%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : ET---2.0
% Problem : SWV367+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.3.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_ET %s %d
% Computer : n017.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Wed Jul 20 18:16:21 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 0.26s 1.45s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.26s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 4
% Number of leaves : 3
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 11 ( 8 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 14 ( 6 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of connectives : 8 ( 5 ~; 0 |; 1 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 2 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 6 ( 3 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 4 ( 2 avg)
% Number of predicates : 3 ( 1 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 9 ( 9 usr; 5 con; 0-3 aty)
% Number of variables : 15 ( 3 sgn 12 !; 0 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(l3_co,conjecture,
! [X1,X2,X3] :
( contains_pq(i(triple(X1,create_slb,X2)),X3)
=> i(remove_cpq(triple(X1,create_slb,X2),X3)) = remove_pq(i(triple(X1,create_slb,X2)),X3) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',l3_co) ).
fof(ax54,axiom,
! [X1,X2] : i(triple(X1,create_slb,X2)) = create_pq,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SWV007+4.ax',ax54) ).
fof(ax8,axiom,
! [X1] : ~ contains_pq(create_pq,X1),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SWV007+1.ax',ax8) ).
fof(c_0_3,negated_conjecture,
~ ! [X1,X2,X3] :
( contains_pq(i(triple(X1,create_slb,X2)),X3)
=> i(remove_cpq(triple(X1,create_slb,X2),X3)) = remove_pq(i(triple(X1,create_slb,X2)),X3) ),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[l3_co]) ).
fof(c_0_4,negated_conjecture,
( contains_pq(i(triple(esk5_0,create_slb,esk6_0)),esk7_0)
& i(remove_cpq(triple(esk5_0,create_slb,esk6_0),esk7_0)) != remove_pq(i(triple(esk5_0,create_slb,esk6_0)),esk7_0) ),
inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_3])])]) ).
fof(c_0_5,plain,
! [X3,X4] : i(triple(X3,create_slb,X4)) = create_pq,
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[ax54]) ).
fof(c_0_6,plain,
! [X2] : ~ contains_pq(create_pq,X2),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[ax8])]) ).
cnf(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
contains_pq(i(triple(esk5_0,create_slb,esk6_0)),esk7_0),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]) ).
cnf(c_0_8,plain,
i(triple(X1,create_slb,X2)) = create_pq,
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).
cnf(c_0_9,plain,
~ contains_pq(create_pq,X1),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).
cnf(c_0_10,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_7,c_0_8]),c_0_9]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.04/0.14 % Problem : SWV367+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.3.0.
% 0.04/0.14 % Command : run_ET %s %d
% 0.14/0.36 % Computer : n017.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.36 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.36 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.36 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.36 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.36 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.36 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.14/0.36 % DateTime : Wed Jun 15 09:53:54 EDT 2022
% 0.14/0.36 % CPUTime :
% 0.26/1.45 # Running protocol protocol_eprover_29fa5c60d0ee03ec4f64b055553dc135fbe4ee3a for 23 seconds:
% 0.26/1.45 # Preprocessing time : 0.021 s
% 0.26/1.45
% 0.26/1.45 # Proof found!
% 0.26/1.45 # SZS status Theorem
% 0.26/1.45 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.26/1.45 # Proof object total steps : 11
% 0.26/1.45 # Proof object clause steps : 4
% 0.26/1.45 # Proof object formula steps : 7
% 0.26/1.45 # Proof object conjectures : 5
% 0.26/1.45 # Proof object clause conjectures : 2
% 0.26/1.45 # Proof object formula conjectures : 3
% 0.26/1.45 # Proof object initial clauses used : 3
% 0.26/1.45 # Proof object initial formulas used : 3
% 0.26/1.45 # Proof object generating inferences : 0
% 0.26/1.45 # Proof object simplifying inferences : 2
% 0.26/1.45 # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 0.26/1.45 # Parsed axioms : 63
% 0.26/1.45 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 0.26/1.45 # Initial clauses : 88
% 0.26/1.45 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 2
% 0.26/1.45 # Initial clauses in saturation : 86
% 0.26/1.45 # Processed clauses : 15
% 0.26/1.45 # ...of these trivial : 0
% 0.26/1.45 # ...subsumed : 0
% 0.26/1.45 # ...remaining for further processing : 15
% 0.26/1.45 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.26/1.45 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.26/1.45 # Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.26/1.45 # Backward-rewritten : 2
% 0.26/1.45 # Generated clauses : 0
% 0.26/1.45 # ...of the previous two non-trivial : 1
% 0.26/1.45 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.26/1.45 # Paramodulations : 0
% 0.26/1.45 # Factorizations : 0
% 0.26/1.45 # Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.26/1.45 # Current number of processed clauses : 13
% 0.26/1.45 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 6
% 0.26/1.45 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.26/1.45 # Negative unit clauses : 6
% 0.26/1.45 # Non-unit-clauses : 1
% 0.26/1.45 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 72
% 0.26/1.45 # ...number of literals in the above : 161
% 0.26/1.45 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.26/1.45 # Current number of archived clauses : 4
% 0.26/1.45 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 0
% 0.26/1.45 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.26/1.45 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 0
% 0.26/1.45 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 2
% 0.26/1.45 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.26/1.45 # BW rewrite match attempts : 2
% 0.26/1.45 # BW rewrite match successes : 1
% 0.26/1.45 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.26/1.45 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.26/1.45 # Termbank termtop insertions : 4916
% 0.26/1.45
% 0.26/1.45 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.26/1.45 # User time : 0.020 s
% 0.26/1.45 # System time : 0.002 s
% 0.26/1.45 # Total time : 0.022 s
% 0.26/1.45 # Maximum resident set size: 3120 pages
% 0.26/23.44 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.26/23.44 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.26/23.45 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.26/23.45 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.26/23.46 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.26/23.46 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.26/23.46 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.26/23.46 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.26/23.46 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.26/23.46 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.26/23.47 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.26/23.47 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.26/23.47 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.26/23.47 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.26/23.47 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.26/23.47 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.26/23.48 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.26/23.48 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.26/23.48 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.26/23.48 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.26/23.48 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.26/23.48 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.26/23.49 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.26/23.49 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.26/23.49 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.26/23.49 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.26/23.49 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.26/23.49 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.26/23.49 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.26/23.49 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.26/23.50 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.26/23.50 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.26/23.50 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.26/23.50 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.26/23.50 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.26/23.50 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.26/23.50 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.26/23.50 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.26/23.51 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.26/23.51 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.26/23.51 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.26/23.51 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.26/23.51 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.26/23.51 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.26/23.52 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.26/23.52 eprover: No such file or directory
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------