↑ Up

ConnectPP---0.7.2.THM-Prf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : ConnectPP---0.7.2
% Problem  : SWV397+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/connect++ --verbosity 1 --no-colour --tptp-proof --schedule default --timeout 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p

% Computer : n017.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 09:03:35 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 2.66s 2.95s
% Output   : Proof 2.66s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   11
%            Number of leaves      :    4
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   31 (  10 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   60 (   7 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    4 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   53 (  24   ~;  15   |;  10   &)
%                                         (   1 <=>;   3  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    7 (   4 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    4 (   2 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    7 (   7 usr;   5 con; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   54 (   5 sgn  30   !;  14   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(ax40,axiom,
    ! [U,V] :
      ( ok(triple(U,V,bad))
    <=> $false ),
    file('SWV007+3.ax',ax40) ).

fof(ax43,axiom,
    ! [U,V,W,X] :
      ( ~ contains_slb(V,X)
     => remove_cpq(triple(U,V,W),X) = triple(U,V,bad) ),
    file('SWV007+3.ax',ax43) ).

fof(l33_co,conjecture,
    ! [U,V,W,X] :
      ( ok(remove_cpq(triple(U,V,W),X))
     => contains_slb(V,X) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',l33_co) ).

fof(f_28_1,plain,
    ! [U,V] :
      ( ( ok(triple(U,V,bad))
        | ~ $false )
      & ( $false
        | ~ ok(triple(U,V,bad)) ) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax40]) ).

fof(f_28_2,plain,
    ! [U_105,U_104] :
      ( ( ok(triple(U_105,U_104,bad))
        | ~ $false )
      & ( $false
        | ~ ok(triple(U_105,U_104,bad)) ) ),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[f_28_1]) ).

fof(f_28_3,plain,
    ( ( ! [U_109,U_107] : ok(triple(U_109,U_107,bad))
      | ~ $false )
    & ( ! [U_108,U_106] : ~ ok(triple(U_108,U_106,bad))
      | $false ) ),
    inference(miniscope,[status(thm)],[f_28_2]) ).

cnf(f_28_4,plain,
    ( ~ ok(triple(U_108,U_106,bad))
    | $false ),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[f_28_3]) ).

fof(f_31_1,plain,
    ! [U,V,W,X] :
      ( remove_cpq(triple(U,V,W),X) = triple(U,V,bad)
      | contains_slb(V,X) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax43]) ).

fof(f_31_2,plain,
    ! [U_120,U_119,U_118,U_117] :
      ( remove_cpq(triple(U_120,U_119,U_118),U_117) = triple(U_120,U_119,bad)
      | contains_slb(U_119,U_117) ),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[f_31_1]) ).

cnf(f_31_3,plain,
    ( remove_cpq(triple(U_120,U_119,U_118),U_117) = triple(U_120,U_119,bad)
    | contains_slb(U_119,U_117) ),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[f_31_2]) ).

fof(f_42_1,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [U,V,W,X] :
        ( ok(remove_cpq(triple(U,V,W),X))
       => contains_slb(V,X) ),
    inference(negate,[status(cth)],[l33_co]) ).

fof(f_42_2,negated_conjecture,
    ? [U,V,W,X] :
      ( ~ contains_slb(V,X)
      & ok(remove_cpq(triple(U,V,W),X)) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[f_42_1]) ).

fof(f_42_3,negated_conjecture,
    ? [U_154,U_153,U_152,U_151] :
      ( ~ contains_slb(U_153,U_151)
      & ok(remove_cpq(triple(U_154,U_153,U_152),U_151)) ),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[f_42_2]) ).

fof(f_42_4,negated_conjecture,
    ? [U_153,U_152,U_151] :
      ( ~ contains_slb(U_153,U_151)
      & ok(remove_cpq(triple(sK1,U_153,U_152),U_151)) ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK1]),skolemize(U_154,sK1)],[f_42_3]) ).

