↑ Up

Prover9---2026-6A.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Prover9---2026-6A
% Problem  : SWV389+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p

% Computer : n013.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Sun Sep 27 09:07:37 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 0.14s 0.41s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.14s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    8
%            Number of leaves      :    3
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   18 (   9 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   35 (   2 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   35 (  18   ~;   9   |;   5   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   3  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    8 (   3 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    4 (   2 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    4 (   2 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    8 (   8 usr;   3 con; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   23 (   0 sgn  10   !;   3   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(ax52,axiom,
    ! [U] : removemin_cpq_eff(U) = remove_cpq(findmin_cpq_eff(U),findmin_cpq_res(U)),
    file('theBenchmark.p',ax52) ).

fof(l25_l40,axiom,
    ! [U,V,W] :
      ( ( ok(removemin_cpq_eff(triple(U,V,W)))
        & check_cpq(removemin_cpq_eff(triple(U,V,W))) )
     => check_cpq(triple(U,V,W)) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',l25_l40) ).

fof(l25_co,conjecture,
    ! [U,V,W] :
      ( ~ check_cpq(triple(U,V,W))
     => ( ~ ok(removemin_cpq_eff(triple(U,V,W)))
        | ~ check_cpq(removemin_cpq_eff(triple(U,V,W))) ) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',l25_co) ).

fof(l25_co_neg,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [U,V,W] :
        ( ~ check_cpq(triple(U,V,W))
       => ( ~ ok(removemin_cpq_eff(triple(U,V,W)))
          | ~ check_cpq(removemin_cpq_eff(triple(U,V,W))) ) ),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[l25_co]) ).

cnf(c_96,plain,
    removemin_cpq_eff(A) = remove_cpq(findmin_cpq_eff(A),findmin_cpq_res(A)),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[ax52]) ).

cnf(c_98,plain,
    ( check_cpq(triple(A,B,C))
    | ~ ok(removemin_cpq_eff(triple(A,B,C)))
    | ~ check_cpq(removemin_cpq_eff(triple(A,B,C))) ),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[l25_l40]) ).

cnf(c_178,plain,
    ( check_cpq(triple(A,B,C))
    | ~ ok(removemin_cpq_eff(triple(A,B,C)))
    | ~ check_cpq(remove_cpq(findmin_cpq_eff(triple(A,B,C)),findmin_cpq_res(triple(A,B,C)))) ),
    inference(paramod,[status(thm)],[c_96,c_98]) ).

cnf(c_99,plain,
    ( check_cpq(triple(A,B,C))
    | ~ ok(remove_cpq(findmin_cpq_eff(triple(A,B,C)),findmin_cpq_res(triple(A,B,C))))
    | ~ check_cpq(remove_cpq(findmin_cpq_eff(triple(A,B,C)),findmin_cpq_res(triple(A,B,C)))) ),
    inference(paramod,[status(thm)],[c_96,c_178]) ).

fof(nnf_42,plain,
    ? [U,V,W] :
      ( ok(removemin_cpq_eff(triple(U,V,W)))
      & check_cpq(removemin_cpq_eff(triple(U,V,W)))
      & ~ check_cpq(triple(U,V,W)) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[l25_co_neg]) ).

fof(sk_l25_co_neg,plain,
    ( ok(removemin_cpq_eff(triple(sK0,sK1,sK2)))
    & check_cpq(removemin_cpq_eff(triple(sK0,sK1,sK2)))
    & ~ check_cpq(triple(sK0,sK1,sK2)) ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK0,sK1,sK2]),skolemize(U,sK0),skolemize(V,sK1),skolemize(W,sK2)],[nnf_42]) ).

cnf(c_100,negated_conjecture,
    ~ check_cpq(triple(sK0,sK1,sK2)),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[sk_l25_co_neg]) ).

cnf(c_101,negated_conjecture,
    check_cpq(removemin_cpq_eff(triple(sK0,sK1,sK2))),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[sk_l25_co_neg]) ).

cnf(c_102,negated_conjecture,
    check_cpq(remove_cpq(findmin_cpq_eff(triple(sK0,sK1,sK2)),findmin_cpq_res(triple(sK0,sK1,sK2)))),
    inference(paramod,[status(thm)],[c_96,c_101]) ).

cnf(c_103,negated_conjecture,
    ok(removemin_cpq_eff(triple(sK0,sK1,sK2))),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[sk_l25_co_neg]) ).

cnf(c_104,negated_conjecture,
    ok(remove_cpq(findmin_cpq_eff(triple(sK0,sK1,sK2)),findmin_cpq_res(triple(sK0,sK1,sK2)))),
    inference(paramod,[status(thm)],[c_96,c_103]) ).

cnf(c_179,negated_conjecture,
    ( check_cpq(triple(sK0,sK1,sK2))
    | ~ ok(remove_cpq(findmin_cpq_eff(triple(sK0,sK1,sK2)),findmin_cpq_res(triple(sK0,sK1,sK2)))) ),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_99,c_102]) ).

cnf(c_180,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ok(remove_cpq(findmin_cpq_eff(triple(sK0,sK1,sK2)),findmin_cpq_res(triple(sK0,sK1,sK2)))),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_179,c_100]) ).

cnf(c_177,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_104,c_180]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : SWV389+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.3.0.
% 0.00/0.04  % Command  : prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.10/0.37  % Computer : n013.cluster.edu
% 0.10/0.37  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.10/0.37  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.10/0.37  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.10/0.37  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.10/0.37  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.10/0.37  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.10/0.37  % DateTime : Sat Sep 26 13:39:51 UTC 2026
% 0.10/0.37  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.14/0.37  % Prover9 (64) version 2026-6A, July 2026, CASC-J13.
% 0.14/0.37  % Process 2863543 was started by sandbox2 on n013,
% 0.14/0.37  % Sat Sep 26 13:39:51 2026
% 0.14/0.37  % The command was "/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p".
% 0.14/0.38  
% 0.14/0.38  % From the command line: assign(max_seconds, 300).
% 0.14/0.41  
% 0.14/0.41  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.14/0.41  
% 0.14/0.41  % Proof 1 at 0.01 (+ 0.01) seconds.
% 0.14/0.41  % Length of proof is 12.
% 0.14/0.41  % Level of proof is 3.
% 0.14/0.41  % Maximum clause weight is 29.000.
% 0.14/0.41  % Given clauses 52.
% 0.14/0.41  
% 0.14/0.41  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark
% See solution above
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------