%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : iProver---3.9.4
% Problem : SWV357-2 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM
% Computer : n010.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Fri Sep 25 03:17:26 PM UTC 2026
% Result : Unsatisfiable 1.57s 1.27s
% Output : CNFRefutation 1.57s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 7
% Number of leaves : 13
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 31 ( 19 unt; 8 def)
% Number of atoms : 89 ( 8 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 3 ( 2 avg)
% Number of connectives : 38 ( 21 ~; 17 |; 0 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 0 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 7 ( 3 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 4 ( 1 avg)
% Number of types : 1 ( 0 usr)
% Number of type conns : 0 ( 0 >; 0 *; 0 +; 0 <<)
% Number of predicates : 11 ( 9 usr; 9 prp; 0-3 aty)
% Number of functors : 16 ( 16 usr; 8 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 22 ( 0 sgn 22 !; 0 ?; 16 :)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f1,negated_conjecture,
c_in(v_evs2,c_Yahalom_Oyahalom,tc_List_Olist(tc_Event_Oevent)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_2) ).
fof(f2,negated_conjecture,
c_in(c_Event_Oevent_OGets(v_Ba,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(v_Aa),c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NB))),c_List_Oset(v_evs2,tc_Event_Oevent),tc_Event_Oevent),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_4) ).
fof(f3,negated_conjecture,
~ c_in(c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NB),c_Message_Oanalz(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evs2)),tc_Message_Omsg),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_6) ).
fof(f4,axiom,
! [X2,X0,X1] :
( c_in(X1,c_Message_Oanalz(X2),tc_Message_Omsg)
| ~ c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(X0,X1),c_Message_Oanalz(X2),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_Message_OMPair__analz_0) ).
fof(f5,axiom,
! [X2,X0,X1] :
( c_in(X2,c_Message_Oanalz(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,X0)),tc_Message_Omsg)
| ~ c_in(c_Event_Oevent_OGets(X1,X2),c_List_Oset(X0,tc_Event_Oevent),tc_Event_Oevent)
| ~ c_in(X0,c_Yahalom_Oyahalom,tc_List_Olist(tc_Event_Oevent)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_Yahalom_OGets__imp__analz__Spy__dest_0) ).
tcf(c_54,negated_conjecture,
c_in(v_evs2,c_Yahalom_Oyahalom,tc_List_Olist(tc_Event_Oevent)),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f1]) ).
tcf(c_55,negated_conjecture,
c_in(c_Event_Oevent_OGets(v_Ba,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(v_Aa),c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NB))),c_List_Oset(v_evs2,tc_Event_Oevent),tc_Event_Oevent),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f2]) ).
tcf(c_56,negated_conjecture,
~ c_in(c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NB),c_Message_Oanalz(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evs2)),tc_Message_Omsg),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f3]) ).
tcf(c_57,plain,
! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] :
( c_in(X1,c_Message_Oanalz(X2),tc_Message_Omsg)
| ~ c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(X0,X1),c_Message_Oanalz(X2),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f4]) ).
tcf(c_58,plain,
! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] :
( c_in(X1,c_Message_Oanalz(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,X2)),tc_Message_Omsg)
| ~ c_in(X2,c_Yahalom_Oyahalom,tc_List_Olist(tc_Event_Oevent))
| ~ c_in(c_Event_Oevent_OGets(X0,X1),c_List_Oset(X2,tc_Event_Oevent),tc_Event_Oevent) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f5]) ).
tcf(c_77,definition,
iPr_def_10 = c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NB),
introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[iPr_def_10])],[]) ).
tcf(c_78,definition,
iPr_def_11 = c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evs2),
introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[iPr_def_11])],[]) ).
tcf(c_79,definition,
iPr_def_12 = c_Message_Oanalz(iPr_def_11),
introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[iPr_def_12])],[]) ).
tcf(c_80,definition,
iPr_def_13 = c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(v_Aa),
introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[iPr_def_13])],[]) ).
tcf(c_81,definition,
iPr_def_14 = c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(iPr_def_13,iPr_def_10),
introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[iPr_def_14])],[]) ).
tcf(c_82,definition,
iPr_def_15 = c_Event_Oevent_OGets(v_Ba,iPr_def_14),
introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[iPr_def_15])],[]) ).
tcf(c_83,definition,
iPr_def_16 = c_List_Oset(v_evs2,tc_Event_Oevent),
introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[iPr_def_16])],[]) ).
tcf(c_84,definition,
iPr_def_17 = tc_List_Olist(tc_Event_Oevent),
introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[iPr_def_17])],[]) ).
tcf(c_85,negated_conjecture,
~ c_in(iPr_def_10,iPr_def_12,tc_Message_Omsg),
inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_56,c_78,c_79,c_77]) ).
tcf(c_86,negated_conjecture,
c_in(iPr_def_15,iPr_def_16,tc_Event_Oevent),
inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_55,c_83,c_80,c_81,c_82]) ).
tcf(c_87,negated_conjecture,
c_in(v_evs2,c_Yahalom_Oyahalom,iPr_def_17),
inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_54,c_84]) ).
tcf(c_294,plain,
! [X0: $i] :
( c_in(iPr_def_10,c_Message_Oanalz(X0),tc_Message_Omsg)
| ~ c_in(iPr_def_14,c_Message_Oanalz(X0),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_81,c_57]) ).
tcf(c_303,plain,
! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] :
( c_in(X1,c_Message_Oanalz(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,X2)),tc_Message_Omsg)
| ~ c_in(X2,c_Yahalom_Oyahalom,iPr_def_17)
| ~ c_in(c_Event_Oevent_OGets(X0,X1),c_List_Oset(X2,tc_Event_Oevent),tc_Event_Oevent) ),
inference(light_normalisation,[status(thm)],[c_58,c_84]) ).