fof(f_42_5,negated_conjecture,
    ? [U_152,U_151] :
      ( ~ contains_slb(sK2,U_151)
      & ok(remove_cpq(triple(sK1,sK2,U_152),U_151)) ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK2]),skolemize(U_153,sK2)],[f_42_4]) ).

fof(f_42_6,negated_conjecture,
    ? [U_151] :
      ( ~ contains_slb(sK2,U_151)
      & ok(remove_cpq(triple(sK1,sK2,sK3),U_151)) ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK3]),skolemize(U_152,sK3)],[f_42_5]) ).

fof(f_42_7,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ contains_slb(sK2,sK4)
    & ok(remove_cpq(triple(sK1,sK2,sK3),sK4)) ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK4]),skolemize(U_151,sK4)],[f_42_6]) ).

fof(f_42_8,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ contains_slb(sK2,sK4)
    & ok(remove_cpq(triple(sK1,sK2,sK3),sK4)) ),
    inference(definitional_conversion,[status(esa)],[f_42_7]) ).

cnf(f_42_9,negated_conjecture,
    ok(remove_cpq(triple(sK1,sK2,sK3),sK4)),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[f_42_8]) ).

cnf(f_42_10,negated_conjecture,
    ~ contains_slb(sK2,sK4),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[f_42_8]) ).

cnf(f_28_4_simplified,plain,
    ~ ok(triple(U_108,U_106,bad)),
    inference(simplify_clause,[status(thm)],[f_28_4]) ).

cnf(equality_27,axiom,
    ( ok(Eq_y_0)
    | ~ ok(Eq_x_0)
    | Eq_x_0 != Eq_y_0 ),
    theory(equality,[substitution_predicates]) ).

cnf(t1,plain,
    ~ contains_slb(sK2,sK4),
    inference(start,[status(thm),parent(0:0)],[f_42_10]) ).

cnf(t2,plain,
    ( remove_cpq(triple(sK1,sK2,sK3),sK4) = triple(sK1,sK2,bad)
    | contains_slb(sK2,sK4) ),
    inference(extension,[status(thm),parent(t1:1)],[f_31_3]) ).

cnf(t3,plain,
    $false,
    inference(connection,[status(thm),parent(t2:1)],[t2:1,t1:1]) ).

cnf(t4,plain,
    ( ~ ok(remove_cpq(triple(sK1,sK2,sK3),sK4))
    | ok(triple(sK1,sK2,bad))
    | remove_cpq(triple(sK1,sK2,sK3),sK4) != triple(sK1,sK2,bad) ),
    inference(extension,[status(thm),parent(t2:2)],[equality_27]) ).

cnf(t5,plain,
    $false,
    inference(connection,[status(thm),parent(t4:1)],[t4:1,t2:2]) ).

cnf(t6,plain,
    ~ ok(triple(sK1,sK2,bad)),
    inference(extension,[status(thm),parent(t4:2)],[f_28_4_simplified]) ).

cnf(t7,plain,
    $false,
    inference(connection,[status(thm),parent(t6:1)],[t6:1,t4:2]) ).

cnf(t8,plain,
    ok(remove_cpq(triple(sK1,sK2,sK3),sK4)),
    inference(extension,[status(thm),parent(t4:3)],[f_42_9]) ).

cnf(t9,plain,
    $false,
    inference(connection,[status(thm),parent(t8:1)],[t8:1,t4:3]) ).


%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : SWV397+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.3.0.
% 0.00/0.03  This is a FOF_THM_RFO_SEQ problem
% 0.00/0.04  % Command  : /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/connect++ --verbosity 1 --no-colour --tptp-proof --schedule default --timeout 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.08/0.36  % Computer : n017.cluster.edu
% 0.08/0.36  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.08/0.36  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.08/0.36  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.08/0.36  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.08/0.36  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.08/0.36  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.08/0.36  % DateTime : Sun Sep 20 03:25:11 UTC 2026
% 0.08/0.36  % CPUTime  : 
% 2.66/2.95  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 2.66/2.95  % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% See solution above
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------