↑ Up

E---3.5.1.UNS-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E---3.5.1
% Problem  : SWV353-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM

% Computer : n005.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 02:54:31 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 72.75s 11.25s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 72.75s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    4
%            Number of leaves      :    7
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   22 (  12 unt;   3 nHn;  22 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   44 (  11 equ;  26 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    5 (   2 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    8 (   2 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    3 (   1 usr;   1 prp; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of functors    :   27 (  27 usr;  15 con; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   68 (  40 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(cls_Yahalom_OSays__unique__NB_0,axiom,
    ( ~ c_in(c_Event_Oevent_OSays(X8,X9,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(X10,c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(c_Public_OshrK(X11),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(X12),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(X13),X7))))),c_List_Oset(X1,tc_Event_Oevent),tc_Event_Oevent)
    | ~ c_in(c_Event_Oevent_OGets(X2,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(X3,c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(c_Public_OshrK(X4),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(X5),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(X6),X7))))),c_List_Oset(X1,tc_Event_Oevent),tc_Event_Oevent)
    | ~ c_in(X1,c_Yahalom_Oyahalom,tc_List_Olist(tc_Event_Oevent))
    | X6 = X13
    | c_in(X7,c_Message_Oanalz(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,X1)),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SWV005-7.ax',cls_Yahalom_OSays__unique__NB_0) ).

cnf(cls_conjecture_6,negated_conjecture,
    ~ c_in(c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NB),c_Message_Oanalz(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evso)),tc_Message_Omsg),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_6) ).

cnf(cls_Yahalom_OSays__Server__imp__YM2_0,axiom,
    ( ~ c_in(c_Event_Oevent_OSays(c_Message_Oagent_OServer,X2,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(c_Public_OshrK(X2),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(X3),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(X4,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(X5,X6)))),X7)),c_List_Oset(X1,tc_Event_Oevent),tc_Event_Oevent)
    | ~ c_in(X1,c_Yahalom_Oyahalom,tc_List_Olist(tc_Event_Oevent))
    | c_in(c_Event_Oevent_OGets(c_Message_Oagent_OServer,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(X3),c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(c_Public_OshrK(X3),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(X2),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(X5,X6))))),c_List_Oset(X1,tc_Event_Oevent),tc_Event_Oevent) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SWV005-7.ax',cls_Yahalom_OSays__Server__imp__YM2_0) ).

cnf(cls_conjecture_8,negated_conjecture,
    ( v_NA != v_NAa
    | X1 != c_Message_Omsg_OKey(v_K) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_8) ).

cnf(cls_conjecture_5,negated_conjecture,
    c_in(c_Event_Oevent_OSays(v_B,c_Message_Oagent_OServer,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(v_B),c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(c_Public_OshrK(v_B),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(v_A),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NA),c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NB)))))),c_List_Oset(v_evso,tc_Event_Oevent),tc_Event_Oevent),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_5) ).

cnf(cls_conjecture_2,negated_conjecture,
    c_in(v_evso,c_Yahalom_Oyahalom,tc_List_Olist(tc_Event_Oevent)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_2) ).

cnf(cls_conjecture_3,negated_conjecture,
    c_in(c_Event_Oevent_OSays(c_Message_Oagent_OServer,v_Aa,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(c_Public_OshrK(v_Aa),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(v_Ba),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OKey(v_K),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NAa),c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NB))))),v_X)),c_List_Oset(v_evso,tc_Event_Oevent),tc_Event_Oevent),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_3) ).

cnf(c_0_7,plain,
    ( ~ c_in(c_Event_Oevent_OSays(X8,X9,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(X10,c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(c_Public_OshrK(X11),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(X12),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(X13),X7))))),c_List_Oset(X1,tc_Event_Oevent),tc_Event_Oevent)
    | ~ c_in(c_Event_Oevent_OGets(X2,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(X3,c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(c_Public_OshrK(X4),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(X5),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(X6),X7))))),c_List_Oset(X1,tc_Event_Oevent),tc_Event_Oevent)
    | ~ c_in(X1,c_Yahalom_Oyahalom,tc_List_Olist(tc_Event_Oevent))
    | X6 = X13
    | c_in(X7,c_Message_Oanalz(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,X1)),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[cls_Yahalom_OSays__unique__NB_0]) ).

cnf(c_0_8,negated_conjecture,
    ~ c_in(c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NB),c_Message_Oanalz(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evso)),tc_Message_Omsg),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[cls_conjecture_6]) ).

