3 ( 3 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(cls_conjecture_4,negated_conjecture,
~ c_in(c_Event_Oevent_ONotes(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NA),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NB),X1))),c_List_Oset(v_evso,tc_Event_Oevent),tc_Event_Oevent),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_4) ).
cnf(cls_conjecture_6,negated_conjecture,
c_in(c_Event_Oevent_ONotes(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NA),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NB),v_k))),c_List_Oset(v_evso,tc_Event_Oevent),tc_Event_Oevent),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_6) ).
cnf(c_0_2,negated_conjecture,
~ c_in(c_Event_Oevent_ONotes(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NA),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NB),X1))),c_List_Oset(v_evso,tc_Event_Oevent),tc_Event_Oevent),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[cls_conjecture_4]) ).
cnf(c_0_3,negated_conjecture,
c_in(c_Event_Oevent_ONotes(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NA),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NB),v_k))),c_List_Oset(v_evso,tc_Event_Oevent),tc_Event_Oevent),
cls_conjecture_6 ).
cnf(c_0_4,negated_conjecture,
~ c_in(c_Event_Oevent_ONotes(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NA),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NB),X1))),c_List_Oset(v_evso,tc_Event_Oevent),tc_Event_Oevent),
c_0_2 ).
cnf(c_0_5,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_3,c_0_4]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03 % Problem : SWV350-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.00/0.05 % Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.11/0.37 % Computer : n017.cluster.edu
% 0.11/0.37 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.11/0.37 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.11/0.37 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.11/0.37 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.11/0.37 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.11/0.37 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.11/0.37 % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 08:37:42 UTC 2026
% 0.11/0.37 % CPUTime :
% 0.11/0.37 Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.11/0.41 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.11/0.41 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.19/0.55 % Version: 3.5.1
% 0.19/0.55 % Preprocessing class: FMLMSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.19/0.55 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.19/0.55 % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.19/0.55 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.19/0.55 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.19/0.55 % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.19/0.55 % G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with pid 1920388 completed with status 0
% 0.19/0.55 % Result found by G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN
% 0.19/0.55 % Preprocessing class: FMLMSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.19/0.55 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.19/0.55 % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.19/0.55 % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 0.19/0.55 % No SInE strategy applied
% 0.19/0.55 % Search class: FGHSM-SMLM32-DFFFFFNN
% 0.19/0.55 % Scheduled 13 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.19/0.55 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 0.19/0.55 % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 151s (1) cores
% 0.19/0.55 % Starting G-E--_008_C45_F1_PI_SE_Q4_CS_SP_S4SI with 113s (1) cores
% 0.19/0.55 % Starting G-E--_207_C01_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_S5PRR_S0Y with 113s (1) cores
% 0.19/0.55 % Starting G-E--_208_B07CMA_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 113s (1) cores
% 0.19/0.55 % G-E--_008_C45_F1_PI_SE_Q4_CS_SP_S4SI with pid 1920397 completed with status 0
% 0.19/0.55 % Result found by G-E--_008_C45_F1_PI_SE_Q4_CS_SP_S4SI
% 0.19/0.55 % Preprocessing class: FMLMSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.19/0.55 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.19/0.55 % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.19/0.55 % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 0.19/0.55 % No SInE strategy applied
% 0.19/0.55 % Search class: FGHSM-SMLM32-DFFFFFNN
% 0.19/0.55 % Scheduled 13 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.19/0.55 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 0.19/0.55 % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 151s (1) cores
% 0.19/0.55 % Starting G-E--_008_C45_F1_PI_SE_Q4_CS_SP_S4SI with 113s (1) cores
% 0.19/0.55 % Preprocessing time : 0.019 s
% 0.19/0.55
% 0.19/0.55 % Proof found!
% 0.19/0.55 % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.19/0.55 % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.19/0.55 % Parsed axioms : 2974
% 0.19/0.55 % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 0.19/0.55 % Initial clauses : 2974
% 0.19/0.55 % Removed in clause preprocessing : 12
% 0.19/0.55 % Initial clauses in saturation : 2962
% 0.19/0.55 % Processed clauses : 23
% 0.19/0.55 % ...of these trivial : 0
% 0.19/0.55 % ...subsumed : 6
% 0.19/0.55 % ...remaining for further processing : 17
% 0.19/0.55 % Other redundant clauses eliminated : 1
% 0.19/0.55 % Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.19/0.55 % Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.19/0.55 % Backward-rewritten : 0
% 0.19/0.55 % Generated clauses : 2
% 0.19/0.55 % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 1
% 0.19/0.55 % ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.19/0.55 % Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.19/0.55 % Paramodulations : 0
% 0.19/0.55 % Factorizations : 0
% 0.19/0.55 % NegExts : 0
% 0.19/0.55 % Equation resolutions : 1
% 0.19/0.55 % Disequality decompositions : 0
% 0.19/0.55 % Total rewrite steps : 0
% 0.19/0.55 % ...of those cached : 0
% 0.19/0.55 % Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.19/0.55 % Propositional check models : 0
% 0.19/0.55 % Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.19/0.55 % Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.19/0.55 % Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.19/0.55 % Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.19/0.55 % Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.19/0.55 % Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.19/0.55 % Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.19/0.55 % Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.19/0.55 % Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.19/0.55 % Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.19/0.55 % Current number of processed clauses : 15
% 0.19/0.55 % Positive orientable unit clauses : 3
% 0.19/0.55 % Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.19/0.55 % Negative unit clauses : 12
% 0.19/0.55 % Non-unit-clauses : 0
% 0.19/0.55 % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 2940
% 0.19/0.55 % ...number of literals in the above : 6383
% 0.19/0.55 % Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.19/0.55 % Current number of archived clauses : 11
% 0.19/0.55 % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 0
% 0.19/0.55 % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.19/0.55 % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 0
% 0.19/0.55 % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 8
% 0.19/0.55 % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.19/0.55 % BW rewrite match attempts : 0
% 0.19/0.55 % BW rewrite match successes : 0
% 0.19/0.55 % Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.19/0.55 % Condensation successes : 0
% 0.19/0.55 % Termbank termtop insertions : 77217
% 0.19/0.55 % Search garbage collected termcells : 4359
% 0.19/0.55
% 0.19/0.55 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.19/0.55 % User time : 0.079 s
% 0.19/0.55 % System time : 0.016 s
% 0.19/0.55 % Total time : 0.094 s
% 0.19/0.55 % Maximum resident set size: 8916 pages
% 0.19/0.55
% 0.19/0.55 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.19/0.55 % User time : 0.177 s
% 0.19/0.55 % System time : 0.047 s
% 0.19/0.55 % Total time : 0.223 s
% 0.19/0.55 % Maximum resident set size: 6912 pages
% 0.19/0.55 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------