↑ Up

E---3.5.1.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E---3.5.1
% Problem  : SWV379+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM

% Computer : n017.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 02:54:36 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 0.15s 0.45s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.15s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   10
%            Number of leaves      :    9
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   47 (  10 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :  117 (  41 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    7 (   2 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  112 (  42   ~;  40   |;  16   &)
%                                         (   3 <=>;  11  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    8 (   4 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    4 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    7 (   4 usr;   2 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :   10 (  10 usr;   5 con; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of variables   :  103 (  18 sgn  69   !;   0   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(stricly_smaller_definition,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] :
      ( strictly_less_than(X1,X2)
    <=> ( ~ less_than(X2,X1)
        & less_than(X1,X2) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SWV007+0.ax',stricly_smaller_definition) ).

fof(ax48,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2,X3,X4] :
      ( ( strictly_less_than(findmin_pqp_res(X1),lookup_slb(X2,findmin_pqp_res(X1)))
        & contains_slb(X2,findmin_pqp_res(X1))
        & X2 != create_slb )
     => findmin_cpq_eff(triple(X1,X2,X3)) = triple(X1,update_slb(X2,findmin_pqp_res(X1)),bad) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SWV007+3.ax',ax48) ).

fof(totality,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] :
      ( less_than(X2,X1)
      | less_than(X1,X2) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SWV007+0.ax',totality) ).

fof(ax47,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2,X3,X4] :
      ( ( ~ contains_slb(X2,findmin_pqp_res(X1))
        & X2 != create_slb )
     => findmin_cpq_eff(triple(X1,X2,X3)) = triple(X1,update_slb(X2,findmin_pqp_res(X1)),bad) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SWV007+3.ax',ax47) ).

fof(ax40,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] :
      ( ok(triple(X1,X2,bad))
    <=> ~ $true ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SWV007+3.ax',ax40) ).

fof(l15_co,conjecture,
    ! [X1,X2,X3] :
      ( ~ ok(triple(X1,X2,X3))
     => ~ ok(findmin_cpq_eff(triple(X1,X2,X3))) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',l15_co) ).

fof(ax41,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2,X3] :
      ( ~ ok(triple(X1,X2,X3))
     => X3 = bad ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SWV007+3.ax',ax41) ).

fof(ax49,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2,X3,X4] :
      ( ( less_than(lookup_slb(X2,findmin_pqp_res(X1)),findmin_pqp_res(X1))
        & contains_slb(X2,findmin_pqp_res(X1))
        & X2 != create_slb )
     => findmin_cpq_eff(triple(X1,X2,X3)) = triple(X1,update_slb(X2,findmin_pqp_res(X1)),X3) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SWV007+3.ax',ax49) ).

fof(ax46,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] : findmin_cpq_eff(triple(X1,create_slb,X2)) = triple(X1,create_slb,bad),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SWV007+3.ax',ax46) ).

fof(c_0_9,plain,
    ! [X1,X2] :
      ( strictly_less_than(X1,X2)
    <=> ( ~ less_than(X2,X1)
        & less_than(X1,X2) ) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[stricly_smaller_definition]) ).

fof(c_0_10,plain,
    ! [X1,X2,X3,X4] :
      ( ( strictly_less_than(findmin_pqp_res(X1),lookup_slb(X2,findmin_pqp_res(X1)))
        & contains_slb(X2,findmin_pqp_res(X1))
        & X2 != create_slb )
     => findmin_cpq_eff(triple(X1,X2,X3)) = triple(X1,update_slb(X2,findmin_pqp_res(X1)),bad) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[ax48]) ).

fof(c_0_11,plain,
    ! [X12,X13] :
      ( ( strictly_less_than(X12,X13)
        | less_than(X13,X12)
        | ~ less_than(X12,X13) )
      & ( ~ strictly_less_than(X12,X13)
        | ~ less_than(X13,X12) )
      & ( ~ strictly_less_than(X12,X13)
        | less_than(X12,X13) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_9])])])]) ).

fof(c_0_12,plain,
    ! [X9,X10] :
      ( less_than(X10,X9)
      | less_than(X9,X10) ),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[totality]) ).

fof(c_0_13,plain,
    ! [X1,X2,X3,X4] :
      ( ( ~ contains_slb(X2,findmin_pqp_res(X1))
        & X2 != create_slb )
     => findmin_cpq_eff(triple(X1,X2,X3)) = triple(X1,update_slb(X2,findmin_pqp_res(X1)),bad) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[ax47]) ).

