%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.5.1
% Problem : SWV362-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% Computer : n008.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 02:54:33 PM UTC 2026
% Result : Unsatisfiable 73.63s 11.21s
% Output : CNFRefutation 73.63s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 5
% Number of leaves : 7
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 20 ( 16 unt; 3 nHn; 20 RR)
% Number of literals : 33 ( 5 equ; 16 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 5 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 7 ( 2 avg)
% Number of predicates : 3 ( 1 usr; 1 prp; 0-3 aty)
% Number of functors : 26 ( 26 usr; 15 con; 0-3 aty)
% Number of variables : 44 ( 31 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(cls_Yahalom_OSays__unique__NB_1,axiom,
( ~ c_in(c_Event_Oevent_OSays(X8,X9,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(X10,c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(c_Public_OshrK(X11),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(X12),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(X13),X7))))),c_List_Oset(X1,tc_Event_Oevent),tc_Event_Oevent)
| ~ c_in(c_Event_Oevent_OGets(X2,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(X3,c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(c_Public_OshrK(X4),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(X5),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(X6),X7))))),c_List_Oset(X1,tc_Event_Oevent),tc_Event_Oevent)
| ~ c_in(X1,c_Yahalom_Oyahalom,tc_List_Olist(tc_Event_Oevent))
| X5 = X12
| c_in(X7,c_Message_Oanalz(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,X1)),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SWV005-7.ax',cls_Yahalom_OSays__unique__NB_1) ).
cnf(cls_conjecture_8,negated_conjecture,
~ c_in(c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NB),c_Message_Oanalz(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evs3)),tc_Message_Omsg),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_8) ).
cnf(cls_conjecture_7,negated_conjecture,
c_in(c_Event_Oevent_OSays(v_B,c_Message_Oagent_OServer,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(v_B),c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(c_Public_OshrK(v_B),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(v_A),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NA),c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NB)))))),c_List_Oset(v_evs3,tc_Event_Oevent),tc_Event_Oevent),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_7) ).
cnf(cls_conjecture_2,negated_conjecture,
c_in(v_evs3,c_Yahalom_Oyahalom,tc_List_Olist(tc_Event_Oevent)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_2) ).
cnf(cls_conjecture_0,negated_conjecture,
~ c_in(v_A,c_Event_Obad,tc_Message_Oagent),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_0) ).
cnf(cls_conjecture_5,negated_conjecture,
c_in(c_Event_Oevent_OGets(c_Message_Oagent_OServer,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(v_Ba),c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(c_Public_OshrK(v_Ba),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(v_Aa),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NAa),c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NB)))))),c_List_Oset(v_evs3,tc_Event_Oevent),tc_Event_Oevent),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_5) ).
cnf(cls_conjecture_9,negated_conjecture,
c_in(v_Aa,c_Event_Obad,tc_Message_Oagent),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_9) ).
cnf(c_0_7,plain,
( ~ c_in(c_Event_Oevent_OSays(X8,X9,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(X10,c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(c_Public_OshrK(X11),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(X12),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(X13),X7))))),c_List_Oset(X1,tc_Event_Oevent),tc_Event_Oevent)
| ~ c_in(c_Event_Oevent_OGets(X2,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(X3,c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(c_Public_OshrK(X4),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(X5),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(X6),X7))))),c_List_Oset(X1,tc_Event_Oevent),tc_Event_Oevent)
| ~ c_in(X1,c_Yahalom_Oyahalom,tc_List_Olist(tc_Event_Oevent))
| X5 = X12
| c_in(X7,c_Message_Oanalz(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,X1)),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[cls_Yahalom_OSays__unique__NB_1]) ).
cnf(c_0_8,negated_conjecture,
~ c_in(c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NB),c_Message_Oanalz(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evs3)),tc_Message_Omsg),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[cls_conjecture_8]) ).