cnf(c_0_9,plain,
    ( ~ c_in(c_Event_Oevent_OSays(c_Message_Oagent_OServer,X2,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(c_Public_OshrK(X2),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(X3),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(X4,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(X5,X6)))),X7)),c_List_Oset(X1,tc_Event_Oevent),tc_Event_Oevent)
    | ~ c_in(X1,c_Yahalom_Oyahalom,tc_List_Olist(tc_Event_Oevent))
    | c_in(c_Event_Oevent_OGets(c_Message_Oagent_OServer,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(X3),c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(c_Public_OshrK(X3),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(X2),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(X5,X6))))),c_List_Oset(X1,tc_Event_Oevent),tc_Event_Oevent) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[cls_Yahalom_OSays__Server__imp__YM2_0]) ).

cnf(c_0_10,negated_conjecture,
    ( v_NA != v_NAa
    | X1 != c_Message_Omsg_OKey(v_K) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[cls_conjecture_8]) ).

cnf(c_0_11,plain,
    ( ~ c_in(c_Event_Oevent_OSays(X8,X9,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(X10,c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(c_Public_OshrK(X11),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(X12),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(X13),X7))))),c_List_Oset(X1,tc_Event_Oevent),tc_Event_Oevent)
    | ~ c_in(c_Event_Oevent_OGets(X2,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(X3,c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(c_Public_OshrK(X4),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(X5),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(X6),X7))))),c_List_Oset(X1,tc_Event_Oevent),tc_Event_Oevent)
    | ~ c_in(X1,c_Yahalom_Oyahalom,tc_List_Olist(tc_Event_Oevent))
    | X6 = X13
    | c_in(X7,c_Message_Oanalz(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,X1)),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
    c_0_7 ).

cnf(c_0_12,negated_conjecture,
    c_in(c_Event_Oevent_OSays(v_B,c_Message_Oagent_OServer,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(v_B),c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(c_Public_OshrK(v_B),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(v_A),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NA),c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NB)))))),c_List_Oset(v_evso,tc_Event_Oevent),tc_Event_Oevent),
    cls_conjecture_5 ).

cnf(c_0_13,negated_conjecture,
    c_in(v_evso,c_Yahalom_Oyahalom,tc_List_Olist(tc_Event_Oevent)),
    cls_conjecture_2 ).

cnf(c_0_14,negated_conjecture,
    ~ c_in(c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NB),c_Message_Oanalz(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evso)),tc_Message_Omsg),
    c_0_8 ).

cnf(c_0_15,plain,
    ( ~ c_in(c_Event_Oevent_OSays(c_Message_Oagent_OServer,X2,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(c_Public_OshrK(X2),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(X3),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(X4,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(X5,X6)))),X7)),c_List_Oset(X1,tc_Event_Oevent),tc_Event_Oevent)
    | ~ c_in(X1,c_Yahalom_Oyahalom,tc_List_Olist(tc_Event_Oevent))
    | c_in(c_Event_Oevent_OGets(c_Message_Oagent_OServer,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(X3),c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(c_Public_OshrK(X3),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(X2),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(X5,X6))))),c_List_Oset(X1,tc_Event_Oevent),tc_Event_Oevent) ),
    c_0_9 ).

cnf(c_0_16,negated_conjecture,
    c_in(c_Event_Oevent_OSays(c_Message_Oagent_OServer,v_Aa,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(c_Public_OshrK(v_Aa),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(v_Ba),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OKey(v_K),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NAa),c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NB))))),v_X)),c_List_Oset(v_evso,tc_Event_Oevent),tc_Event_Oevent),
    cls_conjecture_3 ).

cnf(c_0_17,negated_conjecture,
    ( v_NA != v_NAa
    | X1 != c_Message_Omsg_OKey(v_K) ),
    c_0_10 ).

cnf(c_0_18,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ c_in(c_Event_Oevent_OGets(X2,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(X3,c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(c_Public_OshrK(X4),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(X5),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(X1),c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NB)))))),c_List_Oset(v_evso,tc_Event_Oevent),tc_Event_Oevent)
    | X1 = v_NA ),
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_12]),c_0_13])]),c_0_14]) ).

cnf(c_0_19,negated_conjecture,
    c_in(c_Event_Oevent_OGets(c_Message_Oagent_OServer,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(v_Ba),c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(c_Public_OshrK(v_Ba),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(v_Aa),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NAa),c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NB)))))),c_List_Oset(v_evso,tc_Event_Oevent),tc_Event_Oevent),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_15,c_0_16]),c_0_13])]) ).

cnf(c_0_20,negated_conjecture,
    v_NAa != v_NA,
    inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_17]) ).

