%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.5.1
% Problem : SWV357-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% Computer : n014.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 02:54:32 PM UTC 2026
% Result : Unsatisfiable 5.24s 6.20s
% Output : CNFRefutation 5.24s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 4
% Number of leaves : 5
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 15 ( 9 unt; 0 nHn; 15 RR)
% Number of literals : 24 ( 0 equ; 12 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 4 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 2 ( 1 usr; 1 prp; 0-3 aty)
% Number of functors : 16 ( 16 usr; 8 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 18 ( 6 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(cls_Yahalom_OGets__imp__analz__Spy__dest_0,axiom,
( ~ c_in(c_Event_Oevent_OGets(X2,X3),c_List_Oset(X1,tc_Event_Oevent),tc_Event_Oevent)
| ~ c_in(X1,c_Yahalom_Oyahalom,tc_List_Olist(tc_Event_Oevent))
| c_in(X3,c_Message_Oanalz(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,X1)),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SWV005-4.ax',cls_Yahalom_OGets__imp__analz__Spy__dest_0) ).
cnf(cls_Message_OMPair__analz_0,axiom,
( ~ c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(X1,X2),c_Message_Oanalz(X3),tc_Message_Omsg)
| c_in(X2,c_Message_Oanalz(X3),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SWV005-2.ax',cls_Message_OMPair__analz_0) ).
cnf(cls_conjecture_4,negated_conjecture,
c_in(c_Event_Oevent_OGets(v_Ba,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(v_Aa),c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NB))),c_List_Oset(v_evs2,tc_Event_Oevent),tc_Event_Oevent),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_4) ).
cnf(cls_conjecture_2,negated_conjecture,
c_in(v_evs2,c_Yahalom_Oyahalom,tc_List_Olist(tc_Event_Oevent)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_2) ).
cnf(cls_conjecture_6,negated_conjecture,
~ c_in(c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NB),c_Message_Oanalz(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evs2)),tc_Message_Omsg),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_6) ).
cnf(c_0_5,plain,
( ~ c_in(c_Event_Oevent_OGets(X2,X3),c_List_Oset(X1,tc_Event_Oevent),tc_Event_Oevent)
| ~ c_in(X1,c_Yahalom_Oyahalom,tc_List_Olist(tc_Event_Oevent))
| c_in(X3,c_Message_Oanalz(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,X1)),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[cls_Yahalom_OGets__imp__analz__Spy__dest_0]) ).
cnf(c_0_6,plain,
( ~ c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(X1,X2),c_Message_Oanalz(X3),tc_Message_Omsg)
| c_in(X2,c_Message_Oanalz(X3),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[cls_Message_OMPair__analz_0]) ).
cnf(c_0_7,plain,
( ~ c_in(c_Event_Oevent_OGets(X2,X3),c_List_Oset(X1,tc_Event_Oevent),tc_Event_Oevent)
| ~ c_in(X1,c_Yahalom_Oyahalom,tc_List_Olist(tc_Event_Oevent))
| c_in(X3,c_Message_Oanalz(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,X1)),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
c_0_5 ).
cnf(c_0_8,negated_conjecture,
c_in(c_Event_Oevent_OGets(v_Ba,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(v_Aa),c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NB))),c_List_Oset(v_evs2,tc_Event_Oevent),tc_Event_Oevent),
cls_conjecture_4 ).
cnf(c_0_9,negated_conjecture,
c_in(v_evs2,c_Yahalom_Oyahalom,tc_List_Olist(tc_Event_Oevent)),
cls_conjecture_2 ).
cnf(c_0_10,negated_conjecture,
~ c_in(c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NB),c_Message_Oanalz(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evs2)),tc_Message_Omsg),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[cls_conjecture_6]) ).
cnf(c_0_11,plain,
( ~ c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(X1,X2),c_Message_Oanalz(X3),tc_Message_Omsg)
| c_in(X2,c_Message_Oanalz(X3),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
c_0_6 ).
cnf(c_0_12,negated_conjecture,
c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(v_Aa),c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NB)),c_Message_Oanalz(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evs2)),tc_Message_Omsg),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_7,c_0_8]),c_0_9])]) ).
cnf(c_0_13,negated_conjecture,
~ c_in(c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NB),c_Message_Oanalz(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evs2)),tc_Message_Omsg),
c_0_10 ).