cnf(c_0_9,plain,
( ~ c_in(c_Event_Oevent_OSays(X8,X9,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(X10,c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(c_Public_OshrK(X11),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(X12),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(X13),X7))))),c_List_Oset(X1,tc_Event_Oevent),tc_Event_Oevent)
| ~ c_in(c_Event_Oevent_OGets(X2,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(X3,c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(c_Public_OshrK(X4),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(X5),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(X6),X7))))),c_List_Oset(X1,tc_Event_Oevent),tc_Event_Oevent)
| ~ c_in(X1,c_Yahalom_Oyahalom,tc_List_Olist(tc_Event_Oevent))
| X5 = X12
| c_in(X7,c_Message_Oanalz(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,X1)),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
c_0_7 ).
cnf(c_0_10,negated_conjecture,
c_in(c_Event_Oevent_OSays(v_B,c_Message_Oagent_OServer,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(v_B),c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(c_Public_OshrK(v_B),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(v_A),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NA),c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NB)))))),c_List_Oset(v_evs3,tc_Event_Oevent),tc_Event_Oevent),
cls_conjecture_7 ).
cnf(c_0_11,negated_conjecture,
c_in(v_evs3,c_Yahalom_Oyahalom,tc_List_Olist(tc_Event_Oevent)),
cls_conjecture_2 ).
cnf(c_0_12,negated_conjecture,
~ c_in(c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NB),c_Message_Oanalz(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evs3)),tc_Message_Omsg),
c_0_8 ).
cnf(c_0_13,negated_conjecture,
~ c_in(v_A,c_Event_Obad,tc_Message_Oagent),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[cls_conjecture_0]) ).
cnf(c_0_14,negated_conjecture,
( ~ c_in(c_Event_Oevent_OGets(X2,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(X3,c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(c_Public_OshrK(X4),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(X1),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(X5),c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NB)))))),c_List_Oset(v_evs3,tc_Event_Oevent),tc_Event_Oevent)
| X1 = v_A ),
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_9,c_0_10]),c_0_11])]),c_0_12]) ).
cnf(c_0_15,negated_conjecture,
c_in(c_Event_Oevent_OGets(c_Message_Oagent_OServer,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(v_Ba),c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(c_Public_OshrK(v_Ba),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(v_Aa),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NAa),c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NB)))))),c_List_Oset(v_evs3,tc_Event_Oevent),tc_Event_Oevent),
cls_conjecture_5 ).
cnf(c_0_16,negated_conjecture,
~ c_in(v_A,c_Event_Obad,tc_Message_Oagent),
c_0_13 ).
cnf(c_0_17,negated_conjecture,
v_A = v_Aa,
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_14,c_0_15]) ).
cnf(c_0_18,negated_conjecture,
c_in(v_Aa,c_Event_Obad,tc_Message_Oagent),
cls_conjecture_9 ).
cnf(c_0_19,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_16,c_0_17]),c_0_18])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03 % Problem : SWV362-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.00/0.05 % Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.11/0.37 % Computer : n008.cluster.edu
% 0.11/0.37 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.11/0.37 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.11/0.37 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.11/0.37 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.11/0.37 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.11/0.37 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.11/0.37 % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 08:44:09 UTC 2026
% 0.11/0.37 % CPUTime :
% 0.11/0.37 Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.15/0.41 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.15/0.41 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 73.63/11.21 % Version: 3.5.1
% 73.63/11.21 % Preprocessing class: FMLMSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 73.63/11.21 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 73.63/11.21 % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 73.63/11.21 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 73.63/11.21 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 73.63/11.21 % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 73.63/11.21 % new_bool_3 with pid 618720 completed with status 0
% 73.63/11.21 % Result found by new_bool_3
% 73.63/11.21 % Preprocessing class: FMLMSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 73.63/11.21 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 73.63/11.21 % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 73.63/11.21 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 73.63/11.21 % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0))
% 73.63/11.21 % SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 73.63/11.21 % Search class: FGHSM-FSLM31-DFFFFFNN
% 73.63/11.21 % Scheduled 7 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 73.63/11.21 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 28s (1) cores
% 73.63/11.21 % SubtermCWHack with pid 618725 completed with status 0
% 73.63/11.21 % Result found by SubtermCWHack
% 73.63/11.21 % Preprocessing class: FMLMSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 73.63/11.21 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 73.63/11.21 % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 73.63/11.21 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 73.63/11.21 % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0))
% 73.63/11.21 % SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 73.63/11.21 % Search class: FGHSM-FSLM31-DFFFFFNN
% 73.63/11.21 % Scheduled 7 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 73.63/11.21 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 28s (1) cores
% 73.63/11.21 % Preprocessing time : 0.009 s
% 73.63/11.21
% 73.63/11.21 % Proof found!