fof(c_0_14,plain,
    ! [X80,X81] :
      ( ( ok(triple(X80,X81,bad))
        | $true )
      & ( ~ $true
        | ~ ok(triple(X80,X81,bad)) ) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax40])])]) ).

fof(c_0_15,plain,
    ! [X106,X107,X108] :
      ( findmin_cpq_eff(triple(X106,X107,X108)) = triple(X106,update_slb(X107,findmin_pqp_res(X106)),bad)
      | ~ strictly_less_than(findmin_pqp_res(X106),lookup_slb(X107,findmin_pqp_res(X106)))
      | ~ contains_slb(X107,findmin_pqp_res(X106))
      | X107 = create_slb ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[c_0_10])])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_16,plain,
    ( ~ less_than(X1,X2)
    | strictly_less_than(X1,X2)
    | less_than(X2,X1) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_11]) ).

cnf(c_0_17,plain,
    ( less_than(X2,X1)
    | less_than(X1,X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_12]) ).

fof(c_0_18,plain,
    ! [X103,X104,X105] :
      ( findmin_cpq_eff(triple(X103,X104,X105)) = triple(X103,update_slb(X104,findmin_pqp_res(X103)),bad)
      | contains_slb(X104,findmin_pqp_res(X103))
      | X104 = create_slb ),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[c_0_13])])]) ).

fof(c_0_19,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X1,X2,X3] :
        ( ~ ok(triple(X1,X2,X3))
       => ~ ok(findmin_cpq_eff(triple(X1,X2,X3))) ),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[l15_co]) ).

cnf(c_0_20,plain,
    ( $false
    | ~ ok(triple(X1,X2,bad)) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_14]) ).

cnf(c_0_21,plain,
    ( ~ strictly_less_than(findmin_pqp_res(X2),lookup_slb(X1,findmin_pqp_res(X2)))
    | ~ contains_slb(X1,findmin_pqp_res(X2))
    | findmin_cpq_eff(triple(X2,X1,X3)) = triple(X2,update_slb(X1,findmin_pqp_res(X2)),bad)
    | X1 = create_slb ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_15]) ).

cnf(c_0_22,plain,
    ( less_than(X2,X1)
    | strictly_less_than(X1,X2) ),
    inference(csr,[status(thm)],[c_0_16,c_0_17]) ).

cnf(c_0_23,plain,
    ( findmin_cpq_eff(triple(X2,X1,X3)) = triple(X2,update_slb(X1,findmin_pqp_res(X2)),bad)
    | contains_slb(X1,findmin_pqp_res(X2))
    | X1 = create_slb ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_18]) ).

fof(c_0_24,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X1,X2,X3] :
        ( ~ ok(triple(X1,X2,X3))
       => ~ ok(findmin_cpq_eff(triple(X1,X2,X3))) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[c_0_19]) ).

fof(c_0_25,plain,
    ! [X1,X2,X3] :
      ( ~ ok(triple(X1,X2,X3))
     => X3 = bad ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[ax41]) ).

fof(c_0_26,plain,
    ! [X1,X2,X3,X4] :
      ( ( less_than(lookup_slb(X2,findmin_pqp_res(X1)),findmin_pqp_res(X1))
        & contains_slb(X2,findmin_pqp_res(X1))
        & X2 != create_slb )
     => findmin_cpq_eff(triple(X1,X2,X3)) = triple(X1,update_slb(X2,findmin_pqp_res(X1)),X3) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[ax49]) ).

cnf(c_0_27,plain,
    ~ ok(triple(X1,X2,bad)),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[c_0_20]) ).

cnf(c_0_28,plain,
    ( less_than(lookup_slb(X2,findmin_pqp_res(X1)),findmin_pqp_res(X1))
    | X2 = create_slb
    | findmin_cpq_eff(triple(X1,X2,X3)) = triple(X1,update_slb(X2,findmin_pqp_res(X1)),bad) ),
    inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_21,c_0_22]),c_0_23]) ).

fof(c_0_29,negated_conjecture,
    ( ok(findmin_cpq_eff(triple(esk1_0,esk2_0,esk3_0)))
    & ~ ok(triple(esk1_0,esk2_0,esk3_0)) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_24])])])]) ).

