%------------------------------------------------------------------------------ % File : Etableau---0.67 % Problem : SWV354-2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.2.0. % Transfm : none % Format : tptp:raw % Command : etableau --auto --tsmdo --quicksat=10000 --tableau=1 --tableau-saturation=1 -s -p --tableau-cores=8 --cpu-limit=%d %s % Computer : n016.cluster.edu % Model : x86_64 x86_64 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz % Memory : 8042.1875MB % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64 % CPULimit : 300s % WCLimit : 600s % DateTime : Wed Jul 20 18:20:38 EDT 2022 % Result : Unsatisfiable 0.19s 0.37s % Output : CNFRefutation 0.19s % Verified : % SZS Type : - % Comments : %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ %----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ %----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT % 0.00/0.12 % Problem : SWV354-2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.2.0. % 0.13/0.12 % Command : etableau --auto --tsmdo --quicksat=10000 --tableau=1 --tableau-saturation=1 -s -p --tableau-cores=8 --cpu-limit=%d %s % 0.13/0.33 % Computer : n016.cluster.edu % 0.13/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64 % 0.13/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz % 0.13/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB % 0.13/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64 % 0.13/0.33 % CPULimit : 300 % 0.13/0.33 % WCLimit : 600 % 0.13/0.33 % DateTime : Wed Jun 15 17:32:03 EDT 2022 % 0.13/0.33 % CPUTime : % 0.19/0.36 # No SInE strategy applied % 0.19/0.36 # Auto-Mode selected heuristic G_E___208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN % 0.19/0.36 # and selection function SelectComplexExceptUniqMaxHorn. % 0.19/0.36 # % 0.19/0.36 # Presaturation interreduction done % 0.19/0.36 # Number of axioms: 10 Number of unprocessed: 10 % 0.19/0.36 # Tableaux proof search. % 0.19/0.36 # APR header successfully linked. % 0.19/0.36 # Hello from C++ % 0.19/0.36 # The folding up rule is enabled... % 0.19/0.36 # Local unification is enabled... % 0.19/0.36 # Any saturation attempts will use folding labels... % 0.19/0.36 # 10 beginning clauses after preprocessing and clausification % 0.19/0.36 # Creating start rules for all 6 conjectures. % 0.19/0.36 # There are 6 start rule candidates: % 0.19/0.36 # Found 5 unit axioms. % 0.19/0.36 # Unsuccessfully attempted saturation on 1 start tableaux, moving on. % 0.19/0.36 # 6 start rule tableaux created. % 0.19/0.36 # 5 extension rule candidate clauses % 0.19/0.36 # 5 unit axiom clauses % 0.19/0.36 % 0.19/0.36 # Requested 8, 32 cores available to the main process. % 0.19/0.36 # There are not enough tableaux to fork, creating more from the initial 6 % 0.19/0.36 # Returning from population with 11 new_tableaux and 0 remaining starting tableaux. % 0.19/0.36 # We now have 11 tableaux to operate on % 0.19/0.37 # Creating equality axioms % 0.19/0.37 # Ran out of tableaux, making start rules for all clauses % 0.19/0.37 # There were 1 total branch saturation attempts. % 0.19/0.37 # There were 0 of these attempts blocked. % 0.19/0.37 # There were 0 deferred branch saturation attempts. % 0.19/0.37 # There were 0 free duplicated saturations. % 0.19/0.37 # There were 1 total successful branch saturations. % 0.19/0.37 # There were 0 successful branch saturations in interreduction. % 0.19/0.37 # There were 0 successful branch saturations on the branch. % 0.19/0.37 # There were 1 successful branch saturations after the branch. % 0.19/0.37 # SZS status Unsatisfiable for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p % 0.19/0.37 # SZS output start for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p % 0.19/0.37 # Begin clausification derivation % 0.19/0.37 % 0.19/0.37 # End clausification derivation % 0.19/0.37 # Begin listing active clauses obtained from FOF to CNF conversion % 0.19/0.37 cnf(i_0_15, negated_conjecture, (c_in(v_evso,c_Yahalom_Oyahalom,tc_List_Olist(tc_Event_Oevent)))). % 0.19/0.37 cnf(i_0_19, negated_conjecture, (c_in(c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NB),c_Message_Oanalz(c_insert(c_Message_Omsg_OKey(v_K),c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evso),tc_Message_Omsg)),tc_Message_Omsg))). % 0.19/0.37 cnf(i_0_17, negated_conjecture, (c_in(c_Event_Oevent_OSays(v_B,c_Message_Oagent_OServer,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(v_B),c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(c_Public_OshrK(v_B),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(v_A),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NA),c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NB)))))),c_List_Oset(v_evso,tc_Event_Oevent),tc_Event_Oevent))). % 0.19/0.37 cnf(i_0_16, negated_conjecture, (c_in(c_Event_Oevent_OSays(c_Message_Oagent_OServer,v_Aa,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(c_Public_OshrK(v_Aa),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(v_Ba),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OKey(v_K),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NAa),c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NBa))))),v_X)),c_List_Oset(v_evso,tc_Event_Oevent),tc_Event_Oevent))). % 0.19/0.37 cnf(i_0_18, negated_conjecture, (~c_in(c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NB),c_Message_Oanalz(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evso)),tc_Message_Omsg))). % 0.19/0.37 cnf(i_0_20, negated_conjecture, (v_NAa!=v_NA|v_NBa!