↑ Up

iProver---3.9.4.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : iProver---3.9.4
% Problem  : SWV366+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM

% Computer : n001.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Fri Sep 25 03:17:28 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 3.50s 1.43s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 3.50s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   14
%            Number of leaves      :    8
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   28 (  23 unt;   6 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   55 (  32 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   13 (   8   ~;   0   |;   3   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   2  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   10 (   4 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    5 (   2 avg)
%            Number of types       :    1 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :    0 (   0   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of predicates  :    8 (   6 usr;   7 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :   12 (  12 usr;   7 con; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   79 (   0 sgn  65   !;  14   ?;  17   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f55,axiom,
    ! [X0,X1,X2,X3,X4] : i(triple(X0,insert_slb(X1,pair(X3,X4)),X2)) = insert_pq(i(triple(X0,X1,X2)),X3),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SWV007+4.ax',ax55) ).

fof(f63,conjecture,
    ! [X0] :
      ( ! [X1,X2,X3,X4] : i(triple(X1,X0,X3)) = i(triple(X2,X0,X4))
     => ! [X5,X6,X7,X8,X9,X10] : i(triple(X5,insert_slb(X0,pair(X9,X10)),X7)) = i(triple(X6,insert_slb(X0,pair(X9,X10)),X8)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',l2_co) ).

fof(f64,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X0] :
        ( ! [X1,X2,X3,X4] : i(triple(X1,X0,X3)) = i(triple(X2,X0,X4))
       => ! [X5,X6,X7,X8,X9,X10] : i(triple(X5,insert_slb(X0,pair(X9,X10)),X7)) = i(triple(X6,insert_slb(X0,pair(X9,X10)),X8)) ),
    inference(negated_conjecture,[status(cth)],[f63]) ).

fof(f115,plain,
    ? [X0] :
      ( ! [X1,X2,X3,X4] : i(triple(X1,X0,X3)) = i(triple(X2,X0,X4))
      & ? [X5,X6,X7,X8,X9,X10] : i(triple(X5,insert_slb(X0,pair(X9,X10)),X7)) != i(triple(X6,insert_slb(X0,pair(X9,X10)),X8)) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f64]) ).

fof(f125,plain,
    ? [X0] :
      ( ! [X7,X8,X9,X10] : i(triple(X7,X0,X9)) = i(triple(X8,X0,X10))
      & ? [X1,X2,X3,X4,X5,X6] : i(triple(X1,insert_slb(X0,pair(X5,X6)),X3)) != i(triple(X2,insert_slb(X0,pair(X5,X6)),X4)) ),
    inference(rectify,[],[f115]) ).

fof(f126,plain,
    ( ! [X7,X8,X9,X10] : i(triple(X7,sK1,X9)) = i(triple(X8,sK1,X10))
    & i(triple(sK2,insert_slb(sK1,pair(sK6,sK7)),sK4)) != i(triple(sK3,insert_slb(sK1,pair(sK6,sK7)),sK5)) ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK1,sK2,sK3,sK4,sK5,sK6,sK7]),skolemize(X0,sK1),skolemize(X1,sK2),skolemize(X2,sK3),skolemize(X3,sK4),skolemize(X4,sK5),skolemize(X5,sK6),skolemize(X6,sK7)],[f125]) ).

fof(f191,plain,
    ! [X2,X3,X0,X1,X4] : i(triple(X0,insert_slb(X1,pair(X3,X4)),X2)) = insert_pq(i(triple(X0,X1,X2)),X3),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f55]) ).

fof(f192,plain,
    ! [X10,X8,X9,X7] : i(triple(X7,sK1,X9)) = i(triple(X8,sK1,X10)),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f126]) ).

fof(f193,plain,
    i(triple(sK2,insert_slb(sK1,pair(sK6,sK7)),sK4)) != i(triple(sK3,insert_slb(sK1,pair(sK6,sK7)),sK5)),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f126]) ).

tcf(c_111,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i,X3: $i,X4: $i] : i(triple(X0,insert_slb(X1,pair(X2,X3)),X4)) = insert_pq(i(triple(X0,X1,X4)),X2),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f191]) ).

tcf(c_112,negated_conjecture,
    i(triple(sK2,insert_slb(sK1,pair(sK6,sK7)),sK4)) != i(triple(sK3,insert_slb(sK1,pair(sK6,sK7)),sK5)),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f193]) ).

tcf(c_113,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i,X3: $i] : i(triple(X0,sK1,X1)) = i(triple(X2,sK1,X3)),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f192]) ).

tcf(c_566,plain,
    insert_pq(i(triple(sK2,sK1,sK4)),sK6) != insert_pq(i(triple(sK3,sK1,sK5)),sK6),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_112,c_111]) ).

tcf(c_1382,definition,
    iPr_def_10 = triple(sK2,sK1,sK4),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[iPr_def_10])],[]) ).

tcf(c_1383,definition,
    iPr_def_11 = i(iPr_def_10),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[iPr_def_11])],[]) ).

tcf(c_1384,definition,
    iPr_def_12 = insert_pq(iPr_def_11,sK6),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[iPr_def_12])],[]) ).

tcf(c_1385,definition,
    iPr_def_13 = triple(sK3,sK1,sK5),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[iPr_def_13])],[]) ).