fof(c_0_30,plain,
    ! [X82,X83,X84] :
      ( X84 = bad
      | ok(triple(X82,X83,X84)) ),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_25])]) ).

fof(c_0_31,plain,
    ! [X109,X110,X111] :
      ( findmin_cpq_eff(triple(X109,X110,X111)) = triple(X109,update_slb(X110,findmin_pqp_res(X109)),X111)
      | ~ less_than(lookup_slb(X110,findmin_pqp_res(X109)),findmin_pqp_res(X109))
      | ~ contains_slb(X110,findmin_pqp_res(X109))
      | X110 = create_slb ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[c_0_26])])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_32,plain,
    ( ~ ok(findmin_cpq_eff(triple(X2,X1,X3)))
    | less_than(lookup_slb(X1,findmin_pqp_res(X2)),findmin_pqp_res(X2))
    | X1 = create_slb ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_27,c_0_28]) ).

cnf(c_0_33,negated_conjecture,
    ok(findmin_cpq_eff(triple(esk1_0,esk2_0,esk3_0))),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_29]) ).

cnf(c_0_34,plain,
    ( ~ ok(findmin_cpq_eff(triple(X2,X1,X3)))
    | contains_slb(X1,findmin_pqp_res(X2))
    | X1 = create_slb ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_27,c_0_23]) ).

cnf(c_0_35,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ok(triple(esk1_0,esk2_0,esk3_0)),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_29]) ).

cnf(c_0_36,plain,
    ( X3 = bad
    | ok(triple(X1,X2,X3)) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_30]) ).

cnf(c_0_37,plain,
    ( ~ less_than(lookup_slb(X1,findmin_pqp_res(X2)),findmin_pqp_res(X2))
    | ~ contains_slb(X1,findmin_pqp_res(X2))
    | findmin_cpq_eff(triple(X2,X1,X3)) = triple(X2,update_slb(X1,findmin_pqp_res(X2)),X3)
    | X1 = create_slb ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_31]) ).

cnf(c_0_38,negated_conjecture,
    ( less_than(lookup_slb(esk2_0,findmin_pqp_res(esk1_0)),findmin_pqp_res(esk1_0))
    | esk2_0 = create_slb ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_32,c_0_33]) ).

cnf(c_0_39,negated_conjecture,
    ( contains_slb(esk2_0,findmin_pqp_res(esk1_0))
    | esk2_0 = create_slb ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_34,c_0_33]) ).

cnf(c_0_40,negated_conjecture,
    esk3_0 = bad,
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_35,c_0_36]) ).

cnf(c_0_41,negated_conjecture,
    ( esk2_0 = create_slb
    | triple(esk1_0,update_slb(esk2_0,findmin_pqp_res(esk1_0)),X1) = findmin_cpq_eff(triple(esk1_0,esk2_0,X1)) ),
    inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_37,c_0_38]),c_0_39]) ).

cnf(c_0_42,negated_conjecture,
    ok(findmin_cpq_eff(triple(esk1_0,esk2_0,bad))),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_33,c_0_40]) ).

fof(c_0_43,plain,
    ! [X101,X102] : findmin_cpq_eff(triple(X101,create_slb,X102)) = triple(X101,create_slb,bad),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[ax46]) ).

cnf(c_0_44,negated_conjecture,
    esk2_0 = create_slb,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_27,c_0_41]),c_0_42])]) ).

cnf(c_0_45,plain,
    findmin_cpq_eff(triple(X1,create_slb,X2)) = triple(X1,create_slb,bad),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_43]) ).

