%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.5.1
% Problem : SWV386+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.3.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 02:54:37 PM UTC 2026
% Result : Theorem 0.15s 5.45s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.15s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 5
% Number of leaves : 2
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 11 ( 3 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 23 ( 0 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 3 ( 2 avg)
% Number of connectives : 31 ( 19 ~; 5 |; 2 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 5 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 9 ( 5 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 3 ( 2 usr; 1 prp; 0-1 aty)
% Number of functors : 6 ( 6 usr; 4 con; 0-3 aty)
% Number of variables : 28 ( 1 sgn 24 !; 0 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(l22_co,conjecture,
! [X1,X2,X3] :
( ~ check_cpq(triple(X1,X2,X3))
=> ! [X4] :
( ~ ok(insert_cpq(triple(X1,X2,X3),X4))
| ~ check_cpq(insert_cpq(triple(X1,X2,X3),X4)) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',l22_co) ).
fof(l22_l26,lemma,
! [X1,X2,X3] :
( ~ check_cpq(triple(X1,X2,X3))
=> ! [X4] : ~ check_cpq(insert_cpq(triple(X1,X2,X3),X4)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',l22_l26) ).
fof(c_0_2,negated_conjecture,
~ ! [X1,X2,X3] :
( ~ check_cpq(triple(X1,X2,X3))
=> ! [X4] :
( ~ ok(insert_cpq(triple(X1,X2,X3),X4))
| ~ check_cpq(insert_cpq(triple(X1,X2,X3),X4)) ) ),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[l22_co]) ).
fof(c_0_3,lemma,
! [X1,X2,X3] :
( ~ check_cpq(triple(X1,X2,X3))
=> ! [X4] : ~ check_cpq(insert_cpq(triple(X1,X2,X3),X4)) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[l22_l26]) ).
fof(c_0_4,negated_conjecture,
~ ! [X1,X2,X3] :
( ~ check_cpq(triple(X1,X2,X3))
=> ! [X4] :
( ~ ok(insert_cpq(triple(X1,X2,X3),X4))
| ~ check_cpq(insert_cpq(triple(X1,X2,X3),X4)) ) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[c_0_2]) ).
fof(c_0_5,lemma,
! [X119,X120,X121,X122] :
( ~ check_cpq(insert_cpq(triple(X119,X120,X121),X122))
| check_cpq(triple(X119,X120,X121)) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_3])])])]) ).
fof(c_0_6,negated_conjecture,
( ok(insert_cpq(triple(esk1_0,esk2_0,esk3_0),esk4_0))
& check_cpq(insert_cpq(triple(esk1_0,esk2_0,esk3_0),esk4_0))
& ~ check_cpq(triple(esk1_0,esk2_0,esk3_0)) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_4])])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_7,lemma,
( ~ check_cpq(insert_cpq(triple(X1,X2,X3),X4))
| check_cpq(triple(X1,X2,X3)) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).
cnf(c_0_8,negated_conjecture,
check_cpq(insert_cpq(triple(esk1_0,esk2_0,esk3_0),esk4_0)),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).
cnf(c_0_9,negated_conjecture,
~ check_cpq(triple(esk1_0,esk2_0,esk3_0)),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).
cnf(c_0_10,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_7,c_0_8]),c_0_9]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.02 % Problem : SWV386+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.3.0.
