%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E-SAT---3.5.1
% Problem : SWV357-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% Computer : n026.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 03:01:23 PM UTC 2026
% Result : Unsatisfiable 4.25s 6.14s
% Output : CNFRefutation 4.25s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 4
% Number of leaves : 7
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 21 ( 11 unt; 0 nHn; 19 RR)
% Number of literals : 34 ( 2 equ; 16 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 4 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 3 ( 1 usr; 1 prp; 0-3 aty)
% Number of functors : 16 ( 16 usr; 8 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 29 ( 7 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(cls_Message_OMPair__analz_0,axiom,
( ~ c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(X1,X2),c_Message_Oanalz(X3),tc_Message_Omsg)
| c_in(X2,c_Message_Oanalz(X3),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SWV005-2.ax',cls_Message_OMPair__analz_0) ).
cnf(cls_Message_Oanalz_OInj_0,axiom,
( ~ c_in(X1,X2,tc_Message_Omsg)
| c_in(X1,c_Message_Oanalz(X2),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SWV005-2.ax',cls_Message_Oanalz_OInj_0) ).
cnf(cls_Yahalom_OGets__imp__analz__Spy__dest_0,axiom,
( ~ c_in(c_Event_Oevent_OGets(X2,X3),c_List_Oset(X1,tc_Event_Oevent),tc_Event_Oevent)
| ~ c_in(X1,c_Yahalom_Oyahalom,tc_List_Olist(tc_Event_Oevent))
| c_in(X3,c_Message_Oanalz(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,X1)),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SWV005-4.ax',cls_Yahalom_OGets__imp__analz__Spy__dest_0) ).
cnf(cls_conjecture_4,negated_conjecture,
c_in(c_Event_Oevent_OGets(v_Ba,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(v_Aa),c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NB))),c_List_Oset(v_evs2,tc_Event_Oevent),tc_Event_Oevent),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_4) ).
cnf(cls_conjecture_2,negated_conjecture,
c_in(v_evs2,c_Yahalom_Oyahalom,tc_List_Olist(tc_Event_Oevent)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_2) ).
cnf(cls_conjecture_6,negated_conjecture,
~ c_in(c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NB),c_Message_Oanalz(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evs2)),tc_Message_Omsg),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_6) ).
cnf(cls_Message_Oanalz__idem_0,axiom,
c_Message_Oanalz(c_Message_Oanalz(X1)) = c_Message_Oanalz(X1),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SWV005-2.ax',cls_Message_Oanalz__idem_0) ).
cnf(c_0_7,plain,
( ~ c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(X1,X2),c_Message_Oanalz(X3),tc_Message_Omsg)
| c_in(X2,c_Message_Oanalz(X3),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[cls_Message_OMPair__analz_0]) ).
cnf(c_0_8,plain,
( ~ c_in(X1,X2,tc_Message_Omsg)
| c_in(X1,c_Message_Oanalz(X2),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[cls_Message_Oanalz_OInj_0]) ).
cnf(c_0_9,plain,
( ~ c_in(c_Event_Oevent_OGets(X2,X3),c_List_Oset(X1,tc_Event_Oevent),tc_Event_Oevent)
| ~ c_in(X1,c_Yahalom_Oyahalom,tc_List_Olist(tc_Event_Oevent))
| c_in(X3,c_Message_Oanalz(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,X1)),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[cls_Yahalom_OGets__imp__analz__Spy__dest_0]) ).
cnf(c_0_10,plain,
( ~ c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(X1,X2),c_Message_Oanalz(X3),tc_Message_Omsg)
| c_in(X2,c_Message_Oanalz(X3),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
c_0_7 ).
cnf(c_0_11,plain,
( ~ c_in(X1,X2,tc_Message_Omsg)
| c_in(X1,c_Message_Oanalz(X2),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
c_0_8 ).
cnf(c_0_12,plain,
( ~ c_in(c_Event_Oevent_OGets(X2,X3),c_List_Oset(X1,tc_Event_Oevent),tc_Event_Oevent)
| ~ c_in(X1,c_Yahalom_Oyahalom,tc_List_Olist(tc_Event_Oevent))
| c_in(X3,c_Message_Oanalz(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,X1)),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
c_0_9 ).
cnf(c_0_13,negated_conjecture,
c_in(c_Event_Oevent_OGets(v_Ba,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(v_Aa),c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NB))),c_List_Oset(v_evs2,tc_Event_Oevent),tc_Event_Oevent),
cls_conjecture_4 ).
cnf(c_0_14,negated_conjecture,
c_in(v_evs2,c_Yahalom_Oyahalom,tc_List_Olist(tc_Event_Oevent)),
cls_conjecture_2 ).
cnf(c_0_15,negated_conjecture,
~ c_in(c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NB),c_Message_Oanalz(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evs2)),tc_Message_Omsg),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[cls_conjecture_6]) ).
cnf(c_0_16,plain,
( ~ c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(X3,X1),X2,tc_Message_Omsg)
| c_in(X1,c_Message_Oanalz(X2),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_10,c_0_11]) ).
cnf(c_0_17,negated_conjecture,
c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(v_Aa),c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NB)),c_Message_Oanalz(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evs2)),tc_Message_Omsg),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_12,c_0_13]),c_0_14])]) ).
cnf(c_0_18,axiom,
c_Message_Oanalz(c_Message_Oanalz(X1)) = c_Message_Oanalz(X1),
cls_Message_Oanalz__idem_0 ).