=v_NB)). % 0.19/0.37 cnf(i_0_14, plain, (~c_in(c_Event_Oevent_OSays(c_Message_Oagent_OServer,X1,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(c_Public_OshrK(X1),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(X2),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OKey(c_Public_OshrK(X3)),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(X4,X5)))),X6)),c_List_Oset(X7,tc_Event_Oevent),tc_Event_Oevent)|~c_in(X7,c_Yahalom_Oyahalom,tc_List_Olist(tc_Event_Oevent)))). % 0.19/0.37 cnf(i_0_13, plain, (X1=X2|c_in(X3,c_Message_Oanalz(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,X4)),tc_Message_Omsg)|~c_in(c_Event_Oevent_OSays(X5,X6,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(X7,c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(c_Public_OshrK(X8),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(X9),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(X2),X3))))),c_List_Oset(X4,tc_Event_Oevent),tc_Event_Oevent)|~c_in(c_Event_Oevent_OGets(X10,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(X11,c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(c_Public_OshrK(X12),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(X13),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(X1),X3))))),c_List_Oset(X4,tc_Event_Oevent),tc_Event_Oevent)|~c_in(X4,c_Yahalom_Oyahalom,tc_List_Olist(tc_Event_Oevent)))). % 0.19/0.37 cnf(i_0_11, plain, (c_Public_OshrK(v_sko__2VY(X1))=X1|X2=X3|c_in(c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(X3),c_Message_Oanalz(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,X4)),tc_Message_Omsg)|~c_in(c_Event_Oevent_OSays(c_Message_Oagent_OServer,X5,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(c_Public_OshrK(X5),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(X6),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OKey(X1),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(X7,c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(X2))))),X8)),c_List_Oset(X4,tc_Event_Oevent),tc_Event_Oevent)|~c_in(c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(X3),c_Message_Oanalz(c_insert(c_Message_Omsg_OKey(X1),c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,X4),tc_Message_Omsg)),tc_Message_Omsg)|~c_in(X4,c_Yahalom_Oyahalom,tc_List_Olist(tc_Event_Oevent)))). % 0.19/0.37 cnf(i_0_12, plain, (c_in(c_Event_Oevent_OGets(c_Message_Oagent_OServer,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(X1),c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(c_Public_OshrK(X1),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(X2),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(X3,X4))))),c_List_Oset(X5,tc_Event_Oevent),tc_Event_Oevent)|~c_in(c_Event_Oevent_OSays(c_Message_Oagent_OServer,X2,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(c_Public_OshrK(X2),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(X1),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(X6,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(X3,X4)))),X7)),c_List_Oset(X5,tc_Event_Oevent),tc_Event_Oevent)|~c_in(X5,c_Yahalom_Oyahalom,tc_List_Olist(tc_Event_Oevent)))). % 0.19/0.37 cnf(i_0_119, plain, (X14=X14)). % 0.19/0.37 # End listing active clauses. There is an equivalent clause to each of these in the clausification! % 0.19/0.37 # Begin printing tableau % 0.19/0.37 # Found 4 steps % 0.19/0.37 cnf(i_0_119, plain, (X2=X2), inference(start_rule)). % 0.19/0.37 cnf(i_0_161, plain, (X2=X2), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_123])). % 0.19/0.37 cnf(i_0_187, plain, (tc_List_Olist(X2)=tc_List_Olist(X2)), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_125])). % 0.19/0.37 cnf(i_0_865, plain, (c_Public_OshrK(tc_List_Olist(X2))=c_Public_OshrK(tc_List_Olist(X2))), inference(etableau_closure_rule, [i_0_865, ...])). % 0.19/0.37 # End printing tableau % 0.19/0.37 # SZS output end % 0.19/0.37 # Branches closed with saturation will be marked with an "s" % 0.19/0.37 # Creating equality axioms % 0.19/0.37 # Ran out of tableaux, making start rules for all clauses % 0.19/0.37 # Creating equality axioms % 0.19/0.37 # Ran out of tableaux, making start rules for all clauses % 0.19/0.37 # Creating equality axioms % 0.19/0.37 # Ran out of tableaux, making start rules for all clauses % 0.19/0.37 # Creating equality axioms % 0.19/0.37 # Ran out of tableaux, making start rules for all clauses % 0.19/0.37 # There were 2 total branch saturation attempts. % 0.19/0.37 # There were 0 of these attempts blocked. % 0.19/0.37 # There were 0 deferred branch saturation attempts. % 0.19/0.37 # There were 0 free duplicated saturations. % 0.19/0.37 # There were 2 total successful branch saturations. % 0.19/0.37 # There were 0 successful branch saturations in interreduction. % 0.19/0.37 # There were 0 successful branch saturations on the branch. % 0.19/0.37 # There were 2 successful branch saturations after the branch. % 0.19/0.37 # Child (22500) has found a proof. % 0.19/0.37 % 0.19/0.37 # There were 1 total branch saturation attempts. % 0.19/0.37 # There were 0 of these attempts blocked. % 0.19/0.37 # There were 0 deferred branch saturation attempts. % 0.19/0.37 # There were 0 free duplicated saturations. % 0.19/0.37 # There were 1 total successful branch saturations. % 0.19/0.37 # There were 0 successful branch saturations in interreduction. % 0.19/0.37 # There were 0 successful branch saturations on the branch. % 0.19/0.37 # There were 1 successful branch saturations after the branch. % 0.19/0.37 # Proof search is over... % 0.19/0.37 # Freeing feature tree %------------------------------------------------------------------------------