tcf(c_1386,definition,
    iPr_def_14 = i(iPr_def_13),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[iPr_def_14])],[]) ).

tcf(c_1387,definition,
    iPr_def_15 = insert_pq(iPr_def_14,sK6),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[iPr_def_15])],[]) ).

tcf(c_1388,plain,
    iPr_def_12 != iPr_def_15,
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_566,c_1385,c_1386,c_1387,c_1382,c_1383,c_1384]) ).

tcf(c_1389,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i,X3: $i] : i(triple(X0,sK1,X1)) = i(triple(X2,sK1,X3)),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_113]) ).

tcf(c_2146,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] : i(triple(X0,sK1,X1)) = i(iPr_def_10),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_1382,c_1389]) ).

tcf(c_2148,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] : i(triple(X0,sK1,X1)) = iPr_def_11,
    inference(light_normalisation,[status(thm)],[c_2146,c_1383]) ).

tcf(c_2152,plain,
    i(iPr_def_13) = iPr_def_11,
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_1385,c_2148]) ).

tcf(c_2153,plain,
    iPr_def_11 = iPr_def_14,
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_1386,c_2152]) ).

tcf(c_2154,plain,
    insert_pq(iPr_def_11,sK6) = iPr_def_15,
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_1387,c_2153]) ).

tcf(c_2155,plain,
    iPr_def_12 = iPr_def_15,
    inference(light_normalisation,[status(thm)],[c_2154,c_1384]) ).

tcf(c_2156,plain,
    $false,
    inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_2155,c_1388]) ).


%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : SWV366+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.3.0.
% 0.00/0.04  % Command  : run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM
% 0.10/0.52  % Computer : n001.cluster.edu
% 0.10/0.52  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.10/0.52  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.10/0.52  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.10/0.52  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.10/0.52  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.10/0.52  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.10/0.52  % DateTime : Thu Sep 24 19:28:40 UTC 2026
% 0.10/0.52  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.10/0.52  Running run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM
% 0.10/0.55  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.10/0.55  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/iproveropt-multi-core.sh -d -n -l tptp -s fof_schedule -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.15/0.56  
% 0.15/0.56  % ======== iProver multi-core TPTP/SMT =========
% 0.15/0.56  
% 0.15/0.56  % Detected problem language: tptp
% 0.15/0.58  % Proving...
% 3.50/1.43  % SZS status Started for theBenchmark.p
% 3.50/1.43  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 3.50/1.43  
% 3.50/1.43  %---------------- iProver v3.9.4 (pre CASC 2026/SMT-COMP 2026) ----------------%
% 3.50/1.43  
% 3.50/1.43  % ------  iProver source info
% 3.50/1.43  
% 3.50/1.43  % git: date: 2026-07-19 20:42:38 +0200
% 3.50/1.43  % git: sha1: 804e7d636a263075307957e923b7a22a4035de61
% 3.50/1.43  % git: non_committed_changes: false
% 3.50/1.43  
% 3.50/1.43  % ------ Parsing...
% 3.50/1.43  % ------ Clausification by vclausify_rel  & Parsing by iProver...% 
% 3.50/1.43  
% 3.50/1.43  % ------ Preprocessing... sup_sim: 1  sf_s  rm: 7 0s  sf_e  pe_s  pe:1:0s pe:2:0s pe_e  sup_sim: 0  sf_s  rm: 5 0s  sf_e  pe_s  pe_e % 
% 3.50/1.43  
% 3.50/1.43  % ------ Preprocessing... gs_s  sp: 0 0s  gs_e  snvd_s sp: 0 0s snvd_e % 
% 3.50/1.43  
% 3.50/1.43  % ------ Preprocessing... sf_s  rm: 1 0s  sf_e  sf_s  rm: 0 0s  sf_e 
% 3.50/1.43  % ------ Proving...
% 3.50/1.43  % ------ Problem Properties 
% 3.50/1.43  
% 3.50/1.43  % 
% 3.50/1.43  % clauses                               63
% 3.50/1.43  % conjectures                           1
% 3.50/1.43  % EPR                                   8
% 3.50/1.43  % Horn                                  46
% 3.50/1.43  % unary                                 30
% 3.50/1.43  % binary                                15
% 3.50/1.43  % lits                                  115
% 3.50/1.43  % lits eq                               48
% 3.50/1.43  % fd_pure                               0
% 3.50/1.43  % fd_pseudo                             0
% 3.50/1.43  % fd_cond                               5
% 3.50/1.43  % fd_pseudo_cond                        7
% 3.50/1.43  % AC symbols                            0
% 3.50/1.43  
% 3.50/1.43  % ------ Schedule dynamic 5 is on 
% 3.50/1.43  
% 3.50/1.43  % ------ Input Options "--resolution_flag false --inst_lit_sel_side none" Time Limit: 10.
% 3.50/1.43  
% 3.50/1.43  
% 3.50/1.43  % ------ 
% 3.50/1.43  % Current options:
% 3.50/1.43  % ------ 
% 3.50/1.43  
% 3.50/1.43  
% 3.50/1.43  % 
% 3.50/1.43  
% 3.50/1.43  % ------ Proving...
% 3.50/1.43  % 
% 3.50/1.43  
% 3.50/1.43  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 3.50/1.43  
% 3.50/1.43  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 3.50/1.43  
% 3.50/1.43  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------