%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.5.1
% Problem : SWV356-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% Computer : n015.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 02:54:32 PM UTC 2026
% Result : Unsatisfiable 7.05s 1.63s
% Output : CNFRefutation 7.05s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 4
% Number of leaves : 4
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 13 ( 6 unt; 0 nHn; 13 RR)
% Number of literals : 20 ( 0 equ; 10 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 2 ( 1 usr; 1 prp; 0-3 aty)
% Number of functors : 9 ( 9 usr; 4 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 14 ( 0 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(cls_Event_Oc_A_58_Aparts_A_Iknows_ASpy_Aevs1_J_A_61_61_62_Ac_A_58_Aused_Aevs1_0,axiom,
( ~ c_in(X1,c_Message_Oparts(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,X2)),tc_Message_Omsg)
| c_in(X1,c_Event_Oused(X2),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SWV005-2.ax',cls_Event_Oc_A_58_Aparts_A_Iknows_ASpy_Aevs1_J_A_61_61_62_Ac_A_58_Aused_Aevs1_0) ).
cnf(cls_Message_Oanalz__conj__parts_0,axiom,
( ~ c_in(X1,c_Message_Oanalz(X2),tc_Message_Omsg)
| c_in(X1,c_Message_Oparts(X2),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SWV005-2.ax',cls_Message_Oanalz__conj__parts_0) ).
cnf(cls_conjecture_3,negated_conjecture,
~ c_in(c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NB),c_Event_Oused(v_evs2),tc_Message_Omsg),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_3) ).
cnf(cls_conjecture_7,negated_conjecture,
c_in(c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NB),c_Message_Oanalz(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evs2)),tc_Message_Omsg),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_7) ).
cnf(c_0_4,plain,
( ~ c_in(X1,c_Message_Oparts(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,X2)),tc_Message_Omsg)
| c_in(X1,c_Event_Oused(X2),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[cls_Event_Oc_A_58_Aparts_A_Iknows_ASpy_Aevs1_J_A_61_61_62_Ac_A_58_Aused_Aevs1_0]) ).
cnf(c_0_5,plain,
( ~ c_in(X1,c_Message_Oanalz(X2),tc_Message_Omsg)
| c_in(X1,c_Message_Oparts(X2),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[cls_Message_Oanalz__conj__parts_0]) ).
cnf(c_0_6,plain,
( ~ c_in(X1,c_Message_Oparts(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,X2)),tc_Message_Omsg)
| c_in(X1,c_Event_Oused(X2),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
c_0_4 ).
cnf(c_0_7,plain,
( ~ c_in(X1,c_Message_Oanalz(X2),tc_Message_Omsg)
| c_in(X1,c_Message_Oparts(X2),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
c_0_5 ).
cnf(c_0_8,negated_conjecture,
~ c_in(c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NB),c_Event_Oused(v_evs2),tc_Message_Omsg),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[cls_conjecture_3]) ).
cnf(c_0_9,plain,
( ~ c_in(X1,c_Message_Oanalz(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,X2)),tc_Message_Omsg)
| c_in(X1,c_Event_Oused(X2),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_6,c_0_7]) ).
cnf(c_0_10,negated_conjecture,
c_in(c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NB),c_Message_Oanalz(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evs2)),tc_Message_Omsg),
cls_conjecture_7 ).
cnf(c_0_11,negated_conjecture,
~ c_in(c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NB),c_Event_Oused(v_evs2),tc_Message_Omsg),
c_0_8 ).
