↑ Up

Vampire-SAT---5.0.1.UNS-Ref.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Vampire-SAT---5.0.1
% Problem  : SWV360-2 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_vampire /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 SAT

% Computer : n015.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Sep 29 01:21:04 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.08s 0.28s
% Output   : Refutation 0.08s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    6
%            Number of leaves      :    7
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   13 (   9 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   23 (   5 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    5 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   19 (   9   ~;  10   |;   0   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   19 (   4 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    7 (   2 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    3 (   1 usr;   1 prp; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of functors    :   26 (  26 usr;  15 con; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   28 (  28   !;   0   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f1,axiom,
    ! [X2,X3,X10,X0,X11,X1,X8,X6,X9,X7,X4,X5,X12] :
      ( ~ c_in(c_Event_Oevent_OSays(X7,X8,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(X9,c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(c_Public_OshrK(X10),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(X11),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(X12),X6))))),c_List_Oset(X0,tc_Event_Oevent),tc_Event_Oevent)
      | ~ c_in(c_Event_Oevent_OGets(X1,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(X2,c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(c_Public_OshrK(X3),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(X4),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(X5),X6))))),c_List_Oset(X0,tc_Event_Oevent),tc_Event_Oevent)
      | ~ c_in(X0,c_Yahalom_Oyahalom,tc_List_Olist(tc_Event_Oevent))
      | c_in(X6,c_Message_Oanalz(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,X0)),tc_Message_Omsg)
      | X3 = X10 ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_Yahalom_OSays__unique__NB_2) ).

fof(f2,negated_conjecture,
    ~ c_in(v_B,c_Event_Obad,tc_Message_Oagent),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_1) ).

fof(f3,negated_conjecture,
    c_in(v_evs3,c_Yahalom_Oyahalom,tc_List_Olist(tc_Event_Oevent)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_2) ).

fof(f4,negated_conjecture,
    c_in(c_Event_Oevent_OGets(c_Message_Oagent_OServer,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(v_Ba),c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(c_Public_OshrK(v_Ba),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(v_Aa),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NAa),c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NB)))))),c_List_Oset(v_evs3,tc_Event_Oevent),tc_Event_Oevent),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_5) ).

fof(f5,negated_conjecture,
    c_in(c_Event_Oevent_OSays(v_B,c_Message_Oagent_OServer,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(v_B),c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(c_Public_OshrK(v_B),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(v_A),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NA),c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NB)))))),c_List_Oset(v_evs3,tc_Event_Oevent),tc_Event_Oevent),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_7) ).

fof(f6,negated_conjecture,
    ~ c_in(c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NB),c_Message_Oanalz(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evs3)),tc_Message_Omsg),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_8) ).

fof(f7,negated_conjecture,
    c_in(v_Ba,c_Event_Obad,tc_Message_Oagent),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_9) ).

fof(f8,plain,
    ! [X2,X3,X0,X1,X4] :
      ( ~ c_in(c_Event_Oevent_OGets(X0,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(X1,c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(c_Public_OshrK(X2),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(X3),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(X4),c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NB)))))),c_List_Oset(v_evs3,tc_Event_Oevent),tc_Event_Oevent)
      | ~ c_in(v_evs3,c_Yahalom_Oyahalom,tc_List_Olist(tc_Event_Oevent))
      | c_in(c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NB),c_Message_Oanalz(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evs3)),tc_Message_Omsg)
      | v_B = X2 ),
    inference(resolution,[],[f1,f5]) ).

fof(f9,plain,
    ! [X2,X3,X0,X1,X4] :
      ( ~ c_in(c_Event_Oevent_OGets(X0,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(X1,c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(c_Public_OshrK(X2),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(X3),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(X4),c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NB)))))),c_List_Oset(v_evs3,tc_Event_Oevent),tc_Event_Oevent)
      | c_in(c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NB),c_Message_Oanalz(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evs3)),tc_Message_Omsg)
      | v_B = X2 ),
    inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[],[f8,f3]) ).

fof(f10,plain,
    ! [X2,X3,X0,X1,X4] :
      ( ~ c_in(c_Event_Oevent_OGets(X0,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(X1,c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(c_Public_OshrK(X2),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(X3),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(X4),c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NB)))))),c_List_Oset(v_evs3,tc_Event_Oevent),tc_Event_Oevent)
      | v_B = X2 ),
    inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[],[f9,f6]) ).

fof(f11,plain,
    v_B = v_Ba,
    inference(resolution,[],[f10,f4]) ).

fof(f13,plain,
    c_in(v_B,c_Event_Obad,tc_Message_Oagent),
    inference(superposition,[],[f7,f11]) ).

fof(f14,plain,
    $false,
    inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[],[f13,f2]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : SWV360-2 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.00/0.06  % Command  : run_vampire /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 SAT
% 0.08/0.20  % Computer : n015.cluster.edu
% 0.08/0.20  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.08/0.20  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.08/0.20  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.08/0.20  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.08/0.20  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.08/0.20  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.08/0.20  % DateTime : Mon Sep 28 10:46:47 UTC 2026
% 0.08/0.20  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.08/0.20  Running run_vampire /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 SAT
% 0.08/0.23  Running first-order model finding
% 0.08/0.23  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/vampire-ho --input_syntax tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode casc --intent sat -m 16384 --cores 7 -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.08/0.28  % (2536501)Will run a generic schedule for satisfiability detection.
% 0.08/0.28  % (2536516)dis+10_1_sil=32000:sp=arity:random_seed=1165430093:i=103:fgj=on_2999 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/103Mi)
% 0.08/0.28  % (2536516) found proof, printing to "/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/vampire-proof-2536501-2536516"...
% 0.08/0.28  % (2536516)...printing done.
% 0.08/0.28  % (2536516)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 0.08/0.28  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark
% 0.08/0.28  % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% See solution above
% 0.08/0.28  % (2536516)------------------------------
% 0.08/0.28  % (2536516)Version: Vampire 5.0.1 (Release build, commit 5ef7c2677 on 2026-07-16 16:54:09 +0200)
% 0.08/0.28  % (2536516)Linked with Z3 4.14.0.0 3c47fd96cf5645d0c42b2c819d9e9a84380aa721 z3-4.8.4-9178-g3c47fd96c
% 0.08/0.28  % (2536516)CaDiCaL version: 2.1.3
% 0.08/0.28  % (2536516)Termination reason: Refutation
% 0.08/0.28  % (2536516)Time elapsed: 0.001 s
% 0.08/0.28  % (2536516)Peak memory usage: 11 MB
% 0.08/0.28  % (2536516)Instructions burned: 1 (million)
% 0.08/0.28  % (2536501)Success in time 0.035 s
% 0.08/0.28  % Vampire exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------