% 73.63/11.21 % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 73.63/11.21 % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 73.63/11.21 % Parsed axioms : 2977
% 73.63/11.21 % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 2358
% 73.63/11.21 % Initial clauses : 619
% 73.63/11.21 % Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 73.63/11.21 % Initial clauses in saturation : 619
% 73.63/11.21 % Processed clauses : 55166
% 73.63/11.21 % ...of these trivial : 1264
% 73.63/11.21 % ...subsumed : 47484
% 73.63/11.21 % ...remaining for further processing : 6418
% 73.63/11.21 % Other redundant clauses eliminated : 7838
% 73.63/11.21 % Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 73.63/11.21 % Backward-subsumed : 401
% 73.63/11.21 % Backward-rewritten : 199
% 73.63/11.21 % Generated clauses : 695740
% 73.63/11.21 % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 548696
% 73.63/11.21 % ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 73.63/11.21 % Contextual simplify-reflections : 78
% 73.63/11.21 % Paramodulations : 687794
% 73.63/11.21 % Factorizations : 24
% 73.63/11.21 % NegExts : 0
% 73.63/11.21 % Equation resolutions : 7922
% 73.63/11.21 % Disequality decompositions : 0
% 73.63/11.21 % Total rewrite steps : 434730
% 73.63/11.21 % ...of those cached : 404466
% 73.63/11.21 % Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 73.63/11.21 % Propositional check models : 0
% 73.63/11.21 % Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 73.63/11.21 % Propositional clauses : 0
% 73.63/11.21 % Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 73.63/11.21 % Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 73.63/11.21 % Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 73.63/11.21 % Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 73.63/11.21 % Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 73.63/11.21 % Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 73.63/11.21 % Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 73.63/11.21 % Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 73.63/11.21 % Current number of processed clauses : 5818
% 73.63/11.21 % Positive orientable unit clauses : 1250
% 73.63/11.21 % Positive unorientable unit clauses: 32
% 73.63/11.21 % Negative unit clauses : 995
% 73.63/11.21 % Non-unit-clauses : 3541
% 73.63/11.21 % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 491527
% 73.63/11.21 % ...number of literals in the above : 1308670
% 73.63/11.21 % Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 73.63/11.21 % Current number of archived clauses : 600
% 73.63/11.21 % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 2725201
% 73.63/11.21 % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 1431250
% 73.63/11.21 % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 15362
% 73.63/11.21 % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 381911
% 73.63/11.21 % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 134
% 73.63/11.21 % BW rewrite match attempts : 7788
% 73.63/11.21 % BW rewrite match successes : 279
% 73.63/11.21 % Condensation attempts : 0
% 73.63/11.21 % Condensation successes : 0
% 73.63/11.21 % Termbank termtop insertions : 11090476
% 73.63/11.21 % Search garbage collected termcells : 7784
% 73.63/11.21
% 73.63/11.21 % -------------------------------------------------
% 73.63/11.21 % User time : 10.195 s
% 73.63/11.21 % System time : 0.364 s
% 73.63/11.21 % Total time : 10.560 s
% 73.63/11.21 % Maximum resident set size: 6616 pages
% 73.63/11.21
% 73.63/11.21 % -------------------------------------------------
% 73.63/11.21 % User time : 10.251 s
% 73.63/11.21 % System time : 0.374 s
% 73.63/11.21 % Total time : 10.625 s
% 73.63/11.21 % Maximum resident set size: 6656 pages
% 73.63/11.21 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------