tcf(c_314,plain,
! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
( c_in(X1,c_Message_Oanalz(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evs2)),tc_Message_Omsg)
| ~ c_in(v_evs2,c_Yahalom_Oyahalom,iPr_def_17)
| ~ c_in(c_Event_Oevent_OGets(X0,X1),iPr_def_16,tc_Event_Oevent) ),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_83,c_303]) ).
tcf(c_315,plain,
! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
( c_in(X1,iPr_def_12,tc_Message_Omsg)
| ~ c_in(v_evs2,c_Yahalom_Oyahalom,iPr_def_17)
| ~ c_in(c_Event_Oevent_OGets(X0,X1),iPr_def_16,tc_Event_Oevent) ),
inference(light_normalisation,[status(thm)],[c_314,c_78,c_79]) ).
tcf(c_316,plain,
! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
( c_in(X1,iPr_def_12,tc_Message_Omsg)
| ~ c_in(c_Event_Oevent_OGets(X0,X1),iPr_def_16,tc_Event_Oevent) ),
inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_315,c_87]) ).
tcf(c_328,plain,
( c_in(iPr_def_10,c_Message_Oanalz(iPr_def_11),tc_Message_Omsg)
| ~ c_in(iPr_def_14,iPr_def_12,tc_Message_Omsg) ),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_79,c_294]) ).
tcf(c_329,plain,
( c_in(iPr_def_10,iPr_def_12,tc_Message_Omsg)
| ~ c_in(iPr_def_14,iPr_def_12,tc_Message_Omsg) ),
inference(light_normalisation,[status(thm)],[c_328,c_79]) ).
tcf(c_330,plain,
~ c_in(iPr_def_14,iPr_def_12,tc_Message_Omsg),
inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_329,c_85]) ).
tcf(c_340,plain,
( c_in(iPr_def_14,iPr_def_12,tc_Message_Omsg)
| ~ c_in(iPr_def_15,iPr_def_16,tc_Event_Oevent) ),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_82,c_316]) ).
tcf(c_341,plain,
$false,
inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_340,c_330,c_86]) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.02 % Problem : SWV357-2 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.00/0.04 % Command : run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM
% 0.07/0.35 % Computer : n010.cluster.edu
% 0.07/0.35 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.07/0.35 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.07/0.35 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.07/0.35 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.07/0.35 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.07/0.35 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.07/0.35 % DateTime : Thu Sep 24 19:21:14 UTC 2026
% 0.07/0.35 % CPUTime :
% 0.07/0.35 Running run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM
% 0.12/0.39 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.12/0.39 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/iproveropt-multi-core.sh -d -n -l tptp -s fof_schedule -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.12/0.40
% 0.12/0.40 % ======== iProver multi-core TPTP/SMT =========
% 0.12/0.40
% 0.12/0.40 % Detected problem language: tptp
% 0.12/0.42 % Proving...
% 1.57/1.27 % SZS status Started for theBenchmark.p
% 1.57/1.27 % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark.p
% 1.57/1.27
% 1.57/1.27 %---------------- iProver v3.9.4 (pre CASC 2026/SMT-COMP 2026) ----------------%
% 1.57/1.27
% 1.57/1.27 % ------ iProver source info
% 1.57/1.27
% 1.57/1.27 % git: date: 2026-07-19 20:42:38 +0200
% 1.57/1.27 % git: sha1: 804e7d636a263075307957e923b7a22a4035de61
% 1.57/1.27 % git: non_committed_changes: false
% 1.57/1.27
% 1.57/1.27 % ------ Parsing...% successful
% 1.57/1.27
% 1.57/1.27
% 1.57/1.27 % ------ Clausification by vclausify_rel & Parsing by iProver...%
% 1.57/1.27
% 1.57/1.27 % ------ Preprocessing... sf_s rm: 0 0s sf_e pe_s pe_e %
% 1.57/1.27
% 1.57/1.27 % ------ Preprocessing... gs_s sp: 0 0s gs_e snvd_s sp: 0 0s snvd_e %
% 1.57/1.27
% 1.57/1.27 % ------ Preprocessing... sf_s rm: 1 0s sf_e sf_s rm: 0 0s sf_e
% 1.57/1.27 % ------ Proving...
% 1.57/1.27 % ------ Problem Properties
% 1.57/1.27
% 1.57/1.27 %
% 1.57/1.27 % clauses 13
% 1.57/1.27 % conjectures 3
% 1.57/1.27 % EPR 3
% 1.57/1.27 % Horn 13
% 1.57/1.27 % unary 11
% 1.57/1.27 % binary 1
% 1.57/1.27 % lits 16
% 1.57/1.27 % lits eq 8
% 1.57/1.27 % fd_pure 0
% 1.57/1.27 % fd_pseudo 0
% 1.57/1.27 % fd_cond 0
% 1.57/1.27 % fd_pseudo_cond 0
% 1.57/1.27 % AC symbols 0
% 1.57/1.27
% 1.57/1.27 % ------ Schedule dynamic 5 is on
% 1.57/1.27
% 1.57/1.27 % ------ Input Options "--resolution_flag false --inst_lit_sel_side none" Time Limit: 10.
% 1.57/1.27
% 1.57/1.27
% 1.57/1.27 % ------
% 1.57/1.27 % Current options:
% 1.57/1.27 % ------
% 1.57/1.27
% 1.57/1.27
% 1.57/1.27 %
% 1.57/1.27
% 1.57/1.27 % ------ Proving...
% 1.57/1.27 %
% 1.57/1.27
% 1.57/1.27 % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark.p
% 1.57/1.27
% 1.57/1.27 % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 1.57/1.27
% 1.57/1.27
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------