cnf(c_0_14,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_12]),c_0_13]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.02 % Problem : SWV357-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.00/0.05 % Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.09/5.42 % Computer : n014.cluster.edu
% 0.09/5.42 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.09/5.42 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.09/5.42 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.09/5.42 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.09/5.42 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.09/5.42 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.09/5.42 % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 08:43:10 UTC 2026
% 0.09/5.42 % CPUTime :
% 0.09/5.42 Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.09/5.46 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.09/5.46 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 5.24/6.20 % Version: 3.5.1
% 5.24/6.20 % Preprocessing class: FMLMSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 5.24/6.20 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 5.24/6.20 % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 5.24/6.20 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 5.24/6.20 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 5.24/6.20 % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 5.24/6.20 % G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with pid 3678119 completed with status 0
% 5.24/6.20 % Result found by G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN
% 5.24/6.20 % Preprocessing class: FMLMSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 5.24/6.20 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 5.24/6.20 % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 5.24/6.20 % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 5.24/6.20 % No SInE strategy applied
% 5.24/6.20 % Search class: FGHSM-SMLM32-DFFFFFNN
% 5.24/6.20 % Scheduled 13 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 5.24/6.20 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 5.24/6.20 % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 151s (1) cores
% 5.24/6.20 % Starting G-E--_008_C45_F1_PI_SE_Q4_CS_SP_S4SI with 113s (1) cores
% 5.24/6.20 % Starting G-E--_207_C01_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_S5PRR_S0Y with 113s (1) cores
% 5.24/6.20 % Starting G-E--_208_B07CMA_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 113s (1) cores
% 5.24/6.20 % G-E--_208_B07CMA_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with pid 3678129 completed with status 0
% 5.24/6.20 % Result found by G-E--_208_B07CMA_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN
% 5.24/6.20 % Preprocessing class: FMLMSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 5.24/6.20 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 5.24/6.20 % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 5.24/6.20 % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 5.24/6.20 % No SInE strategy applied
% 5.24/6.20 % Search class: FGHSM-SMLM32-DFFFFFNN
% 5.24/6.20 % Scheduled 13 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 5.24/6.20 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 5.24/6.20 % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 151s (1) cores
% 5.24/6.20 % Starting G-E--_008_C45_F1_PI_SE_Q4_CS_SP_S4SI with 113s (1) cores
% 5.24/6.20 % Starting G-E--_207_C01_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_S5PRR_S0Y with 113s (1) cores
% 5.24/6.20 % Starting G-E--_208_B07CMA_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 113s (1) cores
% 5.24/6.20 % Preprocessing time : 0.019 s
% 5.24/6.20 % Presaturation interreduction done
% 5.24/6.20
% 5.24/6.20 % Proof found!
% 5.24/6.20 % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 5.24/6.20 % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 5.24/6.20 % Parsed axioms : 2975
% 5.24/6.20 % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 5.24/6.20 % Initial clauses : 2975
% 5.24/6.20 % Removed in clause preprocessing : 12
% 5.24/6.20 % Initial clauses in saturation : 2963
% 5.24/6.20 % Processed clauses : 8230
% 5.24/6.20 % ...of these trivial : 31
% 5.24/6.20 % ...subsumed : 2800
% 5.24/6.20 % ...remaining for further processing : 5399
% 5.24/6.20 % Other redundant clauses eliminated : 52
% 5.24/6.20 % Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 5.24/6.20 % Backward-subsumed : 20
% 5.24/6.20 % Backward-rewritten : 56
% 5.24/6.20 % Generated clauses : 9775
% 5.24/6.20 % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 8171
% 5.24/6.20 % ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 5.24/6.20 % Contextual simplify-reflections : 7
% 5.24/6.20 % Paramodulations : 9672
% 5.24/6.20 % Factorizations : 0
% 5.24/6.20 % NegExts : 0
% 5.24/6.20 % Equation resolutions : 103
% 5.24/6.20 % Disequality decompositions : 0
% 5.24/6.20 % Total rewrite steps : 3258
% 5.24/6.20 % ...of those cached : 2302
% 5.24/6.20 % Propositional unsat checks : 1
% 5.24/6.20 % Propositional check models : 1
% 5.24/6.20 % Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 5.24/6.20 % Propositional clauses : 0
% 5.24/6.20 % Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 5.24/6.20 % Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 5.24/6.20 % Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 5.24/6.20 % Propositional encoding time : 0.007
% 5.24/6.20 % Propositional solver time : 0.006
% 5.24/6.20 % Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 5.24/6.20 % Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 5.24/6.20 % Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 5.24/6.20 % Current number of processed clauses : 2524
% 5.24/6.20 % Positive orientable unit clauses : 638
% 5.24/6.20 % Positive unorientable unit clauses: 24
% 5.24/6.20 % Negative unit clauses : 394
% 5.24/6.20 % Non-unit-clauses : 1468
% 5.24/6.20 % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 5686
% 5.24/6.20 % ...number of literals in the above : 11547
% 5.24/6.20 % Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 5.24/6.20 % Current number of archived clauses : 2885
% 5.24/6.20 % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 3406223
% 5.24/6.20 % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 2285940
% 5.24/6.20 % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 2136
% 5.24/6.20 % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 157758
% 5.24/6.20 % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 5.24/6.20 % BW rewrite match attempts : 816
% 5.24/6.20 % BW rewrite match successes : 64
% 5.24/6.20 % Condensation attempts : 0
% 5.24/6.20 % Condensation successes : 0
% 5.24/6.20 % Termbank termtop insertions : 241821
% 5.24/6.20 % Search garbage collected termcells : 4358
% 5.24/6.20
% 5.24/6.20 % -------------------------------------------------
% 5.24/6.20 % User time : 0.617 s
% 5.24/6.20 % System time : 0.025 s
% 5.24/6.20 % Total time : 0.642 s
% 5.24/6.20 % Maximum resident set size: 8868 pages
% 5.24/6.20
% 5.24/6.20 % -------------------------------------------------
% 5.24/6.20 % User time : 3.025 s
% 5.24/6.20 % System time : 0.126 s
% 5.24/6.20 % Total time : 3.151 s
% 5.24/6.20 % Maximum resident set size: 6656 pages
% 5.24/6.20 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------