%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.5.1
% Problem : SWV365+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.3.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% Computer : n002.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 02:54:34 PM UTC 2026
% Result : Theorem 0.09s 0.44s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.09s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 4
% Number of leaves : 2
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 8 ( 8 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 8 ( 7 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Number of connectives : 3 ( 3 ~; 0 |; 0 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 0 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 6 ( 3 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 3 ( 2 avg)
% Number of predicates : 2 ( 0 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 8 ( 8 usr; 6 con; 0-3 aty)
% Number of variables : 14 ( 2 sgn 12 !; 0 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(l1_co,conjecture,
! [X1,X2,X4,X5] : i(triple(X1,create_slb,X4)) = i(triple(X2,create_slb,X5)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',l1_co) ).
fof(ax54,axiom,
! [X1,X2] : i(triple(X1,create_slb,X2)) = create_pq,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SWV007+4.ax',ax54) ).
fof(c_0_2,negated_conjecture,
~ ! [X1,X2,X4,X5] : i(triple(X1,create_slb,X4)) = i(triple(X2,create_slb,X5)),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[l1_co]) ).
fof(c_0_3,negated_conjecture,
i(triple(esk5_0,create_slb,esk7_0)) != i(triple(esk6_0,create_slb,esk8_0)),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_2])])])]) ).
fof(c_0_4,plain,
! [X147,X148] : i(triple(X147,create_slb,X148)) = create_pq,
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[ax54]) ).
cnf(c_0_5,negated_conjecture,
i(triple(esk5_0,create_slb,esk7_0)) != i(triple(esk6_0,create_slb,esk8_0)),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_3]) ).
cnf(c_0_6,plain,
i(triple(X1,create_slb,X2)) = create_pq,
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]) ).
cnf(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_5,c_0_6]),c_0_6])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03 % Problem : SWV365+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.3.0.
% 0.00/0.05 % Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.09/0.36 % Computer : n002.cluster.edu
% 0.09/0.36 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.09/0.36 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.09/0.36 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.09/0.36 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.09/0.36 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.09/0.36 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.09/0.36 % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 08:46:02 UTC 2026
% 0.09/0.36 % CPUTime :
% 0.09/0.36 Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.09/0.41 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.09/0.41 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.09/0.44 % Version: 3.5.1
% 0.09/0.44 % Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.09/0.44 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.09/0.44 % Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.09/0.44 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.09/0.44 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.09/0.44 % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.09/0.44 % G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with pid 2909277 completed with status 0
% 0.09/0.44 % Result found by G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S
% 0.09/0.44 % Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.09/0.44 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.09/0.44 % Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.09/0.44 % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 0.09/0.44 % No SInE strategy applied
% 0.09/0.44 % Search class: FGHSM-FFMF31-MFFFFFNN
% 0.09/0.44 % Scheduled 7 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.09/0.44 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 0.09/0.44 % Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 151s (1) cores
% 0.09/0.44 % Starting G-E--_301_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 136s (1) cores
% 0.09/0.44 % Starting new_bool_3 with 136s (1) cores
% 0.09/0.44 % Starting new_bool_1 with 136s (1) cores
% 0.09/0.44 % G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with pid 2909285 completed with status 0
% 0.09/0.44 % Result found by G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S
% 0.09/0.44 % Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.09/0.44 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.09/0.44 % Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.09/0.44 % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 0.09/0.44 % No SInE strategy applied
% 0.09/0.44 % Search class: FGHSM-FFMF31-MFFFFFNN
% 0.09/0.44 % Scheduled 7 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.09/0.44 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 0.09/0.44 % Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 151s (1) cores
% 0.09/0.44 % Preprocessing time : 0.003 s
% 0.09/0.44 % Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.09/0.44
% 0.09/0.44 % Proof found!
% 0.09/0.44 % SZS status Theorem
% 0.09/0.44 % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.09/0.44 % Parsed axioms : 63
% 0.09/0.44 % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 0.09/0.44 % Initial clauses : 89
% 0.09/0.44 % Removed in clause preprocessing : 4
% 0.09/0.44 % Initial clauses in saturation : 85
% 0.09/0.44 % Processed clauses : 13
% 0.09/0.44 % ...of these trivial : 0
% 0.09/0.44 % ...subsumed : 0
% 0.09/0.44 % ...remaining for further processing : 13
% 0.09/0.44 % Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.09/0.44 % Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.09/0.44 % Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.09/0.44 % Backward-rewritten : 1
% 0.09/0.44 % Generated clauses : 0
% 0.09/0.44 % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 0
% 0.09/0.44 % ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.09/0.44 % Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.09/0.44 % Paramodulations : 0
% 0.09/0.44 % Factorizations : 0
% 0.09/0.44 % NegExts : 0
% 0.09/0.44 % Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.09/0.44 % Disequality decompositions : 0
% 0.09/0.44 % Total rewrite steps : 2
% 0.09/0.44 % ...of those cached : 0
% 0.09/0.44 % Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.09/0.44 % Propositional check models : 0
% 0.09/0.44 % Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.09/0.44 % Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.09/0.44 % Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.09/0.44 % Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.09/0.44 % Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.09/0.44 % Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.09/0.44 % Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.09/0.44 % Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.09/0.44 % Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.09/0.44 % Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.09/0.44 % Current number of processed clauses : 12
% 0.09/0.44 % Positive orientable unit clauses : 5
% 0.09/0.44 % Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.09/0.44 % Negative unit clauses : 6
% 0.09/0.44 % Non-unit-clauses : 1
% 0.09/0.44 % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 72
% 0.09/0.44 % ...number of literals in the above : 161
% 0.09/0.44 % Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.09/0.44 % Current number of archived clauses : 3
% 0.09/0.44 % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 0
% 0.09/0.44 % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.09/0.44 % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 0
% 0.09/0.44 % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 5
% 0.09/0.44 % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.09/0.44 % BW rewrite match attempts : 3
% 0.09/0.44 % BW rewrite match successes : 2
% 0.09/0.44 % Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.09/0.44 % Condensation successes : 0
% 0.09/0.44 % Termbank termtop insertions : 5549
% 0.09/0.44 % Search garbage collected termcells : 1011
% 0.09/0.44
% 0.09/0.44 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.09/0.44 % User time : 0.004 s
% 0.09/0.44 % System time : 0.009 s
% 0.09/0.44 % Total time : 0.013 s
% 0.09/0.44 % Maximum resident set size: 3968 pages
% 0.09/0.44
% 0.09/0.44 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.09/0.44 % User time : 0.015 s
% 0.09/0.44 % System time : 0.023 s
% 0.09/0.44 % Total time : 0.038 s
% 0.09/0.44 % Maximum resident set size: 4608 pages
% 0.09/0.44 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------