% 0.00/0.04 % Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.11/5.38 % Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% 0.11/5.38 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.11/5.38 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.11/5.38 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.11/5.38 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.11/5.38 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.11/5.38 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.11/5.38 % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 08:46:19 UTC 2026
% 0.11/5.38 % CPUTime :
% 0.11/5.38 Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.15/5.42 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.15/5.42 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.15/5.44 % Version: 3.5.1
% 0.15/5.44 % Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.15/5.44 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.15/5.44 % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.15/5.44 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.15/5.44 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.15/5.44 % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.15/5.44 % G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with pid 1495170 completed with status 0
% 0.15/5.44 % Result found by G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN
% 0.15/5.44 % Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.15/5.44 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.15/5.44 % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.15/5.44 % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 0.15/5.44 % No SInE strategy applied
% 0.15/5.44 % Search class: FGHSM-FFMF31-MFFFFFNN
% 0.15/5.44 % Scheduled 7 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.15/5.44 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 0.15/5.44 % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 151s (1) cores
% 0.15/5.44 % Starting G-E--_301_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 136s (1) cores
% 0.15/5.45 % Starting new_bool_3 with 136s (1) cores
% 0.15/5.45 % Starting new_bool_1 with 136s (1) cores
% 0.15/5.45 % new_bool_1 with pid 1495178 completed with status 0
% 0.15/5.45 % Result found by new_bool_1
% 0.15/5.45 % Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.15/5.45 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.15/5.45 % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.15/5.45 % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 0.15/5.45 % No SInE strategy applied
% 0.15/5.45 % Search class: FGHSM-FFMF31-MFFFFFNN
% 0.15/5.45 % Scheduled 7 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.15/5.45 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 0.15/5.45 % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 151s (1) cores
% 0.15/5.45 % Starting G-E--_301_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 136s (1) cores
% 0.15/5.45 % Starting new_bool_3 with 136s (1) cores
% 0.15/5.45 % Starting new_bool_1 with 136s (1) cores
% 0.15/5.45 % Preprocessing time : 0.001 s
% 0.15/5.45 % Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.15/5.45
% 0.15/5.45 % Proof found!
% 0.15/5.45 % SZS status Theorem
% 0.15/5.45 % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.15/5.45 % Parsed axioms : 43
% 0.15/5.45 % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 0.15/5.45 % Initial clauses : 56
% 0.15/5.45 % Removed in clause preprocessing : 4
% 0.15/5.45 % Initial clauses in saturation : 52
% 0.15/5.45 % Processed clauses : 71
% 0.15/5.45 % ...of these trivial : 0
% 0.15/5.45 % ...subsumed : 0
% 0.15/5.45 % ...remaining for further processing : 71
% 0.15/5.45 % Other redundant clauses eliminated : 3
% 0.15/5.45 % Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.15/5.45 % Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.15/5.45 % Backward-rewritten : 0
% 0.15/5.45 % Generated clauses : 3
% 0.15/5.45 % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 2
% 0.15/5.45 % ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.15/5.45 % Contextual simplify-reflections : 2
% 0.15/5.45 % Paramodulations : 1
% 0.15/5.45 % Factorizations : 0
% 0.15/5.45 % NegExts : 0
% 0.15/5.45 % Equation resolutions : 3
% 0.15/5.45 % Disequality decompositions : 0
% 0.15/5.45 % Total rewrite steps : 0
% 0.15/5.45 % ...of those cached : 0
% 0.15/5.45 % Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.15/5.45 % Propositional check models : 0
% 0.15/5.45 % Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.15/5.45 % Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.15/5.45 % Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.15/5.45 % Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.15/5.45 % Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.15/5.45 % Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.15/5.45 % Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.15/5.45 % Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.15/5.45 % Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.15/5.45 % Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.15/5.45 % Current number of processed clauses : 17
% 0.15/5.45 % Positive orientable unit clauses : 8
% 0.15/5.45 % Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.15/5.45 % Negative unit clauses : 5
% 0.15/5.45 % Non-unit-clauses : 4
% 0.15/5.45 % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 35
% 0.15/5.45 % ...number of literals in the above : 77
% 0.15/5.45 % Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.15/5.45 % Current number of archived clauses : 54
% 0.15/5.45 % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 85
% 0.15/5.45 % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 58
% 0.15/5.45 % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 2
% 0.15/5.45 % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 11
% 0.15/5.45 % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.15/5.45 % BW rewrite match attempts : 8
% 0.15/5.45 % BW rewrite match successes : 0
% 0.15/5.45 % Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.15/5.45 % Condensation successes : 0
% 0.15/5.45 % Termbank termtop insertions : 4289
% 0.15/5.45 % Search garbage collected termcells : 597
% 0.15/5.45
% 0.15/5.45 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.15/5.45 % User time : 0.006 s
% 0.15/5.45 % System time : 0.002 s
% 0.15/5.45 % Total time : 0.008 s
% 0.15/5.45 % Maximum resident set size: 3688 pages
% 0.15/5.45
% 0.15/5.45 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.15/5.45 % User time : 0.023 s
% 0.15/5.45 % System time : 0.012 s
% 0.15/5.45 % Total time : 0.034 s
% 0.15/5.45 % Maximum resident set size: 4864 pages
% 0.15/5.45 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------