cnf(c_0_19,negated_conjecture,
~ c_in(c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NB),c_Message_Oanalz(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evs2)),tc_Message_Omsg),
c_0_15 ).
cnf(c_0_20,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_16,c_0_17]),c_0_18]),c_0_19]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03 % Problem : SWV357-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.00/0.05 % Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.12/5.39 % Computer : n026.cluster.edu
% 0.12/5.39 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/5.39 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/5.39 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.12/5.39 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.12/5.39 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/5.39 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.12/5.39 % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 08:45:58 UTC 2026
% 0.12/5.39 % CPUTime :
% 0.12/5.39 Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.16/5.44 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.16/5.44 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 4.25/6.14 % Version: 3.5.1
% 4.25/6.14 % Preprocessing class: FMLMSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 4.25/6.14 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 4.25/6.14 % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 4.25/6.14 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 4.25/6.14 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 4.25/6.14 % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 4.25/6.14 % new_bool_1 with pid 1876664 completed with status 0
% 4.25/6.14 % Result found by new_bool_1
% 4.25/6.14 % Preprocessing class: FMLMSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 4.25/6.14 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 4.25/6.14 % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 4.25/6.14 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 4.25/6.14 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 4.25/6.14 % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0))
% 4.25/6.14 % SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 4.25/6.14 % Search class: FGHSM-FSLM31-DFFFFFNN
% 4.25/6.14 % Scheduled 7 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 4.25/6.14 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 28s (1) cores
% 4.25/6.14 % SubtermCWHack with pid 1876667 completed with status 0
% 4.25/6.14 % Result found by SubtermCWHack
% 4.25/6.14 % Preprocessing class: FMLMSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 4.25/6.14 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 4.25/6.14 % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 4.25/6.14 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 4.25/6.14 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 4.25/6.14 % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0))
% 4.25/6.14 % SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 4.25/6.14 % Search class: FGHSM-FSLM31-DFFFFFNN
% 4.25/6.14 % Scheduled 7 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 4.25/6.14 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 28s (1) cores
% 4.25/6.14 % Preprocessing time : 0.005 s
% 4.25/6.14
% 4.25/6.14 % Proof found!
% 4.25/6.14 % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 4.25/6.14 % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 4.25/6.14 % Parsed axioms : 2975
% 4.25/6.14 % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 2365
% 4.25/6.14 % Initial clauses : 610
% 4.25/6.14 % Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 4.25/6.14 % Initial clauses in saturation : 610
% 4.25/6.14 % Processed clauses : 14022
% 4.25/6.14 % ...of these trivial : 404
% 4.25/6.14 % ...subsumed : 11218
% 4.25/6.14 % ...remaining for further processing : 2400
% 4.25/6.14 % Other redundant clauses eliminated : 670
% 4.25/6.14 % Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 4.25/6.14 % Backward-subsumed : 108
% 4.25/6.14 % Backward-rewritten : 114
% 4.25/6.14 % Generated clauses : 74068
% 4.25/6.14 % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 53468
% 4.25/6.14 % ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 4.25/6.14 % Contextual simplify-reflections : 27
% 4.25/6.14 % Paramodulations : 73328
% 4.25/6.14 % Factorizations : 10
% 4.25/6.14 % NegExts : 0
% 4.25/6.14 % Equation resolutions : 730
% 4.25/6.14 % Disequality decompositions : 0
% 4.25/6.14 % Total rewrite steps : 46282
% 4.25/6.14 % ...of those cached : 41473
% 4.25/6.14 % Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 4.25/6.14 % Propositional check models : 0
% 4.25/6.14 % Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 4.25/6.14 % Propositional clauses : 0
% 4.25/6.14 % Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 4.25/6.14 % Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 4.25/6.14 % Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 4.25/6.14 % Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 4.25/6.14 % Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 4.25/6.14 % Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 4.25/6.14 % Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 4.25/6.14 % Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 4.25/6.14 % Current number of processed clauses : 2178
% 4.25/6.14 % Positive orientable unit clauses : 582
% 4.25/6.14 % Positive unorientable unit clauses: 10
% 4.25/6.14 % Negative unit clauses : 483
% 4.25/6.14 % Non-unit-clauses : 1103
% 4.25/6.14 % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 39778
% 4.25/6.14 % ...number of literals in the above : 84926
% 4.25/6.14 % Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 4.25/6.14 % Current number of archived clauses : 222
% 4.25/6.14 % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 327043
% 4.25/6.14 % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 189304
% 4.25/6.14 % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 2946
% 4.25/6.14 % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 72106
% 4.25/6.14 % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 4
% 4.25/6.14 % BW rewrite match attempts : 2539
% 4.25/6.14 % BW rewrite match successes : 130
% 4.25/6.14 % Condensation attempts : 0
% 4.25/6.14 % Condensation successes : 0
% 4.25/6.14 % Termbank termtop insertions : 922400
% 4.25/6.14 % Search garbage collected termcells : 7793
% 4.25/6.14
% 4.25/6.14 % -------------------------------------------------
% 4.25/6.14 % User time : 0.575 s
% 4.25/6.14 % System time : 0.037 s
% 4.25/6.14 % Total time : 0.612 s
% 4.25/6.14 % Maximum resident set size: 6612 pages
% 4.25/6.14
% 4.25/6.14 % -------------------------------------------------
% 4.25/6.14 % User time : 0.632 s
% 4.25/6.14 % System time : 0.044 s
% 4.25/6.14 % Total time : 0.676 s
% 4.25/6.14 % Maximum resident set size: 6912 pages
% 4.25/6.14 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------