%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : iProver---3.9.4
% Problem : SWV369+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.3.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM
% Computer : n026.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Fri Sep 25 03:17:28 PM UTC 2026
% Result : Theorem 3.88s 16.30s
% Output : CNFRefutation 3.88s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 12
% Number of leaves : 5
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 26 ( 12 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 46 ( 3 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 4 ( 1 avg)
% Number of connectives : 35 ( 15 ~; 13 |; 3 &)
% ( 3 <=>; 0 =>; 0 <=; 1 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 8 ( 4 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Number of types : 1 ( 0 usr)
% Number of type conns : 0 ( 0 >; 0 *; 0 +; 0 <<)
% Number of predicates : 5 ( 3 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 7 ( 7 usr; 5 con; 0-3 aty)
% Number of variables : 40 ( 0 sgn 34 !; 6 ?; 8 :)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f8,axiom,
! [X0] : ~ contains_pq(create_pq,X0),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SWV007+1.ax',ax8) ).
fof(f20,axiom,
! [X0] : ~ contains_slb(create_slb,X0),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SWV007+2.ax',ax20) ).
fof(f39,axiom,
! [X0,X1,X2,X3] :
( contains_cpq(triple(X0,X1,X2),X3)
<=> contains_slb(X1,X3) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SWV007+3.ax',ax39) ).
fof(f54,axiom,
! [X0,X1] : i(triple(X0,create_slb,X1)) = create_pq,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SWV007+4.ax',ax54) ).
fof(f63,conjecture,
! [X0,X1,X2] :
( contains_cpq(triple(X0,create_slb,X1),X2)
<=> contains_pq(i(triple(X0,create_slb,X1)),X2) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',l5_co) ).
fof(f64,negated_conjecture,
~ ! [X0,X1,X2] :
( contains_cpq(triple(X0,create_slb,X1),X2)
<=> contains_pq(i(triple(X0,create_slb,X1)),X2) ),
inference(negated_conjecture,[status(cth)],[f63]) ).
fof(f115,plain,
? [X0,X1,X2] :
( contains_cpq(triple(X0,create_slb,X1),X2)
<~> contains_pq(i(triple(X0,create_slb,X1)),X2) ),
inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f64]) ).
fof(f124,plain,
! [X0,X1,X2,X3] :
( ( ~ contains_cpq(triple(X0,X1,X2),X3)
| contains_slb(X1,X3) )
& ( ~ contains_slb(X1,X3)
| contains_cpq(triple(X0,X1,X2),X3) ) ),
inference(nnf_transformation,[],[f39]) ).
fof(f125,plain,
? [X0,X1,X2] :
( ( contains_cpq(triple(X0,create_slb,X1),X2)
| contains_pq(i(triple(X0,create_slb,X1)),X2) )
& ( ~ contains_cpq(triple(X0,create_slb,X1),X2)
| ~ contains_pq(i(triple(X0,create_slb,X1)),X2) ) ),
inference(nnf_transformation,[],[f115]) ).
fof(f126,plain,
( ( contains_cpq(triple(sK1,create_slb,sK2),sK3)
| contains_pq(i(triple(sK1,create_slb,sK2)),sK3) )
& ( ~ contains_cpq(triple(sK1,create_slb,sK2),sK3)
| ~ contains_pq(i(triple(sK1,create_slb,sK2)),sK3) ) ),
inference(skolemize,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK1,sK2,sK3]),skolemize(X0,sK1),skolemize(X1,sK2),skolemize(X2,sK3)],[f125]) ).
fof(f134,plain,
! [X0] : ~ contains_pq(create_pq,X0),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f8]) ).
fof(f149,plain,
! [X0] : ~ contains_slb(create_slb,X0),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f20]) ).
fof(f174,plain,
! [X2,X3,X0,X1] :
( ~ contains_cpq(triple(X0,X1,X2),X3)
| contains_slb(X1,X3) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f124]) ).
fof(f190,plain,
! [X0,X1] : create_pq = i(triple(X0,create_slb,X1)),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f54]) ).
fof(f192,plain,
( contains_cpq(triple(sK1,create_slb,sK2),sK3)
| contains_pq(i(triple(sK1,create_slb,sK2)),sK3) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f126]) ).
tcf(c_56,plain,
! [X0: $i] : ~ contains_pq(create_pq,X0),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f134]) ).
tcf(c_71,plain,
! [X0: $i] : ~ contains_slb(create_slb,X0),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f149]) ).
tcf(c_97,plain,
! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i,X3: $i] :
( contains_slb(X1,X3)
| ~ contains_cpq(triple(X0,X1,X2),X3) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f174]) ).
tcf(c_110,plain,
! [X0: $i,X1: $i] : i(triple(X0,create_slb,X1)) = create_pq,
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f190]) ).
tcf(c_113,negated_conjecture,
( contains_cpq(triple(sK1,create_slb,sK2),sK3)
| contains_pq(i(triple(sK1,create_slb,sK2)),sK3) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f192]) ).