cnf(c_0_46,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_33,c_0_44]),c_0_40]),c_0_45]),c_0_27]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : SWV379+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.3.0.
% 0.00/0.05  % Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.11/0.37  % Computer : n017.cluster.edu
% 0.11/0.37  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.11/0.37  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.11/0.37  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.11/0.37  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.11/0.37  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.11/0.37  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.11/0.37  % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 08:39:12 UTC 2026
% 0.11/0.37  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.11/0.37  Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.15/0.41  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.15/0.41  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.15/0.45  % Version: 3.5.1
% 0.15/0.45  % Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.15/0.45  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.15/0.45  % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.15/0.45  % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.45  % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.45  % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.45  % G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with pid 1924441 completed with status 0
% 0.15/0.45  % Result found by G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN
% 0.15/0.45  % Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.15/0.45  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.15/0.45  % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.15/0.45  % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 0.15/0.45  % No SInE strategy applied
% 0.15/0.45  % Search class: FGHSM-FFMF31-MFFFFFNN
% 0.15/0.45  % Scheduled 7 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.15/0.45  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.45  % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 151s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.45  % Starting G-E--_301_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 136s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.45  % Starting new_bool_3 with 136s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.45  % Starting new_bool_1 with 136s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.45  % G-E--_301_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with pid 1924449 completed with status 0
% 0.15/0.45  % Result found by G-E--_301_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_RG_S04AN
% 0.15/0.45  % Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.15/0.45  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.15/0.45  % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.15/0.45  % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 0.15/0.45  % No SInE strategy applied
% 0.15/0.45  % Search class: FGHSM-FFMF31-MFFFFFNN
% 0.15/0.45  % Scheduled 7 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.15/0.45  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.45  % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 151s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.45  % Starting G-E--_301_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 136s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.45  % Preprocessing time       : 0.002 s
% 0.15/0.45  
% 0.15/0.45  % Proof found!
% 0.15/0.45  % SZS status Theorem
% 0.15/0.45  % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.15/0.45  % Parsed axioms                        : 42
% 0.15/0.45  % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 0
% 0.15/0.45  % Initial clauses                      : 54
% 0.15/0.45  % Removed in clause preprocessing      : 4
% 0.15/0.45  % Initial clauses in saturation        : 50
% 0.15/0.45  % Processed clauses                    : 141
% 0.15/0.45  % ...of these trivial                  : 1
% 0.15/0.45  % ...subsumed                          : 18
% 0.15/0.45  % ...remaining for further processing  : 122
% 0.15/0.45  % Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 3
% 0.15/0.45  % Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 0.15/0.45  % Backward-subsumed                    : 5
% 0.15/0.45  % Backward-rewritten                   : 8
% 0.15/0.45  % Generated clauses                    : 524
% 0.15/0.45  % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 468
% 0.15/0.45  % ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 0.15/0.45  % Contextual simplify-reflections      : 3
% 0.15/0.45  % Paramodulations                      : 514
% 0.15/0.45  % Factorizations                       : 8
% 0.15/0.45  % NegExts                              : 0
% 0.15/0.45  % Equation resolutions                 : 3
% 0.15/0.45  % Disequality decompositions           : 0
% 0.15/0.45  % Total rewrite steps                  : 84
% 0.15/0.45  % ...of those cached                   : 48
% 0.15/0.45  % Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 0.15/0.45  %    Propositional check models        : 0
% 0.15/0.45  %    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.15/0.45  %    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 0.15/0.45  %    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.15/0.45  %    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 0.15/0.45  %    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 0.15/0.45  %    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
% 0.15/0.45  %    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
% 0.15/0.45  %    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 0.15/0.45  %    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 0.15/0.45  %    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 0.15/0.45  % Current number of processed clauses  : 107
% 0.15/0.45  %    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 20
% 0.15/0.45  %    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.15/0.45  %    Negative unit clauses             : 13
% 0.15/0.45  %    Non-unit-clauses                  : 74
% 0.15/0.45  % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 374
% 0.15/0.45  % ...number of literals in the above   : 1580
% 0.15/0.45  % Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 0.15/0.45  % Current number of archived clauses   : 15
% 0.15/0.45  % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 893
% 0.15/0.45  % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 418
% 0.15/0.45  % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 18
% 0.15/0.45  % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 254
% 0.15/0.45  % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 0.15/0.45  % BW rewrite match attempts            : 11
% 0.15/0.45  % BW rewrite match successes           : 1
% 0.15/0.45  % Condensation attempts                : 0
% 0.15/0.45  % Condensation successes               : 0
% 0.15/0.45  % Termbank termtop insertions          : 13587
% 0.15/0.45  % Search garbage collected termcells   : 571
% 0.15/0.45  
% 0.15/0.45  % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.15/0.45  % User time                : 0.015 s
% 0.15/0.45  % System time              : 0.006 s
% 0.15/0.45  % Total time               : 0.021 s
% 0.15/0.45  % Maximum resident set size: 3636 pages
% 0.15/0.45  
% 0.15/0.45  % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.15/0.45  % User time                : 0.066 s
% 0.15/0.45  % System time              : 0.022 s
% 0.15/0.45  % Total time               : 0.088 s
% 0.15/0.45  % Maximum resident set size: 4608 pages
% 0.15/0.45  % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------