↑ Up

CSE_E---1.7.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : CSE_E---1.7
% Problem  : SWV373+1 : TPTP v9.2.1. Released v3.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/lemma_parallel_prover %s --lemma-prover /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/cse --final-prover /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --proof-time %d --global-time-limit %d

% Computer : n014.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue May  5 05:22:02 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 1.23s 1.68s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 1.23s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    6
%            Number of leaves      :    5
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   22 (   9 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   43 (  10 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    6 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   43 (  22   ~;  10   |;   6   &)
%                                         (   1 <=>;   4  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    8 (   4 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    6 (   4 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    9 (   9 usr;   4 con; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   41 (   6 sgn  30   !;   0   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(l9_co,conjecture,
    ! [X1,X2,X3] :
      ( ~ contains_cpq(triple(X1,X2,X3),findmin_cpq_res(triple(X1,X2,X3)))
     => ~ ok(findmin_cpq_eff(triple(X1,X2,X3))) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',l9_co) ).

fof(ax51,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2,X3,X4] :
      ( X2 != create_slb
     => findmin_cpq_res(triple(X1,X2,X3)) = findmin_pqp_res(X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SWV007+3.ax',ax51) ).

fof(l9_l10,lemma,
    ! [X1,X2,X3] :
      ( ok(findmin_cpq_eff(triple(X1,X2,X3)))
     => ( X2 != create_slb
        & contains_slb(X2,findmin_pqp_res(X1))
        & less_than(lookup_slb(X2,findmin_pqp_res(X1)),findmin_pqp_res(X1)) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',l9_l10) ).

fof(ax39,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2,X3,X4] :
      ( contains_cpq(triple(X1,X2,X3),X4)
    <=> contains_slb(X2,X4) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SWV007+3.ax',ax39) ).

fof(ax20,axiom,
    ! [X1] : ~ contains_slb(create_slb,X1),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SWV007+2.ax',ax20) ).

fof(c_0_5,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X1,X2,X3] :
        ( ~ contains_cpq(triple(X1,X2,X3),findmin_cpq_res(triple(X1,X2,X3)))
       => ~ ok(findmin_cpq_eff(triple(X1,X2,X3))) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[l9_co])]) ).

fof(c_0_6,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ contains_cpq(triple(esk1_0,esk2_0,esk3_0),findmin_cpq_res(triple(esk1_0,esk2_0,esk3_0)))
    & ok(findmin_cpq_eff(triple(esk1_0,esk2_0,esk3_0))) ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_5])])]) ).

fof(c_0_7,plain,
    ! [X237,X238,X239] :
      ( X238 = create_slb
      | findmin_cpq_res(triple(X237,X238,X239)) = findmin_pqp_res(X237) ),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[ax51])])]) ).

fof(c_0_8,lemma,
    ! [X242,X243,X244] :
      ( ( X243 != create_slb
        | ~ ok(findmin_cpq_eff(triple(X242,X243,X244))) )
      & ( contains_slb(X243,findmin_pqp_res(X242))
        | ~ ok(findmin_cpq_eff(triple(X242,X243,X244))) )
      & ( less_than(lookup_slb(X243,findmin_pqp_res(X242)),findmin_pqp_res(X242))
        | ~ ok(findmin_cpq_eff(triple(X242,X243,X244))) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[l9_l10])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_9,negated_conjecture,
    ~ contains_cpq(triple(esk1_0,esk2_0,esk3_0),findmin_cpq_res(triple(esk1_0,esk2_0,esk3_0))),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).

cnf(c_0_10,plain,
    ( X1 = create_slb
    | findmin_cpq_res(triple(X2,X1,X3)) = findmin_pqp_res(X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).

fof(c_0_11,plain,
    ! [X199,X200,X201,X202] :
      ( ( ~ contains_cpq(triple(X199,X200,X201),X202)
        | contains_slb(X200,X202) )
      & ( ~ contains_slb(X200,X202)
        | contains_cpq(triple(X199,X200,X201),X202) ) ),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax39])]) ).

cnf(c_0_12,lemma,
    ( contains_slb(X1,findmin_pqp_res(X2))
    | ~ ok(findmin_cpq_eff(triple(X2,X1,X3))) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).

cnf(c_0_13,negated_conjecture,
    ok(findmin_cpq_eff(triple(esk1_0,esk2_0,esk3_0))),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).

fof(c_0_14,plain,
    ! [X1] : ~ contains_slb(create_slb,X1),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[ax20]) ).

cnf(c_0_15,negated_conjecture,
    ( esk2_0 = create_slb
    | ~ contains_cpq(triple(esk1_0,esk2_0,esk3_0),findmin_pqp_res(esk1_0)) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_9,c_0_10]) ).

cnf(c_0_16,plain,
    ( contains_cpq(triple(X3,X1,X4),X2)
    | ~ contains_slb(X1,X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_11]) ).

cnf(c_0_17,negated_conjecture,
    contains_slb(esk2_0,findmin_pqp_res(esk1_0)),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_12,c_0_13]) ).

fof(c_0_18,plain,
    ! [X141] : ~ contains_slb(create_slb,X141),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[c_0_14]) ).

cnf(c_0_19,negated_conjecture,
    esk2_0 = create_slb,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_15,c_0_16]),c_0_17])]) ).

cnf(c_0_20,plain,
    ~ contains_slb(create_slb,X1),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_18]) ).

cnf(c_0_21,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_17,c_0_19]),c_0_20]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.09  % Problem    : SWV373+1 : TPTP v9.2.1. Released v3.3.0.
% 0.00/0.09  % Command    : /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/lemma_parallel_prover %s --lemma-prover /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/cse --final-prover /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --proof-time %d --global-time-limit %d
% 0.11/0.30  % Computer : n014.cluster.edu
% 0.11/0.30  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.11/0.30  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.11/0.30  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.11/0.30  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.11/0.30  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.11/0.30  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.11/0.30  % DateTime   : Tue May  5 05:05:36 EDT 2026
% 0.11/0.30  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.11/0.31  % start to proof: theBenchmark
% 1.23/1.68  % Version  : CSE_E---1.7
% 1.23/1.68  % Problem  : theBenchmark.p
% 1.23/1.68  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 1.23/1.68  % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 1.23/1.68  % Total time : 1.370s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------