%------------------------------------------------------------------------------ % File : CSE---1.7 % Problem : SWV355-2 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v3.2.0. % Transfm : none % Format : tptp:raw % Command : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %d %s % Computer : n025.cluster.edu % Model : x86_64 x86_64 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz % Memory : 8042.1875MB % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64 % CPULimit : 300s % WCLimit : 300s % DateTime : Mon Jun 24 16:46:56 EDT 2024 % Result : Unsatisfiable 0.79s 0.91s % Output : CNFRefutation 0.79s % Verified : % SZS Type : - % Comments : %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ %----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ %----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT % 0.02/0.11 % Problem : SWV355-2 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v3.2.0. % 0.02/0.11 % Command : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %d %s % 0.10/0.31 % Computer : n025.cluster.edu % 0.10/0.31 % Model : x86_64 x86_64 % 0.10/0.31 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz % 0.10/0.31 % Memory : 8042.1875MB % 0.10/0.31 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64 % 0.10/0.31 % CPULimit : 300 % 0.10/0.31 % WCLimit : 300 % 0.10/0.31 % DateTime : Thu Jun 20 20:11:09 EDT 2024 % 0.10/0.31 % CPUTime : % 0.16/0.50 start to proof:theBenchmark % 0.79/0.90 %------------------------------------------- % 0.79/0.90 % File :CSE---1.7 % 0.79/0.90 % Problem :theBenchmark % 0.79/0.90 % Transform :cnf % 0.79/0.90 % Format :tptp:raw % 0.79/0.90 % Command :java -jar mcs_scs.jar %d %s % 0.79/0.90 % 0.79/0.90 % Result :Theorem 0.370000s % 0.79/0.90 % Output :CNFRefutation 0.370000s % 0.79/0.90 %------------------------------------------- % 0.79/0.90 %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ % 0.79/0.90 % File : SWV355-2 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v3.2.0. % 0.79/0.90 % Domain : Software Verification (Security) % 0.79/0.90 % Problem : Cryptographic protocol problem for Yahalom % 0.79/0.90 % Version : [Pau06] axioms : Reduced > Especial. % 0.79/0.90 % English : % 0.79/0.90 % 0.79/0.90 % Refs : [Pau06] Paulson (2006), Email to G. Sutcliffe % 0.79/0.90 % Source : [Pau06] % 0.79/0.90 % Names : % 0.79/0.90 % 0.79/0.90 % Status : Unsatisfiable % 0.79/0.90 % Rating : 0.00 v5.4.0, 0.06 v5.3.0, 0.10 v5.2.0, 0.00 v3.2.0 % 0.79/0.90 % Syntax : Number of clauses : 7 ( 2 unt; 0 nHn; 7 RR) % 0.79/0.90 % Number of literals : 12 ( 0 equ; 6 neg) % 0.79/0.90 % Maximal clause size : 2 ( 1 avg) % 0.79/0.90 % Maximal term depth : 7 ( 2 avg) % 0.79/0.90 % Number of predicates : 1 ( 1 usr; 0 prp; 3-3 aty) % 0.79/0.90 % Number of functors : 19 ( 19 usr; 9 con; 0-3 aty) % 0.79/0.90 % Number of variables : 14 ( 4 sgn) % 0.79/0.90 % SPC : CNF_UNS_RFO_NEQ_HRN % 0.79/0.90 % 0.79/0.90 % Comments : The problems in the [Pau06] collection each have very many axioms, % 0.79/0.90 % of which only a small selection are required for the refutation. % 0.79/0.90 % The mission is to find those few axioms, after which a refutation % 0.79/0.91 % can be quite easily found. This version has only the necessary % 0.79/0.91 % axioms. % 0.79/0.91 %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ % 0.79/0.91 cnf(cls_Event_OSays__imp__spies_0,axiom, % 0.79/0.91 ( ~ c_in(c_Event_Oevent_OSays(V_A,V_B,V_X),c_List_Oset(V_evs,tc_Event_Oevent),tc_Event_Oevent) % 0.79/0.91 | c_in(V_X,c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,V_evs),tc_Message_Omsg) ) ). % 0.79/0.91 % 0.79/0.91 cnf(cls_Event_Oc_A_58_Aparts_A_Iknows_ASpy_Aevs1_J_A_61_61_62_Ac_A_58_Aused_Aevs1_0,axiom, % 0.79/0.91 ( ~ c_in(V_c,c_Message_Oparts(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,V_evs)),tc_Message_Omsg) % 0.79/0.91 | c_in(V_c,c_Event_Oused(V_evs),tc_Message_Omsg) ) ). % 0.79/0.91 % 0.79/0.91 cnf(cls_Message_OMPair__parts_0,axiom, % 0.79/0.91 ( ~ c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(V_X,V_Y),c_Message_Oparts(V_H),tc_Message_Omsg) % 0.79/0.91 | c_in(V_Y,c_Message_Oparts(V_H),tc_Message_Omsg) ) ). % 0.79/0.91 % 0.79/0.91 cnf(cls_Message_Oparts_OBody__dest_0,axiom, % 0.79/0.91 ( ~ c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(V_K,V_X),c_Message_Oparts(V_H),tc_Message_Omsg) % 0.79/0.91 | c_in(V_X,c_Message_Oparts(V_H),tc_Message_Omsg) ) ). % 0.79/0.91 % 0.79/0.91 cnf(cls_Message_Oparts_OInj_0,axiom, % 0.79/0.91 ( ~ c_in(V_X,V_H,tc_Message_Omsg) % 0.79/0.91 | c_in(V_X,c_Message_Oparts(V_H),tc_Message_Omsg) ) ). % 0.79/0.91 % 0.79/0.91 cnf(cls_conjecture_3,negated_conjecture, % 0.79/0.91 ~ c_in(c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NB),c_Event_Oused(v_evs1),tc_Message_Omsg) ). % 0.79/0.91 % 0.79/0.91 cnf(cls_conjecture_5,negated_conjecture, % 0.79/0.91 c_in(c_Event_Oevent_OSays(v_B,c_Message_Oagent_OServer,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(v_B),c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(c_Public_OshrK(v_B),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(v_A),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NA),c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NB)))))),c_List_Oset(v_evs1,tc_Event_Oevent),tc_Event_Oevent) ). % 0.79/0.91 % 0.79/0.91 %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ % 0.79/0.91 %------------------------------------------- % 0.79/0.91 % Proof found % 0.79/0.91 % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark % 0.79/0.91 % SZS output start Proof % 0.79/0.91 %ClaNum:7(EqnAxiom:0) % 0.79/0.91 %VarNum:24(SingletonVarNum:14) % 0.79/0.91 %MaxLitNum:2 % 0.79/0.91 %MaxfuncDepth:6 % 0.79/0.91 %SharedTerms:23 % 0.79/0.91 %goalClause: 1 2 % 0.79/0.91 %singleGoalClaCount:2 % 0.79/0.91 [2]~P1(f10(a18),f5(a19),a16) % 0.79/0.91 [1]P1(f3(a1,a2,f11(f7(a1),f12(f9(a1),f11(f7(a14),f11(f10(a17),f10(a18)))))),f4(a19,a15),a15) % 0.79/0.91 [3]~P1(x31,x32,a16)+P1(x31,f13(x32),a16) % 0.79/0.91 [6]P1(x61,f5(x62),a16)+~P1(x61,f13(f6(a8,x62)),a16) % 0.79/0.91 [4]P1(x41,f13(x42),a16)+~P1(f11(x43,x41),f13(x42),a16) % 0.79/0.91 [5]P1(x51,f13(x52),a16)+~P1(f12(x53,x51),f13(x52),a16) % 0.79/0.91 [7]P1(x71,f6(a8,x72),a16)+~P1(f3(x73,x74,x71),f4(x72,a15),a15) % 0.79/0.91 %EqnAxiom % 0.79/0.91 % 0.79/0.91 %------------------------------------------- % 0.79/0.91 cnf(8,plain, % 0.79/0.91 (P1(f11(f7(a1),f12(f9(a1),f11(f7(a14),f11(f10(a17),f10(a18))))),f13(f6(a8,a19)),a16)), % 0.79/0.91 inference(scs_inference,[],[1,3,7])). % 0.79/0.91 cnf(11,plain, % 0.79/0.91 (P1(f11(f7(a14),f11(f10(a17),f10(a18))),f13(f6(a8,a19)),a16)), % 0.79/0.91 inference(scs_inference,[],[8,4,5])). % 0.79/0.91 cnf(279,plain, % 0.79/0.91 (~P1(f11(x2791,f10(a18)),f13(f6(a8,a19)),a16)), % 0.79/0.91 inference(scs_inference,[],[2,6,4])). % 0.79/0.91 cnf(280,plain, % 0.79/0.91 ($false), % 0.79/0.91 inference(scs_inference,[],[279,11,4]), % 0.79/0.91 ['proof']). % 0.79/0.91 % SZS output end Proof % 0.79/0.91 % Total time :0.370000s %------------------------------------------------------------------------------