%------------------------------------------------------------------------------ % File : CSE---1.7 % Problem : SWV364-2 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v3.2.0. % Transfm : none % Format : tptp:raw % Command : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %d %s % Computer : n022.cluster.edu % Model : x86_64 x86_64 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz % Memory : 8042.1875MB % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64 % CPULimit : 300s % WCLimit : 300s % DateTime : Mon Jun 24 16:46:59 EDT 2024 % Result : Unsatisfiable 0.54s 0.80s % Output : CNFRefutation 0.54s % Verified : % SZS Type : - % Comments : %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ %----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ %----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT % 0.03/0.12 % Problem : SWV364-2 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v3.2.0. % 0.03/0.12 % Command : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %d %s % 0.12/0.32 % Computer : n022.cluster.edu % 0.12/0.32 % Model : x86_64 x86_64 % 0.12/0.32 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz % 0.12/0.32 % Memory : 8042.1875MB % 0.12/0.32 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64 % 0.12/0.32 % CPULimit : 300 % 0.12/0.32 % WCLimit : 300 % 0.12/0.32 % DateTime : Thu Jun 20 13:49:54 EDT 2024 % 0.12/0.33 % CPUTime : % 0.20/0.55 start to proof:theBenchmark % 0.54/0.80 %------------------------------------------- % 0.54/0.80 % File :CSE---1.7 % 0.54/0.80 % Problem :theBenchmark % 0.54/0.80 % Transform :cnf % 0.54/0.80 % Format :tptp:raw % 0.54/0.80 % Command :java -jar mcs_scs.jar %d %s % 0.54/0.80 % 0.54/0.80 % Result :Theorem 0.200000s % 0.54/0.80 % Output :CNFRefutation 0.200000s % 0.54/0.80 %------------------------------------------- % 0.54/0.80 %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ % 0.54/0.80 % File : SWV364-2 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v3.2.0. % 0.54/0.80 % Domain : Software Verification (Security) % 0.54/0.80 % Problem : Cryptographic protocol problem for Yahalom % 0.54/0.80 % Version : [Pau06] axioms : Reduced > Especial. % 0.54/0.80 % English : % 0.54/0.80 % 0.54/0.80 % Refs : [Pau06] Paulson (2006), Email to G. Sutcliffe % 0.54/0.80 % Source : [Pau06] % 0.54/0.80 % Names : % 0.54/0.80 % 0.54/0.80 % Status : Unsatisfiable % 0.54/0.80 % Rating : 0.00 v5.4.0, 0.06 v5.3.0, 0.10 v5.2.0, 0.00 v3.2.0 % 0.54/0.80 % Syntax : Number of clauses : 5 ( 3 unt; 0 nHn; 5 RR) % 0.54/0.80 % Number of literals : 8 ( 0 equ; 4 neg) % 0.54/0.80 % Maximal clause size : 3 ( 1 avg) % 0.54/0.80 % Maximal term depth : 5 ( 1 avg) % 0.54/0.80 % Number of predicates : 1 ( 1 usr; 0 prp; 3-3 aty) % 0.54/0.80 % Number of functors : 16 ( 16 usr; 8 con; 0-2 aty) % 0.54/0.80 % Number of variables : 6 ( 2 sgn) % 0.54/0.80 % SPC : CNF_UNS_RFO_NEQ_HRN % 0.54/0.80 % 0.54/0.80 % Comments : The problems in the [Pau06] collection each have very many axioms, % 0.54/0.80 % of which only a small selection are required for the refutation. % 0.54/0.80 % The mission is to find those few axioms, after which a refutation % 0.54/0.80 % can be quite easily found. This version has only the necessary % 0.54/0.80 % axioms. % 0.54/0.80 %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ % 0.54/0.80 cnf(cls_conjecture_0,negated_conjecture, % 0.54/0.80 c_in(c_Event_Oevent_OGets(v_A,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(c_Public_OshrK(v_A),v_Y),v_X)),c_List_Oset(v_evs,tc_Event_Oevent),tc_Event_Oevent) ). % 0.54/0.80 % 0.54/0.80 cnf(cls_conjecture_1,negated_conjecture, % 0.54/0.80 c_in(v_evs,c_Yahalom_Oyahalom,tc_List_Olist(tc_Event_Oevent)) ). % 0.54/0.80 % 0.54/0.80 cnf(cls_conjecture_2,negated_conjecture, % 0.54/0.80 ~ c_in(v_X,c_Message_Oanalz(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evs)),tc_Message_Omsg) ). % 0.54/0.80 % 0.54/0.80 cnf(cls_Message_OMPair__analz_0,axiom, % 0.54/0.80 ( ~ c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(V_X,V_Y),c_Message_Oanalz(V_H),tc_Message_Omsg) % 0.54/0.80 | c_in(V_Y,c_Message_Oanalz(V_H),tc_Message_Omsg) ) ). % 0.54/0.80 % 0.54/0.80 cnf(cls_Yahalom_OGets__imp__analz__Spy__dest_0,axiom, % 0.54/0.80 ( ~ c_in(V_evs,c_Yahalom_Oyahalom,tc_List_Olist(tc_Event_Oevent)) % 0.54/0.80 | ~ c_in(c_Event_Oevent_OGets(V_B,V_X),c_List_Oset(V_evs,tc_Event_Oevent),tc_Event_Oevent) % 0.54/0.80 | c_in(V_X,c_Message_Oanalz(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,V_evs)),tc_Message_Omsg) ) ). % 0.54/0.80 % 0.54/0.80 %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ % 0.54/0.80 %------------------------------------------- % 0.54/0.80 % Proof found % 0.54/0.80 % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark % 0.54/0.80 % SZS output start Proof % 0.54/0.80 %ClaNum:5(EqnAxiom:0) % 0.54/0.80 %VarNum:11(SingletonVarNum:6) % 0.54/0.80 %MaxLitNum:3 % 0.54/0.80 %MaxfuncDepth:4 % 0.54/0.80 %SharedTerms:19 % 0.54/0.80 %goalClause: 1 2 3 % 0.54/0.80 %singleGoalClaCount:3 % 0.54/0.80 [1]P1(a1,a2,f12(a11)) % 0.54/0.80 [3]~P1(a16,f9(f7(a8,a1)),a14) % 0.54/0.80 [2]P1(f5(a13,f10(f4(f3(a13),a15),a16)),f6(a1,a11),a11) % 0.54/0.80 [4]P1(x41,f9(x42),a14)+~P1(f10(x43,x41),f9(x42),a14) % 0.54/0.80 [5]~P1(f5(x53,x51),f6(x52,a11),a11)+~P1(x52,a2,f12(a11))+P1(x51,f9(f7(a8,x52)),a14) % 0.54/0.80 %EqnAxiom % 0.54/0.80 % 0.54/0.80 %------------------------------------------- % 0.54/0.81 cnf(6,plain, % 0.54/0.81 (~P1(f10(x61,a16),f9(f7(a8,a1)),a14)), % 0.54/0.81 inference(scs_inference,[],[3,4])). % 0.54/0.81 cnf(686,plain, % 0.54/0.81 ($false), % 0.54/0.81 inference(scs_inference,[],[6,2,1,5]), % 0.54/0.81 ['proof']). % 0.54/0.81 % SZS output end Proof % 0.54/0.81 % Total time :0.200000s %------------------------------------------------------------------------------