%------------------------------------------------------------------------------ % File : CSE---1.7 % Problem : SWV357-2 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v3.2.0. % Transfm : none % Format : tptp:raw % Command : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %d %s % Computer : n020.cluster.edu % Model : x86_64 x86_64 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz % Memory : 8042.1875MB % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64 % CPULimit : 300s % WCLimit : 300s % DateTime : Mon Jun 24 16:46:56 EDT 2024 % Result : Unsatisfiable 0.55s 1.03s % Output : CNFRefutation 0.55s % Verified : % SZS Type : - % Comments : %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ %----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ %----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT % 0.09/0.14 % Problem : SWV357-2 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v3.2.0. % 0.09/0.14 % Command : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %d %s % 0.14/0.35 % Computer : n020.cluster.edu % 0.14/0.35 % Model : x86_64 x86_64 % 0.14/0.35 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz % 0.14/0.35 % Memory : 8042.1875MB % 0.14/0.35 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64 % 0.14/0.35 % CPULimit : 300 % 0.14/0.35 % WCLimit : 300 % 0.14/0.35 % DateTime : Thu Jun 20 20:14:39 EDT 2024 % 0.14/0.36 % CPUTime : % 0.53/0.58 start to proof:theBenchmark % 0.55/1.02 %------------------------------------------- % 0.55/1.02 % File :CSE---1.7 % 0.55/1.02 % Problem :theBenchmark % 0.55/1.02 % Transform :cnf % 0.55/1.02 % Format :tptp:raw % 0.55/1.02 % Command :java -jar mcs_scs.jar %d %s % 0.55/1.02 % 0.55/1.02 % Result :Theorem 0.390000s % 0.55/1.02 % Output :CNFRefutation 0.390000s % 0.55/1.02 %------------------------------------------- % 0.55/1.02 %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ % 0.55/1.02 % File : SWV357-2 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v3.2.0. % 0.55/1.02 % Domain : Software Verification (Security) % 0.55/1.02 % Problem : Cryptographic protocol problem for Yahalom % 0.55/1.02 % Version : [Pau06] axioms : Reduced > Especial. % 0.55/1.02 % English : % 0.55/1.02 % 0.55/1.02 % Refs : [Pau06] Paulson (2006), Email to G. Sutcliffe % 0.55/1.02 % Source : [Pau06] % 0.55/1.02 % Names : % 0.55/1.02 % 0.55/1.02 % Status : Unsatisfiable % 0.55/1.02 % Rating : 0.00 v5.3.0, 0.05 v5.2.0, 0.00 v3.2.0 % 0.55/1.02 % Syntax : Number of clauses : 5 ( 3 unt; 0 nHn; 5 RR) % 0.55/1.02 % Number of literals : 8 ( 0 equ; 4 neg) % 0.55/1.02 % Maximal clause size : 3 ( 1 avg) % 0.55/1.02 % Maximal term depth : 4 ( 1 avg) % 0.55/1.02 % Number of predicates : 1 ( 1 usr; 0 prp; 3-3 aty) % 0.55/1.02 % Number of functors : 16 ( 16 usr; 8 con; 0-2 aty) % 0.55/1.02 % Number of variables : 6 ( 2 sgn) % 0.55/1.02 % SPC : CNF_UNS_RFO_NEQ_HRN % 0.55/1.02 % 0.55/1.02 % Comments : The problems in the [Pau06] collection each have very many axioms, % 0.55/1.02 % of which only a small selection are required for the refutation. % 0.55/1.02 % The mission is to find those few axioms, after which a refutation % 0.55/1.02 % can be quite easily found. This version has only the necessary % 0.55/1.02 % axioms. % 0.55/1.02 %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ % 0.55/1.02 cnf(cls_conjecture_2,negated_conjecture, % 0.55/1.02 c_in(v_evs2,c_Yahalom_Oyahalom,tc_List_Olist(tc_Event_Oevent)) ). % 0.55/1.02 % 0.55/1.02 cnf(cls_conjecture_4,negated_conjecture, % 0.55/1.02 c_in(c_Event_Oevent_OGets(v_Ba,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(v_Aa),c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NB))),c_List_Oset(v_evs2,tc_Event_Oevent),tc_Event_Oevent) ). % 0.55/1.02 % 0.55/1.02 cnf(cls_conjecture_6,negated_conjecture, % 0.55/1.02 ~ c_in(c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NB),c_Message_Oanalz(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evs2)),tc_Message_Omsg) ). % 0.55/1.02 % 0.55/1.02 cnf(cls_Message_OMPair__analz_0,axiom, % 0.55/1.03 ( ~ c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(V_X,V_Y),c_Message_Oanalz(V_H),tc_Message_Omsg) % 0.55/1.03 | c_in(V_Y,c_Message_Oanalz(V_H),tc_Message_Omsg) ) ). % 0.55/1.03 % 0.55/1.03 cnf(cls_Yahalom_OGets__imp__analz__Spy__dest_0,axiom, % 0.55/1.03 ( ~ c_in(V_evs,c_Yahalom_Oyahalom,tc_List_Olist(tc_Event_Oevent)) % 0.55/1.03 | ~ c_in(c_Event_Oevent_OGets(V_B,V_X),c_List_Oset(V_evs,tc_Event_Oevent),tc_Event_Oevent) % 0.55/1.03 | c_in(V_X,c_Message_Oanalz(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,V_evs)),tc_Message_Omsg) ) ). % 0.55/1.03 % 0.55/1.03 %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ % 0.55/1.03 %------------------------------------------- % 0.55/1.03 % Proof found % 0.55/1.03 % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark % 0.55/1.03 % SZS output start Proof % 0.55/1.03 %ClaNum:5(EqnAxiom:0) % 0.55/1.03 %VarNum:11(SingletonVarNum:6) % 0.55/1.03 %MaxLitNum:3 % 0.55/1.03 %MaxfuncDepth:3 % 0.55/1.03 %SharedTerms:19 % 0.55/1.03 %goalClause: 1 2 3 % 0.55/1.03 %singleGoalClaCount:3 % 0.55/1.03 [1]P1(a1,a2,f12(a11)) % 0.55/1.03 [3]~P1(f9(a16),f8(f6(a7,a1)),a15) % 0.55/1.03 [2]P1(f4(a13,f10(f3(a14),f9(a16))),f5(a1,a11),a11) % 0.55/1.03 [4]P1(x41,f8(x42),a15)+~P1(f10(x43,x41),f8(x42),a15) % 0.55/1.03 [5]~P1(f4(x53,x51),f5(x52,a11),a11)+~P1(x52,a2,f12(a11))+P1(x51,f8(f6(a7,x52)),a15) % 0.55/1.03 %EqnAxiom % 0.55/1.03 % 0.55/1.03 %------------------------------------------- % 0.55/1.03 cnf(6,plain, % 0.55/1.03 (~P1(f10(x61,f9(a16)),f8(f6(a7,a1)),a15)), % 0.55/1.03 inference(scs_inference,[],[3,4])). % 0.55/1.03 cnf(682,plain, % 0.55/1.03 ($false), % 0.55/1.03 inference(scs_inference,[],[6,2,1,5]), % 0.55/1.03 ['proof']). % 0.55/1.03 % SZS output end Proof % 0.55/1.03 % Total time :0.390000s %------------------------------------------------------------------------------