cnf(c_0_21,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_18,c_0_19]),c_0_20]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : SWV353-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.00/0.04  % Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.09/0.37  % Computer : n005.cluster.edu
% 0.09/0.37  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.09/0.37  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.09/0.37  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.09/0.37  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.09/0.38  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.09/0.38  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.09/0.38  % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 08:42:33 UTC 2026
% 0.09/0.38  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.09/0.38  Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.15/0.45  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.15/0.45  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 72.75/11.25  % Version: 3.5.1
% 72.75/11.25  % Preprocessing class: FMLMSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 72.75/11.25  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 72.75/11.25  % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 72.75/11.25  % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 72.75/11.25  % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 72.75/11.25  % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 72.75/11.25  % new_bool_3 with pid 3058251 completed with status 0
% 72.75/11.25  % Result found by new_bool_3
% 72.75/11.25  % Preprocessing class: FMLMSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 72.75/11.25  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 72.75/11.25  % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 72.75/11.25  % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 72.75/11.25  % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0))
% 72.75/11.25  % SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 72.75/11.25  % Search class: FGHSM-FSLM31-DFFFFFNN
% 72.75/11.25  % Scheduled 7 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 72.75/11.25  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 28s (1) cores
% 72.75/11.25  % SubtermCWHack with pid 3058254 completed with status 0
% 72.75/11.25  % Result found by SubtermCWHack
% 72.75/11.25  % Preprocessing class: FMLMSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 72.75/11.25  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 72.75/11.25  % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 72.75/11.25  % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 72.75/11.25  % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0))
% 72.75/11.25  % SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 72.75/11.25  % Search class: FGHSM-FSLM31-DFFFFFNN
% 72.75/11.25  % Scheduled 7 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 72.75/11.25  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 28s (1) cores
% 72.75/11.25  % Preprocessing time       : 0.007 s
% 72.75/11.25  
% 72.75/11.25  % Proof found!
% 72.75/11.25  % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 72.75/11.25  % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 72.75/11.25  % Parsed axioms                        : 2974
% 72.75/11.25  % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 2365
% 72.75/11.25  % Initial clauses                      : 609
% 72.75/11.25  % Removed in clause preprocessing      : 0
% 72.75/11.25  % Initial clauses in saturation        : 609
% 72.75/11.25  % Processed clauses                    : 57563
% 72.75/11.25  % ...of these trivial                  : 1417
% 72.75/11.25  % ...subsumed                          : 49544
% 72.75/11.25  % ...remaining for further processing  : 6602
% 72.75/11.25  % Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 8165
% 72.75/11.25  % Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 72.75/11.25  % Backward-subsumed                    : 383
% 72.75/11.25  % Backward-rewritten                   : 191
% 72.75/11.25  % Generated clauses                    : 728188
% 72.75/11.25  % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 574028
% 72.75/11.25  % ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 72.75/11.25  % Contextual simplify-reflections      : 85
% 72.75/11.25  % Paramodulations                      : 719910
% 72.75/11.25  % Factorizations                       : 26
% 72.75/11.25  % NegExts                              : 0
% 72.75/11.25  % Equation resolutions                 : 8252
% 72.75/11.25  % Disequality decompositions           : 0
% 72.75/11.25  % Total rewrite steps                  : 452874
% 72.75/11.25  % ...of those cached                   : 421564
% 72.75/11.25  % Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 72.75/11.25  %    Propositional check models        : 0
% 72.75/11.25  %    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 72.75/11.25  %    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 72.75/11.25  %    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 72.75/11.25  %    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 72.75/11.25  %    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 72.75/11.25  %    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
% 72.75/11.25  %    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
% 72.75/11.25  %    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 72.75/11.25  %    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 72.75/11.25  %    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 72.75/11.25  % Current number of processed clauses  : 6027
% 72.75/11.25  %    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 1321
% 72.75/11.25  %    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 33
% 72.75/11.25  %    Negative unit clauses             : 1026
% 72.75/11.25  %    Non-unit-clauses                  : 3647
% 72.75/11.25  % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 514564
% 72.75/11.25  % ...number of literals in the above   : 1365835
% 72.75/11.25  % Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 72.75/11.25  % Current number of archived clauses   : 574
% 72.75/11.25  % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 2853640
% 72.75/11.25  % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 1510487
% 72.75/11.25  % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 16146
% 72.75/11.25  % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 388257
% 72.75/11.25  % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 157
% 72.75/11.25  % BW rewrite match attempts            : 8961
% 72.75/11.25  % BW rewrite match successes           : 276
% 72.75/11.25  % Condensation attempts                : 0
% 72.75/11.25  % Condensation successes               : 0
% 72.75/11.25  % Termbank termtop insertions          : 11524697
% 72.75/11.25  % Search garbage collected termcells   : 7796
% 72.75/11.25  
% 72.75/11.25  % -------------------------------------------------
% 72.75/11.25  % User time                : 10.088 s
% 72.75/11.25  % System time              : 0.346 s
% 72.75/11.25  % Total time               : 10.434 s
% 72.75/11.25  % Maximum resident set size: 6612 pages
% 72.75/11.25  
% 72.75/11.25  % -------------------------------------------------
% 72.75/11.25  % User time                : 10.189 s
% 72.75/11.25  % System time              : 0.359 s
% 72.75/11.25  % Total time               : 10.547 s
% 72.75/11.25  % Maximum resident set size: 6656 pages
% 72.75/11.25  % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------