tcf(c_169,plain,
( contains_pq(i(triple(sK1,create_slb,sK2)),sK3)
| contains_cpq(triple(sK1,create_slb,sK2),sK3) ),
inference(prop_impl_just,[status(thm)],[c_113]) ).
tcf(c_170,plain,
( contains_cpq(triple(sK1,create_slb,sK2),sK3)
| contains_pq(i(triple(sK1,create_slb,sK2)),sK3) ),
inference(renaming,[status(thm)],[c_169]) ).
tcf(c_652,plain,
( contains_pq(create_pq,sK3)
| contains_cpq(triple(sK1,create_slb,sK2),sK3) ),
inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_170,c_110]) ).
tcf(c_653,plain,
contains_cpq(triple(sK1,create_slb,sK2),sK3),
inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_652,c_56]) ).
tcf(c_2350,plain,
contains_slb(create_slb,sK3),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_653,c_97]) ).
tcf(c_2352,plain,
$false,
inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_2350,c_71]) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03 % Problem : SWV369+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.3.0.
% 0.00/0.04 % Command : run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM
% 0.10/15.39 % Computer : n026.cluster.edu
% 0.10/15.39 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.10/15.39 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.10/15.39 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.10/15.39 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.10/15.39 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.10/15.39 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.10/15.39 % DateTime : Thu Sep 24 19:26:40 UTC 2026
% 0.15/15.40 % CPUTime :
% 0.15/15.40 Running run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM
% 0.15/15.43 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.15/15.43 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/iproveropt-multi-core.sh -d -n -l tptp -s fof_schedule -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.15/15.44
% 0.15/15.44 % ======== iProver multi-core TPTP/SMT =========
% 0.15/15.44
% 0.15/15.44 % Detected problem language: tptp
% 0.15/15.45 % Proving...
% 3.88/16.30 % SZS status Started for theBenchmark.p
% 3.88/16.30 % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 3.88/16.30
% 3.88/16.30 %---------------- iProver v3.9.4 (pre CASC 2026/SMT-COMP 2026) ----------------%
% 3.88/16.30
% 3.88/16.30 % ------ iProver source info
% 3.88/16.30
% 3.88/16.30 % git: date: 2026-07-19 20:42:38 +0200
% 3.88/16.30 % git: sha1: 804e7d636a263075307957e923b7a22a4035de61
% 3.88/16.30 % git: non_committed_changes: false
% 3.88/16.30
% 3.88/16.30 % ------ Parsing...
% 3.88/16.30 % ------ Clausification by vclausify_rel & Parsing by iProver...%
% 3.88/16.30
% 3.88/16.30 % ------ Preprocessing... sup_sim: 2 sf_s rm: 7 0s sf_e pe_s pe:1:0s pe:2:0s pe_e sup_sim: 0 sf_s rm: 5 0s sf_e pe_s pe_e %
% 3.88/16.30
% 3.88/16.30 % ------ Preprocessing... gs_s sp: 0 0s gs_e snvd_s sp: 0 0s snvd_e %
% 3.88/16.30
% 3.88/16.30 % ------ Preprocessing... sf_s rm: 1 0s sf_e sf_s rm: 0 0s sf_e
% 3.88/16.30 % ------ Proving...
% 3.88/16.30 % ------ Problem Properties
% 3.88/16.30
% 3.88/16.30 %
% 3.88/16.30 % clauses 56
% 3.88/16.30 % conjectures 0
% 3.88/16.30 % EPR 7
% 3.88/16.30 % Horn 39
% 3.88/16.30 % unary 23
% 3.88/16.30 % binary 15
% 3.88/16.30 % lits 108
% 3.88/16.30 % lits eq 40
% 3.88/16.30 % fd_pure 0
% 3.88/16.30 % fd_pseudo 0
% 3.88/16.30 % fd_cond 5
% 3.88/16.30 % fd_pseudo_cond 7
% 3.88/16.30 % AC symbols 0
% 3.88/16.30
% 3.88/16.30 % ------ Schedule dynamic 5 is on
% 3.88/16.30
% 3.88/16.30 % ------ no conjectures: strip conj schedule
% 3.88/16.30
% 3.88/16.30 % ------ Input Options "--resolution_flag false --inst_lit_sel_side none" stripped conjectures Time Limit: 10.
% 3.88/16.30
% 3.88/16.30
% 3.88/16.30 % ------
% 3.88/16.30 % Current options:
% 3.88/16.30 % ------
% 3.88/16.30
% 3.88/16.30
% 3.88/16.30 %
% 3.88/16.30
% 3.88/16.30 % ------ Proving...
% 3.88/16.30 %
% 3.88/16.30
% 3.88/16.30 % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 3.88/16.30
% 3.88/16.30 % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 3.88/16.30
% 3.88/16.30
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------