↑ Up

SInE---0.4.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SInE---0.4
% Problem  : SWV385+1 : TPTP v5.0.0. Released v3.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : Source/sine.py -e eprover -t %d %s

% Computer : art01.cs.miami.edu
% Model    : i686 i686
% CPU      : Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 2.80GHz @ 2793MHz
% Memory   : 2018MB
% OS       : Linux 2.6.26.8-57.fc8
% CPULimit : 300s
% DateTime : Sun Dec 26 12:34:13 EST 2010

% Result   : Theorem 0.20s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.20s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   11
%            Number of leaves      :    3
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   27 (   7 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   64 (   0 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    4 (   2 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   81 (  44   ~;  24   |;   6   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   7  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    8 (   4 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    3 (   2 usr;   1 prp; 0-1 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    5 (   5 usr;   3 con; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   45 (   0 sgn  33   !;   6   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(15,conjecture,
    ! [X1,X2,X3] :
      ( ( ~ check_cpq(triple(X1,X2,X3))
        | ~ ok(triple(X1,X2,X3)) )
     => ( ~ check_cpq(im_succ_cpq(triple(X1,X2,X3)))
        | ~ ok(im_succ_cpq(triple(X1,X2,X3))) ) ),
    file('/tmp/tmpIzUuqE/sel_SWV385+1.p_1',l21_co) ).

fof(16,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2,X3] :
      ( ~ ok(triple(X1,X2,X3))
     => ~ ok(im_succ_cpq(triple(X1,X2,X3))) ),
    file('/tmp/tmpIzUuqE/sel_SWV385+1.p_1',l21_li1316) ).

fof(17,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2,X3] :
      ( ~ check_cpq(triple(X1,X2,X3))
     => ( ~ check_cpq(im_succ_cpq(triple(X1,X2,X3)))
        | ~ ok(im_succ_cpq(triple(X1,X2,X3))) ) ),
    file('/tmp/tmpIzUuqE/sel_SWV385+1.p_1',l21_li2225) ).

fof(18,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X1,X2,X3] :
        ( ( ~ check_cpq(triple(X1,X2,X3))
          | ~ ok(triple(X1,X2,X3)) )
       => ( ~ check_cpq(im_succ_cpq(triple(X1,X2,X3)))
          | ~ ok(im_succ_cpq(triple(X1,X2,X3))) ) ),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[15]) ).

fof(22,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X1,X2,X3] :
        ( ( ~ check_cpq(triple(X1,X2,X3))
          | ~ ok(triple(X1,X2,X3)) )
       => ( ~ check_cpq(im_succ_cpq(triple(X1,X2,X3)))
          | ~ ok(im_succ_cpq(triple(X1,X2,X3))) ) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[18,theory(equality)]) ).

fof(23,plain,
    ! [X1,X2,X3] :
      ( ~ ok(triple(X1,X2,X3))
     => ~ ok(im_succ_cpq(triple(X1,X2,X3))) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[16,theory(equality)]) ).

fof(24,plain,
    ! [X1,X2,X3] :
      ( ~ check_cpq(triple(X1,X2,X3))
     => ( ~ check_cpq(im_succ_cpq(triple(X1,X2,X3)))
        | ~ ok(im_succ_cpq(triple(X1,X2,X3))) ) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[17,theory(equality)]) ).

fof(73,negated_conjecture,
    ? [X1,X2,X3] :
      ( ( ~ check_cpq(triple(X1,X2,X3))
        | ~ ok(triple(X1,X2,X3)) )
      & check_cpq(im_succ_cpq(triple(X1,X2,X3)))
      & ok(im_succ_cpq(triple(X1,X2,X3))) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[22]) ).

fof(74,negated_conjecture,
    ? [X4,X5,X6] :
      ( ( ~ check_cpq(triple(X4,X5,X6))
        | ~ ok(triple(X4,X5,X6)) )
      & check_cpq(im_succ_cpq(triple(X4,X5,X6)))
      & ok(im_succ_cpq(triple(X4,X5,X6))) ),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[73]) ).

