%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.5.1
% Problem : SWV364-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% Computer : n012.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 02:54:34 PM UTC 2026
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.07s 0.38s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.07s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 4
% Number of leaves : 5
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 15 ( 9 unt; 0 nHn; 15 RR)
% Number of literals : 24 ( 0 equ; 12 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 5 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 2 ( 1 usr; 1 prp; 0-3 aty)
% Number of functors : 16 ( 16 usr; 8 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 18 ( 6 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(cls_Yahalom_OGets__imp__analz__Spy__dest_0,axiom,
( ~ c_in(c_Event_Oevent_OGets(X2,X3),c_List_Oset(X1,tc_Event_Oevent),tc_Event_Oevent)
| ~ c_in(X1,c_Yahalom_Oyahalom,tc_List_Olist(tc_Event_Oevent))
| c_in(X3,c_Message_Oanalz(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,X1)),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_Yahalom_OGets__imp__analz__Spy__dest_0) ).
cnf(cls_Message_OMPair__analz_0,axiom,
( ~ c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(X1,X2),c_Message_Oanalz(X3),tc_Message_Omsg)
| c_in(X2,c_Message_Oanalz(X3),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SWV006-0.ax',cls_Message_OMPair__analz_0) ).
cnf(cls_conjecture_0,negated_conjecture,
c_in(c_Event_Oevent_OGets(v_A,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(c_Public_OshrK(v_A),v_Y),v_X)),c_List_Oset(v_evs,tc_Event_Oevent),tc_Event_Oevent),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_0) ).
cnf(cls_conjecture_1,negated_conjecture,
c_in(v_evs,c_Yahalom_Oyahalom,tc_List_Olist(tc_Event_Oevent)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_1) ).
cnf(cls_conjecture_2,negated_conjecture,
~ c_in(v_X,c_Message_Oanalz(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evs)),tc_Message_Omsg),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_2) ).
cnf(c_0_5,plain,
( ~ c_in(c_Event_Oevent_OGets(X2,X3),c_List_Oset(X1,tc_Event_Oevent),tc_Event_Oevent)
| ~ c_in(X1,c_Yahalom_Oyahalom,tc_List_Olist(tc_Event_Oevent))
| c_in(X3,c_Message_Oanalz(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,X1)),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[cls_Yahalom_OGets__imp__analz__Spy__dest_0]) ).
cnf(c_0_6,plain,
( ~ c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(X1,X2),c_Message_Oanalz(X3),tc_Message_Omsg)
| c_in(X2,c_Message_Oanalz(X3),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[cls_Message_OMPair__analz_0]) ).
cnf(c_0_7,plain,
( ~ c_in(c_Event_Oevent_OGets(X2,X3),c_List_Oset(X1,tc_Event_Oevent),tc_Event_Oevent)
| ~ c_in(X1,c_Yahalom_Oyahalom,tc_List_Olist(tc_Event_Oevent))
| c_in(X3,c_Message_Oanalz(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,X1)),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
c_0_5 ).
cnf(c_0_8,negated_conjecture,
c_in(c_Event_Oevent_OGets(v_A,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(c_Public_OshrK(v_A),v_Y),v_X)),c_List_Oset(v_evs,tc_Event_Oevent),tc_Event_Oevent),
cls_conjecture_0 ).
cnf(c_0_9,negated_conjecture,
c_in(v_evs,c_Yahalom_Oyahalom,tc_List_Olist(tc_Event_Oevent)),
cls_conjecture_1 ).
cnf(c_0_10,negated_conjecture,
~ c_in(v_X,c_Message_Oanalz(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evs)),tc_Message_Omsg),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[cls_conjecture_2]) ).
cnf(c_0_11,plain,
( ~ c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(X1,X2),c_Message_Oanalz(X3),tc_Message_Omsg)
| c_in(X2,c_Message_Oanalz(X3),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
c_0_6 ).
cnf(c_0_12,negated_conjecture,
c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(c_Public_OshrK(v_A),v_Y),v_X),c_Message_Oanalz(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evs)),tc_Message_Omsg),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_7,c_0_8]),c_0_9])]) ).
cnf(c_0_13,negated_conjecture,
~ c_in(v_X,c_Message_Oanalz(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evs)),tc_Message_Omsg),
c_0_10 ).