cnf(c_0_12,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_9,c_0_10]),c_0_11]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03 % Problem : SWV356-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.00/0.05 % Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.11/0.37 % Computer : n015.cluster.edu
% 0.11/0.37 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.11/0.37 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.11/0.37 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.11/0.37 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.11/0.37 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.11/0.37 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.11/0.37 % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 08:46:36 UTC 2026
% 0.11/0.37 % CPUTime :
% 0.11/0.37 Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.11/0.42 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.11/0.42 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 7.05/1.63 % Version: 3.5.1
% 7.05/1.63 % Preprocessing class: FMLMSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 7.05/1.63 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 7.05/1.63 % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 7.05/1.63 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 7.05/1.63 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 7.05/1.63 % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 7.05/1.63 % new_bool_1 with pid 1078161 completed with status 0
% 7.05/1.63 % Result found by new_bool_1
% 7.05/1.63 % Preprocessing class: FMLMSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 7.05/1.63 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 7.05/1.63 % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 7.05/1.63 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 7.05/1.63 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 7.05/1.63 % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0))
% 7.05/1.63 % SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 7.05/1.63 % Search class: FGHSM-FSLM31-DFFFFFNN
% 7.05/1.63 % Scheduled 7 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 7.05/1.63 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 28s (1) cores
% 7.05/1.63 % SubtermCWHack with pid 1078164 completed with status 0
% 7.05/1.63 % Result found by SubtermCWHack
% 7.05/1.63 % Preprocessing class: FMLMSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 7.05/1.63 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 7.05/1.63 % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 7.05/1.63 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 7.05/1.63 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 7.05/1.63 % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0))
% 7.05/1.63 % SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 7.05/1.63 % Search class: FGHSM-FSLM31-DFFFFFNN
% 7.05/1.63 % Scheduled 7 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 7.05/1.63 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 28s (1) cores
% 7.05/1.63 % Preprocessing time : 0.006 s
% 7.05/1.63
% 7.05/1.63 % Proof found!
% 7.05/1.63 % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 7.05/1.63 % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 7.05/1.63 % Parsed axioms : 2974
% 7.05/1.63 % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 2365
% 7.05/1.63 % Initial clauses : 609
% 7.05/1.63 % Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 7.05/1.63 % Initial clauses in saturation : 609
% 7.05/1.63 % Processed clauses : 15829
% 7.05/1.63 % ...of these trivial : 489
% 7.05/1.63 % ...subsumed : 12731
% 7.05/1.63 % ...remaining for further processing : 2609
% 7.05/1.63 % Other redundant clauses eliminated : 883
% 7.05/1.63 % Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 7.05/1.63 % Backward-subsumed : 114
% 7.05/1.63 % Backward-rewritten : 119
% 7.05/1.63 % Generated clauses : 91298
% 7.05/1.63 % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 66787
% 7.05/1.63 % ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 7.05/1.63 % Contextual simplify-reflections : 27
% 7.05/1.63 % Paramodulations : 90342
% 7.05/1.63 % Factorizations : 10
% 7.05/1.63 % NegExts : 0
% 7.05/1.63 % Equation resolutions : 946
% 7.05/1.63 % Disequality decompositions : 0
% 7.05/1.63 % Total rewrite steps : 54452
% 7.05/1.63 % ...of those cached : 49149
% 7.05/1.63 % Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 7.05/1.63 % Propositional check models : 0
% 7.05/1.63 % Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 7.05/1.63 % Propositional clauses : 0
% 7.05/1.63 % Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 7.05/1.63 % Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 7.05/1.63 % Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 7.05/1.63 % Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 7.05/1.63 % Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 7.05/1.63 % Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 7.05/1.63 % Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 7.05/1.63 % Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 7.05/1.63 % Current number of processed clauses : 2376
% 7.05/1.63 % Positive orientable unit clauses : 632
% 7.05/1.63 % Positive unorientable unit clauses: 12
% 7.05/1.63 % Negative unit clauses : 546
% 7.05/1.63 % Non-unit-clauses : 1186
% 7.05/1.63 % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 51283
% 7.05/1.63 % ...number of literals in the above : 107180
% 7.05/1.63 % Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 7.05/1.63 % Current number of archived clauses : 233
% 7.05/1.63 % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 316914
% 7.05/1.63 % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 182852
% 7.05/1.63 % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 3295
% 7.05/1.63 % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 48564
% 7.05/1.63 % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 4
% 7.05/1.63 % BW rewrite match attempts : 3271
% 7.05/1.63 % BW rewrite match successes : 135
% 7.05/1.63 % Condensation attempts : 0
% 7.05/1.63 % Condensation successes : 0
% 7.05/1.63 % Termbank termtop insertions : 1129740
% 7.05/1.63 % Search garbage collected termcells : 7793
% 7.05/1.63
% 7.05/1.63 % -------------------------------------------------
% 7.05/1.63 % User time : 1.017 s
% 7.05/1.63 % System time : 0.048 s
% 7.05/1.63 % Total time : 1.065 s
% 7.05/1.63 % Maximum resident set size: 6608 pages
% 7.05/1.63
% 7.05/1.63 % -------------------------------------------------
% 7.05/1.63 % User time : 1.123 s
% 7.05/1.63 % System time : 0.053 s
% 7.05/1.63 % Total time : 1.176 s
% 7.05/1.63 % Maximum resident set size: 6400 pages
% 7.05/1.63 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------