fof(75,negated_conjecture,
    ( ( ~ check_cpq(triple(esk1_0,esk2_0,esk3_0))
      | ~ ok(triple(esk1_0,esk2_0,esk3_0)) )
    & check_cpq(im_succ_cpq(triple(esk1_0,esk2_0,esk3_0)))
    & ok(im_succ_cpq(triple(esk1_0,esk2_0,esk3_0))) ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[74]) ).

cnf(76,negated_conjecture,
    ok(im_succ_cpq(triple(esk1_0,esk2_0,esk3_0))),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[75]) ).

cnf(77,negated_conjecture,
    check_cpq(im_succ_cpq(triple(esk1_0,esk2_0,esk3_0))),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[75]) ).

cnf(78,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ ok(triple(esk1_0,esk2_0,esk3_0))
    | ~ check_cpq(triple(esk1_0,esk2_0,esk3_0)) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[75]) ).

fof(79,plain,
    ! [X1,X2,X3] :
      ( ok(triple(X1,X2,X3))
      | ~ ok(im_succ_cpq(triple(X1,X2,X3))) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[23]) ).

fof(80,plain,
    ! [X4,X5,X6] :
      ( ok(triple(X4,X5,X6))
      | ~ ok(im_succ_cpq(triple(X4,X5,X6))) ),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[79]) ).

cnf(81,plain,
    ( ok(triple(X1,X2,X3))
    | ~ ok(im_succ_cpq(triple(X1,X2,X3))) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[80]) ).

fof(82,plain,
    ! [X1,X2,X3] :
      ( check_cpq(triple(X1,X2,X3))
      | ~ check_cpq(im_succ_cpq(triple(X1,X2,X3)))
      | ~ ok(im_succ_cpq(triple(X1,X2,X3))) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[24]) ).

fof(83,plain,
    ! [X4,X5,X6] :
      ( check_cpq(triple(X4,X5,X6))
      | ~ check_cpq(im_succ_cpq(triple(X4,X5,X6)))
      | ~ ok(im_succ_cpq(triple(X4,X5,X6))) ),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[82]) ).

cnf(84,plain,
    ( check_cpq(triple(X1,X2,X3))
    | ~ ok(im_succ_cpq(triple(X1,X2,X3)))
    | ~ check_cpq(im_succ_cpq(triple(X1,X2,X3))) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[83]) ).

cnf(91,negated_conjecture,
    ok(triple(esk1_0,esk2_0,esk3_0)),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[81,76,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(92,negated_conjecture,
    ( check_cpq(triple(esk1_0,esk2_0,esk3_0))
    | ~ check_cpq(im_succ_cpq(triple(esk1_0,esk2_0,esk3_0))) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[84,76,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(93,negated_conjecture,
    ( check_cpq(triple(esk1_0,esk2_0,esk3_0))
    | $false ),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[92,77,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(94,negated_conjecture,
    check_cpq(triple(esk1_0,esk2_0,esk3_0)),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[93,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(119,negated_conjecture,
    ( $false
    | ~ check_cpq(triple(esk1_0,esk2_0,esk3_0)) ),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[78,91,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(120,negated_conjecture,
    ~ check_cpq(triple(esk1_0,esk2_0,esk3_0)),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[119,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(121,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[94,120,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(122,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    121,
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% % SZS status Started for /home/graph/tptp/TPTP/Problems/SWV/SWV385+1.p
% --creating new selector for [SWV007+0.ax, SWV007+2.ax, SWV007+3.ax]
% -running prover on /tmp/tmpIzUuqE/sel_SWV385+1.p_1 with time limit 29
% -prover status Theorem
% Problem SWV385+1.p solved in phase 0.
% % SZS status Theorem for /home/graph/tptp/TPTP/Problems/SWV/SWV385+1.p
% % SZS status Ended for /home/graph/tptp/TPTP/Problems/SWV/SWV385+1.p
% Solved 1 out of 1.
% # Problem is unsatisfiable (or provable), constructing proof object
% # SZS status Theorem
% # SZS output start CNFRefutation.
% See solution above
% # SZS output end CNFRefutation
% 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------