cnf(c_0_14,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_12]),c_0_13]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.01 % Problem : SWV364-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.00/0.02 % Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.02/0.29 % Computer : n012.cluster.edu
% 0.02/0.29 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.02/0.29 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.02/0.29 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.02/0.29 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.02/0.29 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.02/0.29 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.02/0.29 % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 08:43:21 UTC 2026
% 0.02/0.30 % CPUTime :
% 0.02/0.30 Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.02/0.32 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.02/0.32 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.07/0.38 % Version: 3.5.1
% 0.07/0.38 % Preprocessing class: FMLMSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.07/0.38 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.07/0.38 % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.07/0.38 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.07/0.38 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.07/0.38 % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.07/0.38 % new_bool_1 with pid 2020825 completed with status 0
% 0.07/0.38 % Result found by new_bool_1
% 0.07/0.38 % Preprocessing class: FMLMSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.07/0.38 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.07/0.38 % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.07/0.38 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.07/0.38 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.07/0.38 % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0))
% 0.07/0.38 % SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.07/0.38 % Search class: FGHSM-FFLS31-MFFFFFNN
% 0.07/0.38 % Scheduled 7 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.07/0.38 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 28s (1) cores
% 0.07/0.38 % SubtermCWHack with pid 2020830 completed with status 0
% 0.07/0.38 % Result found by SubtermCWHack
% 0.07/0.38 % Preprocessing class: FMLMSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.07/0.38 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.07/0.38 % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.07/0.38 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.07/0.38 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.07/0.38 % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0))
% 0.07/0.38 % SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.07/0.38 % Search class: FGHSM-FFLS31-MFFFFFNN
% 0.07/0.38 % Scheduled 7 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.07/0.38 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 28s (1) cores
% 0.07/0.38 % Preprocessing time : 0.002 s
% 0.07/0.38
% 0.07/0.38 % Proof found!
% 0.07/0.38 % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.07/0.38 % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.07/0.38 % Parsed axioms : 1473
% 0.07/0.38 % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 1324
% 0.07/0.38 % Initial clauses : 149
% 0.07/0.38 % Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.07/0.38 % Initial clauses in saturation : 149
% 0.07/0.38 % Processed clauses : 342
% 0.07/0.38 % ...of these trivial : 27
% 0.07/0.38 % ...subsumed : 36
% 0.07/0.38 % ...remaining for further processing : 279
% 0.07/0.38 % Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.07/0.38 % Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.07/0.38 % Backward-subsumed : 2
% 0.07/0.38 % Backward-rewritten : 3
% 0.07/0.38 % Generated clauses : 6064
% 0.07/0.38 % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 5945
% 0.07/0.38 % ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.07/0.38 % Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.07/0.38 % Paramodulations : 6040
% 0.07/0.38 % Factorizations : 0
% 0.07/0.38 % NegExts : 0
% 0.07/0.38 % Equation resolutions : 24
% 0.07/0.38 % Disequality decompositions : 0
% 0.07/0.38 % Total rewrite steps : 100
% 0.07/0.38 % ...of those cached : 34
% 0.07/0.38 % Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.07/0.38 % Propositional check models : 0
% 0.07/0.38 % Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.07/0.38 % Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.07/0.38 % Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.07/0.38 % Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.07/0.38 % Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.07/0.38 % Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.07/0.38 % Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.07/0.38 % Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.07/0.38 % Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.07/0.38 % Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.07/0.38 % Current number of processed clauses : 274
% 0.07/0.38 % Positive orientable unit clauses : 118
% 0.07/0.38 % Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.07/0.38 % Negative unit clauses : 17
% 0.07/0.38 % Non-unit-clauses : 139
% 0.07/0.38 % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 5710
% 0.07/0.38 % ...number of literals in the above : 6164
% 0.07/0.38 % Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.07/0.38 % Current number of archived clauses : 5
% 0.07/0.38 % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 4956
% 0.07/0.38 % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 4269
% 0.07/0.38 % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 25
% 0.07/0.38 % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 87
% 0.07/0.38 % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.07/0.38 % BW rewrite match attempts : 790
% 0.07/0.38 % BW rewrite match successes : 3
% 0.07/0.38 % Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.07/0.38 % Condensation successes : 0
% 0.07/0.38 % Termbank termtop insertions : 95796
% 0.07/0.38 % Search garbage collected termcells : 2844
% 0.07/0.38
% 0.07/0.38 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.07/0.38 % User time : 0.034 s
% 0.07/0.38 % System time : 0.005 s
% 0.07/0.38 % Total time : 0.039 s
% 0.07/0.38 % Maximum resident set size: 4940 pages
% 0.07/0.38
% 0.07/0.38 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.07/0.38 % User time : 0.043 s
% 0.07/0.38 % System time : 0.009 s
% 0.07/0.38 % Total time : 0.053 s
% 0.07/0.38 % Maximum resident set size: 5376 pages
% 0.07/0.38 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------